NP wants the same level of compensation as a MD/DO.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BorderlineQueen

Full Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
348
Reaction score
360
The title is pretty self-explanatory. On twitter this NP suggested she be compensated as much as a physician because it's the same "job". What a joke it's not even the same job also NPs have less training then physicians which is why they get paid less. There's a lot to say about mid-levels but this is one of the worst takes I've seen. It's just exhausting thinking that someone with so little clinical eduction can practice on their own.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The title is pretty self-explanatory. On twitter this NP suggested she be compensated as much as a physician because it's the same "job". What a joke it's not even the same job also NPs have less training then physicians which is why they get paid less. There's a lot to say about mid-levels but this is one of the worst takes I've seen. It's just exhausting thinking that someone with so little clinical eduction can practice on their own.
NP Payment Parity Bill Signed into Law - Oregon Nurses Association

This is not new, this has been going on for a while and will continue. If anything this will deter physicans from further entering pcp. If someone with 1/3rd of my training can do the job while getting compensated the same why on earth would I be interested in doing something like that.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 11 users
Just reply that it's nice to want things
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Members don't see this ad :)
This is an absolute slap in the face to all primary care physicians. Physicians need to buck up about this.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 6 users
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
NP Payment Parity Bill Signed into Law - Oregon Nurses Association

This is not new, this has been going on for a while and will continue. If anything this will deter physicans from further entering pcp. If someone with 1/3rd of my training can do the job while getting compensated the same why on earth would I be interested in doing something like that.
You're looking at this the wrong way.

Look at this from the patient perspective: if you're paying the same amount either way, why would you see an NP over an MD?

I get a few new patients/week transferring from our NPs for just that reason.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16 users
You're looking at this the wrong way.

Look at this from the patient perspective: if you're paying the same amount either way, why would you see an NP over an MD?

I get a few new patients/week transferring from our NPs for just that reason.
because most patients dont know any better. They see a person in a white coat and just assume its a doctor. Or they just want to get in quickly and get stuff looked at. They dont know the person who is acting like a doctor probably did a good portion of their training online and had no residency.

I honestly have considered IM outpatient as i enjoyed my time in the clinic, but I am going to be doing something that NPs cant do because i dont want to deal with this headache now or in the future and watch my training be devalued.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
because most patients dont know any better. They see a person in a white coat and just assume its a doctor. Or they just want to get in quickly and get stuff looked at. They dont know the person who is acting like a doctor probably did a good portion of their training online and had no residency.
That has not been my experience
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
That has not been my experience
my family is fairly health literate, when booking appointments with an office we do not inquire about who will be seeing us, or when we book with a specific doctor we do not inquire about if a physican extender will be seeing us. Booking appointments with specialists and trying to find an early opening has always resulted in being shunted to an NP.

The older generation of physicians needs to be cognizant of the fact that they are increasing their productivity at the expense of training of future docs and giving NPs the opportunity to practice medicine without having gone through medical school.

The most dangerous aspect of NPs i have witnessed is that they dont even know what they dont know. One NP in a specialty practice was badmouthing the practice of an OB for one of her friends reagarding starting aspirin for a high risk of preeclampsia patient. She literally said that she told her friend to not take the apirin and questioned the care the MD was providing. It literally took a second to find out that there was good enough data for that to support its use in her friend that USTPF and ACOG both reccomended its use.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 9 users
my family is fairly health literate, when booking appointments with an office we do not inquire about who will be seeing us, or when we book with a specific doctor we do not inquire about if a physican extender will be seeing us. Booking appointments with specialists and trying to find an early opening has always resulted in being shunted to an NP.

The older generation of physicians needs to be cognizant of the fact that they are increasing their productivity at the expense of training of future docs and giving NPs the opportunity to practice medicine without having gone through medical school.

The most dangerous aspect of NPs i have witnessed is that they dont even know what they dont know. One NP in a specialty practice was badmouthing the practice of an OB for one of her friends reagarding starting aspirin for a high risk of preeclampsia patient. She literally said that she told her friend to not take the apirin and questioned the care the MD was providing. It literally took a second to find out that there was good enough data for that to support its use in her friend that USTPF and ACOG both reccomended its use.
Not sure you qualify as health literate if you're unaware of who you will be seeing. You also don't need to lecture me on how NPs aren't as good as we are.

That said, I can't speak for everyone, but in my location for primary care we simply don't have enough doctors. There are 5 job postings right now for family medicine that we can't fill. We have probably 15-20 NPs doing PCP work. If we can't find 5 doctors, where are we going to find 25?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Not sure you qualify as health literate if you're unaware of who you will be seeing. You also don't need to lecture me on how NPs aren't as good as we are.

