- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 243
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello everyone. I am a second year who will write the exam in June 2011. Meanwhile let this be a good thread where everyone share their study progress and recent trend of the exam.
yea it keeps track of your total time in the day and you total break down. Any time you have left over from your block is added to your break time.
Has anyone had any experience with the kaplan genetics lectures?
Test was insane. I got destroyed. Way harder than UW or the NBMEs. I went in there feeling pretty good since I was doing well on the last few NBMEs, and I had heard 11 and 12 were a good representation. Man, I was wrong: the real deal made NBME 12 look like a joke. I would mark 6-7 questions per block on the NBMEs.
On the real deal: For 5 out of the 7 blocks, I marked 18-22 questions, basically half the block :/ Block 1 was the worst for me. I ended up marking questions 1-10 consecutively. Very very demoralizing. I was surprised by the lack of giveaways. There were maybe 2 questions/block that were considered "easy." No giveaways, no high yield topics. Question stems were twice as long. The answer choices were very very close. I think this was what stood out the most. With the NBMEs, very few questions had close answer choices. There were so many Qs where I had to narrow down the answer from 3 choices.. never had this happened before.
Content wise: good stuff first: barely any anatomy, easy embryo,easy pharm
Bad: Surprisingly, the hardest was Microbio on my test. The most random bugs: the little random details you wouldn't expect anyone to ask... bugs I'd never encountered on any other practice question. Lots of biochem: some was fine, some were tricky.There wasn't that much Immuno, but damn it was ridiculous. Random cytokines/Interleukins that were not in FA. The biggest problem I had with the test was that you couldn't get that far with "reasoning" ... you either knew it or you didn't. I got unlucky in some areas. For ex, endocrinology is probably my strongest subject. So I didn't spend much time studying random details that simply never really appeared on practice questions. I ended up having 5-6 questions on IGF-1, something I glanced at maybe once in my studying.
Overall hardest test I've ever taken. If I absolutely had to pick one source that was similar, I guess it'd have to be UWorld. Practice NBMEs were not very helpful for preparation for the test. The test was all details... the more you know, the longer you studied, the better you'd do I guess. You've gotta know everything. Score prediction: 20 points lower than practice tests.
WOW. 10 blocks a day? That's 10 hrs right there and THEN you had to review that. I'm amazed. What did you get on the UWSA's (if you took them)? And how were you scoring on Uworld blocks?haven't posted on SDN in a long time but i did find this thread useful... thanks to all who shared.
for what it's worth here's what i did:
took my exam on may 5th
results today: 238 / 99
2 weeks of intense study: uworld 3x (random, tutor, timed, 46Qs) and FA 3x... no RR or goljan audio... no NBME practice...
i did 10+ sets of 46Qs per day... (added more sets as the exam got closer)... built speed and stamina... i'll do the same for step 2
hindsight: another week would have been nice...
anyhow, good luck to future step 1 takers... hopefully someone will find something useful
WOW. 10 blocks a day? That's 10 hrs right there and THEN you had to review that. I'm amazed. What did you get on the UWSA's (if you took them)? And how were you scoring on Uworld blocks?
Test was insane. I got destroyed. Way harder than UW or the NBMEs. I went in there feeling pretty good since I was doing well on the last few NBMEs, and I had heard 11 and 12 were a good representation. Man, I was wrong: the real deal made NBME 12 look like a joke. I would mark 6-7 questions per block on the NBMEs.
On the real deal: For 5 out of the 7 blocks, I marked 18-22 questions, basically half the block :/ Block 1 was the worst for me. I ended up marking questions 1-10 consecutively. Very very demoralizing. I was surprised by the lack of giveaways. There were maybe 2 questions/block that were considered "easy." No giveaways, no high yield topics. Question stems were twice as long. The answer choices were very very close. I think this was what stood out the most. With the NBMEs, very few questions had close answer choices. There were so many Qs where I had to narrow down the answer from 3 choices.. never had this happened before.
