Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Hey guys:

So I took the test on Monday. I'm a DO and took COMLEX back in September and wasn't going to take the USMLE until I got a good score on Path, Pharm and behaviour (crappy score on OMM 🙁) So I took a couple practice tests end of December and got 200 on one NBME and 193 on the other. So I was like ****, I suck at this, time to stop. But I promised myself (and the sig other) I would do one NBME in a test setting (previous two were in bedroom, the 193 was laying in bed). Additionally, I went over the old ones and decided I'm just going to go with the most common answer choice instead of trying to pysch myself into thinking it's not right. I took NBME 15, I think, and got a 219 and 221 on NBME 12? (490 and 500 on the score system). I also got a 221 and 224 on USMLE world. Unforunetly, I dropped a couple points on last the two NBMEs I took that were sandwiched around the 224 Uworld.

So the exam wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. I was really nervous the last few days--esp since my scores dropped a bit, but decided to go ahead and take the exam since I had put the last 4-5 weeks studying pretty seriously for the exam, plus a couple hours a day before that while on rotations. I think one reason it wasn't as bad was because I'm a really fast test taker, always have been, so I wasn't crunched for time and generally finished with 8-12 minutes per section. I did skip over 3-4 questions I was getting stuck on and came back to them. Better to do this then waste 15 minutes on them.

What really helped settle my nerves was that 3 of the first 7-10 questions were covered by Pholston in his amazing powerpoints. Two of the q I might have gotten anyway, but no way was I going to get one on metastastic cancer unless I had read his PPTs the nights before. I also got one question straight from pathoma earlier. Dr. Sattar said, they're not going to list X as an answer choice, because everyone knows that. Instead, they're going to list Y." Well, Y was an an answer choice and honestly, I wouldn't have known that because that bug was in maybe 2-3 questions on Uworld.

I got killed on the neuro. Lot of cross sections and that was my weakness. Cross sections for anatomy too and I'm not sure they went much better, but only I knew a few of those. Rest of anatomy wasn't so bad. I thought the biochem, micro, immuno, pharm and behavioural wasn't that bad--very doable and fair. The comlex micro was probably harder than the Step 1 micro, but everything else was harder on USMLE.

In terms of questions, I thought they were about the same style and difficulty as the NBMEs--same length too for the most part. I thought all the questions were going to be 2-3 paragraphs each, but luckily they weren't. Maybe 20-25% were longer and those are the ones that screw people over, I think. Gotta skip them and come back to them rather than wasting time. Hopefully being a fast test taker will help me as other people may struggle and that'll drop their points some in comparison to mine (yeah, sucky way to think about it, but this is graded in relationship to how others have done in the past). I actually had the same question three times on the exam. Not identical, but they were looking for the same immuno deficiency and just asked it different ways. One of my professors had mentioned this and I got a practice question on it 2 weeks ago, so I think I knew it. I was surprised by this, but one of the NBMEs has the same micro q 3x as well. Different question, though--although that question was on my exam too. One of the graphs from the NBMEs was also on the real deal. The graph was changed and wasn't the same shape, but x and y axises were the same as was the subject. The USMLE alog probably has tons of different pods and probably picks a question (or more) from each pod to balance out the difficulty, so I could see this happened. Hopefully it was the same question they were asking and not me imagining it!

As for scoring, hopefully I'll do well. So I know there has been a lot of controvery on scoring and what percentage you need right, etc. So my professor who teaches for Kaplan said you generally need a 74% to get a 240. Obvioulsy I wasn't in that category on the practice exams, in fact, I was getting a little higher than that on the NBMEs--not great but decent. But he put it down as, if you KNOW 1/3 of the questions and can narrow the other 2/3 down to 2 and get half right, you're at 67%. You'll need to hit a few more right, but if you know you're stuff, you can--it is a doable exam.

