@dozitgetchahi Yes, personally I wouldn't do it, tempting as it is. The unfortunate part is that the survey companies then seem to actively screen for folks who are less honest. On the occasions I shaded my patient numbers up a bit, I'd get the interview, though I tried to stay within reason and only for conditions that I saw a lot of--but still, really not something I'm proud of.
Ultimately though I gave it up. Once you give strictly realistic numbers you end up spending a lot of time getting screened out, so the time/pay shifts dramatically against you.
The exceptions (people who can be honest and still qualify) are probably the subspecialists--dementia, MS, epileptologists, neuromuscular--who actually do have a ton of patients with X condition. Most relatively honest generalists are going to get screened out a fair bit of the time IMO (no idea how it works with the migraine therapeutic surveys though since everyone has a ton of those).