Content wise: good stuff first: barely any anatomy, easy embryo,easy pharm
Bad: Surprisingly, the hardest was Microbio on my test. The most random bugs: the little random details you wouldn't expect anyone to ask... bugs I'd never encountered on any other practice question. Lots of biochem: some was fine, some were tricky.There wasn't that much Immuno, but damn it was ridiculous. Random cytokines/Interleukins that were not in FA. The biggest problem I had with the test was that you couldn't get that far with "reasoning" ... you either knew it or you didn't. I got unlucky in some areas. For ex, endocrinology is probably my strongest subject. So I didn't spend much time studying random details that simply never really appeared on practice questions. I ended up having 5-6 questions on IGF-1, something I glanced at maybe once in my studying.
Overall hardest test I've ever taken. If I absolutely had to pick one source that was similar, I guess it'd have to be UWorld. Practice NBMEs were not very helpful for preparation for the test. The test was all details... the more you know, the longer you studied, the better you'd do I guess. You've gotta know everything. Score prediction: 20 points lower than practice tests.
+1. I averaged ~250s on my practice test and ended up marking 15-20 questions per section. I came out feeling horrible and I really have no idea how I did. I feel like a select few of us are getting abnormally hard exams.
I hope I do not get this exam the rest of you guys got. The curve should even it out because they curved based on each test they give right?
I hope that this isn't the "new test question pool" they were talking about.
My gut says it is! It seems like everyone who took it after the 17th is saying similar things, as in, "It was a lot harder than I thought." Maybe they added in a bunch of tough questions so that the curve is a little wider?
Just got mine. 230/99.
A little lower than predicted by the standard methods, but I am happy with it.
I hope that this isn't the "new test question pool" they were talking about.
I didn't think they were adding a whole new question pool....just maybe adding a little more immunology. Anyone know which one it is?
what about its benefits in increasing HDL? it's in FA!!! lolAs another update on current events:
http://cardiobrief.org/2011/05/26/nhlbi-stops-the-aim-high-trial-of-niacin/
Apparently niacin + statins works no better than statins alone in preventing cardiovascular incidents. The trial was stopped but the official paper hasn't come out yet.
Very very unlikely to show up on our step 1 but still interesting that we may see a large fall in niacin use soon.
As you noted, you're so unlikely to get questions on efficacy of these medications that it's not worth even looking into. Just understand indication, MOA, interactions, and side effects.As another update on current events:
http://cardiobrief.org/2011/05/26/nhlbi-stops-the-aim-high-trial-of-niacin/
Apparently niacin + statins works no better than statins alone in preventing cardiovascular incidents. The trial was stopped but the official paper hasn't come out yet.
Very very unlikely to show up on our step 1 but still interesting that we may see a large fall in niacin use soon.
WOW. 10 blocks a day? That's 10 hrs right there and THEN you had to review that. I'm amazed. What did you get on the UWSA's (if you took them)? And how were you scoring on Uworld blocks?
What do you mean by "harder" endpoints?...Treating an HDL number has long been known to be ineffective at preventing "harder" endpoints...
soft = lab values, measurements, most composite endpoints, subjective ratingsWhat do you mean by "harder" endpoints?
Gotcha, thx. Good to know.soft = lab values, measurements, most composite endpoints, subjective ratings
hard = events such as death, MI, stroke
Not very step 1 relevant. In third year when you review studies for your team/attending, just keep in mind that only evidence with a reduction in important events should change practice.
I think next Wed, but I'm not positive. And, while I guess there are probably some parallels between our experiences, I didn't get a chance to do any NBME's (too much to do in too little time for me) so I have no idea where I may end up o_0 I just know that I was doing better than average on UW with random, timed blocks. Right now, I think I'll be relieved to break 200. lol.Raynor,
When are you supposed to get your results? It sounds like we had very identical test experiences.
I think next Wed, but I'm not positive. And, while I guess there are probably some parallels between our experiences, I didn't get a chance to do any NBME's (too much to do in too little time for me) so I have no idea where I may end up o_0 I just know that I was doing better than average on UW with random, timed blocks. Right now, I think I'll be relieved to break 200. lol.