One thing I was surprised about was how much basic physio there was on it. There's a lot on the NBMEs and maybe even more on the exam. If you know the concept, the questions are easy. If you don't, then youre screwed. I got screwed on one that I knew because they asked it in a weird way. Same thing for a anti-viral drug I knew well. I've seen the videos for how it works, but it got me. I thought every answer choice was going to be asked in a weird way, but I think 50-60% of the answer choices were pretty straight forward (like in the NBMEs) and maybe 15-20% were were asked in a totally oddball way with the rest somewhere in between.

here's to a couple tough weeks waiting for my score!

where are these PPT that you speak of?
 
where are these PPT that you speak of?



He refused to send them to me (which seemed a bit ridiculous...), I'll happily pm them to you when I receive them from someone else (update: just download them yourself from the link provided below #357) . There was originally a thread made by Phloston a bit over a year ago; however, the downloads no longer seem to work.
 
Last edited:
He refused to send them to me (which seemed a bit ridiculous...), I'll happily pm them to you when I receive them from someone else. There was originally a thread made by Phloston a bit over a year ago; however, the downloads no longer seem to work.

PM to me too please!
 
He refused to send them to me (which seemed a bit ridiculous...), I'll happily pm them to you when I receive them from someone else. There was originally a thread made by Phloston a bit over a year ago; however, the downloads no longer seem to work.

I would love a PM as well, if you don't mind. Thank you!
 
He refused to send them to me (which seemed a bit ridiculous...), I'll happily pm them to you when I receive them from someone else. There was originally a thread made by Phloston a bit over a year ago; however, the downloads no longer seem to work.
Lol that sucks. @leftpinky sharing is caring.
Did u receive them yet? If u didn't, I'll send them to u.
 
Last edited:
Yeah guys. Jumping on the seemingly obvious answer ("he WON'T SHARE") without full consideration and a little investigation is bad form for the step's questions as well 😉

Yo @Phloston people are wondering what dealio is with the PPTs you shared previously
 
Took my exam yesterday , so here goes

I am a MS4 IMG , I started my prep 6 months back… 3 months along side doing my rotations and 3 months dedicated time period.


Exam was doable, there wasn’t any new concept that wasn’t mentioned in uworld or fa, no obscure drugs . Majority of my exam was endocrine and reproductive questions,path mostly.

Question style was closely to nbme 15 and 12 ,many questions were direct - no buzzwords but you can make them out easily if you did uworld.

There were about 2-4 wtf questions per block, I started off easy, which put me to ease- but 2,4,6 blocks were pretty brutal - they had long stems and tricky questions that were strategically placed right in the middle of the blocks


Behavioral sci - ethics questions had some wtf ones, and biostats was tricky too - I did not get any problem type questions, all I got were - innterpreting graphs, type 1 and 2 errors. Biostats is one of my weak areas, I wish I spent a little more time on the complicated topics.

Biochem - Again, there werent any direct questions. Questions which had knockout gene mice with provided data and we need to interpret what enzyme wasn’t present and stuff. Research type questions which can easily freak you out but once you think about it- takes a minute or two to answer.

Micro - direct, nothing out of FA.

Path - Majority of the exam, I really have to thank Dr.Sattar here. Some questions were just vague- I could narrow it down to choices but couldn’t decide between those two. I just went with my gut with such questions.


Pharm- I had one or two unknown drugs but I am pretty sure they were mentioned in UW. My bad, I forgot. Rest were direct, fair questions.



Molecular bio and Genetics - Experiment type questions and it was tricky too. They tested stuff from FA in a unique way - sort of experiments with data or graphs. I went through HY Molecular bio twice during my prep period, well, I don’t think I had any added advantage going through it. Just know all the processes in FA cold . Definitely one of the high yield subjects.

CVS- had two murmurs. I suck at murmurs. I got one right because the vignette gave it away, but I think I lost the other murmur one. I simply suck at these. Rest of the CVS questions were straightforward.

