Official 2014 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
. I'm just hoping that the percent correct vs score curving is more forgiving on this than on the NBMEs.

+1. I've been going through the old 2013 thread and it seems like it may be, but then there's also people who got 260s saying they only missed 20 (which is right where the NBME curve would be). Guess we'll never know, let's just hope for the best.
 
+1. I've been going through the old 2013 thread and it seems like it may be, but then there's also people who got 260s saying they only missed 20 (which is right where the NBME curve would be). Guess we'll never know, let's just hope for the best.
What? There's no way of telling how many you missed, unless you're an exceptionally skilled mnemonist.
 
Would any of you champions be ever so kind to explain bacterial genetics (transformation/conjugation/transposition/transduction) and viral genetics (recombination/reassortment/complementation/phenotypic mixing) to me. I honestly understand the text and the concept, but when it comes to an NBME question, more than half the time I get these questions wrong.

Thanks for your time and I'll pay the gesture forward asap.

-Cali
FA has all the information you need to know regarding this topic. CMMRS has a great chapter explaining it if FA wasn't clear enough, and Kaplan QBank has some excellent questions testing this material. Honestly I felt the Kaplan questions were much harder than any UWorld, USMLERx or NBME questions on the same material, but they were asked in a way that really tested if you knew the material or not. Understanding these questions will help you answer similar questions on NBMEs which will then seem much easier in comparison. Videos may also be helpful here (youtube) because seeing the process occur will make understanding it that much easier.

Most commonly tested concept in this area? The fact that cells utilizing transformation will cease to do so once DNase is added. Simple enough but I've seen it multiple times across the 3 qbanks and in NBMEs. Toxins obtained via lysogenic phages is a close second.
 
Well when I go from marking 5 questions per block on practice exams to 25-30 questions a block on the real deal AND ran out of time on 10-15 questions in the last block where I randomly just picked all Cs what the hell am i supposed to say? Yeah I did amazing?

This is exactly my feeling/concern. I get that I'm not alone in thinking the real deal was exponentially harder than UWorld or NBME, but EVERYTHING was different on test day. I took both UWSAs and 4 or 5 NBMEs, and I usually never marked more than 10 questions per block. I always finished with at least 10 minutes left, and that was WITH reviewing my marked. On test day, I marked more than half of the questions in each block, and I used up every last second in each block, never even got to review all of my marked (and thinking back to the marked ones I can remember, a lot of them were wrong). Just really hoping for a generous curve...
 
nobody is sharing their final step 1 score.That makes me wonder.Dont get me wrong i am just saying that people are exaggerating a little bit.I am sure that everyone here will pass very easly even the ones who are saying that they are not sure whether they passed.

People who took their test within the past month (since May) don't get our scores until July 9 at the earliest.
 
This is exactly my feeling/concern. I get that I'm not alone in thinking the real deal was exponentially harder than UWorld or NBME, but EVERYTHING was different on test day. I took both UWSAs and 4 or 5 NBMEs, and I usually never marked more than 10 questions per block. I always finished with at least 10 minutes left, and that was WITH reviewing my marked. On test day, I marked more than half of the questions in each block, and I used up every last second in each block, never even got to review all of my marked (and thinking back to the marked ones I can remember, a lot of them were wrong). Just really hoping for a generous curve...

That is the same exact experience I had 🙁
Quite frankly I was in complete shock at the level of difficulty.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I agree with the whole ekgs in first aid aren't enough, I got one out of left field and I only knew it cause we had a great pair of cardio professors. My heart sounds were also a little out of the way, it wasn't like 65 year old man with a crescendo-decrescendo in the right sternal border or whatever that would make it super obvious. Also I had a few questions where the right answer wasn't even in the answer choices. There was a psych question where the person was exhibiting a mature response, no question about it, and the answer choices were all immature responses. So I went with the "best answer", knowing full well that it wasn't correct.

I think I got that same psych question. They were asking about sublimation and the only answer choice close was reaction formation, iirc.
 
+1. I've been going through the old 2013 thread and it seems like it may be, but then there's also people who got 260s saying they only missed 20 (which is right where the NBME curve would be). Guess we'll never know, let's just hope for the best.

I would wager that the number of people who only get 20 or so questions wrong is very small. Just based on the number of experimental questions alone it makes it incredibly hard to believe. Basically, you would have to make no stupid mistakes, get extremely lucky at least several times and have an incredibly deep knowledge base to even have a shot at that.
 
you'll know I did horrible, when I don't do a final post 😛

It felt like a 220-230 kind of day, but failing is in the realm of possibilities....
 
