Official 2013 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Phloston

Osaka, Japan
Removed
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
1,676
I figure now is a good time to jump-start this thread.

Even though some of us who had taken the exam in late-2012 are still awaiting our scores (amid the holiday delays) and could technically still post within last year's thread, it is after all mid-January now, so it's probably apposite that we move forward and hope for a great year.

:luck: Cheers to 2013 :luck:
 
Its so crazy how everyone on here is scoring over 240 on the NBME, but the average for the country is like 224... are people doing a lot worse on the real thing than the NBME or is it only the creme de la creme thats posting on this website? Where are the people here that are receiving the 200's on NBME's? I mean according to statistics, there should be an equal amount of people scoring the 240+s as there are the 200s
 
Its so crazy how everyone on here is scoring over 240 on the NBME, but the average for the country is like 224... are people doing a lot worse on the real thing than the NBME or is it only the creme de la creme thats posting on this website? Where are the people here that are receiving the 200's on NBME's? I mean according to statistics, there should be an equal amount of people scoring the 240+s as there are the 200s

That would be me. I'm one of those "normal" people. Altho i havent taken any NBMEs recently to see if im still one of those normal ppl or if things have changed dramatically and I moved to the below average category...but i hear your "statistical concerns" and it has crossed my mind many times as a long time reader of this forum. I see no reason for people to lie about their scores/stats...i mean why would they? Its not like we know who they are.
 
Its so crazy how everyone on here is scoring over 240 on the NBME, but the average for the country is like 224... are people doing a lot worse on the real thing than the NBME or is it only the creme de la creme thats posting on this website? Where are the people here that are receiving the 200's on NBME's? I mean according to statistics, there should be an equal amount of people scoring the 240+s as there are the 200s

I'm right here...the lone sub-220 in the entire thread. :laugh:
 
I'm right here...the lone sub-220 in the entire thread. :laugh:

haha ur not alone im right there with u in that sad club LOL, thats why I was just thinking to myself, ok everyone is scoring over 240 on here, what is wrong with me ?
Good thing there's published statistics so I know im definetely not the only one in the sub 220 club- half the country is!
 
Hey i hope im not being annoying but im just scared to death...i read online ina forum that a 72% on uworld timed, random is consistent with a 220-230. Do u know of anyone breaking the 230 point with a similar uworld avg?
 
Hey i hope im not being annoying but im just scared to death...i read online ina forum that a 72% on uworld timed, random is consistent with a 220-230. Do u know of anyone breaking the 230 point with a similar uworld avg?

Don't use Uworld as a score predictor. Take an NBME. Just do the best you can with World and learn from it.
 
Hey i hope im not being annoying but im just scared to death...i read online ina forum that a 72% on uworld timed, random is consistent with a 220-230. Do u know of anyone breaking the 230 point with a similar uworld avg?

Most people who score that high break 230.

It used to be a 65% ~240. It's not as good a correlation anymore though.
 
I took the test a couple of days ago. I have remembered about 10 q's that I know I should have gotten right (gimme questions). I was scoring 245-250 on the nbme's. The rest of the test was tricky for me as well. I have talked to others who feel the same way. I don't know how your or my score will turn out, but just know you aren't alone.

I just looked something up that I remembered and realized I missed it. Despite specifically making a mental note several days prior not to forget. I could have kicked myself but whatever.... nothing I can do about it now.
 
How do you guys approach the questions with all the lab data? Pick an answer first than double check your guess with the lab numbers?
 
First post, so it probably doesn't hold much clout; however, I wanted to share my experience and mostly say thanks to everyone who offered useful information.

For those trying to figure out why the stats are skewed based off of what people report on here, I think it' pretty simple really: people with high scores or those going for high scores realize it's socially awkward to talk about it with people at school, so this is the only medium through which to gain support and camaraderie. I know this is something I really struggled with because I am going for a big score and none of my friends care as long as they break 220+. I think it is really important to have a goal for yourself, but just as important to support others' goals -- no matter what they are.

