Official 2013 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Phloston

Osaka, Japan
Removed
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
1,676
I figure now is a good time to jump-start this thread.

Even though some of us who had taken the exam in late-2012 are still awaiting our scores (amid the holiday delays) and could technically still post within last year's thread, it is after all mid-January now, so it's probably apposite that we move forward and hope for a great year.

:luck: Cheers to 2013 :luck:
 
In regards to your remarks on DIT, why do you say it was not worth it in retrospect?

Because it's an audio-visual regurgitation of First Aid with almost no extra value added. I'm not even sure how it's not copyright infringement because most things are repeated verbatim. And a majority of the visual parts is an annoying person standing there on your screen, moving their arms awkwardly.

Unless you're illiterate, DIT is a waste of $700+
 
Because it's an audio-visual regurgitation of First Aid with almost no extra value added. I'm not even sure how it's not copyright infringement because most things are repeated verbatim. And a majority of the visual parts is an annoying person standing there on your screen, moving their arms awkwardly.

Unless you're illiterate, DIT is a waste of $700+

so much this. It's funny because when you full screen the video, you can see the person at the podium just shifting their eyes as if they're reading a CUE card or something, lol.

I thought the 2010 DIT was amazing, but did 2 or 3 videos of 2012, and it was horrible. Just deleted it after downloading it. Can't imagine somebody spending $700 for the program.
 
Got my score back this Wednesday, but I hadn't had a chance to post until this evening.

Background:
I don't attend the most "prestigious" university in the world, so I knew that performing well on Step 1 was even more important for me than some of the blue bloods that post here. I'm in the upper quartile of my med school class and made pretty solid grades throughout first and second year. During first year, I studied balls to the wall and tried to do as well as I possibly could in all of my classes, sometimes at the expense of truly understanding the material. Very early on in second year, I decided that I was going to make studying for Step 1 a priority. I read the 2012 Experiences thread and learned a great deal about review books, question banks, and study plans. I originally set a goal of 230 as my target score and began reviewing for Step 1 the first week of second year.

Resources:
First Aid is so popular for a reason. I made it a priority to learn as much of FA as I absolutely could. I figured it would at least help me get as many of the auto-click type questions correct as possible and help minimize mistakes on the gimme questions. The great thing about FA is its formatting; there were many instances on my actual Step 1 where the exact page in FA would pop into my head after reading the question stem. Excellent resource for nailing down the basics. I recommend starting as early as possible getting familiar with this book.

Pathoma was also an incredible resource. I had heard of Pathoma on SDN before, but it wasn't until my school emailed out a discount code for the one-year subscription that I actually looked into it as a study resource. Similar to FA, what makes Pathoma so great is Dr. Sattar's drawings - they become tattooed to your brain and ingrained into your long-term memory because of Dr. Sattar's brilliant explanations and visual representations of complex subjects. I loathed hematology before Pathoma, but it turned out to be one of my strongest subjects by the end.

As far as question banks went, I used what many would consider to be "the big three" - USMLERx, Kaplan QBank, and USMLEWorld. I started second year by doing Rx questions every night after studying for my med school coursework. The Rx questions are way easier than the questions on the actual exam, but they got me used to dissecting question stems and making diagnoses based on classic presentations. Used alongside FA, this question bank was a great help that undoubtedly increased my score. Kaplan was excellent for micro, but the other subjects tested were either way too obscure or unnecessarily tricky. I'd recommend Kaplan only if you have time to do Rx and UWorld also. UWorld is UWorld - I can't say anything about it that hasn't been said before. It's pretty much mandatory if you want a high score. As countless others have stated before, the strength of UWorld is in the explanations. If you understand the explanations for all answer choices, you will score high.

I also took 4 NBMEs during the course of my dedicated study period:
NBME 11 (7 weeks out) - 228
NBME 12 (5 weeks out) - 240
NBME 13 (2 weeks out) - 254
NBME 15 (1 week out) - 242

Exam Day:
I'm pretty sure I got one of the easier forms of the exam, which worried me because I was expecting a very harsh curve. I honestly don't remember very many specific questions from my test. Many questions were answered based off pure intuition rather than rote memorization and regurgitation, but there were several questions that were straight from FA. I left Prometric certain that I had passed, but I didn't know where my score would fall since I was expecting a very hard curve.

Actual Score: 254

I'm definitely not the smartest guy out there, but I feel like I worked just as hard as anybody during my study period and it paid off. My MCAT score was only a 26, so it feels good to work hard and actually see the fruits of my labor. If I could go back and change anything about the way I prepared, the only thing I would do differently would be to change the mindset I had during M1 and some of M2. I was so concerned with getting A's on all of my med school exams that I sometimes spent all my time trying to memorize the pedantic details that were asked on our exams rather than developing a strong foundation of knowledge.

Thanks to everybody who's helped me out along the way. I owe at least part of my success on Step 1 to those of you who have answered my questions, provided feedback, posted your exam experiences, and offered encouragement. If anybody has any specific questions, I'd be happy to answer them here on the forum or via PM.
 
I also took 4 NBMEs during the course of my dedicated study period:
NBME 11 (7 weeks out) - 228
NBME 12 (5 weeks out) - 240
NBME 13 (2 weeks out) - 254
NBME 15 (1 week out) - 242

Congrats on the score! You said you took the NBMEs during your dedicated study period. Was 11 taken right at the beginning or did you take longer than 7 weeks for your dedicated study time. And about how much time did you put in during then as well?
 
Because it's an audio-visual regurgitation of First Aid with almost no extra value added. I'm not even sure how it's not copyright infringement because most things are repeated verbatim. And a majority of the visual parts is an annoying person standing there on your screen, moving their arms awkwardly.

Unless you're illiterate, DIT is a waste of $700+

100% agree.
 
Resources:
First Aid is so popular for a reason. I made it a priority to learn as much of FA as I absolutely could. I figured it would at least help me get as many of the auto-click type questions correct as possible and help minimize mistakes on the gimme questions. The great thing about FA is its formatting; there were many instances on my actual Step 1 where the exact page in FA would pop into my head after reading the question stem. Excellent resource for nailing down the basics. I recommend starting as early as possible getting familiar with this book.

Pathoma was also an incredible resource. I had heard of Pathoma on SDN before, but it wasn't until my school emailed out a discount code for the one-year subscription that I actually looked into it as a study resource. Similar to FA, what makes Pathoma so great is Dr. Sattar's drawings - they become tattooed to your brain and ingrained into your long-term memory because of Dr. Sattar's brilliant explanations and visual representations of complex subjects. I loathed hematology before Pathoma, but it turned out to be one of my strongest subjects by the end.

As far as question banks went, I used what many would consider to be "the big three" - USMLERx, Kaplan QBank, and USMLEWorld. I started second year by doing Rx questions every night after studying for my med school coursework. The Rx questions are way easier than the questions on the actual exam, but they got me used to dissecting question stems and making diagnoses based on classic presentations. Used alongside FA, this question bank was a great help that undoubtedly increased my score. Kaplan was excellent for micro, but the other subjects tested were either way too obscure or unnecessarily tricky. I'd recommend Kaplan only if you have time to do Rx and UWorld also. UWorld is UWorld - I can't say anything about it that hasn't been said before. It's pretty much mandatory if you want a high score. As countless others have stated before, the strength of UWorld is in the explanations. If you understand the explanations for all answer choices, you will score high.

I also took 4 NBMEs during the course of my dedicated study period:
NBME 11 (7 weeks out) - 228
NBME 12 (5 weeks out) - 240
NBME 13 (2 weeks out) - 254
NBME 15 (1 week out) - 242

Exam Day:
I'm pretty sure I got one of the easier forms of the exam, which worried me because I was expecting a very harsh curve. I honestly don't remember very many specific questions from my test. Many questions were answered based off pure intuition rather than rote memorization and regurgitation, but there were several questions that were straight from FA. I left Prometric certain that I had passed, but I didn't know where my score would fall since I was expecting a very hard curve.

Actual Score: 254

Excellent post. I second all of your recommendations. All people who recently started this thread should read it. I think if you use FA, Pathoma, and constantly keep your mind engaged by doing lots of Qbank questions (and put in the time to truly understand them) you will do well on Step 1.
 