The horror stories make me think of this quote: "The purpose is to experience fear, fear in the face of certain death, to accept that fear, and maintain control of oneself"

I'll be taking Monday and am trying to fill in some of those last gaps, but I pretty much have heard from everyone else here and elsewhere that is gon' be bad.
 
6/19 test: it was awful. I practically marked 70% of each block and felt like I was guessing most of the time. I'd be lucky if I pass. The real thing was infinitely harder than nbme/uworld. I'm totally screwed now.

Yeah man I mean we all felt that same way. I took my exam 06/19 too I don't know if the 19th was dooms day or what but here's to praying that we all at least pass.
 
I take it Friday, here are my numbers:

Did ~60% of USMLERX, I think the % was roughly mid 60s.

UWorld 74% (upper 60's starting, last third of it I averaged ~80%, Finished a few weeks ago)
^Incorrects ~90%
CBSE 250 (1 month out)
NBME 12 247 (5/22)
NBME 13 251 (5/29)
UWSA 1 265 (6/5)
NBME 7 260 (6/9)
NBME 11 251 (6/11)
UWSA 2 265 (6/13)
NBME 15 254 (6/15)
NBME 16 249 (6/17)

I used FA/Uworld/Pathoma for 95% of my prep. Read FA 3x, starting with ~10-20 pages each day back in January, with random Rx questions every other day or so. Last pass did 45 pages a day. Used Pathoma during coursework religiously, probably have gone through each chapter 3-4x, some sections more. Started UWorld in April, annotated everything I thought mattered into FA-->read FA for the 3rd time. I kept a log of my missed questions written as one-liners from each missed UWorld question and each missed NBME question and reviewed these a little each day.

The other 5% was with pharmcards and microcards, which I do think helped if only for the breaking up the monotony of reading FA. I would just grab a random card from a huge mixed pile I had and read about a bug/drug. My scores in these two areas remained high throughout, so I do feel like this has helped my retain the "crammable" info.

My goal is >250, hopefully my test won't by Behavioral heavy 🙂 I will post soon after with my experience.

This thread has been extremely helpful for me while studying. The advice and motivation have been great. I'll do my best to offer up any helpful advice in return. Good luck!

I took the exam yesterday. Yes, the question stems were longer than NBMEs and UWorld. Yes, some questions didn't seem to have the right answer. And yes, I felt a little more pressed for time. However, my form at least was FAIR. ~80% of it came from FA/UWorld/Pathoma. ~50% concepts were questioned in their classical question scenarios with no trickiness. I think it was much more like UWorld in question style.

My exam was a good balance of everything, honestly. Systems were mixed pretty evenly. If anything stood out I would have to say Pulm and Renal were covered more than others but not by much. For subjects: I felt like my exam had more "general principle" type questions than anything else. A lot of stuff from the first 3 Pathoma chapters popped up (praise be to Sattar). As others have said, Immuno was tested in terms of both concepts and diseases. Know your Humoral/Cell-mediated responses and how they interact well. I think a "big picture" understanding of immunology will take you far on a lot of the questions. FYI the new Pathoma material in chapter 2 scored me 2 questions I would not have gotten otherwise. Micro and Pharm were straight forward, either you knew the bug/drug or you didn't. As others have said, FA Pharm is all you need. If you are in a crunch with Pharm-focus on the mechanisms. I had ~30 Pharm questions and >2/3 literally just asked which drug has blah blah mechanism, basically. Know parasites and their treatment! Don't skimp that stuff. Anatomy was well represented, but again, the same concepts in the NBMEs and UW showed up and were VERY familiar. Brachial plexus and Lower limb anatomy=key. The anatomy I had that wasn't in FA/UW just involved spatial awareness of what nerves are where..etc. Like the inferior vesical artery is nowhere near the spleen right? That kind of awareness. Biostats questions were straightforward as well, or just required you to think a step to the left of what you had learned.

In terms of questions people are worried about:

1) "Next best step". These were straight forward for me, and I only had maybe 5-6. The stem seemed like it was leading me to the correct choice and it usually involved the most emergent option for the patient. I think if you focus on what they tell you in the question you don't have to try and remember anything.
2) Ethics. I only had about 5-6 of these and I won't lie a few of them came down to picking between two "correct" choices. I was able to reason through these after I read the stem again most of the time.
3) Anatomy: See above. FA covered ~75% of this, the rest I felt I could reason through based on what they gave me in the image or what I knew about the body region.