I'm sure that EVEN IF you had a bad day, averaging in the 250's for the NBME's pretty much guarantees you'll do fine. ^_^
Does anyoen have a good recommendtaion on how to study pelvic anaomty? There is jsut so much information for it and i dont know where to start.
Hey guys, i have about week before I take the exam and was wondering which NBME to take. I already took form 6 and was wondering if I should take form 7 next or take the either form 11 or 12?
Took the beast today. I did about 60% of Kaplan qbank over spring semester, and got through Uworld once during the month before the exam. I'll save my projected scores and all that until I have my score in hand for comparison. I will say that I don't think there's any way Medfriends' estimate for the free 150 questions can be valid. It projected me for 261 and there's no way I pulled that off.
The questions themselves were pretty much like Uworld. I did NBME 12 and don't remember any repeats from that. I did think a few questions looked familiar from Uworld, but given there are 2000 questions on Uworld, that shouldn't be surprising. There were some off-the-wall cell & molecular bio questions, but even those you could at least narrow down the choices once you figured out what they were getting at.
I feel like I overstudied interleukins, CD markers, and "which chromosome is gene X on" stuff. I had one immuno question about what IL's relating to granulomas, but that's the only question like that I can remember. I guess I did have another one on translocations in a particular leukemia, but that's a question everybody should be expecting.
There was only one question where I couldn't figure out what they were getting at, and I can't remember what it asked. I had a really, really weird/funny question in my 2nd to last block about the mechanism of a drug reaction to an illicit substance that was just amazing, and at that point I forgot all the other weird questions I'd made a note of from earlier blocks. This question was so unexpected, that after I stopped laughing, I sat there staring at the screen for a minute thinking, "Bravo, test writers. Bravo." So it's true that no matter how much you study, they'll throw you a curveball.
I will say, Uworld + first aid remains a solid combo for test prep. I used Goljan audio and his book during the year, but once it got close, I just skimmed through tables and his photos. Gunner Training was great for micro, and solid in immuno (ironically it helped me remember all those chromosomes and interleukins that weren't on my exam), but it ended up being too time-consuming to get through FA, and Uworld, and GT. If I'd had another week, maybe I could've done more. We'll see how it turned out when mid-July rolls around.
/rant
Nice. Thanks for the write up! So you felt that FA and UW had all the info you were tested on? (except for the curveballs)
For those who have taken the exam / practice nbme's.... on the cardio valve defect questions that show changes in oxygen saturation, when the change in % occurs do you assume the defect is at that chamber or happened in the chamber before it? For example: if there is a ASD, on the exam would the right answer show a Step Up in saturation in the R atria or will it show it in the R Ventricle after it equalibriates?
I 'highly' doubt I got anywhere near that score. I left there thinking to myself: "I can't believe anybody who went through 2yrs of medical school could have done so poorly."I know how you feel. Hopefully you can get a sigh of relief on Wednesday when you get a 240+. I think I have to wait until July because I missed the cutoff for the earlier release. Killer.
Does anyoen have a good recommendtaion on how to study pelvic anaomty? There is jsut so much information for it and i dont know where to start.
So I just finished up with USMLE Step 1 earlier today (thank goodness thats over with, now I need to finish up with the COMLEX). I felt really good walking out of the exam with knowing that there were only a couple I absolutely had no clue. There were plenty of questions where educated guessing was my best weapon. I had maybe 3-4 audio questions that were pretty much murmurs (no bowel sounds) most of the pictures were recognizable tumors, auer rods, and holoprosencephaly. The test was pretty much split down the middle between systems, i had very few micro and pharm questions.
If you have any questions just ask me, its late and I can't remember all 8x46 questions.
I hope you mean 7x46 lol.. unless I missed a whole section
why dont you call up the prometric center you are going to. Im sure they could find some way to accomodate you.For anyone who has taken the actual test - do you know if you can make the font bigger? I am seriously a little worried I'm losing my vision (or my mind, maybe)...I keep having to squint to see the questions and I'm making strange mistakes that I've never made before (e.g. I knew rhinovirus was the answer, I looked for it among the answer choices, thought it wasn't there & picked something else...and then when I checked it over again, rhinovirus WAS there...and it was the right answer).