Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
May the 5th

Aite, u really don't have enough time to be slothful. I heard good things about the biochem and micro sections of the Kaplan, physio as well. Biochem is a volatile subject. If u can get ur hands on the Kaplan videos and start very soon, u could have time to keep revising so that it sticks. Same applies to micro. Listening to the same concepts the second time will be beneficial. You will be able to retain and understand the information a lot more. Doing questions will also help tremendously.
May is around the corner, time to step! We gotta slay this exam, so chop chop.

All the best.
 
Critique my Step 1 Study Schedule -
Hey guys just wanted a quick Critique of my study scheduled for the Step 1 I'm taking in early July. Study Schedule is as follows
7 weeks of FA + Uworld Tutor mode (taking notes as I go) + Pathoma (second pass) + DIT 2013 (very passively when IM cooking or doing things where I can not study concurrently)+ Goljan Audio (passively and also second pass) +Goljan RR (Blue words only, very quickly annotating anything I dont know into FA) + Picmonic (I'm extremely visual so it cuts down the learning curve A LOT) . I will also be making Anki cards as I go on anything I feel even slightly shaky on.

After that I do straight Qs for 14 weeks (at about 1000 per week in real timed conditions so 322 Qs 3 days per week with review on other days) + FA/Uworld/Goljan audio Anki Flash cards (time it so I can get through the set about 5 weeks out) . I plan to hit Uworld 3.5x (Including the initial tutor mode and .5 for marked Qs when 2 - 3 weeks out) + USMLE RX 1.5 + Kaplan QBOOK + All NBME exams I can find, The only consistent correlation Ive found between Step 1 score and studying is doing more Qs (There are two US schools that actually did correlation studies and found the same). Once every 6 weeks I'll take a week out (no Qs that week) to re-review Pathoma+ FA.
Some things to keep in mind about me:
- I go to a foreign med school but Im a Straight A student (aside from 2 minor courses)
- I rarely get burned out, if there's something I want I can go all day to get it.

Please only people who have taken the step 1 already , preferably fairly high scorers as I'm going for a 250+.Thanks in advance guys just reading these SDN pages has been very helpful. Phloston seems to know more about the step than anyone so if he could comment Id really appreciate it.
 
Rx just got a sizable update... anybody see that email? How do you get the changes to pop up?

Whoops... Just read the "over the next few weeks part". I'll be finishing it over the next few weeks haha. That larger font can't come fast enough.
 
Critique my Step 1 Study Schedule -
Hey guys just wanted a quick Critique of my study scheduled for the Step 1 I'm taking in early July. Study Schedule is as follows
7 weeks of FA + Uworld Tutor mode (taking notes as I go) + Pathoma (second pass) + DIT 2013 (very passively when IM cooking or doing things where I can not study concurrently)+ Goljan Audio (passively and also second pass) +Goljan RR (Blue words only, very quickly annotating anything I dont know into FA) + Picmonic (I'm extremely visual so it cuts down the learning curve A LOT) . I will also be making Anki cards as I go on anything I feel even slightly shaky on.

After that I do straight Qs for 14 weeks (at about 1000 per week in real timed conditions so 322 Qs 3 days per week with review on other days) + FA/Uworld/Goljan audio Anki Flash cards (time it so I can get through the set about 5 weeks out) . I plan to hit Uworld 3.5x (Including the initial tutor mode and .5 for marked Qs when 2 - 3 weeks out) + USMLE RX 1.5 + Kaplan QBOOK + All NBME exams I can find, The only consistent correlation Ive found between Step 1 score and studying is doing more Qs (There are two US schools that actually did correlation studies and found the same). Once every 6 weeks I'll take a week out (no Qs that week) to re-review Pathoma+ FA.
Some things to keep in mind about me:
- I go to a foreign med school but Im a Straight A student (aside from 2 minor courses)
- I rarely get burned out, if there's something I want I can go all day to get it.

Please only people who have taken the step 1 already , preferably fairly high scorers as I'm going for a 250+.Thanks in advance guys just reading these SDN pages has been very helpful. Phloston seems to know more about the step than anyone so if he could comment Id really appreciate it.