Overall, my advice would be to do what others have said: Know FA/UW/Pathoma. Seriously 80% of my exam came from this stuff. Also, for the random questions, don't be intimidated if it wasn't in any of the prep materials. I recognized something I had seen before in all of those WTF questions. The tricky part are the answer choices. I kind of had an idea what they were talking about in these WTF questions, but the answer choices didn't give you any help. I just went with what was the most familiar and didn't think twice. Be confident that you are prepared and have a clear head.

Test day advice: Sleep. Seriously go to bed at 8 the night before and get >8 hrs of sleep. My last few days of prep I was averaging about 6 hours of sleep for 5 days in a row and it showed in my stupid mistakes on NBMEs. I was refreshed and focused during the real thing after getting 2-3 nights of amazing sleep, no matter what. Also, take more food than you need and take a variety. You won't know what you feel like eating that day, or if you'll have time between breaks. I took the test in 2-2-1-1-1 blocks with breaks between, which helped immensely. I had to calm down after the first 5-10 questions because I was spazzing, then I realized it wasn't that bad. I anticipated long stems (and they all were) so I tried to just read faster and move through the blocks without any hiccups. You WILL get screwed on timing if you get hung up on 2-3 questions. For me, going through the questions relatively quickly then going back to my marks was helpful. I marked ~10 questions a block, but reviewed every question. I usually finished each block with about 20 minutes left, which was my goal. It helps to allow enough time. For every block there were 5 that were toss ups where I had to just guess and move on. Be comfortable doing this! I think this mindset really made me more focused and I got a lot of easy questions right by moving on from harder questions and forgetting them as soon as the block was over.

Good luck! If anyone has any questions please ask.
 
Experience write-ups have been a huge help to me in my preparation, so I am repaying the favor by posting about my experience.

First two years
1. Worked my butt off for classes
2. Firecracker-I started using Gunner training right before the switch to Firecracker. I did an ok job of keeping up with daily reviews. 100% banked but mastery was in the high 70s.
3. I read FA alongside class material.
4. BRS phys
5. Fadem for behavioral science

Dedicated period (~6 weeks)

I began my dedicated period by running through pathoma and FA. While reading FA, I made a dedicated anki deck of facts and concepts that I was unfamiliar with or thought I would forget. I did the daily reviews for this deck, which at times exceeded 900 cards per day (anki stats attached). Reviews would normally take 4-6 hrs per day. After finishing FA and pathoma, I moved onto UWorld. I did 3 blocks per day, and instead of annotating FA, I made anki cards of material that I thought was important.

Practice tests

I took all of the NBME practice tests available online. The following are my scores:

NBME 16 (5/19): 256
NBME 11 (5/24): 266
NBME 12 (5/31): 256
NBME 7 (6/4): 277
NBME 13 (6/9): 260
NBME 15 (6/12): 262
Free 138 (6/14): 91%
UWorld : 84% (46 question timed, random blocks; 1 pass)

Exam day (6/19)

The exam was much tougher than anything I had encountered in my studies. FA covered about 5-10% of the exam. Another 5% were WTF questions. The rest of the test was a mixture of questions that required application of basic knowledge and principles in very strange ways. I found that I was able to narrow down most questions to two answers or make an educated guess, but I was rarely sure about my answer. It felt as if I made educated guesses on a majority of the test. My best recommendation is to do well during the first two years and stick to the tried and true FA/Pathoma/UWorld.

Score: ????
 

Attachments

  • anki-stats-2014-06-21@12-14-42.png
    [email protected]
    153.1 KB · Views: 189
Did the USMLE change things recently or has it been like that for years?

The problem lies in misreading. The NBMEs give you an idea of WHERE YOU STAND...i.e. roughly the score you can expect on the real deal. They're NOT MEANT to be representative of the questions / breakup on the test.
 
Ya.



Did the USMLE change things recently or has it been like that for years?

Some people claim to have taken an exam which was similar to NBMEs or Uworld but in my own personal experience with a neutral perspective I tried to compare it to all the practice exams I have taken in the past. My exam was outrageously harder than NBME or Uworld.
The question stems were easily 2-3x longer with a lot of convoluted information. Every time I thought I had a diagnosis I realized I was going in the wrong direction because of some minute BS written in the question. Also more importantly by the time I was done reading a question I had already run out of time and hardly had a few seconds if even that to think about what was actually going on. There were a lot more atypical presentations and a lot of application instead of just searching for buzz words like the NBME exams and even Uworld questions.
The multiple choice answers in Uworld can kind of guide you into knowing what's going on and there's usually only 4-5 choices and one of them really sticks out as the best answer. On the real deal that was not the case at all, there were a lot more options and looking at the answers gave absolutely no clue and if anything confused me some more because I just couldn't find answers that I was looking for.
 