The test felt exactly like Uworld with about 4-5 nearly identical questions. I got at least 5-7 questions right specifically because they were repeats of exact concepts (even the wording was nearly identical) on my NBMEs. I wish I would have looked at more neuro anatomy as I had multiple gross brain stem questions which through me for a loop. Final studying advice would be to do a full round of FA 1 week before the test, pathoma 2x and know Uworld in and out, so basically the same as everyone else's advice.

I am really nervous about my score as I feel I have a lot to prove as a DO, but I think I have a good shot at breaking 250 (Uworld- 78% 1st pass, NBME 15 one week ago at 257).

Good luck to everyone! I have always been really intimidated by this forum because I know there are so many really smart people and I have a lot of respect for the crazy amount of work everyone puts in. Put in the hours and the score will take care of itself.
 
I'm right here...the lone sub-220 in the entire thread. :laugh:

Nope, I am here too! Just trying to get 200+. My original goal was 220-230, but the more I keep studying and doing practice exams the more I am being realistic. I take it on Tuesday, and I just took NBME 15 a few days ago and got a 207 on it, so I will be happy if I get 210+ now.

You are not alone!
 
I'm right here...the lone sub-220 in the entire thread. :laugh:

Count me in, too. I'm a week and a half out and am currently sitting at a 207 as of yesterday's NBME 13, so I'd be happy with a 210+.

Hell, I'm just hoping that my score doesn't decrease on exam day...
 
Nope, I am here too! Just trying to get 200+. My original goal was 220-230, but the more I keep studying and doing practice exams the more I am being realistic. I take it on Tuesday, and I just took NBME 15 a few days ago and got a 207 on it, so I will be happy if I get 210+ now.

You are not alone!

Be sure to actually study your wrongs on NBME 15. I lost a few points by not doing that.

Count me in, too. I'm a week and a half out and am currently sitting at a 207 as of yesterday's NBME 13, so I'd be happy with a 210+.

Hell, I'm just hoping that my score doesn't decrease on exam day...

Hit the weak areas in FA, thats the easiest way to get more points on the real deal at this score level. I did bad on my NBMEs, never did them right, I mean my average was a 195.5. :laugh: Got a 217 on the real thing, I guess the pressure helped.
 
Be sure to actually study your wrongs on NBME 15. I lost a few points by not doing that.

Yeah I went through all my wrong questions. Some were dumb mistakes, some were because I had not gone through that specific material well enough, and then only a handful were actual things I did not know. I just hope these last few days I can just make sure to not make those dumb mistakes of "I knew that, but forgot." If I can stay at a 207 I will be happy. I am just worried that if all the 250+ people felt it was really hard, I am worried about my score dropping. Oh well!

Oh and congrats on the 217! 🙂
 
Yeah I went through all my wrong questions. Some were dumb mistakes, some were because I had not gone through that specific material well enough, and then only a handful were actual things I did not know. I just hope these last few days I can just make sure to not make those dumb mistakes of "I knew that, but forgot." If I can stay at a 207 I will be happy. I am just worried that if all the 250+ people felt it was really hard, I am worried about my score dropping. Oh well!

Its all relative. No one comes out saying its 'easy'. Just stay on track and you'll be straight.
 
