I saw that there was a similar thread for 2011 that had plenty of useful info so I figured its best to start one for 2012. 👍
What about a physical exam finding of splenomegaly? I would think the bigger the spleen the greater the risk for rupture.
Dr. Lionel Raymon in the 2010 Kaplan videos is about as good as it gets. The man is a pharmacology god.What is an excellent Pharm reference? I've yet to hear what the best pharm source is.
yeah, this is what I thought about
I just can't see in terms of answer options given by Mdquestion how and what lab test can predict rupture risk
Yeah, or a ton of cash.But that's only available through piracy?
so then pick estrogen? I had a similar question like this on UW; estrogen wasn't an answer choice but progesterone was. I knew it was both of em so I just picked progesterone (which was correct).
We were always taught it's due to disulfiram like effects, so it'd be inhibition of acetyladehyde dehydrogenase. Was that not an option?
Edit: you beat me! 😛
Don't think that was one of the choices (physical exam). I also had EBV-mono recently and my doc did none of this for me
The only two I was seriously considering was an capsid viral titer (to assess whether or not the virus was still reasonably active) and a Direct Coomb's test. I was thinking that EBV infection can produce abnormal cytokine release and antibody production that might explain why the spleen gets enlarged (i.e. there are immune complexes and antibodies circulating in the blood) and this might be best predicted by looking if there was any antibody attachment to native cells/red blood cells/etc. that would end up in the spleen and cause inflammation.
I guess that makes sense given the positive monospot test has to do with heterophile antibodies. But I didn't think this had to deal with splenic rupture risk, just whether you had the virus.
hyperplasia of t cells in PALS of spleen
the more I'm reading these discussions the more I'm getting nervous about this freaking test..
you guys shouldnt be discussing questions that were on the exam
i imagine its not hard for the ppl at the nbme to see what questions you're referring too, look at who's exam had all those questions, and then identify the person.
you guys shouldnt be discussing questions that were on the exam
i imagine its not hard for the ppl at the nbme to see what questions you're referring too, look at who's exam had all those questions, and then identify the person.
I disagree. This forum is a tool for sharing as much information as possible without crossing boundaries. We all want to ace the exam and we'll do what we have to to make that happen. Merely talking about questions is more than fine.
Agreed.
It's clear that you aren't supposed to talk about specific questions in the confidentiality agreement. Doing the right thing is more important than acing any exam.
Thats true. In my excitement I forgot you are not supposed to discuss the questions.
I disagree. This forum is a tool for sharing as much information as possible without crossing boundaries. We all want to ace the exam and we'll do what we have to to make that happen. Merely talking about questions is more than fine.
Sorry about sharing exam information- though, I don't think I was crossing any line (it's not as if I'm trying to reproduce exam questions here and distribute them). I won't mention anymore specific questions and I'll try to keep the discussion to concepts rather than questions.
no worries. i understand the excitement. just trying to say you should be careful. def dont want the nbme to get involved
Mdquestion, I think a few of our posters would benefit from a dual MD/JD program. There hasn't been any breach of confidentiality, and we can most certainly talk about questions.
(I'll be away and will post back in 8-12 hours)
The USMLE is copyrighted, and USMLE examinees agree not to disclose secure test questions at any time. Unauthorized access to secure test materials may raise questions about the validity of a test-taker's score.
The disclosure of secure, copyrighted test questions undermines the integrity of the USMLE and presents the threat that persons without the skill and knowledge required to practice medicine will be licensed as a doctor.
Drunk man in fight with dilated pupils --> LSD. If he also had tachycardia/arrhythmia --> cocaine. Nystagmus is PCP, so that can be ruled out, but they may have been trying to trick bc PCP induces belligerence.
PCP causes pupillary dilation (at least according to wikipedia's source).
what is an excellent pharm reference? I've yet to hear what the best pharm source is.
first aid.
The materials (i.e., test questions, clinical computer simulations, and standardized patient cases) of the USMLE, NBMEs self-assessment program and NBME subject examinations are copyrighted. Publishing any remembered materials or replicas of these materials on The Student Doctor Network (or any other forum) is an unauthorized reproduction of NBMEs materials, constitutes copyright infringement and is strictly prohibited. Any violation of NBMEs copyrights and trademarks can not only lead to legal sanctions, but can also have professional consequences. Medical students and medical school graduates, prospective students, examinees of the USMLE and NBME self-assessment examinations and subject examinations are reminded that they are bound to the terms they agreed to follow regarding disclosure of intellectual property prior to the administration of one of these examinations. Failure to adhere to the terms of these policies will subject an individual to various penalties up to and including being barred from future USMLE examinations.
The rules are the rules. As long as the NBME can easily prove it they definitely will go after you. But if you spill your guts out to Kaplan or the First Aid authors then it's packaged up and sold as a $3000 review course or a $35 review book. The whole system is pretty weird. I guess there will never be legal cases against those companies because it's too difficult to accumulate solid evidence on how the test information was originally leaked.
The rules are the rules. As long as the NBME can easily prove it they definitely will go after you. But if you spill your guts out to Kaplan or the First Aid authors then it's packaged up and sold as a $3000 review course or a $35 review book. The whole system is pretty weird. I guess there will never be legal cases against those companies because it's too difficult to accumulate solid evidence on how the test information was originally leaked.
I also suggest that the benefits of testing where the NBME draws the line with respect to their agreement does not justify the risk to your career.
Banister: PCP causes pupillary dilation (at least according to wikipedia's source).
Btw, I'd love to get a JD.
Just got 245 on UWSA1 29 days out.
sigh... I have work to do. Best way to spend these last 4 weeks to break 260?
If you're spending so long doing every resource, why are you going off only what is in FA? PCP causes pupil dilation too. I think people on LSD would be less likely to get in a bar fight.First Aid's the Bible (in my case, the Torah). PCP might cause mydriasis, but FA says "vertical and horizontal nystagmus." Right below it, it says "pupillary dilation" for LSD.
I recall having had this distinguishing factor show up in a USMLE Rx question, so by all means, it's high-yield to know the difference between PCP and LSD- they like it.
First Aid's the Bible (in my case, the Torah). PCP might cause mydriasis, but FA says "vertical and horizontal nystagmus." Right below it, it says "pupillary dilation" for LSD.
I recall having had this distinguishing factor show up in a USMLE Rx question, so by all means, it's high-yield to know the difference between PCP and LSD- they like it.
Phloston, you should get out more. The last place you'd see someone on LSD is ****faced in a bar fight.
Phloston, you should get out more. The last place you'd see someone on LSD is ****faced in a bar fight.