I dont think you need to do UW 3.5x. No I havent taken the test.
 
Critique my Step 1 Study Schedule -
Hey guys just wanted a quick Critique of my study scheduled for the Step 1 I'm taking in early July. Study Schedule is as follows
7 weeks of FA + Uworld Tutor mode (taking notes as I go) + Pathoma (second pass) + DIT 2013 (very passively when IM cooking or doing things where I can not study concurrently)+ Goljan Audio (passively and also second pass) +Goljan RR (Blue words only, very quickly annotating anything I dont know into FA) + Picmonic (I'm extremely visual so it cuts down the learning curve A LOT) . I will also be making Anki cards as I go on anything I feel even slightly shaky on.

After that I do straight Qs for 14 weeks (at about 1000 per week in real timed conditions so 322 Qs 3 days per week with review on other days) + FA/Uworld/Goljan audio Anki Flash cards (time it so I can get through the set about 5 weeks out) . I plan to hit Uworld 3.5x (Including the initial tutor mode and .5 for marked Qs when 2 - 3 weeks out) + USMLE RX 1.5 + Kaplan QBOOK + All NBME exams I can find, The only consistent correlation Ive found between Step 1 score and studying is doing more Qs (There are two US schools that actually did correlation studies and found the same). Once every 6 weeks I'll take a week out (no Qs that week) to re-review Pathoma+ FA.
Some things to keep in mind about me:
- I go to a foreign med school but Im a Straight A student (aside from 2 minor courses)
- I rarely get burned out, if there's something I want I can go all day to get it.

Please only people who have taken the step 1 already , preferably fairly high scorers as I'm going for a 250+.Thanks in advance guys just reading these SDN pages has been very helpful. Phloston seems to know more about the step than anyone so if he could comment Id really appreciate it.

Haven't taken the exam, but why not do Kaplan Qbank instead of doing UW 3.5x and Rx 1.5x?
 
Haven't taken the exam, but why not do Kaplan Qbank instead of doing UW 3.5x and Rx 1.5x?
Kaplan is supposed to be filled with minutiae that is very low yield (which is why Ill do the book which is 1000 Qs taken form the Q bank.) IMO and from what Ive read Uworld is the highest yield resource there is for the Step 1 and I think 3.5x will guarantee I understand the mechanisms behind every Q. I've seen others recommend doing it multiple times as well.
 
Kaplan is supposed to be filled with minutiae that is very low yield (which is why Ill do the book which is 1000 Qs taken form the Q bank.) IMO and from what Ive read Uworld is the highest yield resource there is for the Step 1 and I think 3.5x will guarantee I understand the mechanisms behind every Q. I've seen others recommend doing it multiple times as well.

I was under the impression that knowing low yield minutiae is what differentiates the 260s from the 240-250s. Could be wrong though.
 
just wrote NMBE 13. I did well for 4weeks of studying [240+], I am 7 weeks out from the real deal. I found for this form, it was more conceptual vs. memorization. For the people who have taken the test, was this the case on the real test or was it more detail orientated/ equal amounts of both? Or is nmbe 13 just an easy one?
thanks!
 
just wrote NMBE 13. I did well for 4weeks of studying [240+], I am 7 weeks out from the real deal. I found for this form, it was more conceptual vs. memorization. For the people who have taken the test, was this the case on the real test or was it more detail orientated/ equal amounts of both? Or is nmbe 13 just an easy one?
thanks!

Someone's about brutalize that exam! Great score on the NBME.
 
just wrote NMBE 13. I did well for 4weeks of studying [240+], I am 7 weeks out from the real deal. I found for this form, it was more conceptual vs. memorization. For the people who have taken the test, was this the case on the real test or was it more detail orientated/ equal amounts of both? Or is nmbe 13 just an easy one?
thanks!

240+ after 4 weeks? Glad you won't be in the same pool of residency applicants as me 😉
 
I am taking the exam July 3rd. Do you think dedicating 3 days to Kaplan videos (biochem, micro/immuno) in late March during our spring break is worth it, or do you think it will all be forgotten by the time 7/3 comes around?
 