Taking the exam next Wednesday and just finished my second pass of FA today. I am SICK of FA. I will replicate the the fax-machine gangster beatdown scene in Office Space on my FA 2013 after my test. Anyways, I'm concerned about how everyone here is emphasizing Pathoma. I really like Pathoma but only got through maybe 60% of it during the school year. I'm considering doing a cram session of all the videos on 1.5x speed for the next 3 days. Has anyone done this before and found it useful right before the actual exam? It's that or another pass on my weak areas in FA, doing UWorld incorrects, or Goljan. Does anybody use Goljan anymore? (roughly the same amt of of hours in audio compared to Pathoma)

My stats so far:

UWorld, 1x pass, random-timed - 72%
UWSA 1 - 245 (overestimates like crazy i know)
NBME 15 - 235

Aiming for 240+

Any advice is appreciated~
 
Taking the exam next Wednesday and just finished my second pass of FA today. I am SICK of FA. I will replicate the the fax-machine gangster beatdown scene in Office Space on my FA 2013 after my test. Anyways, I'm concerned about how everyone here is emphasizing Pathoma. I really like Pathoma but only got through maybe 60% of it during the school year. I'm considering doing a cram session of all the videos on 1.5x speed for the next 3 days. Has anyone done this before and found it useful right before the actual exam? It's that or another pass on my weak areas in FA, doing UWorld incorrects, or Goljan. Does anybody use Goljan anymore? (roughly the same amt of of hours in audio compared to Pathoma)

My stats so far:

UWorld, 1x pass, random-timed - 72%
UWSA 1 - 245 (overestimates like crazy i know)
NBME 15 - 235

Aiming for 240+

Any advice is appreciated~
I think that watching pathoma and then doing missed uworld questions to keep you engaged would be your best bet. I secured more than a couple q's remembering Sattar's words and the test is so similar to uworld. Good luck!
 
Wheres Goober? Was it anything like NBME 6? :naughty:

Goober is bro chilling at a movie theater... Ok for realz nbme 6 was poopie but it did
hook me up once... Go over your old nbmes! Ill post a write up later, promise
 
Last edited:
Hey everyone--
Took the beast today. Studied 5 weeks but basically burned out the past week and a half. Got through 70% of uworld, FA 2x, goljan 2x (book only, 1st pass during the yr with classes), pathoma 1x. Read medium Robbins during the year with classes (a waste). I did Uworld subject mode, untimed. Then went through the explanations and made a word doc of the important points.

I only took NBME 13 at the beginning of my study period and got a 225. I wish I had taken more NBMEs (especially 15) but oh well.

The test felt very similar to Uworld. Each question felt REALLY long (as others have noted). I was surprised because I thought there would be shorter stems, but it felt like each question had lab values, vitals, etc. It got really draining by the 5th block. Some questions were literally duplicates of Uworld questions--be sure to finish Uworld! Surprisingly, I finished each block with 5-8 minutes to spare.

I had a ton of neuro (but no brainstem or spinal cord slices), MSK pathology, and micro. Luckily micro is a strong subject for me. Very little anatomy, embryo or biochem. There were more developmental milestone questions than anatomy and embryo combined. No crazy cell biology that people talked about from previous posts or threads. Each block had 1 or 2 random obnoxious questions about esoteric proteins, genes, etc. that aren't in any review book. When I got these, I rolled my eyes, made a random click and went on my way.😀

Will update my score when I get it. I think I did ok but not amazing. Honestly I feel like I could have gotten anywhere from a 215-245.

No new advice: do well with classes, if you're still at that stage. Uworld, pathoma, and FA. Goljan might be overkill. Don't lose points for FA recall questions!!
 
Last edited:
Pholston and all. I dropped 7 points on NBME 15. I didn't think it was different or anything from the other ones and felt pretty good while doing it. I would say at least 8 of the questions wrong were from me just misreading or thinking too hard. Honestly I keep getting a handful of questions wrong on all NBMEs simply from misreading choices and questions. Should I expect my concentration to be better on test day lol. How can I get past this? Even from reviewing NBME 15 the questions I got wrong weren't from lack of knowledge or lack of reasoning or lack of test taking skills. Idk. Should I be worried about this result? My test is in a week, I don't like seeing the drop although I know it was mainly from goof ups. I'm mainly in the low 260's (NBME 7, 11, 12, 13 + 2 UWSA), and on NBME 15 I got 254.
 
