Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
For those of you taking the exam in the summer, if you are currently going through your first pass of FA, how much do you try to gain from it? I'm trying to cram a review of several different sources in, so right now I've been passively reading FA just to make sure I get through it. Is this a waste of time? I would assume most people don't try to sit down and remember everything on their first pass.
I'm also going through my first pass right now, and i'm studying physiology, what i do is go through BRS physio, solve questions and go through the relevant section of FA, adding points/notes to help me understand the text better in FA.
I think it's very important to have at least looked at the material once in FA right now just to get familiar with it.
 
I'm also going through my first pass right now, and i'm studying physiology, what i do is go through BRS physio, solve questions and go through the relevant section of FA, adding points/notes to help me understand the text better in FA.
I think it's very important to have at least looked at the material once in FA right now just to get familiar with it.

Thanks, I've been doing the same as far as BRS. For the most part I'd say >90% of FA is information I've been exposed to. Maybe >70%-65% is something that if you give me the topic I could explain it to you. I guess I never truly understood what people meant by the "memorized" First Aid as part of their studying. Having something "memorized" could definitely be a subjective accomplishment.
 
I see people get overwhelmed because they expect to be able to get up and give an oral presentation on everything in FA. Most of the info sits in the preconscious, not conscious, state. And quite honestly, that's how it should be, because you can either fit a smaller amount in the conscious state or a huge amount in the preconscious, and for the Step1, we need the latter.

By memorizing FA, that definitely refers to all of the pharm, embryo, micro and biochem, as well as all charts/diagrams in the organ chapters (e.g., IBD, stroke lesions). This stuff is just clock-work and one should be able to present on it by the time he or she sits the Step1.

But many of the path and physio mechanisms/detail you won't feel like you've "memorized," but more just understood.
 
If u need something from me, u need to send me a PM, don't write it on here smh.
Go to kisspharm website, they have the videos.
KISSpharm is somewhat effective, the lecturer has a lot of verbal repetition worked into the video. picmonic is getting better with pharm content coverage, i think for the memorization aspect its pretty solid
 
Hey guys, wanted to introduce myself. I'm an IMG taking the test around the first week of may. I am currently in our Kaplan review. Basically right now I'm just doing passes of first aid (snails pace) with kaplan notes and QBank tidbits being added in. I will be purchasing uworld as soon as I'm done with qbank.
 
KISSpharm is somewhat effective, the lecturer has a lot of verbal repetition worked into the video. picmonic is getting better with pharm content coverage, i think for the memorization aspect its pretty solid

Yeah, I really like that verbal repetitive aspect of kisspharm.
 
Hey, welcome to the fam!
Okay, here's my advice for u. Since u are weak in ur basic sciences, I would suggest watching Kaplan videos for all the subjects except pathology. For pathology, watch pathoma (Some people would suggest goljan, but if u are more of a visual learner, pathoma is great. If u don't mind audio, goljan is awesome.)
Instead of spending thousands of dollars for the Kaplan subscription, u could buy the books PLUS the Kaplan CDs from eBay or Amazon for dirt cheap (in comparison to what u would pay if u were to subscribe). You may have friends who have the videos and are willing to let u have them, in that case, u would only need to buy the books. Whatever saves u a dollar.

I have a set a brand new set of kaplan comlex (identical to usmle version) lecture notes up for grabs. pm if interested
 
For those who have taken the test, I was wondering if anyone can comment on the test strategy in terms of ruling out answer choices. Basically, in U world questions, you can easily rule out a lot of answer choices because the wrong answer choices obviously correlate with another disease process. On the real exam, would you say incorrect answer choices are often blatantly associated with other disease processes, and therefore can be eliminated, or do they have to be eliminated by another mechanism?
 