I have read every post in this thread and found it to be useful during my step studies and second year of med school, and I wanted to make my own contribution. I am a mostly lurker/infrequent poster and I didn't want my score associated with my forum name, so I created this account. I assure you, I'm not trolling but you can always believe what you will.

I received my score a few weeks ago, took the test in late June.

CBSE near the beginning of 2nd year: 205
NBME 12 in April, still in school: 233
NBME 11 in May on day 1 of study break: 247
NBME 13 two weeks (halfway) into study break: 261
NBME 15 three weeks into study break: 266
Score: Comfortably above 270, less than 280.

I started studying for step I around January, but really only put in a couple hours here or there. I didn't get more serious until late April, at which point I put in about two-three hours every day and one full day on the weekends. When school got out, I studied about 10 hours a day for four weeks and then took the test.

Before study break:
1. Firecracker/GT: I flagged 20% of the step 1 cards and tried to do this regularly. If I would have changed one thing, I would have done Firecracker more seriously. That being said, I used it to cover the topics that my school did not cover well, like microbiology, during this time.
2. UWorld: I finished 90% of Uworld prior to study break. I annotated heavily into first aid, but mostly didn't study from first aid. I did everything timed and by organ system group (usually 2-3 organ systems, like cardio+pulm+vascular). I averaged between 78% and 95% depending on the organ system.

During study break:

Early study break
- I spent the first two weeks of study break reviewing heavily the basic sciences. I felt pretty strong on the organ systems and both Uworld and the NBMEs showed me that if I missed a question, usually it was some biochemistry or pharmacology that I hadn't seen in a long time.
- I did around 2 blocks of USMLERx per day
- I was adding new topics to Firecracker like crazy. Was doing around 200 review questions and 100-200 questions on new topics every day. To put this in context, I doubled the number of topics I had flagged all of second year.

Late study break
- I spent the second two weeks of study break burning through the organ systems really fast. 1-3 days per system, depending on how strong I was in the organ.
- I did USMLERx for the organ system I was reviewing. I did 2-3 blocks per day, so depending on the organ system some of them got finished and some of them didn't.
- Towards the end, I planned it so my last organ systems coincided with the 10% of UWorld I hadn't covered yet, so I did that.
- I spent the last couple days reviewing my problem topics, trying to relearn anatomy, and I did about 8 blocks of my UWorld incorrects.
- I stopped adding new topics to Firecracker and coasted on 300-350 review questions per day until the last 7-10 days, at which point I stopped doing Firecracker completely.

My sources and scores
First Aid
I probably covered about 2/3 of first aid. I hated reading it. It's terribly written, things are organized in a nonsensical manner (alphabetical, wtf?). I tried really, really hard and I wanted to do "3 passes" of first aid but somewhere in my first pass I was trying to memorize some table when I realized, "they're not testing you on first aid, they're testing you on medical knowledge."

I would use other sources to go through an organ system, then I'd flip through the pages (literally flipping/skimming) and see if there was anything I was unfamiliar with. My first aid was crammed full of notes I took while doing Uworld, but I never really went back through and read those notes. I think writing them in alone probably helped a lot.

Firecracker
I had about 20% flagged when I went into Study Break, and I upped it to 40% flagged by two weeks in. I went from doing 80-100 questions a day before study break to 300-400 questions a day. I did this for the first three weeks out of the four, then I stopped since I felt like I maximized the benefit/time ratio. I flagged very aggressively topics I felt weak in and it really helped me drill them.

As a tradeoff, doing 300-400 firecracker questions/day is a true pain in the butt and definitely took time away that I could have used on USMLERx or some other question bank. I chose this route because I've always been good at answering standardized test questions and I wanted to get as many "facts" in my brain as possible.

Class Notes
I'm serious here. Everyone says don't do it, but I found this helpful. I took awesome, awesome concise notes second year with the intention of revisiting them for step 1. I really distilled stuff into relevant bundles of information that gave me explanations and information beyond what's available in 1st aid, while not being laborious and nitpicky. I always used the best pictures and diagrams I could find and I annotated them with captions, my own mnemonics, explanations, etc...

Picmonic
I only used picmonic for stuff I found difficult to remember. If I had to go over something 3 or 4 times and it was hurting my brain, I looked to see if picmonic had it. I believe it really, really saved me time here. That being said, I wouldn't use it for everything. I think I used like 60 cards.

Pathoma and Flashcards
I listened to pathoma during 2nd year. I went back and listened again at 1.8x while going through organ systems. I got through most of it, but the basic pathology and stuff I was too familiar with so I skipped.

What was really helpful: Keep an excel spreadsheet open on half your monitor. Type flashcards (front and back are two columns on the same row) into the excel spreadsheet - only for tidbits and facts that you want to keep. Twice a day, convert the excel spreadsheet into online flashcards. (I used flashcardexchange). When I stopped doing firecracker the 4th week, I drilled these flashcards and really picked up a lot.

Others
Microcards: I knew these backwards and forwards. I supplemented them with Phloston's ppt's, which closely follow them.
Biochem & Genetics flashcards: I used these a lot and found them very helpful.

Question Banks
UWorld: The best. Do it. I averaged between 78% and 95% depending on the organ system. I did it all timed, but according to organ system that I was studying. When I went back and did blocks of my incorrect questions (I didn't remember the answers, since it had been months since I'd seen them) I was getting 70% or so on those.

USMLERx: Was ok. Their questions require you to do some very specific 3-4 step thinking and will sometimes drill you on the 3rd or 4th side effect, etc. I wouldn't say I'm the authority on USMLERx, since I only completed about 25% of it. However, it did pretty much predict my score spot-on.

Test Experience
I flag generously questions I want to take a second look at before the block is done. I flagged 5-10 per section. I test quickly so I had about 10-12 minutes left at the end of each block to go back and review my flags. I would end the block with 2-3 minutes left so I had extra break time.

I took the full break to eat a snack, drink some coffee, and go to the bathroom, every single block.

To be honest, I expected a much harder test than I got, mostly because everyone on SDN was freaking out. When I took NBME15 a week before, I remember thinking it was joke-easy. I would say the real thing felt 80% like that, with some tougher questions and a few random questions on things I hadn't seen before. I could usually eliminate all or most the incorrect answers on those. One clear difference is that they give you a lot more extraneous information - e.g. lab values - for every stem. I was ready for that and since time wasn't a challenge for me, it didn't bug me too much.

I hope this was helpful. I definitely feel like my studying wasn't "optimum" - some of it was pretty scattered - but some things were really high yield and I wanted to make sure to write up my experience with them.

This isn't my normal SDN username, but I'll respond to any questions on this account in the thread or by PM.
 
Last edited:
I have read every post in this thread and found it to be useful during my step studies and second year of med school, and I wanted to make my own contribution. I am a mostly lurker/infrequent poster and I didn't want my score associated with my forum name, so I created this account. I assure you, I'm not trolling but you can always believe what you will.

I received my score a few weeks ago, took the test in late June.

CBSE near the beginning of 2nd year: 205
NBME 12 in April, still in school: 233
NBME 11 in May on day 1 of study break: 247
NBME 13 two weeks (halfway) into study break: 261
NBME 15 three weeks into study break: 266
Score: Comfortably above 270, less than 280.

Your baseline last Fall was 205? 😱
 
I hope this was helpful. I definitely feel like my studying wasn't "optimum" - some of it was pretty scattered - but some things were really high yield and I wanted to make sure to write up my experience with them.

This isn't my normal SDN username, but I'll respond to any questions on this account in the thread or by PM.


that was useful, thanks!
How much time did you invest on 1 UWorld block on average?
 
Congrats on the score! You said you took the NBMEs during your dedicated study period. Was 11 taken right at the beginning or did you take longer than 7 weeks for your dedicated study time. And about how much time did you put in during then as well?

My med school coursework ended sometime in early May, after which we had a week of HIPAA lectures, ACLS, ID precautions training, etc. After all that was out of the way, I had about 7 weeks until my USMLE. I took NBME 11 early that first week of studying, but not the very first day.

Usually, I tried to put in about 12 hours a day with breaks spaced throughout to stay focused. On the days I took my NBMEs, I would start the exam around 7 AM, finish around 11 AM, review my incorrect questions for an hour or two, and then just call it a day.
 