Pholston and all. I dropped 7 points on NBME 15. I didn't think it was different or anything from the other ones and felt pretty good while doing it. I would say at least 8 of the questions wrong were from me just misreading or thinking too hard. Honestly I keep getting a handful of questions wrong on all NBMEs simply from misreading choices and questions. Should I expect my concentration to be better on test day lol. How can I get past this? Even from reviewing NBME 15 the questions I got wrong weren't from lack of knowledge or lack of reasoning or lack of test taking skills. Idk. Should I be worried about this result? My test is in a week, I don't like seeing the drop although I know it was mainly from goof ups. I'm mainly in the low 260's (NBME 7, 11, 12, 13 + 2 UWSA), and on NBME 15 I got 254.

i think the nbme's will differ from the real thing in that they are overly simplified. it sounds like the test will be closer to uworld from what people are attesting over here. either way, you'll likely at least get in the 250's which will not rule you out of any specialty, so i wouldn't stress.
 
Hmmm all of this talk about how the test has changed this year is quite worrying. 🙁

I'm gonna have to reformulate my plan of attack these last two weeks.
 
Well just took the test..the only thing new I have to contribute that hasn't been mentioned before that I was surprised by was that I had two sets of almost identical word for word questions testing the same drug lol. Good luck to everyone about to take it!
 
Seriously! I had 2 pair of questions in different blocks that tested on the same disease mechanism. I wondered if it was just me reading the question wrong since I didn't have time to go back and review them.
 
Seriously! I had 2 pair of questions in different blocks that tested on the same disease mechanism. I wondered if it was just me reading the question wrong since I didn't have time to go back and review them.

I had the same concept tested twice within 10 questions and another instance of a different concept appearing twice within the same block. Don't let it psyche you out, concept repetition is not uncommon.
 
Ok guys, let's hear it now that you're done. What would you have done differently? What resources were da best on da test day
 
Again, got 80% in random, timed block of USMLE Rx. I noticed that my weakest subject is epidemiology.
I don't know if USMLE Rx is useful for the real deal, but questions and explanations remind me and solidify FA info that I have totally forgotten.

What do you think? Keep doing Rx? Do I need to do the whole 3000 questions?!
 
I found Pathoma invaluable as well as Goljans Audio transcripts. The majority of the exam is Pathology and when you have a clear understanding of the fundamentals of Pathology only then can you apply it to more complex and difficult questions - which is what the USMLE strives to do, and basically how you break the 220-230 barrier, in my opinion anyways. I wasn't one of the persons who memorized F.A. because that type of learning doesn't appeal to me, I used the Kaplan L.N. for my primary resource, substituting Pathology for Pathoma/Goljan transcripts. I did give F.A. a quick read though and I was astonished at how thorough and how 95% of UWORLD was in F.A, even if it was just 2-3 words mentioned randomly in a table on page X. But again, that style of memorization has never worked for me.

I found Pathoma's repetition of highly tested material very useful. The hardest things to remember are all the annoying CD markers LTs, neutrophil attractants etc. Dr. Sattar did an amazing job of simplifying it all and giving easy mnemonics to remember the important stuff. A lot of these CD markers are highly tested in Micro/Immuno/Patho so I found it useful across many subjects.

But obviously, the best resource is UWOLRD without a doubt. Perfect blend of gimme questions, slightly thinking questions, difficult questions, and WTF questions, simulating the exam perfectly.
 
I remember hitting one question that I only got correct because the concept showed up in Uworld and not FA/Pathoma. Was pretty thankful I spent the time reading those explanations. Pathoma definitely hit some clutch points for me, listen when Sattar says something is high yield. For some subjects that have been trending of late, FA/Pathoma/Uworld would not have adequately prepared me for it, but I wouldn't have changed how I prepped. I don't think it's worth the time to go read subject specific texts like anatomy since it can be hit or miss on what really appears on your test. It's far more important to make sure you have a strong foundation in what FA/Uworld covers. Know how to do calculations quick and stuff like that since they are easy points and more predictable to show up. Learn how to quickly skim passages for longer prompts to pick out what key facts are and what are just red herrings.
 
