Normal Force

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

adrakdavra

Full Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Members don't see this ad.
Back to Jorge and his crate… Jorge pushes on a 10-kg crate 5 m with a 50 N force at 45 degrees. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.2. What is the total work?

How much work is done by friction in the Jorge/crate example? How much work is done by the normal force?
I push on a wall. Does the normal force do work? Why am I tired?
I push on a wall while on a skateboard, does the normal force do work?
Does the normal force ever do work?
 

milski

1K member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
527
The normal force is always perpendicular to the direction of movement and never does work.

For the rest: you need to be a bit more clear: what is 45 degrees? Is he pushing a cart up on a ramp? Or a cart on flat ground with a force at 45 degrees with the ramp? Pointed up or down?

Draw a free body diagram, calculate the force parallel to the movement surface and multiply that by the distance of the movement along that surface.
 

adrakdavra

Full Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
The normal force is always perpendicular to the direction of movement and never does work.

For the rest: you need to be a bit more clear: what is 45 degrees? Is he pushing a cart up on a ramp? Or a cart on flat ground with a force at 45 degrees with the ramp? Pointed up or down?

Draw a free body diagram, calculate the force parallel to the movement surface and multiply that by the distance of the movement along that surface.


cart on flat ground with a force at 45 degrees with the ramp? Pointed up
 

milski

1K member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
527
cart on flat ground with a force at 45 degrees with the ramp? Pointed up

The horizontal component of the force is Sqrt(2)/2*50N=0.7*50N=35N.

Work done by Jorge: 5m*35N=175J

Friction force = -μN=0.2*sqrt(2)/2*mg=-0.2*0.7*10*10=-2*7=-14J
 

PhysMatMan

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
140
Reaction score
82
The horizontal component of the force is Sqrt(2)/2*50N=0.7*50N=35N.

Work done by Jorge: 5m*35N=175J

Friction force = -μN=0.2*sqrt(2)/2*mg=-0.2*0.7*10*10=-2*7=-14J

Friction=-μN but N does not equal sqrt(2)/2*mg in general. You have to add Jorge's push to gravity. N=mg-sqrt(2)/2*50
 

milski

1K member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
527
Friction=-μN but N does not equal sqrt(2)/2*mg in general. You have to add Jorge's push to gravity. N=mg-sqrt(2)/2*50

Yes, you're right, I butchered N completely.

N=mg-sqrt(2)/2*50=100N-0.7*50=100-35=65N

Work by the friction force: 0.2*65N*5m=65J
 

Nickmiller

New Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if I could hijack the thread with another forces question?
If I have, for example, three forces acting on a box, one pointing in one direction (F1) and the other two pointing in the opposite direction (F2 and F3), and the object is moving in constant velocity (so acceleration=0), which of the following would you say is correct:

F1= F2+F3

or

F1+F2+F3=0

I thought the second one is correct but the answer states that the first one is correct. Do you not consider the direction in this case, only magnitude? Sorry if this is a silly question, it's just been bothering me. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
 

milski

1K member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
527
I was wondering if I could hijack the thread with another forces question?
If I have, for example, three forces acting on a box, one pointing in one direction (F1) and the other two pointing in the opposite direction (F2 and F3), and the object is moving in constant velocity (so acceleration=0), which of the following would you say is correct:

F1= F2+F3

or

F1+F2+F3=0

I thought the second one is correct but the answer states that the first one is correct. Do you not consider the direction in this case, only magnitude? Sorry if this is a silly question, it's just been bothering me. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

The first is valid for the magnitudes, the second if consider the forces to have a sign. The first will get you positive numbers for all three, the second will have some of the forces with a minus sign. I prefer the second way, since you don't have to think about direction explicitly but if you know that you're working with magnitudes, the first one will do ok too.
 

Nickmiller

New Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The first is valid for the magnitudes, the second if consider the forces to have a sign. The first will get you positive numbers for all three, the second will have some of the forces with a minus sign. I prefer the second way, since you don't have to think about direction explicitly but if you know that you're working with magnitudes, the first one will do ok too.

Thank you for the clarification
 
Top