I am taking the exam July 3rd. Do you think dedicating 3 days to Kaplan videos (biochem, micro/immuno) in late March during our spring break is worth it, or do you think it will all be forgotten by the time 7/3 comes around?
youll probably forget it. By the way, how are you accessing Kaplan videos?
 
By the way, how are you accessing Kaplan videos?

My wife's school gives their students an online subscription + COMLEX workbook + qbank. Too bad it doesn't include Dr. Raymon's biochem lectures, which I heard are great. When do you think a good time is to watch those videos?
 
On average how long is it taking everyone to do 1 block of 46 Q's on Uworld, including going through all explanations?
 
Last edited:
On average how long is it taking everyone to do 1 block of 46 Q's on Uworld, including going through all explanations?

It takes me about 4 hours total. I think people commonly say you should be spending 2-3 hours reviewing for every hour of questions.

I've been making anki cards out of the facts I wasn't sure of, so I start everyday by getting caught up on my anki cards from the previous days, which takes about 1 hour. Then, taking the block is 1 hour, and it takes me about 2 hours to review and make the cards for that block.
 
It takes me about 4 hours total. I think people commonly say you should be spending 2-3 hours reviewing for every hour of questions.

I've been making anki cards out of the facts I wasn't sure of, so I start everyday by getting caught up on my anki cards from the previous days, which takes about 1 hour. Then, taking the block is 1 hour, and it takes me about 2 hours to review and make the cards for that block.
It takes me 3 hours, maybe 2.5
 
Kaplan is supposed to be filled with minutiae that is very low yield (which is why Ill do the book which is 1000 Qs taken form the Q bank.) IMO and from what Ive read Uworld is the highest yield resource there is for the Step 1 and I think 3.5x will guarantee I understand the mechanisms behind every Q. I've seen others recommend doing it multiple times as well.

Out of curiosity, I wonder how much of the effect might just be that you recognize a question you've already seen 3 times vs. gaining new understanding with each pass. This happens to me all the time w/ Firecracker. Either way, good luck.
 
I am taking the exam July 3rd. Do you think dedicating 3 days to Kaplan videos (biochem, micro/immuno) in late March during our spring break is worth it, or do you think it will all be forgotten by the time 7/3 comes around?

Unless you plan on staying awake for 3 days straight, dedicating 3 days to Kaplan biochem AND micro = waste of time.
I would suggest at least a week each for both.
 
just wrote NMBE 13. I did well for 4weeks of studying [240+], I am 7 weeks out from the real deal. I found for this form, it was more conceptual vs. memorization. For the people who have taken the test, was this the case on the real test or was it more detail orientated/ equal amounts of both? Or is nmbe 13 just an easy one?
thanks!

It's absolutely more conceptual. There was very little straight memorization.
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.

Awesome elaboration! Thank u for that.
Yo, u might be the first 270+ on this thread, based on ur uWorld and NBME scores. Congratulations!!!
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).
.

Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. .

How can we prepare ourselves for this kind of crap in the real deal while studying anatomy right now?
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.
1) congrats on being done
2) what was your strategy during the exam, on that 20-30% material that you have never seen before?
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.

Definitely looking forward to seeing your follow-up in a few weeks. Despite the questions you marked, I think you should find some comfort in the fact that if you were so well prepared, unless you had a complete brain fart (which is doesn't sound like), then in all likelihood most people who took the exam at the same time felt the same way or worse. By and large people do within a range of their NBMEs, and it's highly unlikely you did poorly. I'd even go as far as to say that it's probably very unlikely you scored anywhere below a 250.
 
I appreciate all your support, and I want to make sure everyone is as prepared as possible so keep any questions coming. I'll do my best within the limits the NBME imposes to answer them. Nasty surprises aren't good for anybody, not when we've all worked so hard just to get into med school :| (took me two rounds - not fun).