For those who have taken the test, I was wondering if anyone can comment on the test strategy in terms of ruling out answer choices. Basically, in U world questions, you can easily rule out a lot of answer choices because the wrong answer choices obviously correlate with another disease process. On the real exam, would you say incorrect answer choices are often blatantly associated with other disease processes, and therefore can be eliminated, or do they have to be eliminated by another mechanism?
I found the exam similar to uworld ! Major chunk of questions u can easily eliminate the choices like in uworld if u have an idea about what they are trying to ask ! Obviously the questions u have no freaking idea what there asking, u can never eliminate u just have to guess on them n move on ! I found the BS questions confusing ! There are always two good choices 😀
 
I took my exam on 24th Jan Friday ! Anyone has an idea when I'll get my result ? 3rd wed or 4th ! :s
 
I was studying and all of a sudden, I felt a void. . . and then I realized that I haven't been or posted on this thread in 2 days. I feel alive again.

Btw, does anyone have lippincott's illustrated Q&A review pharmacology by any chance?
 
Last edited:
Hi everybody!
I've been told about this forum awhile ago, but only now have checked it... Fool me I know...
I'm an IMG, graduated in 2013... And I'm currently studying for the step 1... Planing on taking it somewhere around June... Haven't scheduled it yet though...
I see a lot of study methods around here... still have a lot to browse though...
I'm using FA (obviously lol), Kaplan and uWorld... (I also have BRS, but somehow I've enjoyed more the teachings of kaplan)...
So far I've read kaplan physiology (I figured it'd be helpful to start with this one), done my first read on FA, going through the second now, and going through biochem on kaplan as well... next anatomy... I'm not really sure whether I'm on schedule or not... Eish!

Wish you all the best luck!
 
Hi everyone, I've been reading SDN regularly since starting Step 1 prep, and have HUGELY benefited from the experiences a lot of people post on here (it's also crazy how high the scores reported on here are, and I don't think newcomers to SDN really understand how much higher than the average scores reported on here are). That being said, I just joined to share my experience with Step 1. I got my score back last week and writing out your experience really puts things in perspective. Will basically put my entire experience, sorry if you don't want a biography, but maybe someone will find it useful apart from me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those of you taking the exam in the summer, if you are currently going through your first pass of FA, how much do you try to gain from it? I'm trying to cram a review of several different sources in, so right now I've been passively reading FA just to make sure I get through it. Is this a waste of time? I would assume most people don't try to sit down and remember everything on their first pass.
The first pass of FA is NOT to memorize the book. It's to get an idea of what is important and tested. Once you read that book once slowly, you will know whenever you read say Goljan, that whatever is in both books is of utmost importance. I would read it slowly, and just understand all the concepts in the book. Save memorizing every detail, table, side effect, labs etc. to your dedicated study period. FA jams stuff into your head for short term regurgitation, I'd say 2-3 weeks. Memorizing it now will be futile and redundant. Just know what's in that book and it will tell you what is important, and what isn't.
 
@MaliOMali or any else who has taken the exam recently: Ive noticed a lot of nbme forms have repeated questions throughout the test--not exactly the same but testing the exact same concept in almost the exact same way. Did you notice that on the real test? I am just curious if that is one of the ways they validate/standardize the scores (if someone gets it right once, they are lucky, if they get it right twice, they actually understand the concept)
 
@MaliOMali or any else who has taken the exam recently: Ive noticed a lot of nbme forms have repeated questions throughout the test--not exactly the same but testing the exact same concept in almost the exact same way. Did you notice that on the real test? I am just curious if that is one of the ways they validate/standardize the scores (if someone gets it right once, they are lucky, if they get it right twice, they actually understand the concept)

They do repeat stuff. I had probably 3 questions on the same side effect of a chemotherapy drug
 
During the test, can you take a break between sections without leaving the computer? If so, how do you do that? Is there a "pause" button like on the online NBMEs?
 
