Normal protocol or unsafe practice?

[UAbio9301]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

A facility that I work at (Partner in a private practice) has decided to launch a Navigational Bronchoscopy Program in the interim future. Roughly speaking, the procedure requires GETA with high PEEP, full paralysis, TIVA (due to longer procedure and exposure of proceduralist to circuit), coordination with pulmonologist for biopsy of pulmonary nodules. However, the administration did not involve the anesthesia department in the planning of the launch. Little to no consideration was placed on risk assessment, logistical constraints and the remote location relative to where our anesthesiologists are typically busy providing care to OR patients.

Many of our partners, including the site chief, insist that the procedures be done in the OR due to it being a thoracic procedure with far from mild potential complications, and transporting s patient on an elevator would be required, if done in a non-OR setting. Yes, it is re-assuring that a critical care physician would be doing the procedure, but shouldn't the overall judgement of the anesthesiologist take precedence over any other facility reason? The rebuttal was Joint Commission guidelines be followed, and none of the ORs are currently equipped for negative pressure. However, many bronchoscopies are done in this facility without negative pressure, on higher risk patients. Let me re-emphasize that these are elective procedures.

Would anyone be in the wrong for refusing to do the procedure outside of the OR unless it is medically necessary to NOT be performed in an OR suite?

 

[coffeebythelake]

A facility that I work at (Partner in a private practice) has decided to launch a Navigational Bronchoscopy Program in the interim future. Roughly speaking, the procedure requires GETA with high PEEP, full paralysis, TIVA (due to longer procedure and exposure of proceduralist to circuit), coordination with pulmonologist for biopsy of pulmonary nodules. However, the administration did not involve the anesthesia department in the planning of the launch. Little to no consideration was placed on risk assessment, logistical constraints and the remote location relative to where our anesthesiologists are typically busy providing care to OR patients.

Many of our partners, including the site chief, insist that the procedures be done in the OR due to it being a thoracic procedure with far from mild potential complications, and transporting s patient on an elevator would be required, if done in a non-OR setting. Yes, it is re-assuring that a critical care physician would be doing the procedure, but shouldn't the overall judgement of the anesthesiologist take precedence over any other facility reason? The rebuttal was Joint Commission guidelines be followed, and none of the ORs are currently equipped for negative pressure. However, many bronchoscopies are done in this facility without negative pressure, on higher risk patients. Let me re-emphasize that these are elective procedures.

Would anyone be in the wrong for refusing to do the procedure outside of the OR unless it is medically necessary to NOT be performed in an OR suite?

Lymph node biopsies? What exactly are you worried about? "High peep" like 10? Bleeding risk tend to be low compared to interventional pulm procedures. Why would you need to rush from the procedure room to the OR? You think you might need to Crack the chest?🙀 thats basically zero risk of that.

Presumably there is some risk stratification that takes place? Unless i'm missing something this is pretty normally done in a procedure room +/-offsite. We do them next to our gi lab

From an operational and logistic perspective i would be more worried about an anesthesiologist covering this plus some other site at the same time.

 

[abolt18]

We do these robotic bronchscopy cases every day in Endo (down the hall from the ORs, but definitely not IN the OR) 10 of peep, large ETT, inhaled anesthetic, zero issues. Very boring stuff. Occasionally they ask for a breath hold so they can do a spin with the fluoro/CT to sync the imaging better with the machine.

 

[UAbio9301]

Lymph node biopsies? What exactly are you worried about? "High peep" like 10? Bleeding risk tend to be low compared to interventional pulm procedures. Why would you need to rush from the procedure room to the OR? You think you might need to Crack the chest?🙀 thats basically zero risk of that.

Presumably there is some risk stratification that takes place? Unless i'm missing something this is pretty normally done in a procedure room +/-offsite. We do them next to our gi lab

From an operational and logistic perspective i would be more worried about an anesthesiologist covering this plus some other site at the same time.

They are not lymph node biopsies, they are targeting peripheral lesions in the lung parenchyma through a robotic bronchoscope.

 

[coffeebythelake]

They are not lymph node biopsies, they are targeting peripheral lesions in the lung parenchyma through a robotic bronchoscope.

Ok so what is your concern? Still biopsy. Still low risk for bleeding. If they cause a ptx multiple people in the room can put in a chest tube? Not sure how doing it in OR would be superior?

 

[UAbio9301]

We do these robotic bronchscopy cases every day in Endo (down the hall from the ORs, but definitely not IN the OR) 10 of peep, large ETT, inhaled anesthetic, zero issues. Very boring stuff. Occasionally they ask for a breath hold so they can do a spin with the fluoro/CT to sync the imaging better with the machine.

The room they have designated to do these procedures is on a different floor and isn't a short walk (or run) to if there is an ACLS event and the anesthesiologist responsible is managing a pediatric induction or dealing with a PACU event. It is fine if that anesthesiologist is solely responsible, but the coverage requirement will almost always require that anesthesiologist to be responsible for OR cases AND non-OR concurrently.

 

[coffeebythelake]

coverage requirement will almost always require that anesthesiologist to be responsible for OR cases AND non-OR concurrently.

This is the only real potential issue. And there is a simple solution. You just pointed it out.

 

[UAbio9301]

Ok so what is your concern?

Tension pnuemothorax, major vascular injury, iatrogenic mediastinal injury, iatrogenic bronchopleural fistula, just to name a few. Those risks (while rare) are statistically more likely with a provider performing a novel procedure. Those concerns, superimposed on facility limitations and remote location of this suite would make me very nervous if I were responsible for other anesthetics nowhere near this suite.

 

[UscGhost]

Tension pnuemothorax, major vascular injury, iatrogenic mediastinal injury, iatrogenic bronchopleural fistula, just to name a few. Those risks (while rare) are statistically more likely with a provider performing a novel procedure. Those concerns, superimposed on facility limitations and remote location of this suite would make me very nervous if I were responsible for other anesthetics nowhere near this suite.

While true. If you do those in the OR, is there going to be a thoracic surgeon available to handle them anyway?

Otherwise its going to be the pulmonologist placing an emergency chest tube....dont need an OR for that

 

[psychbender]

Tension pnuemothorax, major vascular injury, iatrogenic mediastinal injury, iatrogenic bronchopleural fistula, just to name a few. Those risks (while rare) are statistically more likely with a provider performing a novel procedure. Those concerns, superimposed on facility limitations and remote location of this suite would make me very nervous if I were responsible for other anesthetics nowhere near this suite.

So make that a solo physician site. Directing remote sites plus main OR is asinine.

These cases are real basic and uneventful, though. PTX risk is a little higher than the usual bronch when they go after those distal lesions, but otherwise risks are very similar. If you would have been fine covering a regular bronch with EBUS at that location, you should be fine doing these.

 

[UAbio9301]

While true. If you do those in the OR, is there going to be a thoracic surgeon available to handle them anyway?

Otherwise its going to be the pulmonologist placing an emergency chest tube....dont need an OR for that

More of my concerns are the logistical, facility specific limitation. This is a community hospital with 1 anesthesia tech.

They will have to be transferred (most O2 dependent at baseline) to an elevator and another long walk to the PACU.

Most pneumothoraxes don't develop until post procedure. What happens if your patient is in the PACU, develops a hemodynamically significant pneumothorax and the pulmonologist has already started the next procedure, but you are tied up with a difficult intubation or intra-operative event?