Hey i am new on this forum. I am an INternational medical student. I have been reading this thread during mu prep time.
My scores were:
UWSA 1 = 206 ( start of dedicated study period)
Nbme 13= 219 ( 3 weeks b4 )
UWSA 2 = 244 ( 1 week b4)
Nbme 7 = 221 ( 3 days b4)
UW average= 65% ( random timed)

Sat for real deal on 24th of july 2013.

Real deal was a bit tough than both nbme and uw. Very long scnerios, hardly got time to review my flagged ones. Flagged 12 on first and second block. 10 on third and fouth. 5 to 7 on last three blocks. realy dont know how i performed. Really confused about wat i am goin to get. Can any 1 predict my score based on my nbme n uwsa. All were online. I took nbme 11, 4 and 3 ofline and scored almost 83% on them. Plz do reply i am realy tensed.
 
Last edited:
Hey i am new on this forum. I am an INternational medical student. I have been reading this thread during mu prep time.
My scores were:
UWSA 1 = 206 ( start of dedicated study period)
Nbme 13= 219 ( 3 weeks b4 )
UWSA 2 = 244 ( 1 week b4)
Nbme 7 = 221 ( 3 days b4)
UW average= 65% ( random timed)

Sat for real deal on 24th of july 2013.

Real deal was a bit tough than both nbme and uw. Very long scnerios, hardly got time to review my flagged ones. Flagged 12 on first and second block. 10 on third and fouth. 5 to 7 on last three blocks. realy dont know how i performed. Really confused about wat i am goin to get. Can any 1 predict my score based on my nbme n uwsa. All were online. I took nbme 11, 4 and 3 ofline and scored almost 83% on them. Plz do reply i am realy tensed.

230s most likely assuming you got through all of World and that % doesn't include any repeats. Avg on World seems to be around 60% or so, so if you're slightly above average then you'll probably land a bit above a 227 which was the average, hence the 230s. Probably upper 230s actually as I think about it.

My prediction: 234 +/- 6
 
To all of those preparing for the exam, I wish you the best of luck. Keep up the good work!

I scored a 267 on my test on July 12, 2013. I received the results two days ago on July 31, 2013.

My preparation in brief:

I went through FA six times, supplemented with Pathoma and BRS Physiology. I had originally planned to go through the entirety of both the Kaplan and UWorld Qbanks, but ended up only finishing 90% of UWorld and 25% of Kaplan. I scored a 650 (257) on the NBME 15 practice exam two weeks prior to my actual test. This was the only practice test that I used.

More in depth:

Unfortunately, it took me six passes to memorize FA to the extent that I considered adequate. I think for many other people it may take fewer passes, but I forget things rapidly, especially facts that require brute force memorization, such as biochemical pathways. Since FA is the core of Step 1 prep, I figured the time spent would pay off. This is absolutely true in retrospect.

Pathoma was essential and complemented FA nicely. I started out using Goljan's Rapid Review Pathology, but soon realized that the book contained too much information, most of which went beyond the scope of the Step 1. In terms of studying for the Step 1, this "wastes" precious time and brain space. Pathoma provided a concise and extremely high-yield overview of the most prominent pathologies, a good number of which are not covered adequately or at all in FA. I did not use Pathoma's videos at all, only the book. After going through a system in FA, I immediately went through the corresponding section in Pathoma. This allowed me to go through Pathoma rapidly, highlighting only those things that I noticed were not mentioned in FA. As a result, when reviewing Pathoma again later, I was able to look only at the highlighted portions, saving me the time that would have otherwise been spent on reading redundant information already mentioned in FA.

BRS Physiology was an absolute must as well. In addition to providing a solid foundation for understanding the information in FA, BRS also contains many basic, nitty-gritty concepts and mechanisms that are very testable (which you will not find in FA).

I felt that the Kaplan QBank often went beyond the scope of the Step 1. UWorld was by far more representative and high yield. I do not think you need the Kaplan Qbank to score well, but you cannot compromise on your UWorld questions. I was scoring between 85-90% on my UWorld Qbank mixed blocks. I learned an incredible amount from reviewing the answer choices of both my wrong and my right questions. However, it was easy to lose track of time and spend about 5 hours reviewing each block, which is not efficient or practical. I developed a mechanism of separating questions into two categories. If I was completely clueless approaching a question, I would read all of the answer choices in depth. If I was somewhat familiar with the question, I would scan (not read) through the answer choices, slowing down to a reading pace only when I caught something that seemed unfamiliar. I would then use my cursor to highlight those facts that were new to me. Then, I would write down the corresponding block and question number (i.e. block 24-question 6) in the relevant section/system in my FA, which allowed me to revisit the highlighted text when I was reviewing my FA. Beware: If you don't do this and instead write down the question ID, when you use the search question ID function, the question that turns up will not have your highlighted text. This helped me in two ways: 1) the new information was packaged in its appropriate section in the appropriate context in FA. If I did not do this, and instead chose to later review the questions in the order that they are presented in the blocks (and out of context), it would be harder for me to memorize the facts, and 2) I wrote down the block-question number rather than annotating my FA because this saved me the enormous amount of time that would have otherwise been spent on copying endless lines of text and complicated figures from UWorld into my FA, which is also not allowed 😛. Using this system, I was able to review each block of 46 questions in 2 hours.

I bought but did not use Lippincott's Microcards. I felt the combination of FA and UWorld covered microbio adequately. I bought and tried the Lange pharm cards, which were minimally helpful. Again, I felt FA and UWorld covered pharm very, very well. I did not see anything in the pharm cards that wasn't mentioned in FA or UWorld that was high yield. For instance, my understanding of the anti-arrhythmic drugs came primarily from three specific UWorld questions, which did a phenomenal job in explaining the mechanisms and side-effects, even comparing and contrasting the different classes.

I visited the testing area the day prior to my exam to test the travel time and gauge the surrounding noise level. I did not take a practice exam at the testing center.

As a side note, most of my preparation came specifically from my studying for the Step 1, not from my school's curriculum. To be sure, my school does a wonderful job in preparing its students for the Step 1. However, as mentioned earlier, I tend to forget facts rapidly, and as such, I retained little from what I learned during first and second year. This is my curse. When I reviewed FA, it felt like I was relearning everything. You have to trust me on this. I mention this to give more credit to the resources that I mentioned.

Once again, to those of you who are preparing for the exam or will be preparing for the exam, I wish you all the best of luck. It is a long and trying road, but in the end, it is well worth it. I would be happy to answer any questions via pm or this thread.

One last tip, which for most is a game-changer: The actual exam incorporates questions and answer choices that are extremely verbose with many red herrings, in what seems to be an attempt to deplete your time. The time crunch you will experience is significantly greater than any NBME practice test, Kaplan QBank, or UWorld QBank. As such, it is best to practice scanning the last two sentences of the question first in an attempt to identify the actual question, and then to skim the answer choices. This should take no longer than 10-15 seconds. This allows you to focus appropriately while reading the question. Practice this strategy on your qbank blocks. You will find that it is extremely effective at conserving time.
 
Last edited:
230s most likely assuming you got through all of World and that % doesn't include any repeats. Avg on World seems to be around 60% or so, so if you're slightly above average then you'll probably land a bit above a 227 which was the average, hence the 230s. Probably upper 230s actually as I think about it.

My prediction: 234 +/- 6
Thanks budy. Thats truly encouriging.
 
I wanna ask about the best strategy in doing questions. Sometimes I have 5 minutes left to review UW block, while sometimes I just finish on time with no time to look back on marked questions.
How can you manage your time efficiently? I heard that the real deal questions are longer than UW!
 
Thanks budy. Thats truly encouriging.

I got a 228 on 7, then a 247 a few days later in 11. Nbme 7 underscores a bit since it's out of date. 66% on UWorld is solid.

I'd guess high 230, low 240. Good luck man. I know the weeks after were rough.
 
Hello everyone,

Just took my exam on July 30th. Felt the exam was a lot tougher than the nbme's and uwsa's. First block was definitely the toughest for me, probably marked half of it. Felt upset after the exam, really don't know if i passed.

Uworld: 70% correct (80th percentile)
Nbme 15: 3 weeks back- 220
Nbme 11: 3 days before exam- 250

Wish everyone good luck for their results!
 
To all of those preparing for the exam, I wish you the best of luck. Keep up the good work!

I scored a 267 on my test on July 12, 2013. I received the results two days ago on July 31, 2013.