Neuro - CTs , MRIs and brain sections with every neuro question . I felt they were nitpicky about the details on neuro questions, like lets say you have a lesion type A, you would be pretty sure it would be somewhere in the temporal lobe but there are like 3 arrow choices pointing to temporal lobe , LMAO, idk. That’s how I felt about it.

Anatomy - I had very few anat questions, a few difficult and few easy ones. I had a question where they asked about a muscle's insertion site, idk, guess all these questions are part of package of USMLE.


Overall, It just feels like a blur.I am happy to complete the exam but I just wish I got the result the same day too.

And yeah forgot to mention, DO ALL NBMEs and free 150 questions. Just do them all. You will thank me when you take the exam.I had very similar questions on the the exam.

All the best to everyone who is taking the test ! Good luck.
 
Took my exam yesterday , so here goes

I am a MS4 IMG , I started my prep 6 months back… 3 months along side doing my rotations and 3 months dedicated time period.


Exam was doable, there wasn’t any new concept that wasn’t mentioned in uworld or fa, no obscure drugs . Majority of my exam was endocrine and reproductive questions,path mostly.

Question style was closely to nbme 15 and 12 ,many questions were direct - no buzzwords but you can make them out easily if you did uworld.

There were about 2-4 wtf questions per block, I started off easy, which put me to ease- but 2,4,6 blocks were pretty brutal - they had long stems and tricky questions that were strategically placed right in the middle of the blocks


Behavioral sci - ethics questions had some wtf ones, and biostats was tricky too - I did not get any problem type questions, all I got were - innterpreting graphs, type 1 and 2 errors. Biostats is one of my weak areas, I wish I spent a little more time on the complicated topics.

Biochem - Again, there werent any direct questions. Questions which had knockout gene mice with provided data and we need to interpret what enzyme wasn’t present and stuff. Research type questions which can easily freak you out but once you think about it- takes a minute or two to answer.

Micro - direct, nothing out of FA.

Path - Majority of the exam, I really have to thank Dr.Sattar here. Some questions were just vague- I could narrow it down to choices but couldn’t decide between those two. I just went with my gut with such questions.


Pharm- I had one or two unknown drugs but I am pretty sure they were mentioned in UW. My bad, I forgot. Rest were direct, fair questions.



Molecular bio and Genetics - Experiment type questions and it was tricky too. They tested stuff from FA in a unique way - sort of experiments with data or graphs. I went through HY Molecular bio twice during my prep period, well, I don’t think I had any added advantage going through it. Just know all the processes in FA cold . Definitely one of the high yield subjects.

CVS- had two murmurs. I suck at murmurs. I got one right because the vignette gave it away, but I think I lost the other murmur one. I simply suck at these. Rest of the CVS questions were straightforward.

Neuro - CTs , MRIs and brain sections with every neuro question . I felt they were nitpicky about the details on neuro questions, like lets say you have a lesion type A, you would be pretty sure it would be somewhere in the temporal lobe but there are like 3 arrow choices pointing to temporal lobe , LMAO, idk. That’s how I felt about it.

Anatomy - I had very few anat questions, a few difficult and few easy ones. I had a question where they asked about a muscle's insertion site, idk, guess all these questions are part of package of USMLE.


Overall, It just feels like a blur.I am happy to complete the exam but I just wish I got the result the same day too.

And yeah forgot to mention, DO ALL NBMEs and free 150 questions. Just do them all. You will thank me when you take the exam.I had very similar questions on the the exam.

All the best to everyone who is taking the test ! Good luck.

Thanks for this legit elaboration. Hope u get the score u're aiming for!
Now, go party ur face off.
 
To anyone who has taken the exam recently, is it at all useful to know which cancers require which chemotherapeutic agents? It comes up from time to time in Rx, but not in UW. I'm inclined not to study it, but if it's come up on the real deal then I probably would.
 
Took my exam yesterday , so here goes

I am a MS4 IMG , I started my prep 6 months back… 3 months along side doing my rotations and 3 months dedicated time period.


