Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi everyone! Blessed to be making this choice, but it's definitely tough right now
NYU Grossman
Pros
-- Accepted to their 3-year MD Directed Pathway program with guaranteed residency in a DOPEN surgical subspecialty
-- Removes uncertainty of an increasingly competitive match process
-- Earlier attending timeline (by ~1–2 years vs 4–5 year path + research year)
-- Close to home (~20 min) → strong family/support system during both med school and residency
-- Very strong residency program with strong case volume and institutional continuity
-- Opportunity for longitudinal projects over a 10-year span within one system
Cons
-- Limited flexibility if interests change (though not a concern in my case, i'm 100% sure this is the specialty I want to do)
-- Compressed preclinical/clinical timeline → potentially less time for extensive research output during med school
-- Research infrastructure not as strong as the other two, which is important to me
-- Slightly less prestige (?) than traditional ivys
-- Slightly higher annual cost (~35k/year vs Columbia ~20k/year)
Pros
-- Strong personal fit; really enjoyed the environment/culture. Always a dream to go to Columbia
-- Close to home (NYC) → still excellent proximity to family/support system (20 mins away_
-- Established mentorship with an attending I’m very close with in my goal specialty → meaningful for guidance, research, and networking
-- Strong academic reputation and research ecosystem, particularly for neuroscience/translational work
-- Lower cost (~20k/year)
Cons
-- No guaranteed residency → must go through standard match (probably requires research year?)
-- Likely 4–5 year timeline before residency
-- Reintroduces uncertainty despite strong institutional support
-- Opportunity cost of delayed attending income/training progression
UPenn Perelman
Pros
-- Extremely strong research environment (arguably strongest of the three)
-- Excellent match outcomes across competitive specialties
-- Significant opportunities for interdisciplinary work
Cons
-- Farther from home (~2.5 hours) → less day-to-day family support
-- Highest cost (~70k/year currently)
-- No guaranteed residency pathway
-- Less personal connection compared to Columbia
TLDR: NYU offers certainty, proximity, and a faster path to my dream (very competitive) specialty; Columbia offers strong mentorship, lower cost, a better culture fit, and a more traditional (but uncertain) path; Penn offers maximal research resources but is weaker on cost and proximity.
I will say that out of these, I'm pretty close to eliminating Penn since it's way more expensive and I want to stay in NYC. Thanks everyone!
NYU Grossman
Pros
-- Accepted to their 3-year MD Directed Pathway program with guaranteed residency in a DOPEN surgical subspecialty
-- Removes uncertainty of an increasingly competitive match process
-- Earlier attending timeline (by ~1–2 years vs 4–5 year path + research year)
-- Close to home (~20 min) → strong family/support system during both med school and residency
-- Very strong residency program with strong case volume and institutional continuity
-- Opportunity for longitudinal projects over a 10-year span within one system
Cons
-- Limited flexibility if interests change (though not a concern in my case, i'm 100% sure this is the specialty I want to do)
-- Compressed preclinical/clinical timeline → potentially less time for extensive research output during med school
-- Research infrastructure not as strong as the other two, which is important to me
-- Slightly less prestige (?) than traditional ivys
-- Slightly higher annual cost (~35k/year vs Columbia ~20k/year)
Columbia VP&SPros
-- Strong personal fit; really enjoyed the environment/culture. Always a dream to go to Columbia
-- Close to home (NYC) → still excellent proximity to family/support system (20 mins away_
-- Established mentorship with an attending I’m very close with in my goal specialty → meaningful for guidance, research, and networking
-- Strong academic reputation and research ecosystem, particularly for neuroscience/translational work
-- Lower cost (~20k/year)
Cons
-- No guaranteed residency → must go through standard match (probably requires research year?)
-- Likely 4–5 year timeline before residency
-- Reintroduces uncertainty despite strong institutional support
-- Opportunity cost of delayed attending income/training progression
UPenn Perelman
Pros
-- Extremely strong research environment (arguably strongest of the three)
-- Excellent match outcomes across competitive specialties
-- Significant opportunities for interdisciplinary work
Cons
-- Farther from home (~2.5 hours) → less day-to-day family support
-- Highest cost (~70k/year currently)
-- No guaranteed residency pathway
-- Less personal connection compared to Columbia
TLDR: NYU offers certainty, proximity, and a faster path to my dream (very competitive) specialty; Columbia offers strong mentorship, lower cost, a better culture fit, and a more traditional (but uncertain) path; Penn offers maximal research resources but is weaker on cost and proximity.
I will say that out of these, I'm pretty close to eliminating Penn since it's way more expensive and I want to stay in NYC. Thanks everyone!