That said, I can't speak for everyone, but in my location for primary care we simply don't have enough doctors. There are 5 job postings right now for family medicine that we can't fill. We have probably 15-20 NPs doing PCP work. If we can't find 5 doctors, where are we going to find 25?
If my family is not health literate then god bless everyone. I am not lecturing you, merely stating my experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The title is pretty self-explanatory. On twitter this NP suggested she be compensated as much as a physician because it's the same "job". What a joke it's not even the same job also NPs have less training then physicians which is why they get paid less. There's a lot to say about mid-levels but this is one of the worst takes I've seen. It's just exhausting thinking that someone with so little clinical eduction can practice on their own.
Curious what her twitter handle is
 
NP Payment Parity Bill Signed into Law - Oregon Nurses Association

This is not new, this has been going on for a while and will continue. If anything this will deter physicans from further entering pcp. If someone with 1/3rd of my training can do the job while getting compensated the same why on earth would I be interested in doing something like that.
Sooooo..... every PA and NP in primary care will suddenly receive a starting salary of 180k up from their 90k?? Wtf? Or will PCPs and NPs meet in the middle in Oregon at like 130k?? This is so scary. Good thing I'm doing well in school, goodbye goal of primary care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Sooooo..... every PA and NP in primary care will suddenly receive a starting salary of 180k up from their 90k?? Wtf? Or will PCPs and NPs meet in the middle in Oregon at like 130k?? This is so scary. Good thing I'm doing well in school, goodbye goal of primary care.
If you think this won’t transcend to specialty fields you’re beyond naive. Baby boomer docs screwed everyone over
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
If you think this won’t transcend to specialty fields you’re beyond naive. Baby boomer docs screwed everyone over
call me when a nurse is doing spine surgery. but i agree on the second point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
call me when a nurse is doing spine surgery.
During my general surgery rotation NPs were doing the bulk of the surgeries so the attendings could bill 2-3 rooms

Sorry didn’t do a nsg rotation but if you think the spread will just *poof* stop at nsg you are completely clueless
 
During my general surgery rotation NPs were doing the bulk of the surgeries so the attendings could bill 2-3 rooms

Sorry didn’t do a nsg rotation but if you think the spread will just *poof* stop at nsg you are completely clueless
doing what in surgery , opening and closing ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
NP Payment Parity Bill Signed into Law - Oregon Nurses Association

This is not new, this has been going on for a while and will continue. If anything this will deter physicans from further entering pcp. If someone with 1/3rd of my training can do the job while getting compensated the same why on earth would I be interested in doing something like that.
Apparently a med student on his rotation in surgery got not teaching but the np did the surgery . Can’t blame the nursing lobby all on their own . Some physicians looking to make a quick buck sold us out and have medicine for the younger generation even worse .
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 4 users
Apparently a med student on his rotation in surgery got not teaching but the np did the surgery . Can’t blame the nursing lobby all on their own . Some physicians looking to make a quick buck sold us out and have medicine for the younger generation even worse .

well I guess I should have become a nurse practitioner. Since the older generation of physicans care more about their pocket books than the future of our profession.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users
It’s gonna be a terrible cycle but that’s what it’s gonna take for DC to actually do something.

Basically, they’ll continue getting broader scope until they realize they’re starting to kill people, then they’ll bring it back. If they want the money, take the liability too. Then docs won’t get unnecessarily roped into malpractice suits
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Well, I think medicine should start focusing more on specialties that require extensive training. Focusing on PCP to me is kind of goofy. There are PCP physicians that refer patients out for uncomplicated hypertension and asthma to specialists. If the PCP can't treat asthma or hypertension, what is the point of going to one? A $250 referral, what a waste of money.
 
Well, I think medicine should start focusing more on specialties that require extensive training. Focusing on PCP to me is kind of goofy. There are PCP physicians that refer patients out for uncomplicated hypertension and asthma to specialists. If the PCP can't treat asthma or hypertension, what is the point of going to one? A $250 referral, what a waste of money.
I don’t get your point . There’s nps in all specialities . The literature shows nps aren’t cost effective ordering more tests than doctors and not being cost effective .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Apparently a med student on his rotation in surgery got not teaching but the np did the surgery . Can’t blame the nursing lobby all on their own . Some physicians looking to make a quick buck sold us out and have medicine for the younger generation even worse .

You should take anything posted on Reddit with an even finer grain of salt than anything posted on SDN
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I don’t get your point . There’s nps in all specialities . The literature shows nps aren’t cost effective ordering more tests than doctors and not being cost effective .
What I am saying is that you do not need to go to school for 7+ years to learn how to treat and monitor type II diabetes, prescribe albuterol or metoprolol. PCP is too expensive and could be managed by NPs in many scenarios. These aren't scenarios that require the hospitalization and specialist attention. This is part of the reason why healthcare is so expensive in America, and there is also over-utilization of many services in America as well.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
 
What I am saying is that you do not need to go to school for 7+ years to learn how to treat and monitor type II diabetes, prescribe albuterol or metoprolol. PCP is too expensive and could be managed by NPs in many scenarios. These aren't scenarios that require the hospitalization and specialist attention. This is part of the reason why healthcare is so expensive in America, and there is also over-utilization of many services in America as well.
Im sorry have you been treating diabetes and HTN? How do you know that it is simple or that an NP could effectively do it ?