My preparation in brief:

I went through FA six times, supplemented with Pathoma and BRS Physiology. I had originally planned to go through the entirety of both the Kaplan and UWorld Qbanks, but ended up only finishing 90% of UWorld and 25% of Kaplan. I scored a 650 (257) on the NBME 15 practice exam two weeks prior to my actual test. This was the only practice test that I used.

More in depth:

Unfortunately, it took me six passes to memorize FA to the extent that I considered adequate. I think for many other people it may take fewer passes, but I forget things rapidly, especially facts that require brute force memorization, such as biochemical pathways. Since FA is the core of Step 1 prep, I figured the time spent would pay off. This is absolutely true in retrospect.

Pathoma was essential and complemented FA nicely. I started out using Goljan's Rapid Review Pathology, but soon realized that the book contained too much information, most of which went beyond the scope of the Step 1. In terms of studying for the Step 1, this "wastes" precious time and brain space. Pathoma provided a concise and extremely high-yield overview of the most prominent pathologies, a good number of which are not covered adequately or at all in FA. I did not use Pathoma's videos at all, only the book. After going through a system in FA, I immediately went through the corresponding section in Pathoma. This allowed me to go through Pathoma rapidly, highlighting only those things that I noticed were not mentioned in FA. As a result, when reviewing Pathoma again later, I was able to look only at the highlighted portions, saving me the time that would have otherwise been spent on reading redundant information already mentioned in FA.

BRS Physiology was an absolute must as well. In addition to providing a solid foundation for understanding the information in FA, BRS also contains many basic, nitty-gritty concepts and mechanisms that are very testable (which you will not find in FA).

I felt that the Kaplan QBank often went beyond the scope of the Step 1. UWorld was by far more representative and high yield. I do not think you need the Kaplan Qbank to score well, but you cannot compromise on your UWorld questions. I was scoring between 85-90% on my UWorld Qbank mixed blocks. I learned an incredible amount from reviewing the answer choices of both my wrong and my right questions. However, it was easy to lose track of time and spend about 5 hours reviewing each block, which is not efficient or practical. I developed a mechanism of separating questions into two categories. If I was completely clueless approaching a question, I would read all of the answer choices in depth. If I was somewhat familiar with the question, I would scan (not read) through the answer choices, slowing down to a reading pace only when I caught something that seemed unfamiliar. I would then use my cursor to highlight those facts that were new to me. Then, I would write down the corresponding block and question number (i.e. block 24-question 6) in the relevant section/system in my FA, which allowed me to revisit the highlighted text when I was reviewing my FA. Beware: If you don't do this and instead write down the question ID, when you use the search question ID function, the question that turns up will not have your highlighted text. This helped me in two ways: 1) the new information was packaged in its appropriate section in the appropriate context in FA. If I did not do this, and instead chose to later review the questions in the order that they are presented in the blocks (and out of context), it would be harder for me to memorize the facts, and 2) I wrote down the block-question number rather than annotating my FA because this saved me the enormous amount of time that would have otherwise been spent on copying endless lines of text and complicated figures from UWorld into my FA, which is also not allowed 😛. Using this system, I was able to review each block of 46 questions in 2 hours.

I bought but did not use Lippincott's Microcards. I felt the combination of FA and UWorld covered microbio adequately. I bought and tried the Lange pharm cards, which were minimally helpful. Again, I felt FA and UWorld covered pharm very, very well. I did not see anything in the pharm cards that wasn't mentioned in FA or UWorld that was high yield. For instance, my understanding of the anti-arrhythmic drugs came primarily from three specific UWorld questions, which did a phenomenal job in explaining the mechanisms and side-effects, even comparing and contrasting the different classes.

I visited the testing area the day prior to my exam to test the travel time and gauge the surrounding noise level. I did not take a practice exam at the testing center.

As a side note, most of my preparation came specifically from my studying for the Step 1, not from my school's curriculum. To be sure, my school does a wonderful job in preparing its students for the Step 1. However, as mentioned earlier, I tend to forget facts rapidly, and as such, I retained little from what I learned during first and second year. This is my curse. When I reviewed FA, it felt like I was relearning everything. You have to trust me on this. I mention this to give more credit to the resources that I mentioned.

Once again, to those of you who are preparing for the exam or will be preparing for the exam, I wish you all the best of luck. It is a long and trying road, but in the end, it is well worth it. I would be happy to answer any questions via pm or this thread.

One last tip, which for most is a game-changer: The actual exam incorporates questions and answer choices that are extremely verbose with many red herrings, in what seems to be an attempt to deplete your time. The time crunch you will experience is significantly greater than any NBME practice test, Kaplan QBank, or UWorld QBank. As such, it is best to practice scanning the last two sentences of the question first in an attempt to identify the actual question, and then to skim the answer choices. This should take no longer than 10-15 seconds. This allows you to focus appropriately while reading the question. Practice this strategy on your qbank blocks. You will find that it is extremely effective at conserving time.

This. 👍
 
Your baseline last Fall was 205? 😱

More like early winter. We had covered an organ system or two by that point. Also, the CBSE is nothing like NBMEs or the USMLE.

that was useful, thanks!
How much time did you invest on 1 UWorld block on average?

I was able to do 1 block a day probably on average while doing schoolwork during April and May. On the weekends I would do maybe 2 blocks a day.

I usually spent 30 minutes taking the block and about two hours to three hours reviewing it. Depends on how many I got wrong; fewer wrong means faster, more wrong means slower.
 
To all of those preparing for the exam, I wish you the best of luck. Keep up the good work!

I scored a 267 on my test on July 12, 2013. I received the results two days ago on July 31, 2013.

My preparation in brief:

I went through FA six times, supplemented with Pathoma and BRS Physiology. I had originally planned to go through the entirety of both the Kaplan and UWorld Qbanks, but ended up only finishing 90% of UWorld and 25% of Kaplan. I scored a 650 (257) on the NBME 15 practice exam two weeks prior to my actual test. This was the only practice test that I used.

More in depth:

Unfortunately, it took me six passes to memorize FA to the extent that I considered adequate. I think for many other people it may take fewer passes, but I forget things rapidly, especially facts that require brute force memorization, such as biochemical pathways. Since FA is the core of Step 1 prep, I figured the time spent would pay off. This is absolutely true in retrospect.

Pathoma was essential and complemented FA nicely. I started out using Goljan's Rapid Review Pathology, but soon realized that the book contained too much information, most of which went beyond the scope of the Step 1. In terms of studying for the Step 1, this "wastes" precious time and brain space. Pathoma provided a concise and extremely high-yield overview of the most prominent pathologies, a good number of which are not covered adequately or at all in FA. I did not use Pathoma's videos at all, only the book. After going through a system in FA, I immediately went through the corresponding section in Pathoma. This allowed me to go through Pathoma rapidly, highlighting only those things that I noticed were not mentioned in FA. As a result, when reviewing Pathoma again later, I was able to look only at the highlighted portions, saving me the time that would have otherwise been spent on reading redundant information already mentioned in FA.

BRS Physiology was an absolute must as well. In addition to providing a solid foundation for understanding the information in FA, BRS also contains many basic, nitty-gritty concepts and mechanisms that are very testable (which you will not find in FA).

I felt that the Kaplan QBank often went beyond the scope of the Step 1. UWorld was by far more representative and high yield. I do not think you need the Kaplan Qbank to score well, but you cannot compromise on your UWorld questions. I was scoring between 85-90% on my UWorld Qbank mixed blocks. I learned an incredible amount from reviewing the answer choices of both my wrong and my right questions. However, it was easy to lose track of time and spend about 5 hours reviewing each block, which is not efficient or practical. I developed a mechanism of separating questions into two categories. If I was completely clueless approaching a question, I would read all of the answer choices in depth. If I was somewhat familiar with the question, I would scan (not read) through the answer choices, slowing down to a reading pace only when I caught something that seemed unfamiliar. I would then use my cursor to highlight those facts that were new to me. Then, I would write down the corresponding block and question number (i.e. block 24-question 6) in the relevant section/system in my FA, which allowed me to revisit the highlighted text when I was reviewing my FA. Beware: If you don't do this and instead write down the question ID, when you use the search question ID function, the question that turns up will not have your highlighted text. This helped me in two ways: 1) the new information was packaged in its appropriate section in the appropriate context in FA. If I did not do this, and instead chose to later review the questions in the order that they are presented in the blocks (and out of context), it would be harder for me to memorize the facts, and 2) I wrote down the block-question number rather than annotating my FA because this saved me the enormous amount of time that would have otherwise been spent on copying endless lines of text and complicated figures from UWorld into my FA, which is also not allowed 😛. Using this system, I was able to review each block of 46 questions in 2 hours.