As for what to look at with anatomical structure names, I hate to say it but... Wikipedia is probably the best source for synonyms. The first few lines usually list alternative names. One artery that came up on my exam has multiple names, all on Wiki. My best advice? If you see a structure with an EPONYM, look up its alternative names. There was a moderately large movement among biologists a little while ago to rename all structures that contained someone's name - the boards seem to be following that advice to a degree (just to mess with us I'm sure 😉) If I were creating a Step 1 prep course now, I would include the statement, "Knowing alternative names for structures with eponyms is HIGH YIELD." Sorry, too much Pathoma.

On the 20-30% I had not seen, I sometimes just had to use logic. If they hinted that an artery was in a certain place, I eliminated all answers that did not fit that part of the body. Occasionally they included subtle hints in the question stem as to what they were looking for - you might feel bad about getting something right you "didn't know" - DON'T, just please take what they give you. Then there were several questions where I had no idea and you just needed to know that information. Sitting here now I just thought of another question about a mechanism of drug interaction I had never heard of. I guessed (incorrectly on that one it seems) and moved on. Don't lose points on things you know for a question you're unlikely to figure out.

A few things were odd about my exam though. When I came home and searched for answers, some of the information came up in Google in Step 2 prep books instead of Step 1 materials. Just thought that was weird.
 
^Interesting what you say about Step 2 books. I've been told by a few people that studying Step2CK books can be useful.. just skip the parts about treatment plan. Most of everything else is stuff we should know for Step 1.
 
I appreciate all your support, and I want to make sure everyone is as prepared as possible so keep any questions coming. I'll do my best within the limits the NBME imposes to answer them. Nasty surprises aren't good for anybody, not when we've all worked so hard just to get into med school :| (took me two rounds - not fun).

Thank you for the response. Did going through the goljan images help you in the exam?
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.


Hey there. Congratulations on getting the exam done. After reading your post, I was like "holy cow I have been cloned and just took Step 1 all over again". I prepared 5 weeks, used FA and UWorld as my sole resources (nothing else at all), got >265 on both UWSA but never took a single NBME. I went in confident that I knew most, if not all, of first aid, and I walked out of there feeling like I got POUNDED....like hardcore. Just like you, I have been blessed (or cursed?) with great short-term memory and could remember probably 30 questions verbatim. Of the 30 that I could remember, I missed 20 of them. And of the 20 I missed, 19 of them were CAKE questions. Like super easy, 1+1=2 type questions, and instead I put 1+1=7 on all of them. I felt demoralized. I made a HUGE number of dumb mistakes on EASY questions, so my first thought was "if I am missing the easy ones, then there is no way I'm going to break a 230...." I was literally 100% certain I bombed the test and couldn't sleep for a week rethinking my life after what I thought was a possible exam failure.

Long story short, I got a 267. Despite feeling absolutely destroyed and demoralized after 5 hard weeks of preparation and what I thought was a VERY subpar performance on Step 1 (possibly failure, in my mind), I somehow killed the test. I tell you my story because I literally felt identical to you, and my score ended up being right where my practice tests predicted. Keep the faith, try to sleep, and I wish you the very best.
 
Hey there. Congratulations on getting the exam done. After reading your post, I was like "holy cow I have been cloned and just took Step 1 all over again". I prepared 5 weeks, used FA and UWorld as my sole resources (nothing else at all), got >265 on both UWSA but never took a single NBME. I went in confident that I knew most, if not all, of first aid, and I walked out of there feeling like I got POUNDED....like hardcore. Just like you, I have been blessed (or cursed?) with great short-term memory and could remember probably 30 questions verbatim. Of the 30 that I could remember, I missed 20 of them. And of the 20 I missed, 19 of them were CAKE questions. Like super easy, 1+1=2 type questions, and instead I put 1+1=7 on all of them. I felt demoralized. I made a HUGE number of dumb mistakes on EASY questions, so my first thought was "if I am missing the easy ones, then there is no way I'm going to break a 230...." I was literally 100% certain I bombed the test and couldn't sleep for a week rethinking my life after what I thought was a possible exam failure.

Long story short, I got a 267. Despite feeling absolutely destroyed and demoralized after 5 hard weeks of preparation and what I thought was a VERY subpar performance on Step 1 (possibly failure, in my mind), I somehow killed the test. I tell you my story because I literally felt identical to you, and my score ended up being right where my practice tests predicted. Keep the faith, try to sleep, and I wish you the very best.