Also overutilization is a driver but not as you are explaining. Overutilization in terms of procedures, end of life care, overdiagnosis, imaging, etc.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users
What I am saying is that you do not need to go to school for 7+ years to learn how to treat and monitor type II diabetes, prescribe albuterol or metoprolol. PCP is too expensive and could be managed by NPs in many scenarios. These aren't scenarios that require the hospitalization and specialist attention. This is part of the reason why healthcare is so expensive in America, and there is also over-utilization of many services in America as well.
As a pre med you have literally no clue what you need to go to med school or not for. In many instances being a primary care doc is much harder than being a specialist
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users
Im sorry have you been treating diabetes and HTN? How do you know that it is simple or that an NP could effectively do it ?

Also overutilization is a driver but not as you are explaining. Overutilization in terms of procedures, end of life care, overdiagnosis, imaging, etc.
Do you know how PCP treatment works? The doctor writes a prescription and the patient then goes to the pharmacy, fills it, and manages it on their own until they see the doc again six months later. Do you think the PCP doc administers the medication in office, observes the patient for 24 hours while taking notes, and gives them a custom treatment plan? In reality the doc sees the patient for 5 minutes, bills them for an hour, does a dictation that takes 5 minutes, and then sends them on their way. Even in the hospital, the PCP docs will just review the chart or give telephone orders without ever seeing the patient. These are the realities of healthcare.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Do you know how PCP treatment works? The doctor writes a prescription and the patient then goes to the pharmacy, fills it, and manages it on their own until they see the doc again six months later. Do you think the PCP doc administers the medication in office, observes the patient for 24 hours while taking notes, and gives them a custom treatment plan? In reality the doc sees the patient for 5 minutes, bills them for an hour, does a dictation that takes 5 minutes, and then sends them on their way. Even in the hospital, the PCP docs will just review the chart or give telephone orders without ever seeing the patient. These are the realities of healthcare.

Lol are you joking?

not sure if you are troll or completely dont know anything. Do you know what the physican is thinking about when they are writing that prescription? Do you know what the physician is looking out for when they are examining the patient or asking pointed questions? How about the med interactions? or the zebras like insulinomas, life threatening emergencies that need to be addressed immediately by seeking a higher level of care?

You are a pre-med come back when you get some training. Also even if you get into medical school there is solid chance you will end up in primary care. 40% to be exact for MDs and more for DOs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
I have patients not health literate at all but they know who they're seeing when they make appointments...
My healthcare premiums or copays are not reduced when my family sees and NP, my wait time is. My point was that in order to see someone quiker or seeing specialists in the same year you end up seeing an NP in their office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lol are you joking?

not sure if you are troll or completely dont know anything. Do you know what the physican is thinking about when they are writing that prescription? Do you know what the physician is looking out for when they are examining the patient or asking pointed questions? How about the med interactions? or the zebras like insulinomas, life threatening emergencies that need to be addressed immediately by seeking a higher level of care?

You are a pre-med come back when you get some training. Also even if you get into medical school there is solid chance you will end up in primary care. 40% to be exact for MDs and more for DOs.
Been working in hospitals for the last 5 years. Come back when you have more experience than "president of my pre-med club." lol
 
Been working in hospitals for the last 5 years. Come back when you have more experience than "president of my pre-med club." lol

lol dude I have worked at hospitals for longer than you have and have been rotating with physicans. And have actually completed the first two years of medical school. You have no idea what you are talking about . If you do manage to get a spot at a school remember this conversation when you are matching. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
lol dude I have worked at hospitals for longer than you have and have been rotating with physicans. And have actually completed the first two years of medical school. You have no idea what you are talking about . If you do manage to get a spot at a school remember this conversation when you are matching. lol.
So then you should know how much time the PCP spends with their patients.
 
In reality, many PCP spots could be replaced by NPs. This would free up more physicians to do the comprehensive research needed to push the current healthcare system forward. I think we are wasting physician talent by placing them in PCP roles.
 
So then you should know how much time the PCP spends with their patients.
You should focus more on reading.
I outlined
1. The mental process a physican goes through when making medical decisions for their patients.
2. The zebra's that one looks for.
3. The exam that may look like nothing to you but they are already examining multiple things.
4. The med interactions and contraindications they are thinking through.
5. Other aspects of a patient they are thinking about.
6. Discerning life threatening conditions from benign ones.