Exam was doable, there wasn’t any new concept that wasn’t mentioned in uworld or fa, no obscure drugs . Majority of my exam was endocrine and reproductive questions,path mostly.

Question style was closely to nbme 15 and 12 ,many questions were direct - no buzzwords but you can make them out easily if you did uworld.

There were about 2-4 wtf questions per block, I started off easy, which put me to ease- but 2,4,6 blocks were pretty brutal - they had long stems and tricky questions that were strategically placed right in the middle of the blocks


Behavioral sci - ethics questions had some wtf ones, and biostats was tricky too - I did not get any problem type questions, all I got were - innterpreting graphs, type 1 and 2 errors. Biostats is one of my weak areas, I wish I spent a little more time on the complicated topics.

Biochem - Again, there werent any direct questions. Questions which had knockout gene mice with provided data and we need to interpret what enzyme wasn’t present and stuff. Research type questions which can easily freak you out but once you think about it- takes a minute or two to answer.

Micro - direct, nothing out of FA.

Path - Majority of the exam, I really have to thank Dr.Sattar here. Some questions were just vague- I could narrow it down to choices but couldn’t decide between those two. I just went with my gut with such questions.


Pharm- I had one or two unknown drugs but I am pretty sure they were mentioned in UW. My bad, I forgot. Rest were direct, fair questions.



Molecular bio and Genetics - Experiment type questions and it was tricky too. They tested stuff from FA in a unique way - sort of experiments with data or graphs. I went through HY Molecular bio twice during my prep period, well, I don’t think I had any added advantage going through it. Just know all the processes in FA cold . Definitely one of the high yield subjects.

CVS- had two murmurs. I suck at murmurs. I got one right because the vignette gave it away, but I think I lost the other murmur one. I simply suck at these. Rest of the CVS questions were straightforward.

Neuro - CTs , MRIs and brain sections with every neuro question . I felt they were nitpicky about the details on neuro questions, like lets say you have a lesion type A, you would be pretty sure it would be somewhere in the temporal lobe but there are like 3 arrow choices pointing to temporal lobe , LMAO, idk. That’s how I felt about it.

Anatomy - I had very few anat questions, a few difficult and few easy ones. I had a question where they asked about a muscle's insertion site, idk, guess all these questions are part of package of USMLE.


Overall, It just feels like a blur.I am happy to complete the exam but I just wish I got the result the same day too.

And yeah forgot to mention, DO ALL NBMEs and free 150 questions. Just do them all. You will thank me when you take the exam.I had very similar questions on the the exam.

All the best to everyone who is taking the test ! Good luck.

I hope you get the score you were aiming for! In regard to Micro, does "nothing out of FA" mean everything could be found in FA? Or that your questions asked about things not in FA?
 
And me! Unless it's the same PPT that was posted above..?
Could be, but I'll send it regardless.

I hope you get the score you were aiming for! In regard to Micro, does "nothing out of FA" mean everything could be found in FA? Or that your questions asked about things not in FA?

Lol I was thinking the same thing.
 
Has anyone used or is anyone using USMLERx? If yes, is it worth the investment? Or are uWoulrd, Kaplan Q and the NBMEs sufficient for step 1?
 
Has anyone used or is anyone using USMLERx? If yes, is it worth the investment? Or are uWoulrd, Kaplan Q and the NBMEs sufficient for step 1?

Thanks the PM!

I'm using Rx now (MS1) because I plan to do Kaplan and UW next year. I think it's useful in terms of the generally accepted notion that more Qs = better score and also it makes learning FA much less monotonous. Also, Rx seems to overlap quite a bit with Kaplan Lectures (I haven't looked at KaplanQ) and does have things that aren't included in FA. For example, there's a fairly thorough discussion of Fanconi's Anemia in Rx whereas it's only briefly mentioned twice in FA14.

My understanding is that Rx contains all of the questions in FA Q&A and you can preview that book on Amazon (or find a PDF floating around on google) to get an idea of the difficulty of Rx.
 