Thanks for sharing calcineurin (awesome choice for a name btw, how in the world did no one have that when you registered?). Just talking about it with people helps. My whole class is taking it right now so we are not exactly in great positions to calm each other down 🙂.

Someone a class ahead of me said the Step 2 prep books can help with Step 1 to some extent and with preclinical classes if your curriculum is particularly "clinically oriented" (ours definitely is), so maybe there is something to that ulikedaggers?

BlueArc: Short answer: VERY VERY YES. Even in questions where I did not know the necessary detail about the disease, I recognized the images. I tend to be visual and, for example, couldn't memorize Kawasaki disease until I had seen a child with it.
 
Thanks for sharing calcineurin (awesome choice for a name btw, how in the world did no one have that when you registered?). Just talking about it with people helps. My whole class is taking it right now so we are not exactly in great positions to calm each other down 🙂.

Someone a class ahead of me said the Step 2 prep books can help with Step 1 to some extent and with preclinical classes if your curriculum is particularly "clinically oriented" (ours definitely is), so maybe there is something to that ulikedaggers?

BlueArc: Short answer: VERY VERY YES. Even in questions where I did not know the necessary detail about the disease, I recognized the images. I tend to be visual and, for example, couldn't memorize Kawasaki disease until I had seen a child with it.

BioCF--congrats on the strong prep. From the sounds of it, your test will have a ridiculously harsh curve, so just keep that in mind (you're going to kill it). Where can you take a lot at some goljan images? And also, I am trying to strengthen my CT anatomy. I don't have HY anatomy--where else can I go to on the internet? For LearningRadiology, its a great site but how do you do it systematically rather than looking at a bunch of random images?
 
BioCF--congrats on the strong prep. From the sounds of it, your test will have a ridiculously harsh curve, so just keep that in mind (you're going to kill it). Where can you take a lot at some goljan images? And also, I am trying to strengthen my CT anatomy. I don't have HY anatomy--where else can I go to on the internet? For LearningRadiology, its a great site but how do you do it systematically rather than looking at a bunch of random images?
Check ur pm for that HY anatomy and Nero anat
 
Last edited:
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.


AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.
Sounds exactly like my experience. The real deal had many weird and vague questions. And that anxiety had caused me to change the answers of atleast 7 mcqs, which i got wrong for sure. (regretting till now) Ended up with a 250 after getting 259, 263 and 270 in practice nbme tests with 89% usmle world av. I know its a good score, but less than what i expected it to be. It rendered me a bit disheartened for several days.
 
Sounds exactly like my experience. The real deal had many weird and vague questions. And that anxiety had caused me to change the answers of atleast 7 mcqs, which i got wrong for sure. (regretting till now) Ended up with a 250 after getting 259, 263 and 270 in practice nbme tests with 89% usmle world av. I know its a good score, but less than what i expected it to be. It rendered me a bit disheartened for several days.

Herpangina, how do you recommend approaching the vague/weird questions? Do you think if you had known certain facts it would have made those easier? I know there is no way to prepare for them before the test, but I'm wondering if in retrospect there is a test-taking technique you would have tried to apply more broadly to those tough questions.
 
To anyone who has taken it, how many questions do you think you knew the answer to immediately simply because you remembered some low-yield minutiae?
 
Herpangina, how do you recommend approaching the vague/weird questions? Do you think if you had known certain facts it would have made those easier? I know there is no way to prepare for them before the test, but I'm wondering if in retrospect there is a test-taking technique you would have tried to apply more broadly to those tough questions

Stay calm! that's the key. I got those 7 mcqs wrong because i was so tense ( and these were the easiest qs) . And remember one thing, your ist instinct is right in 99% of cases. Don't change the answer unless you r pretty sure why you r doing it. I could not perform at par with my nbmes because of test day anxiety. Coming back home, i wrote down 300 mcqs and there i realized that my stupid mistakes were going to cost me quite a points. I found 25 mistakes, probably more would be there, which i forgot. Picking the right option is way easier with a relaxed state of mind. I need to improve my test taking skills, because that was a problem with me even in medical school exams. There would be 10-12 questions testing entirely new concepts which r not to be found in any review material or q bank. but for those few qs dont mess with those of which you ve got a clear cut clue about.
 