I bought but did not use Lippincott's Microcards. I felt the combination of FA and UWorld covered microbio adequately. I bought and tried the Lange pharm cards, which were minimally helpful. Again, I felt FA and UWorld covered pharm very, very well. I did not see anything in the pharm cards that wasn't mentioned in FA or UWorld that was high yield. For instance, my understanding of the anti-arrhythmic drugs came primarily from three specific UWorld questions, which did a phenomenal job in explaining the mechanisms and side-effects, even comparing and contrasting the different classes.

I visited the testing area the day prior to my exam to test the travel time and gauge the surrounding noise level. I did not take a practice exam at the testing center.

As a side note, most of my preparation came specifically from my studying for the Step 1, not from my school's curriculum. To be sure, my school does a wonderful job in preparing its students for the Step 1. However, as mentioned earlier, I tend to forget facts rapidly, and as such, I retained little from what I learned during first and second year. This is my curse. When I reviewed FA, it felt like I was relearning everything. You have to trust me on this. I mention this to give more credit to the resources that I mentioned.

Once again, to those of you who are preparing for the exam or will be preparing for the exam, I wish you all the best of luck. It is a long and trying road, but in the end, it is well worth it. I would be happy to answer any questions via pm or this thread.

One last tip, which for most is a game-changer: The actual exam incorporates questions and answer choices that are extremely verbose with many red herrings, in what seems to be an attempt to deplete your time. The time crunch you will experience is significantly greater than any NBME practice test, Kaplan QBank, or UWorld QBank. As such, it is best to practice scanning the last two sentences of the question first in an attempt to identify the actual question, and then to skim the answer choices. This should take no longer than 10-15 seconds. This allows you to focus appropriately while reading the question. Practice this strategy on your qbank blocks. You will find that it is extremely effective at conserving time.

Thanks.
I kinda have the same problem, I forget facts quickly.
But I have some other abilities to compensate, for ex, by the end of my preparation I'll be able to review FA cover to cover in a single day.
I will review FA, Pathoma, UW notes in the last week before the exam.

This really highlights the fact that people DO have different styles, ways or approaches of studying.
Many of my friends don't need to review what they've studied 10 days before an exam.
While me and some other friends need to review everything we've studied just the day before the exam.

I don't think step 1 will be any different, except that I'm dedicating a lot more time to make my final week's review shorter and more solid with no surprising forgotten information lol.
 
Longtime lurker, used this thread heavily to help guide my studying and now looking to help others. I'm a pretty average medical student (full disclosure: my undergrad was in engineering at a "decent" school in the northeast). I had mostly Bs, an A and 2 Cs first year (biochem as our first class owned me for 8 weeks….). Second year mostly Bs and As because I worked my butt off. Step 1 really is like training for a marathon (I've done both) and you really get out of it what you put into it. This is way different from the MCAT. My goal was to break 240, as that seems to be the cutoff for most things and I just wanted to keep my options open (look at my username and you can prob guess what I'm going to go for).

Here are my practice exams and then I'll detail my method:

NBME 7 (12 wks out) – 205
NBME 13 (7 wks out) – 221
NBME 15 (school-administered, 4 wks out) – 235
UWSA 1 (2 wks out) – 248
UWSA 2 (1 wk out) – 257

Real Deal: 245 (and wicked stoked)

Method:

Pathoma - buy it, this is non-optional. Go through it 2nd year and know this book. It easily increased my score 10-15 points.

Goljan – mostly optional, but he does have a few gems where he makes connections and you go, "ohhh. So that's why that does that!" I also run/exercise a lot to stay sane and Goljan was my friend during these times so I could feel useful and not psych myself out for taking an hour "break". I remember 3 or 4 questions from my test that as I was reading them I heard Dr. Goljan saying the answer. Also, Goljanoids (what he calls his grandkids) is now a term I still use.

THE MOST IMPORTANT RESOURCE FOR STEP 1: First Aid, First Aid, First Aid, First Aid (one for each time I read it cover-to-cover). I ended up having a Kinko's cut the binding off of mine and spiral binding it. This made it great for folding in half, being able to writing deep into the margins, and overall was an awesome thing to do in hindsight. I highly recommend it.

I read somewhere on orthogate or SDN that if you know First Aid, you will do well on this test, and I am a good example of that. Know it like the back of your hand; you don't have to memorize it, and for me it took until the 3rd pass to start really having information sink in to the point where I could tell you on which pages diseases and concepts are discussed (I'm a visual learner). I annotated my first aid every pass through, and if I found myself wanting to write something down that was already written down, I'd write it down again anyways so it would stick.

Note: I worked my tail off first and second year; took me a while to learn how to learn in medical school. This test really is 90% "second year material" with some anatomy and phys thrown in as pathology-based questions. For those just starting second year: work. your. tail. off. I'd say don't start studying for boards until within at least 6 months. Go ahead and read the section of first aid for the current block you are doing, but be mindful the edition will get updated in ~ january.

I laid out sections of First Aid into 18-26 page blocks using an excel spreadsheet, that let me get through the whole book in 26 days reading just 1-1.5 hrs per day, on top of normal class studying. I am un-medicated and have a bit of ADD, so being able to see the end of my reading helped me focus for an hour and get it done.

-February-

1st Pass through FA, then NBME 7 at the beginning of March for a baseline and to help me identify things I needed to do better on (which at this point was everything). IMHO, the extended feedback is a waste of time because you don't get a lot for the extra $10 bucks (that's two beers!) and have to sort through loads of posts on USMLE forums with bad English to maybe get an answer that is possibly correct. Instead, what I did for the second two was write down 4-5 words on the topic of a question I wasn't totally sure about DURING the exam. For each 200 question NBME (Form 13 and 15) this was around 60-70 topics. I then would reference these lists while I was reading through FA or Pathoma or UWorld or Pharm and review them.

A lot of this test is about identifying tidbits of information you are unsure of, and hammering them home during multiple review sessions and readings through of first aid.

NBME 7  205 (hmmm… well at least I haven't started really studying yet).

-March-

2nd pass through FA, while starting to do blocks of Kaplan questions in the evening. I bought a three-month subscription to UWorld and ended up stopping after four blocks because I realized it was a better learning tool if used closer to the exam thanks to some posts on Orthogate and SDN (my first four scores were 62, 50, 54, and 64, for those interested). Our spring break was last week in march, and TBH I had planned to read first aid fully in one week. This did not happen and I ended up taking the whole week off (after finishing my second pass through FA) and taking an NBME at the end of spring break. This was form 13, I scored a 221, and starting to realize that something was working. I was about 50% through Kaplan at this point. It is important to use Math as your friend. If you have 1200 questions in a Qbank left, figure out how long it will take you to finish it doing X questions a day and use that to help you plan. Proper planning is so immensely important to help lay out study schedules. If you are not organized, get organized; or PM me and I can send you my schedule. It is basically one giant Excel spreadsheet.

Also, I bought a two month subscription to Rx because I wanted more questions than just Kaplan. Rx is awesome if you are hammering First Aid because, as hundreds of other people have already stated, it really does just act like flashcards for FA. After all was said and done I ended up doing around 1000 questions from Rx (blocks of 10-25 add up real fast if you do 1-2 of each/day for two months). Kaplan is nice, but some of their questions are super-duper nitpicky.

Form 13  221 (holy crap I think I might be able to hit this crazy 240 score everyone is talking about….)

-April-

I took Form 13 on a Saturday at the end of March, so took that afternoon and Sunday completely off before our last block of 2nd year. Mentally prepare yourself for no long breaks for the next two months (longer than an afternoon after taking a practice test or final), and don't let yourself get jealous of friends on vacation, family members, etc. Turn off facebook if you have to (I did, and it helped a lot). April for us was only "three weeks long" because we had two weeks of final exams the last week in April/First week in May. I used a compressed FA schedule (in 21 days) so was reading around 26-28 pages/day but as I said earlier, your third pass through you start picking things up really well and being able to read a bit faster. Reminder for those like me and who don't like reviewing things you are comfortable with, DO NOT SKIM OVER A PAGE and call it "reading". Read every single word and if you are distracted, then just look at the pictures. Let your curiosity get the better of you if a pretty picture is somewhere on the page. I read about half the book "backwards" where I'd see the picture, read the accompanying text and end up getting drawn into the page. Yeah it's kinda weird, but it worked for me.