Has anyone used or is anyone using USMLERx? If yes, is it worth the investment? Or are uWoulrd, Kaplan Q and the NBMEs sufficient for step 1?

One thing I discovered today is that Rx has significantly more pharm than either of the other two. Kaplan ~ 260, UWorld ~ 380, Rx > 500 questions... I dunno if that matters for you at all, but if you are weak in pharm, it's something to consider.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
One thing I discovered today is that Rx has significantly more pharm than either of the other two. Kaplan ~ 260, UWorld ~ 380, Rx > 500 questions... I dunno if that matters for you at all, but if you are weak in pharm, it's something to consider.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Have you noticed if it has any drugs not listed in FA?
 
One thing I discovered today is that Rx has significantly more pharm than either of the other two. Kaplan ~ 260, UWorld ~ 380, Rx > 500 questions... I dunno if that matters for you at all, but if you are weak in pharm, it's something to consider.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Hmm thanks for pointing that out. If that's the only difference, then I'm good.
 
Has anyone used or is anyone using USMLERx? If yes, is it worth the investment? Or are uWoulrd, Kaplan Q and the NBMEs sufficient for step 1?
I have all 3 [kaplan came with my course]. Rx is really good to see if you know first-aid; there are mistakes tho. Kaplan is too nit picky with random/ obscure details.
 
To anyone who has taken the exam recently, is it at all useful to know which cancers require which chemotherapeutic agents? It comes up from time to time in Rx, but not in UW. I'm inclined not to study it, but if it's come up on the real deal then I probably would.
Hey,
I took the exam on the 16th, it was interesting but I feel like if any specific cancers they would ask treatments, it would be testicular and breast cancer. But as far as just naming a drug, myself nor my friends who took it this year had any question that would ask a drug straight up. Instead, they would mention that a person is receiving rx for a certain cancer, give you the symptoms (which are very specific for the drug) then either ask the name of the drug or what mechanism of action of the drug is similar to.
E.g. patient receiving rx for testicular cancer. Presents with shortness of breath and dry harsh cough. The MOA of the drug is... and it would be something like -Creates free radicals (Bleomycin)

**They also seem to be leaning towards the drugs used to prevent certain symptoms of chemotherapy, like Leucovorin, Acrolein, N-acetylcysteine, Dexrazoxane
 
Hey,
I took the exam on the 16th, it was interesting but I feel like if any specific cancers they would ask treatments, it would be testicular and breast cancer. But as far as just naming a drug, myself nor my friends who took it this year had any question that would ask a drug straight up. Instead, they would mention that a person is receiving rx for a certain cancer, give you the symptoms (which are very specific for the drug) then either ask the name of the drug or what mechanism of action of the drug is similar to.
E.g. patient receiving rx for testicular cancer. Presents with shortness of breath and dry harsh cough. The MOA of the drug is... and it would be something like -Creates free radicals (Bleomycin)

**They also seem to be leaning towards the drugs used to prevent certain symptoms of chemotherapy, like Leucovorin, Acrolein, N-acetylcysteine, Dexrazoxane

Congrats on being done! What materials did you use?
 
Hey,
I took the exam on the 16th, it was interesting but I feel like if any specific cancers they would ask treatments, it would be testicular and breast cancer. But as far as just naming a drug, myself nor my friends who took it this year had any question that would ask a drug straight up. Instead, they would mention that a person is receiving rx for a certain cancer, give you the symptoms (which are very specific for the drug) then either ask the name of the drug or what mechanism of action of the drug is similar to.
E.g. patient receiving rx for testicular cancer. Presents with shortness of breath and dry harsh cough. The MOA of the drug is... and it would be something like -Creates free radicals (Bleomycin)

**They also seem to be leaning towards the drugs used to prevent certain symptoms of chemotherapy, like Leucovorin, Acrolein, N-acetylcysteine, Dexrazoxane
Awesome. That makes sense--I can handle the side effects, but besides bleomycin for testicular cancer and cyclophosphamide for breast, that's about all I can ever remember.