Hi everyone, I've been reading SDN regularly since starting Step 1 prep, and have HUGELY benefited from the experiences a lot of people post on here (it's also crazy how high the scores reported on here are, and I don't think newcomers to SDN really understand how much higher than the average scores reported on here are). That being said, I just joined to share my experience with Step 1. I got my score back yesterday and writing out your experience really puts things in perspective. Will basically put my entire experience, sorry if you don't want a biography, but maybe someone will find it useful apart from me.
I am an IMG from Europe with a dual citizenship of US and my country where my medical school is in Europe. I think I've understood the importance of Step 1 since week 1 of medical school, and have worried about it enough. I am currently 5/6 years and will be applying for residency next fall, this general surgery in mind. I came into the whole USMLE game with a Step 1 score goal of 250's.
Anyways the earliest I could take Step 1 was after my 4th year (after ALL basic science courses were done). I used BRS books and Goljan during the 4 years of basic science.

6 months out: fast forward to March 2013, I read Goljan Patho once again, and then re-read it by June. Took my first NBME just to see where I was at and it predicted a 178 (Wasn't surprising to score low but was disappointed that I wasn't closer to 200 range). I scheduled my exam for late August, just before school started.

3 months out: Started June and used a few books that Pollux (http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/preparing-for-usmle-in-australia-my-experience.597742/) recommended during this time. HY Cell/Molecular Bio, BRS Biochem, BRS Anatomy, HY Neuroanatomy, and read FA cover to cover slowly in June. By July I was working on UWorld and FA only and my averages were slowly going up. I always did random, timed 23 or 46 q's. I started in low 50's, then within a week or two was scoring in 60's. Took NBME 12 early August and got a 232 (I was pleased as I knew I was in the general area of where I'm supposed to be/ no major holes in knowledge!) Took UWorldSS1 a week later and got a 250. Finished UWorld with a 64% avg. Next, I took NBME 7 one week out and got a 242. This made me hesitant as, while most people reported on here NBME under predicting esp. in this range, there were many cases of NBME being accurate. As an IMG Step 1 is so crucial, and I made the difficult decision to go back to school in Sept, and wait until Dec/Jan 2014. I ended up scheduling for med-Jan due to family reasons (1st half of Jan is a no-go). During the fall I did USMLERx (77% overall) and then in December did UWorld for the 2nd time (83% overall). This put me at 95th percentile on UWorld but I felt like it was inflated as I resubscribed so my history was clean. To be honest, I found USMLERx to be the best improver of my knowledge as a whole. I found that the older descriptions of it were outdated and found a lot of well written challenging questions on there. I agree that UWorld is most similar to real exam, but USMLERx in my opinion is a great bank to hammer a lot of concepts home not just from FA.
8 days out from test I caught a nasty flu (a major downside when choosing to take USMLE in the winter months, it happened to me so beware!). I literally couldn't study. All I did was sacrifice each day of FA review thinking it would speed my recover, but it didn't. Ended up moving me exam to Jan late Jan to a different testing center further from my house, which was disappointing but ended up being no big deal. This whole ending was very anticlimactic. My girlfriend was already sad that I moved my exam from Aug, and 4 more months of seclusion to mid Jan and then had to move it by another week. Agh, so exhausting. That last week was tough to motivate myself to study. Took two more NBME's and got 242, and 245 on them (disappointed and exhausted). Went into the exam confident due to my UWorld averages! I was definitely expecting 240+. All in all, because I had to move my exam several times and the whole process would get delayed, I read FA 7 times cover-to-cover. Memorized every table and diagram by memory and understood every concept in that book.