I remember hitting one question that I only got correct because the concept showed up in Uworld and not FA/Pathoma. Was pretty thankful I spent the time reading those explanations. Pathoma definitely hit some clutch points for me, listen when Sattar says something is high yield. For some subjects that have been trending of late, FA/Pathoma/Uworld would not have adequately prepared me for it, but I wouldn't have changed how I prepped. I don't think it's worth the time to go read subject specific texts like anatomy since it can be hit or miss on what really appears on your test. It's far more important to make sure you have a strong foundation in what FA/Uworld covers. Know how to do calculations quick and stuff like that since they are easy points and more predictable to show up. Learn how to quickly skim passages for longer prompts to pick out what key facts are and what are just red herrings.

What do you mean by trending subjects? Can you be more specific?
 
In retrospect, I personally felt that Uworld was by far the most high-yield for my USMLE in early June. Doctors in Training seemed really good at the time but amazingly there were very few questions that had anything to do with what DIT constantly harped upon. Also, I think First Aid might actually turn out to be a detriment to some people because there's clearly a lot more "basic" path and much less extremely detailed physiology than I had expected. FA is great for understanding physio but not so hot for path. Uworld is really where you can drill yourself with Path, and I'm telling you, the new USMLE is a path beast. :laugh:
 
In retrospect, I personally felt that Uworld was by far the most high-yield for my USMLE in early June. Doctors in Training seemed really good at the time but amazingly there were very few questions that had anything to do with what DIT constantly harped upon. Also, I think First Aid might actually turn out to be a detriment to some people because there's clearly a lot more "basic" path and much less extremely detailed physiology than I had expected. FA is great for understanding physio but not so hot for path. Uworld is really where you can drill yourself with Path, and I'm telling you, the new USMLE is a path beast. :laugh:

first aid's biggest weakness by far is path. it doesn't explain mechanisms and just lists facts. pathoma + goljan (goljan is too long for use during dedicated study time).
 
So,

I basically used three main sources, FA+UWORLD+DIT. I thought I was doing okay considering NBME 6=245 (4 weeks out) and NBME 15=252 (1 week out). However, I feel like my actual exam was significantly more difficult...emphasis on significantly. I've done some searching and it seems like NBME's taken 1 week before highly correlate with actual step 1 scores. I remember getting only 20 questions wrong on nbme 15 for that 252 which is 90% correct....The real deal seemed like every other question was a 50/50...has anyone experienced this? Has anyone experienced a drastic drop in score on the real deal versus a recent practice exam?

I can post my full experience once my score comes in
 
Dude I'm there with you. I was doing pretty decent on my NBME's. Felt that for the path sections I had a general idea what the answer was. But on the real deal I was super unsure. Made some bad guesses from ones that I remembered and looked up after. It was just tough overall. There was such long passages that lacked a lot of the typical buzz words, and multiple questions where I narrowed down to 2 good looking answers but had to guess. Part of it was definitely just the stress of the test though. Path is such a huge part of the test and it was a struggle to get the answer for many.
 
Took it today, I'll do a detailed writeup when I'm not feeling as pissed off and have gotten some sleep. Felt like it was significantly harder then any NBME (even 15). Questions were longer, confusing and tested a level of detail unattainable for me to acquire in 5 weeks of studying. Maybe I'm an idiot? I feel like I had to make a wild guess on 30%. Had to make educated guesses on another 20%. Any one else feel that way? Not trying to scare anyone..just venting, prolly just my own fault and you will all do great.

Everyone should do The Free 150, as some of those questions and concepts definitely popped up. Think I failed it, time for sleep. Best of luck to anyone taking it I'm sure you will do better then me haha.
 