I just tried looking up any specific drugs for which N-acetylcysteine and couldn't find any. I know it has a radical reducing mechanism, if anyone knows of specific cancer/drugs it is used for (besides tylenol) that would be awesome. The other three are pretty common in questions
 
Awesome. That makes sense--I can handle the side effects, but besides bleomycin for testicular cancer and cyclophosphamide for breast, that's about all I can ever remember.

I just tried looking up any specific drugs for which N-acetylcysteine and couldn't find any. I know it has a radical reducing mechanism, if anyone knows of specific cancer/drugs it is used for (besides tylenol) that would be awesome. The other three are pretty common in questions
NAC can also be used like Acrolein to prevent some of the cystitis side effects of ifosfamide (cyclophosphamide). In DIT they like to use the mnemonic Eradicate Ball Cancer for Etoposide, bleomycin and Cisplatin.
 
Congrats on being done! What materials did you use?
Thank you! my prep was kinda all over the place, which is why I haven't posted any prep and schedule that I used. I used way more resources than necessary because I liked reading concepts from different authors, which each explain it in a different manner - helped me remember stuff. But nearing the end I did focus more on reviewing uworld, kaplan and usmlerx. I completed uworld, but mainly used kaplan and rx to cover all the questions in my weak areas like behavioral, ethics, some physio and general principles which I think helped. I also did the diagnostic and 2 full length Sims by Kaplan to help build up some endurance before the exam.

I didn't get through all of First aid, but noticed that what I had gone through during school and questions, pretty much covered everything in there. Organ systems and General principles (by first aid) was great to skim through for pictures, treatments/physical presentations and Tables that covered pretty much everything. The books that came with the kaplan program were also and excellent way to go through a specific topic before the exam, but I didn't waste any time reading anything I already understood. Lastly, 2.5 weeks before the exam, I started DIT and did that for 9 days or so, which was a great review.
 
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around the differences between shh and homeobox. I know that shh mutation can cause holoprosencephaly as seen in chromosome 13. besides that, they both seem to be associated with random patterning and I can't find a consistent pattern about which mutations cause which kind of phenotypes. Any way that people remember this?
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.

Do you think Rx express is superior to DIT ?
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.

wish I was taking the Step in a couple of years just so I could buy your book man
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.
Phloston Rapid Review? I like it!
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.
What??? That's just foul!
People, stop trying to take credit for other people's work! Messed up.
 
Just read a few comments earlier on this thread about my PPTs. The reason I'm not sending them to anyone anymore is because someone had taken them and tried selling them. You'd think all aspiring doctors would be trustworthy, but that's just not reality. I'm in the process of writing my own book and making corresponding slides; I've had to start considering all of the legal stuff.

But anyway, if you're interested in seeing some slides, I am a lecturer for the 2014 USMLE Rx Express series. You could possibly check out that platform if you want an adjunct to FA14. I was also an author for FA14. I can assure you that some of that PPT info has made its way in.
This 😎
 
Has anyone used or is anyone using USMLERx? If yes, is it worth the investment? Or are uWoulrd, Kaplan Q and the NBMEs sufficient for step 1?

I've got both Kaplan and USMLE-Rx, which I primarily do along with classwork. I don't think USMLE-Rx is a bad investment. I actually think their questions are better written (though much easier) than Kaplan's. But, at the end of the day, it's basically just pounding FA. If you're short on cash and time, I'd skip it.
 
I came across an old question asking the best way to prevent calcium kidney stones. The patient was not hypertensive. After drinking a lot of fluids, is din crease in dietary calcium the best choice? Basically, should you NOT give HCTZ to prevent the stones if the patient isn't hypertensive? I was always taught HCTZ, but we never made the distinction of whether or you can give it to the patient if he/she is normotensive.
 