Test Day: sleeping was difficult the night before. I made the difficult decision to use a sleep aid the night before (hoping that taking my prescription benzo and the slight morning grogginess the next day would be easier to deal with than a night of literally ZERO sleep which is what I experienced two nights before). I took a 1:30PM test which I found very valuable. I always did better on Uworld during these hours. The hardest part of the exam is the wait in the waiting room right before the exam, and the first 5 minutes when you type in your ID and the 3 or so clocks start counting down. You look at the questions with shear fear and after a few questions you're sure you got right you realize your resources you used war eon par with what they want and you get in a rhythm. I didn't find fatigue or mental exhausting to be a major issue like some people complain of. Did tons of pushups during breaks and jumping jacks and took a break after every block except first. Had 15 min break time left at end of day. I finished each question block at the buzzer, which was very surprising. I don't think I ever finished a UWorld block with less than 10 min left. I ALWAYS finished early. This is a testament to how long and hard the questions are (and difficult the pressure of reasoning something in 10 seconds) is on the actual test. I also found that only about 50% of the exam was something you can learn or memorize in FA or any other book. I found that almost half of the test was a test of intelligence and reasoning. Something that you can practice but something that time and time again if you're not a certain level of smart you will just get those wrong. These were questions that involved pharmocokinetics and analyzing research (at least 5-10 questions asked about research models or analysis!). When I see people with these scores of 265+, I can tell you from experience that not only did they put an immense amount of time into getting almost all the questions that involve fact regurgitation correct, but they also have the ability to think and reason that the other 95% just don't have.I'm a firm believer that these people will score higher than someone of average intelligence who prepped nonstop for 5 years. I also found that a lot of topics stressed in FA were not stressed on my exam like drug side effects, and random characteristics of diseases which are highly tested in UWorld. Topics I found to be surprisingly numerous on my exam: Leukemias, research models, listening to murmurs, genetics, P450 drugs interactions! Everything else was fair game.
I finished exam exhausted but hopeful, although I was unsure of result. I thought that actual exam was harder than Uworld, and harder but similar in nature to NBME questions. 3 weeks of waiting was brutal.
Actual Step 1 Score: 251
I am pleased as I accomplished my goal of 250+, but a tiny bit greedy as I honestly thought that if I got slightly lucky on a few questions I could get near or above 260. Luck is definitely a factor on this test! So many questions are educated guesses, so luck of the draw on 5-10 q's might be the difference between 250 and 260. Anyways I am pleased that the beast is over with and I can concentrate on rotations, Step 2, family, private life, have a social life again. In case you are wondering whether I am glad that I moved my exam from Aug to Jan, I would say yes. I think my score would have been slightly lower but similar with 3 months less of review, but I think the importance of this exam for IMG's (i.e. you fail or score sub-200 and you're done) made me want to exhaust myself just for slightly more of a guarantee that I would do well. If only to sleep better at night and know I did everything I could.
My recommendations based on my experience: read Goljan patho during patho block for MS2's in US. Don't ever bother with recommended textbooks. The HY and BRS books are what make you a well rounded Step 1 takes/doctor overall and not knowing every ******* detail of for instance neuroanatomy. That's for PhD students. Don't worry too much. Enormous gaps in knowledge can be covered in a few months. Eat well and exercise is as important as actually studying. Don't do what some people do in their dedicated 8 weeks of review and neglect your body. I learned this the hard way. USMLERx is very useful in addition to UWorld (if you want to do a bank late in MS2, then do it and leave Uworld for last). Memorizing every last work of FA isn't as useful as people say it is. You WILL hit your score limit, more time will only exhaust you and make you do worse. To get 260+, you have to have that it-factor, which most people don't have and any amount of reviewing won't get you there. Another thing which I found is that where you went to school doesn't mean JACK **** for what you will get on Step 1. Yes, Harvard med students almost all pass, but it's all about the caliber of the individual not where they went to school. You can't look at my experience and say oh look I'm an IMG from Europe, so I can get a 251. WRONG! You might get a 251 but I found that it has little to do with your school and education and more to do with your intelligence, study plan, motivation, and demeanor. Apart from that relax, chill the **** out, doing something to relax yourself like watching movies and tv is ok. Don't worry that your classmates are studying 16 hour days. Study 8 solid hours and hang out with your family, eat, exercise the rest, and I guarantee you'll do better than if you were to do the ******* kamikaze 16 hours a day. People in your year will make you feel like it's all a rat race and you have to study all the time but it's total BS. It's all about the whole process, not just study quantity. Also, sex if you have a partner, or self-release is important. At least it was for me. Be patient in this entire process, getting your target Step 1 score is such a journey, and while I didn't get 260+, I am satisfied and at the 90th percentile (something that will not preclude me from interviews for any specialty). Sorry for rambling, but I found typing this out to be a good way to gain perspective on the last year of my life.