For all the peopel pumping pathoma right now, would you say the book itself or his audio too? I really don't care for his audio
 
This is a question that is probably geared towards all that recently took the exam and have been talking about how heavy the exam was in regards to path. I'm taking step 1 in 2 weeks and was planning to review biochem, pharm, and embryo the last 2 days of studying because those are subjects were I would probably forget small details but would you guys recommend moving those up in my study schedule and saving the last couple days to do difficult path subjects such as neuro, cardio, heme-onc, etc.

Also, when you guys are strongly recommending pathoma do you guys really mean to know every little detail in the book. I mean I'm scoring in mid to high 250s on NBMEs right now and would like to score 260 on the real exam and right now I would say I have a pretty good idea of most of the topics in pathoma but I don't have the book memorized and all the little details but does the board actually test those small details or is it more big picture?

One more question lol are there a lot of path images on the exam or is it mostly path questions. What about images and heart sounds in general. I suck at questions with images (gross path, histo, X-ray, ct, etc) and heart sounds so just curious.
 
This is a question that is probably geared towards all that recently took the exam and have been talking about how heavy the exam was in regards to path. I'm taking step 1 in 2 weeks and was planning to review biochem, pharm, and embryo the last 2 days of studying because those are subjects were I would probably forget small details but would you guys recommend moving those up in my study schedule and saving the last couple days to do difficult path subjects such as neuro, cardio, heme-onc, etc.

Also, when you guys are strongly recommending pathoma do you guys really mean to know every little detail in the book. I mean I'm scoring in mid to high 250s on NBMEs right now and would like to score 260 on the real exam and right now I would say I have a pretty good idea of most of the topics in pathoma but I don't have the book memorized and all the little details but does the board actually test those small details or is it more big picture?

One more question lol are there a lot of path images on the exam or is it mostly path questions. What about images and heart sounds in general. I suck at questions with images (gross path, histo, X-ray, ct, etc) and heart sounds so just curious.

Reviewing biochem and embryo didn't help for me since there were so few questions, but I made a mnemonic for a random drug the day before and it showed up on the real thing. I also went over Kaplan notes for neuro, and it helped in the sense that neuro on the real thing was very straightforward in regards to the images that they had. I think I only had one gross neuro image and two CT scans and I'm pretty sure I got them right. The cardio wasn't as straightforward and one murmur question was 50/50 for me, and hem-onc was one of my strongest subjects so I didn't feel like I struggled with it.

Boards is a lot of details and a lot of thinking. There's not a lot of "big picture" things that I can remember, but they do require you to know details and think through questions - that's why a lot of people say it's in between the NBMEs and UW in terms of difficulty, which I agree with. I got one question right about some random constellation of symptoms only because we had one slide on it during first year. It wasn't covered in UW/FA/Pathoma, and I chose it off of gut instinct. Did the same with a lot of other questions, and some were Step 2 CK material, no doubt.

There are enough path images that you shouldn't rule them out or brush them off. I had one micro question where I had to identify the organism based off of a picture. I had plenty of other imaging questions where you were required to recognize something in the image that led you to the right answer. Some of them were pretty tricky, but I developed good recognition skills from taking so many NBMEs and getting pissed off at UW images.
 
Last edited:
Took my exam on the 14th. For reference I am a US MD student who had 5.5 weeks of dedicated study time. I score slightly average to above average on school exams and I wouldn't even have a chance at a 240+ without this forum, so thank you all very much.


Test day:
I think I had one of the more "fair" exams. Much of it was out of FA/UW, I'd say probably 80% was covered in those resources. I relied on my undergrad knowledge for biochem and genetics more than I thought I would and anatomy was everywhere. In my opinion, if you are not supplementing FA/UW with an anatomy resource you are costing yourself points on the exam. I didn't get tired during the exam which I think had a lot to do with my doing 3 7-block simulations before the exam. Pharm was very straightforward with all but one drug being covered in FA/UW.


