I both agree and (humbly) disagree with some of the points made above. Definitely don't agree with not learning anything by extra 50 cases over 100. Just finished my residency in June with 127 class one cases (attendings don't touch clinic patients). The more the better is my philosophy; you can only get better by doing more cases. Even with routine cases- you can work on your time and efficiency. I only felt comfortable after 100 cases (definitely not 75), and started to do the hard cases towards the end (small pupils, PXE; although being in New York we had a lot of dense cataracts even early in the year). I didn't even feel that comfortable with small pupil cases at the end of my residency, but now halfway through my fellowship I am not intimidated. Another argument for more cases- for example, between 100 and 125 I cut down my average operating time from about 25 to 20 minutes. Give me another 25-30 cases, and I could probably cut it down further. Some of the residents in my program who did under 100 didn't even feel comfortable doing cases with topical anesthesia!
When I was a resident one of my fellows did about 200 cases in her residency. She told me, in the first 30-40 you figure out the steps; by 90-100 you feel comfortable; between 100-200 you work on the nuances and speed.
I agree with the statement above that extracaps help. My suturing wasn't that great even at the end of residency, but halfway through a vitreoretinal fellowship- all of those sclerotomies and secondary IOLs have made me quick. I disagree that one technique is better than another. Divide and conquer is certainly important to get good at (probably the most important), but the more in your arsenal, the more options you have- if I had done 170 cases instead of 127 I could have learned quick chop (I do stop and chop on most cases).
Not every program has a teacher like Tom Oetting (I interviewed at Iowa, Andrew! 🙂 ). I basically taught myself how to do cataract surgery. This meant that I needed to get more cases in to be as good as people in other programs. The more cases you do, the more situations you'll be in, and the more comfortable you'll be in any tough situation. Now that I attend resident cases as part of my fellowship, I have to say the more you do the better- someone with 170 will probably be more experienced than someone with 100. Even the "good" residents who have already done 80 cases that I teach still need my help to get out of trouble sometimes.
Having said all of this, do I think that you should pick one residency over another because of 170 vs 100? It definitely shouldn't be the only criteria, but it should certainly be taken into consideration along with everything else (geography, quality of faculty, friendlieness of program, presteige of program, etc). There is also a big variation among residents within one program depending on the aggresiveness, motivation, and skill of the individual resident, the numbers for the people in my class were two about 125, one at 100-110, and the fourth at 85. Would I have felt comfortable going into practice after 127? Absolutely yes, I don't need an attending sitting next to me in order to improve- they don't even scrub when I do the phacos in my retina fellowship. I can improve on my own.
One other thing that I would look at is other types of cases that residents do. For example, I only did three trabs, one corneal transplant, and one vitrectomy (although I did a LOT of plastics). While you won't be doing them on your own as a general ophthalmologist, it certainly can't hurt to get exposure to other subspecialties.
Hope this helps.