CONGRATULATIONS and THANK YOU for the breakdown!
 
During the test, can you take a break between sections without leaving the computer? If so, how do you do that? Is there a "pause" button like on the online NBMEs?

If you don't take an authorized break and leave the room you have 30 seconds otherwise the computer will automatically give you a break. So basically you have 30 seconds to choose to break or go to next block. That's how I understood it.
 
If you don't take an authorized break and leave the room you have 30 seconds otherwise the computer will automatically give you a break. So basically you have 30 seconds to choose to break or go to next block. That's how I understood it.

got it, but once you take a break, you can just hang out at your computer right?
 
got it, but once you take a break, you can just hang out at your computer right?
That's actually a very good question. I would always use my break time to leave to the waiting room. I preferred to go get some calorie rich food and water and move around than to sit in the room. I think that theoretically you can sit at your testing station while on an authorized break. Someone else on here needs to confirm these rules just so you're sure doing this isn't considered "irregular behavior". I would assume it's ok though.
 
@MaliOMali or any else who has taken the exam recently: Ive noticed a lot of nbme forms have repeated questions throughout the test--not exactly the same but testing the exact same concept in almost the exact same way. Did you notice that on the real test? I am just curious if that is one of the ways they validate/standardize the scores (if someone gets it right once, they are lucky, if they get it right twice, they actually understand the concept)


Yea i had many similar concepts getting repeated
 
got it, but once you take a break, you can just hang out at your computer right?
Yes, it's perfectly OK to just sit there and not to leave the room.
This is exactly what I did for CK-Click "Take a break" after every block and decide how long you want to extend it. Leaving the room wastes 2 minutes at least for checking in & out, so consider that too.
I used to go out of the room after every two blocks for refreshments etc for 5-10 minutes and in between just a 2 minute break @ the computer to close my eyes and forget about the previous block and be ready for next block.
I highly recommend a break after EVERY block to clear your mind/thoughts for the next block.
 
Any good plan to start studying for step 1 guys ? thank you all ..

1. Find out your weak areas by doing QBanks.
2. Read , understand and know the concepts about those topics.
3. Take NBMEs to know where you stand and go back to step 2 if needed.
4. Once you have reached your desired score on NBMEs ( take UWSA to confirm) take the test.

P.S. 1 & 2 go simultaneously.

Bottom-line: Focus on what you do and don't know and work on it instead of focusing on which book to read.

Also, read MaliOMali's experience above. Each and every word about the test is so true that it feels like deja vu to me.
 
Last edited:
1. Find out your weak areas by doing QBanks.
2. Read , understand and know the concepts about those topics.
3. Take NBMEs to know where you stand and go back to step 2 if needed.
4. Once you have reached your desired score on NBMEs ( take UWSA to confirm) take the test.

P.S. 1 & 2 go simultaneously.

Bottom-line: Focus on what you do and don't know and work on it instead of focusing on which book to read.

Also, read MaliOMali's experience above. Each and every word about the test is so true that it feels like deja vu to me.


Thank you so much.
 
Has "AVP" started to show up on boards yet? Professors at my school are saying "ADH" is old terminology.
 
Any advice on how to improve your genetics after studying kaplan lecture notes and uw questions?
 
So I've been doing Rx in 46 question blocks by subject and am pretty far in the bank (80%). I have a pretty mediocre average (60-something%). I'm feeling pretty discouraged and am taking the exam some in the summer. Does anyone have suggestions for to break through this barrier and improve my averages?

I've been using this bank to learn/expose myself to common presentations so I was wondering if I'm putting too much emphasis on my score vs. the material I am learning.
 
Last edited:
So I've been doing Rx in 46 question blocks by subject and am pretty far in the bank (80%). I have a pretty mediocre average (60-something%). I'm feeling pretty discouraged and am taking the exam some in the summer. Does anyone have suggestions for to break through this barrier and improve my averages?