Last edited:
Yea... real thing is infinitely harder... I marked/guessed on 70%. I'm freaking out and will be really lucky if I don't fail...

I thought I was gonna be okay. I swear I marked 50% of the questions in every block. And factor in the stupid mistakes that are bound to happen (for everyone except the immaculate Brain Bucket) and it's just a complete mess.

I hope some schools did a better job of being honest with their students before preparations than my school was. All we got were rainbows and ponies and candy and rah rah rah BS. I would have appreciated it if the people responsible for knowing what happens with the tests would have told us the truth and laid out how unbelievable insane the real thing is. I'm old enough to appreciate the truth, no matter how tough it is. To tell us that an NBME is a fair representation of our knowledge or what the test is like is just flat out wrong. It was a complete mess.
 
Ya.



Did the USMLE change things recently or has it been like that for years?

There's a ton of false info out there, and sadly some of it comes from our deans who are responsible for preparing us. All they told us was "NBMEs NBMEs NBMEs- they're great practice and are the type of test you should expect."

BS. Complete BS.
 
to those who have taken it.....would it have helped to read the last sentence (what the question is looking for) before the vignette?
 
to those who have taken it.....would it have helped to read the last sentence (what the question is looking for) before the vignette?
I did this on very long questions, it neither helped nor hurt. I was not short on time, and generally the super long stems for me were first order questions anyway.
 
6/19 test was not about FA, UWORLD , pathoma . It's was about I don't care if you studied. I don't want you be doctor and I'm gonna show you

lol exactly I would say FA, Uworld, Pathoma hardly covered 10-20 % of the material I saw on that 06/19 exam. The majority of the exam was just me throwing random darts.
 
I did this on very long questions, it neither helped nor hurt. I was not short on time, and generally the super long stems for me were first order questions anyway.

Everyone I've heard from has said something similar. They said it did help on 2nd order qs. Apparently it gave them some time to retrieve the answer. An example is: super long vignette about giant cell arteritis, and the last sentence asks HLA.
 
lol exactly I would say FA, Uworld, Pathoma hardly covered 10-20 % of the material I saw on that 06/19 exam. The majority of the exam was just me throwing random darts.

Quite frankly, pathoma proved to be a complete waste of time for boards review. Sattar just failed us when it came to "this is particularly high yield... examiners love to go after this."
 
Quite frankly, pathoma proved to be a complete waste of time for boards review. Sattar just failed us when it came to "this is particularly high yield... examiners love to go after this."

Well I mean I think we just got unlucky with the harder forms. A lot of people have praised Pathoma but I agree for my exam it didn't help at all not one bit. The only thing that helped a little bit was first aid but even then it helped with the initial step of must i say a very few questions. Even for those questions I still had to figure out the next step which was just a wild guess on my part.

Overall I'm disappointed in myself. I had full faith in my NBME and Uworld performances but how can I rely on those when the real deal had almost nothing in common with them?
 
hahaha that test was sooooo hard 🙁

lol I've seen some really F'd up questions but the stuff I saw that day man I can't even go to sleep anymore. I just keep asking myself WTF did I do in my life to deserve that exam after all the hard work I put in?
 
I took the exam yesterday. Yes, the question stems were longer than NBMEs and UWorld. Yes, some questions didn't seem to have the right answer. And yes, I felt a little more pressed for time. However, my form at least was FAIR. ~80% of it came from FA/UWorld/Pathoma. ~50% concepts were questioned in their classical question scenarios with no trickiness. I think it was much more like UWorld in question style.My exam was a good balance of everything, honestly. Systems were mixed pretty evenly...."


The exam was much tougher than anything I had encountered in my studies. FA covered about 5-10% of the exam. Another 5% were WTF questions. The rest of the test was a mixture of questions that required application of basic knowledge and principles in very strange ways. I found that I was able to narrow down most questions to two answers or make an educated guess, but I was rarely sure about my answer. It felt as if I made educated guesses on a majority of the test. My best recommendation is to do well during the first two years and stick to the tried and true FA/Pathoma/UWorld



When there is markedly different opinions about the test.....one says about 80% was covered in First Aid/Pathoma/Uworld and the other says only 5-10%, I'm not sure what to think. How are the questions generated? Ive read about people having forms with an equal distribution of questions across systems, while others have complained that entire systems were completely abandoned in their form. Also, a lot of people seem to get multiple Qs on the same concept, sometimes within the same block. I'm curious to know exactly how the different forms are generated, and if the selection of questions is truly objective and standardized.
 