I've got both Kaplan and USMLE-Rx, which I primarily do along with classwork. I don't think USMLE-Rx is a bad investment. I actually think their questions are better written (though much easier) than Kaplan's. But, at the end of the day, it's basically just pounding FA. If you're short on cash and time, I'd skip it.
Thank u.
 
Hi everyone,

I'm new here, but I've been reading SDN for a while now. Thanks for this great thread!

I'll be taking my Step 1 later this year. But I foolishly (!!!) didn't study very well for this last year and a half, give or take, and so I feel extremely weak on my basic sciences. I've passed, but barely. I know, stupid, not cool, I totally regret my crap study habits.

Most of this thread seems to be focused on people who have a solid basic science background. But any advice for someone like me who is coming from a very weak one? I have no illusions about getting a super high score. My goal is a 230 which is already more than high enough for me and a score that I would be extremely happy with! But maybe 230 is out of my reach too given my weak performance so far where I feel like I have tons of holes or gaps in my knowledge? My question is if I start now on First Aid (I'll be using DIT too) + USMLE-Rx, and then closer to the exam focusing on UW, will this be sufficient to help me not only overcome my weak basic sciences background, but also make it realistic for me to hopefully reach my target of 230?

Thanks again!
 
Hi everyone,

I'm new here, but I've been reading SDN for a while now. Thanks for this great thread!

I'll be taking my Step 1 later this year. But I foolishly (!!!) didn't study very well for this last year and a half, give or take, and so I feel extremely weak on my basic sciences. I've passed, but barely. I know, stupid, not cool, I totally regret my crap study habits.

Most of this thread seems to be focused on people who have a solid basic science background. But any advice for someone like me who is coming from a very weak one? I have no illusions about getting a super high score. My goal is a 230 which is already more than high enough for me and a score that I would be extremely happy with! But maybe 230 is out of my reach too given my weak performance so far where I feel like I have tons of holes or gaps in my knowledge? My question is if I start now on First Aid (I'll be using DIT too) + USMLE-Rx, and then closer to the exam focusing on UW, will this be sufficient to help me not only overcome my weak basic sciences background, but also make it realistic for me to hopefully reach my target of 230?

Thanks again!
Welcome.
My advice would be to find the holes/gaps (by doing QBanks) and fill them (with knowledge gained by reading).
Simple but highly effective individualized approach (worked for me).
Do not go for the cookie-cutter approach or any formulas (this book or that QBank).
Good Luck.
 
Welcome.
My advice would be to find the holes/gaps (by doing QBanks) and fill them (with knowledge gained by reading).
Simple but highly effective individualized approach (worked for me).
Do not go for the cookie-cutter approach or any formulas (this book or that QBank).
Good Luck.

Thanks for your advice, Transposony! I really appreciate it!

If I understand correctly, you mean I should start doing questions (QBanks) as a way to find out where my weaknesses are and then read various books or other resources around my weaknesses to gain knowledge? But isn't it too early for me to start with a QBank now since I don't really know much, maybe I need to build a foundational amount of knowledge in the basic sciences first? (I tried a little bit of USMLE-Rx and found I missed a lot of questions even though USMLE-Rx is supposed to be "easier" than UW... Ouch.)

Sorry, just trying to clarify as I'm probably slow at grasping things! Thanks again for your help.
 
Thanks for your advice, Transposony! I really appreciate it!

If I understand correctly, you mean I should start doing questions (QBanks) as a way to find out where my weaknesses are and then read various books or other resources around my weaknesses to gain knowledge? But isn't it too early for me to start with a QBank now since I don't really know much, maybe I need to build a foundational amount of knowledge in the basic sciences first? (I tried a little bit of USMLE-Rx and found I missed a lot of questions even though USMLE-Rx is supposed to be "easier" than UW... Ouch.)

Sorry, just trying to clarify as I'm probably slow at grasping things! Thanks again for your help.
When you are just starting you, you are always going to miss questions, using any question bank. Don't worry about it, its part of the process.
 
Top