I've been using this bank to learn/expose myself to common presentations so I was wondering if I'm putting too much emphasis on my score vs. the material I am learning.
Learning tool man, use em all as a learning tool. Figure out why you chose the answer you did and read the answer choices. As an aside Rx sometimes is WRONG! Or there is more than 1 correct answer choice/ poorly worded.
 
So I've been doing Rx in 46 question blocks by subject and am pretty far in the bank (80%). I have a pretty mediocre average (60-something%). I'm feeling pretty discouraged and am taking the exam some in the summer. Does anyone have suggestions for to break through this barrier and improve my averages?

I've been using this bank to learn/expose myself to common presentations so I was wondering if I'm putting too much emphasis on my score vs. the material I am learning.
What I would do is re-read FA again slowly, and make sure you understand every concept in that textbook. Diagnose what you are weak in and don't understand. No page of FA is skippable or unimportant. Make sure you are learning not just reviewing. If you suck at neurology for example, go and read HY neuroanatomy and re-read FA section. Focus on weak points. Also make sure you are reading explanations of questions, NOT JUST your wrong questions/answers but also alternate choices for every question because a question only tests one concept but if you read the entire explanation and alternate choices, you've suddenly covered 10+ concepts, and you will learn a lot more that way. I had a more positive experience with Rx than posted above. I found mistakes in both UWorld and Rx. I would also do an NBME soon to show you what areas you're not good at. I found that NBME questions (while often easier than actual USMLE) were the most similar to Step 1 in reality, so make sure you do at least a few NBME's (some recommend doing all of them, which I don't). I guarantee if you learn FA and do enough questions you'll start hitting 70's% on Uworld in no time.
And don't be fooled by a lot of posts on here and other forums that Rx is easy! I think they have added and updated their bank extensively in recent years and you'll see a lot of opinions from pre-2013 saying it is easy and one-step reasoning. I thought it was very close to quality to UWorld with exception of having shorter explanations.
 
Has "AVP" started to show up on boards yet? Professors at my school are saying "ADH" is old terminology.

AVP is the old terminology and ADH is the new terminology. Are you sure you didn't get what he said backwards?

They called it vasopressin because they noticed how it constricted arterioles via V1 receptors. Anti-diuretic hormone is the newer terminology and you should stick to that but knowing its old name was vasopressin is helpful if you get a question talking about arteriole constriction via hormones.
 
What I would do is re-read FA again slowly, and make sure you understand every concept in that textbook. Diagnose what you are weak in and don't understand. No page of FA is skippable or unimportant. Make sure you are learning not just reviewing. If you suck at neurology for example, go and read HY neuroanatomy and re-read FA section. Focus on weak points. Also make sure you are reading explanations of questions, NOT JUST your wrong questions/answers but also alternate choices for every question because a question only tests one concept but if you read the entire explanation and alternate choices, you've suddenly covered 10+ concepts, and you will learn a lot more that way. I had a more positive experience with Rx than posted above. I found mistakes in both UWorld and Rx. I would also do an NBME soon to show you what areas you're not good at. I found that NBME questions (while often easier than actual USMLE) were the most similar to Step 1 in reality, so make sure you do at least a few NBME's (some recommend doing all of them, which I don't). I guarantee if you learn FA and do enough questions you'll start hitting 70's% on Uworld in no time.
And don't be fooled by a lot of posts on here and other forums that Rx is easy! I think they have added and updated their bank extensively in recent years and you'll see a lot of opinions from pre-2013 saying it is easy and one-step reasoning. I thought it was very close to quality to UWorld with exception of having shorter explanations.

I was dead set on doing UWorld during MS2 but now I think I'll use RX for the first half of MS2 and Uworld during the remainder up till test date based on your and other's take on these Qbanks. Especially since the last semester of school they give us a free uworld sub for 6 months.
 