If you have finals (ours were NBME shelf exams in Micro/Immuno, Path, Pharm, and a hand-wavy approach to clinical diagnosis final), dedicate yourself to those subjects for four days.

Micro: I went through the FA Micro/Immuno sections twice, half the first day, half the second day, repeat that 3rd and 4th days, and also did the entire Rapid Review Micro/Immuno (Goljan series) qbank in those four days (it's around 125-150 q's/day but doable). Yes you will be working 14 hour days, but after that I didn't miss more than a handful of micro questions in all of UWorld and rocked the micro section of Step.

Path: this is where pathoma comes in handy. I went through all of pathoma in 4 days, and it was kind of painful and didn't really feel like it helped with the Pathology shelf, but it definitely helped me kick butt in Uworld. Sattar does an awesome job at integrating things, making seemingly complicated groups of cancers (i.e. breast, germ cell, etc.) differentiable, and so on.

Pharm: I used the Kaplan/Lionel Raymond Pharmacology videos, had a C in pharmacology before the shelf, and aced the shelf using these videos. I swear by them and they made me love Pharmacology. I wish I had been using them all year. I also rocked the pharm section of step because of them. If you can get your hands on his Pharm videos they are gold (comparable or better to Goljan path). Also, he is absolutely hilarious, and makes jokes about "snow in Miami" and certain controlled substances…..

Phys – no final but it's part of the big 3; I took a computational physiology course in grad school, and this plus med school made my phys kung fu strong. I didn't use BRS phys and First Aid was plenty good. I will say:
- Practice drawing the Pulmonary function test diagram. Draw one of these on your sheet before you start your test.
- Know all your renal equations (ERPF, RPF, RBF, GFR, etc.). Write them down on your sheet before you start your test. It will help lighten the mental load.
- Know the Hb dissociation curve cold
- For most everything else, study for understanding, NOT for memorization.

Side note – I am way better at problem solving and am mediocre at rote memorization; most of the resources I used/liked aside from First Aid stressed conceptual/abstract understanding of things rather than just listing facts. This is what Step 1 is all about; there are a few obligate straight recall questions, but a majority of the test is questions requiring you to think through a diagnosis. These are the 2-3 step questions everyone talks about.

After finals, we had several days to study for a school-administered NBME, which was the latest one released (form 15) this year. I basically ignored studying for it and started studying for step 1 with DIT (huge waste of time and $$$; see below). I started doing one block of UWorld every other day mid-way through our final exam period, and after finals were over did 1 block of UWorld every day.

-May- (Last month)

I spent the first week of dedicated board studying doing DIT, reading first aid, and doing UWorld before our school-administered NBME. My daily schedule was something like: wake up at 6-7, eat breakfast, and start doing DIT by 8. I'd do 5-6 lectures between 8 and lunch, then try to be back to doing DIT by 1-2. I'd then do another 6 lectures and stop DIT for the day around 5. Read my 26 pages of FA (not the same ones they covered in DIT that day) and then do a block of UWorld and review the questions, then bed by 10. The NBME CBSSA our school bought was the 8th day after my first week of studying, and that afternoon I came home and did two blocks of UWorld, then reviewed them. This was 3 weeks out:

Three weeks out:

Form 15  235 (almost there….)
Two blocks of UWorld after Form 15  74% and 68%. After the 68% I decided I wasn't going to do three, went for a run and then watched a movie with my wife.

The next three weeks consisted of the same daily schedule as above, with no breaks except for an hour each day when I would run (some days) and eat lunch. The days I took a break was after a self-assessment. I guess it's kind of sad if I said I finished two seasons of family guy while studying for step, but it kept me sane. I took UWSA 1 two weeks out, following by two UWorld blocks. This took me the rest of the day to review:

UWSA 1 – 248 (84%, 62%, 76%, 76%) (break between 2, 3, and 4th)
Two blocks of UWorld – 78% and 74%. (no break)

This was really important for me because I got a 62% on the second block of Uworld and was like, "dafuq?" I realized that I needed to be conscious of this fact the next time I took a self-assessment, so made sure to be more awake for the second one. This is the power of doing practice tests. If you track your percentage on each block you can identify when/where it would be most advantageous for your exam. I ended up taking a break between blocks 1 and 2 on UWSA 2 and did much better on the second block.

Continued doing DIT + FA + UWorld, reading 26-30 pages of First Aid now and plogging through DIT. I was about 70% done with UWorld 2 weeks out from my test, and finished DIT with 6 days to go. A week before my exam I took UWSA2 and got a 257, followed by two blocks of UWorld.

UWSA 2 – 257 (86%, 76%, 74%, 76%)
UW 2 blocks – 78%, 76%

Taking a break after every block definitely made it easier, and even if I didn't feel like taking one I ended up feeling better after a snack and some air squats.

Last week – kind of just treat water and keep sane. I flipped through sections of First Aid, and did 3-5 blocks of Uworld every day. This really helped me because I started freaking out about little things I didn't know. This will happen and it does to everyone and you will be fine. Read that again: you will freak out about little things, but it happens to everyone and YOU WILL BE FINE. I had about 600 questions in UWorld left 4 days before my exam and just did blocks of 46 all day until the end of those 4 days. The last day I went through the last 17 pages of Uworld with the super-dense summaries of word associations, and then put the book down and stopped studying at 5 PM on a Sunday. My wife and I went to dinner, watched a movie and then went to bed.

The day before, I did nothing until we got to our hotel (she was also taking it). I broke down and fast-read the biochem section because I wanted those diseases to be fresh. I ended up not having a single biochem question on anything I read that evening (-_-). We went to a Texas Road House and drank a Sam Adams over a full rack of ribs and realized that this adventure was finally over. For those of you who do long-distance races, it felt kind of like the night before a marathon.

Test day – breakfast at Panera/Starbucks. I took a break after every section save between blocks 4-5. I'd eat a granola bar, drink some water, and go back in. Don't hang out and talk to other test-takers, just eat your glucose and jump back in the ring. I used the bathroom between blocks 1-2, 3-4, and 6-7. Do it even if you don't feel like you have to. Remember kids, you have voluntary control over your external urethral sphincter! Block 3 I almost pissed myself and that probably hurt my score. :laugh:

For my last block I knew from my practice tests that I had been in "screw this I want to be done" mode, so I mentally prepped myself during block 6 to focus on the next one until the end. This was a great strategy in hindsight and just for fun I took the whole time on the last block reviewing final questions and making sure I was happy with it.

Walking out of the test center I couldn't recall hardly anything in the long-term, but I can tell you at that point I felt like just passing or getting 200+ would be fine with me. This fluctuated and mostly I spent the next 35 days waiting for my score probably slightly bipolar with regards to step 1. I think we call this defense mechanism splitting ;-).

Predictions - The UWSAs over-predicted my score, but my UWorld percentage was spot on.

Practice test averages – 221 + 235 + 248 + 257 = 240
UWorld %-age – 70% (90% of this was blocks of 46, the other 10% were shorter blocks of 25 I'd do just to do some questions and were easier/quicker to review). 70*2.3 + 84 = 245.
Step 1 – 245.

PM me with questions and I hope this helps the next round of students. It is possible to rock step 1 (by all standards) with average grades if you study hard, study smart, and keep an even keel. I also owe a big thank you to everyone else on this thread because lurking on here and reading your guys' discussions helped me to excel.
 
i hate how i cant relate to anyone's base score.. i scored a crappy 186 on nbme 11 8 weeks ago.. with 3 weeks left i'm so anxious to take the next nbme ..anyone go through anything similar?
 
i hate how i cant relate to anyone's base score.. i scored a crappy 186 on nbme 11 8 weeks ago.. with 3 weeks left i'm so anxious to take the next nbme ..anyone go through anything similar?

Never worry about what everyone's doing or scoring... just focus on your preparation and do what you need to do to score at your highest potential... so what if some SDNer scores 295.7 on step1 - it don't mean shyt. My 1st score during prep score was 190 (and that's after studying almost 2wks @ 14-18hrs per day) ..... ended with significantly higher than that.