You are acting like playing major league baseball is easy considering the batters can hit home runs so easily, and you yourself could do it too. Most of the time when you deal with professionals they make complex things look easy.

You are likely going to a DO school, it would be in your best interest to acknowledge that there is a good chance you are going to end up in primary care. You also seem to be in your late 30's so I would think someone who has life experience would realize that there are people who infact know more than you about what you are talking about. especially people who have gone through the process. If not you are going to have a bad time in residency when most of your senior residents and attendings are going to be younger than you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
My healthcare premiums or copays are not reduced when my family sees and NP, my wait time is. My point was that in order to see someone quiker or seeing specialists in the same year you end up seeing an NP in their office.
And that's quite true, one of the reasons people hire midlevels, no argument there
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You should focus more on reading.
I outlined
1. The mental process a physican goes through when making medical decisions for their patients.
2. The zebra's that one looks for.
3. The exam that may look like nothing to you but they are already examining multiple things.
4. The med interactions and contraindications they are thinking through.
5. Other aspects of a patient they are thinking about.
6. Discerning life threatening conditions from benign ones.

You are acting like playing major league baseball is easy considering the batters can hit home runs so easily, and you yourself could do it too. Most of the time when you deal with professionals they make complex things look easy.

You are likely going to a DO school, it would be in your best interest to acknowledge that there is a good chance you are going to end up in primary care. You also seem to be in your late 30's so I would think someone who has life experience would realize that there are people who infact know more than you about what you are talking about. especially people who have gone through the process. If not you are going to have a bad time in residency when most of your senior residents and attendings are going to be younger than you are.
Your post didn't answer the question of how much time the physician spends with the patient.
 
I do not think that NPs should make as much as physicians, I just believe that many PCP spots could adequately be filled by NPs under physician guidance. For example, there is a director physician that supervises and trains 5-6 NPs in a practice.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
I do not think that NPs should make as much as physicians, I just believe that many PCP spots could adequately be filled by NPs under physician guidance. For example, there is a director physician that supervises and trains 5-6 NPs in a practice.
You’re in too deep of water kid. Sure they can do the bread and butter, Hell any one of us on here could. The key is they (mostly) don’t have the ability to know when it’s an abnormal presentation of a benign thing, or a normal presentation of a malignant thing (and vice versa). That’s when people die when you don’t get to something in time. And before you throw your big “5 years in the hospital” stuff out there I worked in one longer than that
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
In reality, many PCP spots could be replaced by NPs. This would free up more physicians to do the comprehensive research needed to push the current healthcare system forward. I think we are wasting physician talent by placing them in PCP roles.

Physicians don't typically act as scientists doing comprehensive research... at all. And research takes a ton of time to just "push the current healthcare system forward" - Im not even sure what this means. And, talented PCPs can save healthcare systems a **** ton by reducing unnecessary tests and referrals. I think you're working with/going to bad PCPs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
I do not think that NPs should make as much as physicians, I just believe that many PCP spots could adequately be filled by NPs under physician guidance. For example, there is a director physician that supervises and trains 5-6 NPs in a practice.
Considering a np isn’t a physician they couldn’t fill any Primary Care Physician (PCP) spot
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users
I vote to force NPs to take STEP 1-3 and do their own residency programs--and then we can pay them the same and they can have all the autonomy they want. It's called justice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
In reality, many PCP spots could be replaced by NPs. This would free up more physicians to do the comprehensive research needed to push the current healthcare system forward. I think we are wasting physician talent by placing them in PCP roles.

Lol woefully naive if you think most physicians are doing any type of research, let alone research that would push the current healthcare system forward. I went to school to treat people not do data analysis and procedure production. The fact is, it is hard to do PC right because it’s monitoring so many intangibles. It is also easy to do pc wrong but pass it off as “adequate” because many chronic conditions take years to develop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
I vote to force NPs to take STEP 1-3 and do their own residency programs--and then we can pay them the same and they can have all the autonomy they want. It's called justice.
True but med school is more expensive then NP school so that still doesn't make that much sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I do not think that NPs should make as much as physicians, I just believe that many PCP spots could adequately be filled by NPs under physician guidance. For example, there is a director physician that supervises and trains 5-6 NPs in a practice.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Im a surgical subspecialist and it's much easier to fill our fields with NPs and PAs because the scope of the things they have to do is so narrow - there are only so many things that are going to be sent to an ENT office. Primary care is hard because you have undifferentiated complaints as a large part of your practice. Those NPs learn like 200 pathologies in their entire length of training how would they even know what to look for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users
It is also easy to do pc wrong but pass it off as “adequate” because many chronic conditions take years to develop.
This exactly. I routinely tell my hypertensive patients that barring hemorrhagic stroke level BP, hypertension is a disease of years/decades.

Its also what I tell my 90+ year olds as to why I'm not treating their blood pressure more aggressively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
Top