Is 250 competitive? I m worried. Because of my stupid mistakes and carelessness, I could not sleep and eat properly in the post exam period. And thanks to holidays, I had to wait for one more week.
 
Is 250 competitive? I m worried. Because of my stupid mistakes and carelessness, I could not sleep and eat properly in the post exam period. And thanks to holidays, I had to wait for one more week.

Regardless of what you want to go into, 250 IS competitive. For the most competitive specialties, 250 is still the average score. No residency specialty has a usmle average of >250 at this time.
 
Hey guys I just took Step 1 today. I studied about 7 weeks, mostly used FA and World, and some flashcards. Anyways, I was freaking out because of the above post regarding how hard the step was etc but it wasnt too bad at all. I dont want to jinx myself but most everything was in FA. There were a few drugs not in FA but the rest of the drugs were in FA so you could narrow it down to 1-2 answer choices. My practice scores were 257 for NBME 13 and 257 for NBME 15 also. I also took earlier NBMEs (2,4,5) which I had access to and was scoring around 260 on those.

In terms of the test itself; almost no embryo and very little anatomy (YES!!). Also biochem was straight forward. Tricky questions were physio experiments and random pharm drugs which you cant prepare for anyways.

My advice is to just relax and dont second guess yourself. I wouldnt have studied any differently if I could go back.
 
Been too long since I've haunted the forums, but I figured I would share my recent Step 1 experience (Warning: The following is a novel).

I took my Step a few days ago after studying for ~7-8 weeks of dedicated time. It seemed like sufficient time when I started, and ultimately it was enough to memorize FA, Pathoma, Uworld, UsmleRX, and a few extra resources. However, it wasn't enough for the test itself. Why? Read on my friends.

Background: My plan was to fill my first 3 weeks with FA, BRS physiology, BRS embryo, HYA Neuro, Pathoma (I had already finished the videos before my dedicated period), and UsmleRX. That worked well. By the time I started UWorld, I had a sufficient knowledge base to average 85% on my first pass. I tossed in some practice tests every few days in the final three weeks to test my study plan.

UWorld SA 1: 265
UWorld SA 2: 265
NBME 15: 275
NBME 13: 273

In short, I was missing about ~5 questions on many of my NBME practice exams. To fill in some blanks, I looked at Goljan and webpath for pathology images and LearningRadiology for, well, radiology. HYA gross anatomy allowed me to get some pelvic/abdominal anatomy knowledge missing from other books.

I thought I was ready for the real thing. Boy was I wrong.

AT LEAST 20-30% of my exam had info I had never seen before (I went back and checked my annotated FA, Pathoma, and UWorld - nada). Unlike what most people have described, the test gave me NO HINTS on the cardiac auscultation questions. The questions were basically, "A patient comes in. You hear a murmur. What is it?" Every anatomy question used obscure synonyms for each structure - the structures were in FA, HYA anatomy, and UWorld but were never identified by those names in the real step. There were at least 5 neuro questions I nailed because of my undergrad bio classes (info missing from most resources, including HYA Neuro). Unfortunately, I don't think those will be enough to help me out. The real thing was also much more ambiguous - every question included symptoms that could be reasonably attributed to two possible answers. They threw out numerous red herrings, way more than on the NBMEs or in UWorld.

Most of the infectious disease questions were laughably easy (they practically gave the answers in the question stems :|) except for two that were not covered by most resources and one question that required high-level mycology knowledge (something that I might have known 4 years ago, but not now). Barring one question about meds in pregnancy (one never covered even in Katzung IMO) and one on drug abuse that I would argue had ~3 correct answers, pharm was very straightforward. Psych was good except for one Q, which had so much history it was almost impossible to figure it out. There was actually one question I might consider "inappropriate" (wink wink nudge nudge) for a standardized exam (was choking during the test while trying to stifle my laughter), but the point was clear.