You got 3wks left; how do you feel about ur studying thus far? have you identified your weak subjects? what's your plan to rectify it.... take an NBME or two NBMEs if you don't know what they are. Good luck studying.
 
i hate how i cant relate to anyone's base score.. i scored a crappy 186 on nbme 11 8 weeks ago.. with 3 weeks left i'm so anxious to take the next nbme ..anyone go through anything similar?

My base was the same. I posted my scores back in March/April. You're not the only one. Keep at it.
 
Never worry about what everyone's doing or scoring... just focus on your preparation and do what you need to do to score at your highest potential... so what if some SDNer scores 295.7 on step1 - it don't mean shyt. My 1st score during prep score was 190 (and that's after studying almost 2wks @ 14-18hrs per day) ..... ended with significantly higher than that.

You got 3wks left; how do you feel about ur studying thus far? have you identified your weak subjects? what's your plan to rectify it.... take an NBME or two NBMEs if you don't know what they are. Good luck studying.

After that NBME redid all the incorrects on Uworld and went through FA properly.. taking the next nbme tmrw but seriously feel like im still struggling

My base was the same. I posted my scores back in March/April. You're not the only one. Keep at it.

I know CDI i took your advice of going through FA more thoroughly
 
I am an IMG
Graduation year 2008
Failed Step 1 in 2012 183/74
studied for another 8 months
Uworld self assessments 247 and 260 month before exam
nbme 2 weeks before 228

Got 242 on real exam !!!

Best book - Goljan Pathology, very helpful
also read High-yelds: anatomy, embriology, behavioral sience
old Kaplan notes(2009)
Medical microbiology, The big picture
First Aid -last three weeks
Uworld Qbank 4 months 2 times, second time "incorrect" only

On exam
in a test blocks I was marking 5-15 questions, finished block in 45 minutes;
rest of the time - run through marked questions
Exam was as hard as Uworld
 
I am an IMG
Graduation year 2008
Failed Step 1 in 2012 183/74
studied for another 8 months
Uworld self assessments 247 and 260 month before exam
nbme 2 weeks before 228

Got 242 on real exam !!!

Best book - Goljan Pathology, very helpful
also read High-yelds: anatomy, embriology, behavioral sience
old Kaplan notes(2009)
Medical microbiology, The big picture
First Aid -last three weeks
Uworld Qbank 4 months 2 times, second time "incorrect" only

On exam
in a test blocks I was marking 5-15 questions, finished block in 45 minutes;
rest of the time - run through marked questions
Exam was as hard as Uworld

Wow. Nice turnaround! Congrats.
 
I am an IMG
Graduation year 2008
Failed Step 1 in 2012 183/74
studied for another 8 months
Uworld self assessments 247 and 260 month before exam
nbme 2 weeks before 228

Got 242 on real exam !!!

Best book - Goljan Pathology, very helpful
also read High-yelds: anatomy, embriology, behavioral sience
old Kaplan notes(2009)
Medical microbiology, The big picture
First Aid -last three weeks
Uworld Qbank 4 months 2 times, second time "incorrect" only

On exam
in a test blocks I was marking 5-15 questions, finished block in 45 minutes;
rest of the time - run through marked questions
Exam was as hard as Uworld


Congratulations!
 
I am an IMG
Graduation year 2008
Failed Step 1 in 2012 183/74
studied for another 8 months
Uworld self assessments 247 and 260 month before exam
nbme 2 weeks before 228

Got 242 on real exam !!!

Best book - Goljan Pathology, very helpful
also read High-yelds: anatomy, embriology, behavioral sience
old Kaplan notes(2009)
Medical microbiology, The big picture
First Aid -last three weeks
Uworld Qbank 4 months 2 times, second time "incorrect" only

On exam
in a test blocks I was marking 5-15 questions, finished block in 45 minutes;
rest of the time - run through marked questions
Exam was as hard as Uworld

Brilliant

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
 
I am an IMG
Graduation year 2008
Failed Step 1 in 2012 183/74
studied for another 8 months
Uworld self assessments 247 and 260 month before exam
nbme 2 weeks before 228

Got 242 on real exam !!!

Best book - Goljan Pathology, very helpful
also read High-yelds: anatomy, embriology, behavioral sience
old Kaplan notes(2009)
Medical microbiology, The big picture
First Aid -last three weeks
Uworld Qbank 4 months 2 times, second time "incorrect" only

On exam
in a test blocks I was marking 5-15 questions, finished block in 45 minutes;
rest of the time - run through marked questions
Exam was as hard as Uworld

congrats on your score
 
Does anyone who wrote on July 19 know if we are getting scores back today?

I took on the 18th and just got texted mine by school faculty, NBME email said it would be in at 10 am EST. Assume yours would be in too then

Edit: just released online
 
Last edited:
256. Very happy with it. I'll do a write up later today or tomorrow probably

Ok, so... I did very well during classes - honored everything except anatomy, histo, and derm. My initial goals coming into dedicated were 240+ with dream target of 250+ (I'm at a US allo, and I really think there are only maybe a dozen residencies across the country with a cutoff higher than 250, and I'm leaning toward finding a strong Med/Peds program regardless). After my practice tests, I bumped my goals up to 250+ with dream target of 260+. Going into a gap year to finish a MPH, so I initially scheduled 8 weeks of dedicated prep, but ended up using 9. This was too much time - 5-6 weeks is a good sweet spot in retrospect. I was way burned out toward the end (and I have a VERY high tolerance to putting in long hours for a long time), and I don't think the time particularly helped (even though I learned a lot more). I'll divide this into what I did to prep, opinions on the test, my opinion on the prep materials, and what I would do differently if I could redo it. Feel free to ask any Q's.

Prep -
---Gunnertraining/Firecracker - From second semester of first year to early second semester second year. Got through about 75% of it.

---Pathoma - Watched the videos twice second year, and I annotated everything in the videos into the book during my second pass (never actually reread the book though). These first two passes, had the book open and followed along while I watched. Made 3 more passes during dedicated, just watching the videos.

---BRS Phys - Read during first semester second year before corresponding path system.

---First Aid - Didn't open it until the end of second year. At the start of my last block of second year, I pushed school aside for 2 weeks and made a pass. During dedicated, I made two more passes.

---Kaplan videos - During that same time I made my first pass of FA, I also watched Kaplan pharm and behavioral.

---Question banks - Did about 60% of Qbank (systems based) during first semester of second year (made around 80% iirc). Did about 11% of Rx (random) during second semester of second year (also around 80% iirc). Did all of UW (random, only 1 pass) during dedicated (started at 83%, last 10 blocks at 87%). Later did a couple blocks of UW incorrects, but didn't make time to get through them all. Extensively annotated FA with UW explanations.

---Practice tests - Free 150 (first day of dedicated, 9 weeks before test; 91%). NBME 7 (3 weeks into dedicated, 6 weeks before test, 264). I took UWSA 1 and 2 5 weeks into dedicated, 4 weeks before test (both 265+, 87% and 91% respectively). NBME's 11 and 12 (7 weeks into dedicated, 2 weeks before test, 252 and 261 respectively).

Test -
I consider myself a pretty decent test taker, and I don't really stress about tests, and that was true for step too. However, I do feel that the test played to my weaknesses a bit (though I think some of these areas would be common weaknesses for other students too). If I divided the test questions into categories (not based on how hard they were to me, but in general - say based on what percent of takers would get them right), I would say it was
  • 40% Easy - Buzzwords everywhere, classic presentations, primary or secondary questions
  • 20% Medium - Required a little bit of thinking, but fair and well phrased, secondary or tertiary questions
  • 20% Hard - Difficult either d/t complex pathophys or required knowledge of minutiae, but fair and well phrased, secondary or tertiary questions
  • 20% Ambiguous - These questions may have been intended as medium or hard Q's, but there was something about them that made them more difficult than they should have been to answer. I find it hard to explain... There was just something strange about them
I felt iffy about ~10 questions/block on average. Most of the Q's I missed I feel probably fell into either a known weakness (identifying cranial nerves on gross specimen, pelvic anatomy, embryo, etc.), minutiae, or ambiguous question category. The minutiae and ambiguous questions, I don't feel there is any way to prepare for (short of pulling a Phloston year), but I'll address that below. I don't usually remember questions on tests, but anatomy stood out to me. I had 1 upper limb question (and it was a hard one), 10 questions related to pelvic anatomy, a couple lower limb Q's, and brain stem gross pictures (not cross sections). The test felt relatively light on pharm and path (but again, only in the relative sense - it was still heavily tested). Micro was half gimmes and half parasites (has always been a weakness. Had to identify one picture of a parasite). After the test, I thought I wouldn't have been surprised by any scores in the 235-255 range. Was pretty confident I didn't murder it (260+), but was also pretty confident I still did respectably (though a 20 point range there as how I did was fairly dependent on how well I performed on the ones I wasn't sure on).