Resources:

Gunner Training: I was about 40% banked with 30% mastered. I worked through all of anatomy, physio, some pharm, some neuro. I quit GT December 2012 to start doing Rx and GT was causing me an incredible amount of stress because the system was really buggy all the time. With the site always crashing I my daily reviews piled up so I stuck it to the man and quit and picked up USMLERx--best decision ever. I'll get there. I will say though, that my test had a stupid amount of anatomy and autonomics that I was well prepared for because of GT that I stopped doing 6 months ago. So I guess it works, it's just a pain in the ass.

First Aid: Read throughout the year, great resource I would say my exam was still 60-70% out of FA.

Pathoma: Sattar is my guy. I listened to whatever subject we were covereing in school at the time, however, second semester I stopped listening to class lecture entirely and Sattar taught me everything I need to know. What a boss. I noticed a plateauing in my NBMEs so I went through the audio again my last 1.5 weeks before my exam. EXCELLENT DECISION.

Rx: Other than UW, I would say Rx was my most important resource. It's a well known fact that FA is daunting and it is hard to just sit down and read--that's why people inexplicably subject themselves to DIT (sorry, ha).

DIT: Watched two lectures, gouged my eyes/ears out and moved on with my life. I know I didn't give the program a full shake but I just couldn't do it. Rx is the ACTIVE LEARNING alternative to DIT and is less than a quarter of the price, no brainer for me.

Khan's cases: Went through twice and felt VERY prepared for the ethics questions I saw on test day. Great, underutilized resource.

HY Neuro: Went through once during my neuro class. Revisited the images the morning before my exam and I was rewarded for my effort.

Kaplan: During my first 1.5 weeks of dedicated study period I completed probably 800 questions in some of my weaker area. SO CLUTCH. I went through all of the anatomy, micro, embryo, biochem and molecular/cellular biology. While I was going through Kaplan I constantly wondered whether or not I was wasting my time. However, on the 14th I counted 7 times where I shook my head and smiled, knowing that Kaplan had lead me to the correct answer. For those looking for an additional anatomy source since I know that is a hot topic at the moment, Kaplan is a great place to look.

UW: Gold standard, duh. 7-8 repeats on the real deal. I went through like 1.8 times. Went through random timed the last 6 weeks of school and redid most of it during the school year. 69% the first time through 87% the second.

Anatomy resources: Flipped through HY anatomy---meh not so great. Not enough pictures and nothing is bolded so it is difficult to know where to focus your attention during dedicated study period. Used BRS Anatomy during my M1 class and this turned out to be the best additional anatomy resource outside of the Qbanks. I felt very prepared for all the images I saw on the exam because of this book. Each chapter has great pics that I encourage everyone to get through at least the pics. I didn't start looking thru BRS anatomy until the week before my exam, wish I started earlier.

Practice assessments.
6 weeks out 7 block USMLERx assessment: 248
5.5 weeks out UWSA 1: 245
4.5 weeks NBME 11: 252
4 weeks UWSA 2: 256
3 weeks NBME 12: 247
2.5 weeks NBME 7: 250 (started flat lining here and started pathoma again)
2 weeks NBME 13: 257 (did after 3 blocks of UW)
1 week Free 150: 93%
1 week NBME15: 245 (did after free 150) AHHHH, I was PISSED. I will say I was really tired when I took it but still a disappointing result given my NBME 13. I am glad I had a week to redouble my efforts after this result)

Average NBME score over my dedicated study period--250. I would be ELATED with a score anywhere near that. My goal going into dedicated was a 240+, leaving the testing center I think I have a solid chance of getting within 10 points of my average. Who knows if I will be embarrassed by saying this on July 10th when I get my score, but I think it is important for others to know how I felt leaving the exam.

I am open to questions and clarifications! Thank you all again 👍.
 
Top