- Joined
- Aug 30, 2009
- Messages
- 924
- Reaction score
- 175
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/...f=health&gwh=7D090FC05739037768BCE2802D8F32E7
OK here you go, another doctor bashing NYT article. What else is new. The gist of the article is that GI docs are using propofol-based sedation requiring a anesthesiologist in the colonoscopy suite, rather than use conscious sedation which the GI doc can manage simultaneously with the scope. By bringing in these out of network gas docs, the costs skyrocket.
It brought up a couple of questions for me though. I just finished residency, and where I trained we were always instruced that it was not allowed to have the proceduralist be the same person who adminsters/monitors the conscious sedation. I guess I was under the mistaken impression that there were some kind of overarching rules preventing this. Is this not the case?
If you are allowed to be the proceduralist and the sedationist at the same time, does that mean that GI docs can "double dip" and bill separately for the procedure and the anesthesia? If thats the case it seems strange that the GI docs would want the gas docs to get involved since they would make more money without them.
I thought using nurses to deliver anesthesia was supposed to make everything cheaper? 🙄
OK here you go, another doctor bashing NYT article. What else is new. The gist of the article is that GI docs are using propofol-based sedation requiring a anesthesiologist in the colonoscopy suite, rather than use conscious sedation which the GI doc can manage simultaneously with the scope. By bringing in these out of network gas docs, the costs skyrocket.
It brought up a couple of questions for me though. I just finished residency, and where I trained we were always instruced that it was not allowed to have the proceduralist be the same person who adminsters/monitors the conscious sedation. I guess I was under the mistaken impression that there were some kind of overarching rules preventing this. Is this not the case?
If you are allowed to be the proceduralist and the sedationist at the same time, does that mean that GI docs can "double dip" and bill separately for the procedure and the anesthesia? If thats the case it seems strange that the GI docs would want the gas docs to get involved since they would make more money without them.
I thought using nurses to deliver anesthesia was supposed to make everything cheaper? 🙄