Opinion on prep materials used -
---Gunnertraining/Firecracker - It IS helpful, but I would NOT recommend it. Spaced repetition is THE way to learn information long term. Unfortunately, the GT leadership seems focused on expanding their product in a way that will allow them to more successfully market their product rather than improve the quality of what they offer. GT had a fairly unique niche in SRS step 1 prep, but they're expending their efforts on making step 2 material and board style questions when there are several issues with what they currently offer for step 1 prep. Until they make a focused effort on making a genuine high yield option and improving their question base (eliminating MCQ's, eliminating board style Q's, eliminating errata, etc.), I would not recommend using it (and they unfortunately do not appear to be heading in the correct direction - they previously had staff in the GT thread that were very responsive to feedback, but they've been yanked out by higher ups)

---Question banks - UWorld is gold, but it takes forever to do properly. Necessity in prep. Kaplan vs Rx - Rx is superior. The cutouts of FA in Rx are gold. I would recommend Rx, but not Qbank.

---Pathoma - Wonderful resource. Quick and easy to get through. I've heard people say Pathoma doesn't have enough detail, and I disagree - too much detail if anything (with the exception of missing hemodynamics and nutrition chapters). I think you need a dedicated path resource, and this is a great one. Didn't try Goljan enough to fairly compare the two

---BRS Phys - Great book. Only use it during dedicated if phys is a notable weakness. Too low yield otherwise. Recommend a pass during second year though.

---Kaplan Videos - I felt both pharm and behavioral were worth the time invested, but not something I would do during dedicated (though I did rewatch antiarrhythmics during dedicated).

---First Aid - I hate bullet points. HATE. Doesn't matter. Make the time for it. FA is a necessity.

---Practice tests - NBME's: Not sure how I feel about the utility of these honestly. I think they're most useful as a tool to predict your score. The lack of quality explanations makes them meh for actually learning. UWSA's: Worthwhile as a learning tool.

How I'd prepare if I did it again -
I think people get obsessed with learning more more more more, including all the random minutiae they can pick up. During my last week of prep, I made a final pass through pathoma and first aid (and UW annotations). During this, I made a study guide (that I didn't end up finishing or using) of bullet point facts I wasn't 100% on. If I had finished the study guide, it would have been ~60 or 70 pages of 8 point font, 3 columns per page. This is after having done very well in classes and having taken more time than most people do for step prep. The point I'm trying to make here is that there is a sickening amount of high yield information - too much for (almost) anyone to truly know it all perfectly. That means all the time you spend learning random low yield minutiae is time wasted that could have gone toward learning high yield things. There will be random minutiae on your test. It won't be stuff that's in FA, UW, or pathoma/Goljan. But it's the vast minority of the test. Lock up those resources as best you can, and you'll lock up a respectable score. That said, if I prepped again -

  • Do well in classes. I was overly neurotic about learning everything and was in the 90-92+% range on tests and whatnot, but I really think if you're hovering around an 85%, you're learning plenty to secure yourself a solid knowledge base for dedicated time and step.
  • I would make a pass of FA material with corresponding course material. Just read through the relevant sections and become acquainted with the text.
  • Do Rx systems based with classes.
  • Pathoma - watch it before relevant lectures, and watch it twice more later on (with at least one of those later passes being during dedicated).
  • Make a concentrated pass of FA during christmas break of second year
  • UW - timed tutor, starting during second semester second year, knocking out whatever you can before dedicated. Ideally, I think it would be worthwhile to redo your incorrects
  • FA - 1-2 more passes during dedicated
  • NBME's - thrown in when you feel you need a measure of where you are


That's all I can think to say offhand, but I'd be happy to input more if people have any Q's

Good luck to anyone still prepping
 

Attachments

  • Performance breakdown.JPG
    Performance breakdown.JPG
    66.9 KB · Views: 512
Last edited:
Test -
I consider myself a pretty decent test taker, and I don't really stress about tests, and that was true for step too. However, I do feel that the test played to my weaknesses a bit (though I think some of these areas would be common weaknesses for other students too). If I divided the test questions into categories (not based on how hard they were to me, but in general - say based on what percent of takers would get them right), I would say it was
  • 40% Easy - Buzzwords everywhere, classic presentations, primary or secondary questions
  • 20% Medium - Required a little bit of thinking, but fair and well phrased, secondary or tertiary questions
  • 20% Hard - Difficult either d/t complex pathophys or required knowledge of minutiae, but fair and well phrased, secondary or tertiary questions
  • 20% Ambiguous - These questions may have been intended as medium or hard Q's, but there was something about them that made them more difficult than they should have been to answer. I find it hard to explain... There was just something strange about them
I felt iffy about ~10 questions/block on average. Most of the Q's I missed I feel probably fell into either a known weakness (identifying cranial nerves on gross specimen, pelvic anatomy, embryo, etc.), minutiae, or ambiguous question category. The minutiae and ambiguous questions, I don't feel there is any way to prepare for (short of pulling a Phloston year), but I'll address that below. I don't usually remember questions on tests, but anatomy stood out to me. I had 1 upper limb question (and it was a hard one), 10 questions related to pelvic anatomy, a couple lower limb Q's, and brain stem gross pictures (not cross sections). The test felt relatively light on pharm and path (but again, only in the relative sense - it was still heavily tested). After the test, I thought I wouldn't have been surprised by any scores in the 235-255 range. Was pretty confident I didn't murder it (260+), but was also pretty confident I still did respectably (though a 20 point range there as how I did was fairly dependent on how well I performed on the ones I wasn't sure on).

That's all I can think to say offhand, but I'd be happy to input more if people have any Q's

Congratulations, loveoforganic2!! 🙂 That's amazing performance.

Nice write-up.
 
10 pelvic anatomy questions? Wow. And FA doesn't cover any of that.

Maybe one of them was answerable with FA information - it was a fairly easily identifiable pelvic structure they asked the embryo on. Three or four others were on penile innervation/blood supply. To be fair, I did end up starring anatomy, so while I didn't study the information, they must have been fairly deducible. My game plan for penile/vaginal anatomy has always been go with pudendal if the choice is available 😀

Edit: and a couple were lymphatics q's iirc
 
I took the exam on July 19 too..didn't get my score yesterday though. anyone else in that boat?
I think we get the results on the 4th wednesday AFTER the test(if its taken on a wed, i dont think that wed counts).. So u'll most probably get u'r score on 14th August.. Takes abt 3 to 4 weeks to get them.. I'm expecting my score on the same day too.. Gud luck.. Lets hope both of us did well.. 🙂
 
Last edited:
It sounds like the performance of other students is making you feel insecure 😉

Edit: just since there haven't been many of them on this thread so far, my class had a student with a 273 this year

Of course u would say that....its the cycle of oh if I complain about others being insecure then that makes me automatically insecure. I don't put my step score on here so that makes me too insecure to do so? I got a 260+ take it or leave it.
 
Replace "med students" in the above with "my colleagues and friends" and see if it sounds a little off to you.

I wish I could replace it with my colleagues and friends. But sadly that isn't the case at my school. Everyone is uber competitive and only looks out for themselves. Ppl throw others under the bus during clinicals to make themselves look better. I'm glad that at your school people are friendly and willing to work together and respect one another. But that isn't the case at my school. And I know someone's gonna say that I must go to a crappy school and I wish that was the case but it isn't. And it isn't just me that feel this way. It's an subjective experience for sure but if you meet some of them you'd understand better. And of course someone's gonna say that it's probably me and blah blah blah. It's like this isn't it? Anything u say is gonna get denied by someone else. So there really is no way to express how you feel on this forum. And just look at all the responses. Not one person was sympathetic or even said I'm sorry you feel this way but....all I got was a bunch of "there's something wrong with you" not that maybe you had a bad experience. Oh well end of posting for me. I know all that's gonna happen is another batch of crappy comments.
 
Top