Last edited:
Lol... clay? Wow.

Quite frankly, pathoma proved to be a complete waste of time for boards review. Sattar just failed us when it came to "this is particularly high yield... examiners love to go after this."

Well just wait for next years update.

"Okay, welcome back... This next section is going to be about clay and is particularly high yield. I can't emphasize that enough. It may seem confusing, but I find it rather easy once you understand the pathology behind it. And once you understand whats going on with clay, I find it will make understanding eating dirt very simple."
 
Block 2 I had two questions asking the same exact thing. It was about the inheritance pattern of a particular triple repeat disease. True story
 
Every day I remember one more and more that I missed:/

Every time I remember something I missed, I down another diphenhydramine. I've been chewing them like tic-tacs. Helps me cope. Also helps to minorly trip balls without failing my m3 drug test in a couple weeks.
 
When there is markedly different opinions about the test.....one says about 80% was covered in First Aid/Pathoma/Uworld and the other says only 5-10%, I'm not sure what to think. How are the questions generated? Ive read about people having forms with an equal distribution of questions across systems, while others have complained that entire systems were completely abandoned in their form. Also, a lot of people seem to get multiple Qs on the same concept, sometimes within the same block. I'm curious to know exactly how the different forms are generated, and if the selection of questions is truly objective and standardized.

Based on my experience and what I have read from others, I would guess that the tests are randomly generated. They may not be completely random, but there must be some degree of randomness. One guy in my class finished the exam in half the allotted time and said it was all very clear cut classic stuff, like the NBMEs. Despite the difficulty of my exam, I still believe in the tried and true sources. Good knowledge of them will ensure that you get the easiest questions correct, but for the hard stuff, there is simply no way to prepare, except to have a good foundation in the material.
 
Last edited:
Eating clay is Pica, isn't it?
When there is markedly different opinions about the test.....one says about 80% was covered in First Aid/Pathoma/Uworld and the other says only 5-10%, I'm not sure what to think. How are the questions generated? Ive read about people having forms with an equal distribution of questions across systems, while others have complained that entire systems were completely abandoned in their form. Also, a lot of people seem to get multiple Qs on the same concept, sometimes within the same block. I'm curious to know exactly how the different forms are generated, and if the selection of questions is truly objective and standardized.

Great question. I don't know the answer, but I do know that all of these views are coming from INDIVIDUALS with varying mindsets and approach to studying (not resources used...I mean specifically approach). For example, a renal stone question asking about the importance of the relationship of the ureter to the rest of pelvic anatomy may be considered under multiple categories (e.g. renal, anatomy, general health principles) by the boards, but may not even be considered a renal question by a student who may have been hoping to get questions on nephritic/nephrotic syndromes because that's what they happened to study hard coming up to the test, so that student may walk out of the test dazed and confused, saying that they had "no renal questions" when in fact they did -- just not the type of 'renal' questions they had in mind. Yes, the forms are different because they have to be. But that doesn't mean the distributions of questions under certain categories are much different because the questions are integrated, and the categories are broad. Best thing for you to do is to cover all your bases, focus on your weaknesses (most important), and use your best practice test score be your motivation and boost your confidence. Your test is likely to be unique as well, so it doesn't really help to dwell on negative comments from us who took it and have yet to see our scores. Good luck!
 
No what chromosome it's inherited from.

oh ok. thanks!

Eating clay is Pica, isn't it?


Great question. I don't know the answer, but I do know that all of these views are coming from INDIVIDUALS with varying mindsets and approach to studying (not resources used...I mean specifically approach). For example, a renal stone question asking about the importance of the relationship of the ureter to the rest of pelvic anatomy may be considered under multiple categories (e.g. renal, anatomy, general health principles) by the boards, but may not even be considered a renal question by a student who may have been hoping to get questions on nephritic/nephrotic syndromes because that's what they happened to study hard coming up to the test, so that student may walk out of the test dazed and confused, saying that they had "no renal questions" when in fact they did -- just not the type of 'renal' questions they had in mind. Yes, the forms are different because they have to be. But that doesn't mean the distributions of questions under certain categories are much different because the questions are integrated, and the categories are broad. Best thing for you to do is to cover all your bases, focus on your weaknesses (most important), and use your best practice test score be your motivation and boost your confidence. Your test is likely to be unique as well, so it doesn't really help to dwell on negative comments from us who took it and have yet to see our scores. Good luck!

yeah clay would be pica, along with ice-chips, and dirt lol, causing iron-def anemia. But I guess we would have to know how the question was structured.

And yes I def agree with your post. This is something i often thought about as well. good advice!
 
Top