In short, after destroying the practice exams, I ended up marking about 60-70 questions on the real thing, easily 2-3x my usual. Being somewhat obsessive and blessed with a great short-term memory, I checked answers to as many questions as possible later. I missed at least 20-30, and those are just the marked ones I remember (and I'm assuming I got the unmarked ones correct...haha).

If I could do it again? I would skip almost every resource except FA, UWorld, Goljan (which I pushed to the side b/c of time constraints), a good anatomy review text, and HYA Neuro. Good luck to you all. My getting even to where I am now has depended on many contributions to this forum by its wonderful members.
I think we have some form of USMLE savant here.

Yeah... Mid 270's on practice tests and 30% unrecognized content on the real test? Hmm...
 
Hey guys I just took Step 1 today. I studied about 7 weeks, mostly used FA and World, and some flashcards. Anyways, I was freaking out because of the above post regarding how hard the step was etc but it wasnt too bad at all. I dont want to jinx myself but most everything was in FA. There were a few drugs not in FA but the rest of the drugs were in FA so you could narrow it down to 1-2 answer choices. My practice scores were 257 for NBME 13 and 257 for NBME 15 also. I also took earlier NBMEs (2,4,5) which I had access to and was scoring around 260 on those.

In terms of the test itself; almost no embryo and very little anatomy (YES!!). Also biochem was straight forward. Tricky questions were physio experiments and random pharm drugs which you cant prepare for anyways.

My advice is to just relax and dont second guess yourself. I wouldnt have studied any differently if I could go back.
:soexcited: <-- I bet that's how u felt walking out of the prometric center. Congratulations! Hope to hear from u in 3 weeks!
 
To anyone who has taken it, how many questions do you think you knew the answer to immediately simply because you remembered some low-yield minutiae?

It depends on any one person's particular form. As the recent test-takers can tell you, there will be questions that test pure facts (e.g., what is a chaperone protein? what is irinotecan?). These are easy recollection but might be considered "hard/wtf" by people who simply haven't encountered the info. The hardest questions on your exam will actually be mid-difficulty ones that require a little lateral thinking, which, only several days after your exam do you realize you got them wrong.
 
Yeah... Mid 270's on practice tests and 30% unrecognized content on the real test? Hmm...

One thing I've observed on this forum for the past two years is that there is absolutely zero correlation between how one feels coming out and how he or she actually performed. The NBMEs don't lie, and it really is rare to drop significantly on them, although any score in the 260+ range is very sensitive to even a couple questions wrong, based on the steepness at that level. It might be one thing to just be nicking 270 on an NBME, but to score a 275 on a practice, I'd be shocked if the real performance is anything less than a 260.
 
One thing I've observed on this forum for the past two years is that there is absolutely zero correlation between how one feels coming out and how he or she actually performed. The NBMEs don't lie, and it really is rare to drop significantly on them, although any score in the 260+ range is very sensitive to even a couple questions wrong, based on the steepness at that level. It might be one thing to just be nicking 270 on an NBME, but to score a 275 on a practice, I'd be shocked if the real performance is anything less than a 260.

Seriously. I started my prep by reading through a ton of people's posts in the prior years threads and it's insane how alike many of them were:

-person studies hard for months and is averaging X on NBMEs/UWSAs
-takes step 1, posts on SDN that they missed at least 20-40 questions, probably failed, and certainly will get no better than X-20 in the absolute best case scenario. Wonders if they should cancel their vacation plans and begin studying for the inevitable retake.
-a month later posts again to say they actually scored X+4.

Even knowing this, I am sure I will go through the exact same process.
 
Seriously. I started my prep by reading through a ton of people's posts in the prior years threads and it's insane how alike many of them were:

-person studies hard for months and is averaging X on NBMEs/UWSAs
-takes step 1, posts on SDN that they missed at least 20-40 questions, probably failed, and certainly will get no better than X-20 in the absolute best case scenario. Wonders if they should cancel their vacation plans and begin studying for the inevitable retake.
-a month later posts again to say they actually scored X+4.

Even knowing this, I am sure I will go through the exact same process.
Sounds like you need to put in more work. X+4 is a pretty low score by SDN standards.
 
Top