I was dead set on doing UWorld during MS2 but now I think I'll use RX for the first half of MS2 and Uworld during the remainder up till test date based on your and other's take on these Qbanks. Especially since the last semester of school they give us a free uworld sub for 6 months.

Damn that's clutch. I've already spent too much money so far on board prep material and registering for both exams. My school is giving us DIT but I would much prefer a subscription for UWorld.
 
AVP is the old terminology and ADH is the new terminology. Are you sure you didn't get what he said backwards?

They called it vasopressin because they noticed how it constricted arterioles via V1 receptors. Anti-diuretic hormone is the newer terminology and you should stick to that but knowing its old name was vasopressin is helpful if you get a question talking about arteriole constriction via hormones.

Yes.. ADH is old terminology because ADH is more than just an anti-diuretic. Maybe vasopressin is the old terminology for ADH, but AVP is the new terminology for ADH.

I guess it doesn't matter. It's all the same anyway.
 
Yes.. ADH is old terminology because ADH is more than just an anti-diuretic. Maybe vasopressin is the old terminology for ADH, but AVP is the new terminology for ADH.

I guess it doesn't matter. It's all the same anyway.

how many names does this thing need. You could easily confuse it with ANP if you are in a rush, which does the opposite of AVP.
 
Damn that's clutch. I've already spent too much money so far on board prep material and registering for both exams. My school is giving us DIT but I would much prefer a subscription for UWorld.

I love when SoM admin take it upon themselves in isolation to help with Step prep by suggesting/purchasing definitive resources, when in actuality it's the MS3/4s that know best. I had never used DIT, so I can't comment per se, but it sounds like they need someone to step up and just push questions on the students.
 
I love when SoM admin take it upon themselves in isolation to help with Step prep by suggesting/purchasing definitive resources, when in actuality it's the MS3/4s that know best. I had never used DIT, so I can't comment per se, but it sounds like they need someone to step up and just push questions on the students.

I honestly don't think I'll be using it much because I already have my own system with FA, UWorld, and Goljan/Pathoma. My school has a class on Fridays specifically designed for going over board questions (I think we use some sort of Kaplan question set?). Believe it or not we are actually tested on the topics for a grade twice a semester during M2 year.
 
I love when SoM admin take it upon themselves in isolation to help with Step prep by suggesting/purchasing definitive resources, when in actuality it's the MS3/4s that know best. I had never used DIT, so I can't comment per se, but it sounds like they need someone to step up and just push questions on the students.

I agree. I keep seeing book lists and hearing of titles recommended by faculty and I can't help but roll my eyes. The solid sources have been vetted and established over the years. The Test Prep Industrial Complex just keeps getting bigger and bigger every year.
 
At least you guys get stuff from your school. I'm pretty sure ours doesn't "give" us anything from board prep companies.

I love when SoM admin take it upon themselves in isolation to help with Step prep by suggesting/purchasing definitive resources, when in actuality it's the MS3/4s that know best. I had never used DIT, so I can't comment per se, but it sounds like they need someone to step up and just push questions on the students.

Can you comment on the utility of USMLE Express?
 
At least you guys get stuff from your school. I'm pretty sure ours doesn't "give" us anything from board prep companies.



Can you comment on the utility of USMLE Express?

Just a warning, but you can't speed up the Rx Express videos. That was a deal breaker for me. The up-side is that there is a money back policy if you return it within a given amount of time, so you can give it a try without throwing your cash away. I've listened to some of the Rx videos from 2012, and it seems like it's hit-or-miss. The immuno section was brilliant. The micro section was little more than someone reading FA.
 
Just a warning, but you can't speed up the Rx Express videos. That was a deal breaker for me. The up-side is that there is a money back policy if you return it within a given amount of time, so you can give it a try without throwing your cash away. I've listened to some of the Rx videos from 2012, and it seems like it's hit-or-miss. The immuno section was brilliant. The micro section was little more than someone reading FA.

You can't open them with VLC?

DIT= biggest waste of time/money

I agree. That's why I'm considering Rx Express (only $200, sometimes less when on sale).
 
Top