ochem - IUPAC naming Q

Started by 123321
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

123321

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
do i have this right:

when naming a molec based on IUPAC, you want the MOST # of substituents in your chain, but the LEAST number of "numbers"/you want your number count to be as low as possible?

does that make sense/is that the rule?
 
do i have this right:

when naming a molec based on IUPAC, you want the MOST # of substituents in your chain, but the LEAST number of "numbers"/you want your number count to be as low as possible?

does that make sense/is that the rule?

Yes. You are looking for the longest chain with a largest number of substituents. When numbering substituents, one must chose the lowest possible numbers.

cleardot.gif