Elaborate on chem in the summer, I'm still trying to decide between summer chem or summer bio. Would you do it again or would you stick to the normal year? Is it really as bad as some people make it out it be? Why do you think you didn't get a A-, or A+? Lack of effort, too much material, not enough time, or too busy with other things like job? Is it like a full time jobs where you're putting in almost 40 hours a week to the class?
I've heard that summer Biology is much more difficult than full-year Biology. Now that Anderson has two (or three) years of experience teaching the class, there is much more test prep available. On the other hand, Fixsen is (supposedly) a brilliant professor. His course will set you up for success on both the MCAT and in future Biology courses. The summer courses, due to their structure, are going to be difficult.
If I had to choose between summer Chemistry or Biology, and I was not dead set on the one year plan, I would choose Biology. It is the gatekeeper for many interesting upper level courses. Also, as corny as this sounds, class with Tucci is enjoyable. Nothing wrong with having his course once a week for a year.
I read this piece of advice on a Facebook site and wanted to run it by you to see how you feel about it.
"A few years ago, one of our students (well call him Jeff) found himself in need of letters of recommendation. Jeff took the basic pre-medical advice he knew and went around to his science class faculty to try to make connections. He tried his orgo and his physics II professor. But these faculty were busy, teaching classes of hundreds of students. They wouldnt be able to provide true mentorship for Jeff and definitely nothing more than a generic rec letter.
We discussed Jeffs undergraduate experience to try to figure something out. It turned out that one of his favorite courses was an anthropology course taken as a sophomore. Jeff had a great relationship with his GSI (graduate student instructor) and aced the class. Traditional pre-med advice suggests that you find professors to write your letters of recommendation, but we recommended that Jeff reach out to his GSI. He received an excellent letter which was signed off by the professor of the anthropology course. Now in his 2nd year of med school, were sure that Jeff doesnt regret his decision to use a GSI to write his recommendation."
It immediately reminded me that orgo and physics profs at HES might be similarly busy, so if the above advice makes sense?
Here's another post from the same Facebook source
"Most pre-meds make the mistake of going to one of their freshman/sophomore lecturers for rec letters and attempt to build good rapport. At the end of organic chemistry lecture, just count how many people come down to ask questions and try to introduce themselves to the instructor. Now, this may not be a terrible idea, it just likely has little benefit. Orgo (and other pre-med instructors) teach hundreds of students per semester, run their own lab, and have multiple other obligations. They rarely have time to form a meaningful relationship with a premed; unless they really take you under their wing, youre not likely to get a good letter in the long run."
There are two issues here
- whether using a GSI makes sense at all
- using non-Science profs from our former universities who knew us well because Science profs at HES are likely to teach very large classes.
What do you think?
The key, as far as I know, to recommendations is balance. First, you want at least one non-science professor and 2-3 science professors. The other letters will come from work advisors, lab PIs, physicians you have shadowed extensively with, etc. As post-baccs we have (hopefully) lead successful careers in other fields. This comes with strong LORs that help to set us apart from other applicants. Use this to your advantage. Do not be afraid (once you have a few solid academic LORs) to reach out for professional letters. Your grades will do much of the talking in terms of convincing adcoms that you can handle medical school. Letters from past supervisors who can go into detail about your dedication, professionalism, maturity, etc. are money in the bank, and, if read, can definitely make a difference.
Now, when you say GSI do you mean that they were the "professor", or were they leading sections in a TF/TA type position. If they were the sole instructor of the course, I don't think it matters very much. If they were your TF/TA, your best bet would be for them to comment on your participation, and your professor to comment on your grades.
I always find that the best letters of recommendation come from a naturally developing relationship. Do not force something to happen just for the sake of getting a letter. If you have a question about a topic, ask your professor. If you find a cool article/interesting video, mention it to them after class then email them the link.
That said, I find professors here to be approachable and, for the most part, never too busy for a quick word. Hell, Tucci's office door is seriously open every single time I walk past it (and it's right in a main corridor of the science center).
Also, there's a realtor that lives in my girlfriends building whose helping me look for apartments. If interested, I could PM you his email address - I'm sure he'd be happy to help you and your sister out. Right now he has a program set up searching his database that automatically emails me when a match comes in. Pretty nifty. Let me know.
Good luck Physics-ers.