hi errbody! long time lurker here, figured it was about time i start posting on these forums.
🙂
step 1: 249
NBME 7 (3 weeks prior): 246
NBME 4 (1.5 weeks prior): 263
UWSA (3 days prior): 264
step 2 ck: 265
i studied for 3.5 weeks after finishing my last clerkship, which was IM. i had been using SUTM to study for the IM shelf but focused mainly on MTB step 2 and 3 for my dedicated step 2 study time (read thru 1x each). reread a couple of chapters from SUTM that i felt weak on (mainly cards). also reread pestana's book 1x and referenced some of the tables from BRS peds. didn't feel like MTB had enough substance, which made it difficult to stick with it at times. as others have mentioned, i don't think there's a magic bullet text for step 2 ck like FA was for step 1. just have to find a book that you can stick with. and of course, do as many UWorld questions as you can! i reset my UWorld qbank sometime just before my IM shelf and did all the qs again. read through all the explanations but was too lazy to annotate much. 90% on my 2nd pass (random blocks), but felt this was bc i had just seen many of the qs when i was preparing for the IM shelf. never got the hang of the biostats or drug ad questions, and overall felt pretty underprepared going into my actual test.
day of: arrived at the test center only to realize i forgot my lunch at home (OH NOES). spent my first few breaks texting up a storm trying to find someone who could bring food for me XD anyway, left the test center feeling crappy... as expected... but less crappy than i felt after taking step 1! had 2 sets of drug ad questions (2-3 qs each), several WEIRD ethical questions, very little obgyn (thank goodness), more bread and butter stuff compared to step 1.
anyway, as everyone else says, i think UWorld is key to doing well on step 2. don't freak out or get frustrated if you can't find a good review book to supplement UWorld. i honestly don't know how much i retained from my one pass through MTB 2 and 3, but think i would have done it the same way if i had to do it all over again. trust in what you know... i feel like step 2 is more about your clinical impression of patients which you develop throughout 3rd year whereas step 1 is more about regurgitation of obscure facts.