i am curious to hear about iv experience at Yale or LIJ.
Call seems more frequent than other programs, especially in 3rd year. Ive heard residents at other programs say dont the residents at Longwood work really hard?, and Im not sure if they are referring to the call schedule or what. The schedule doesnt really look any worse than other top NE programs, and the residents I met seemed pretty happy and not overworked but who knows.
Great review, GmailQueen; thanks for posting this. About the working hard thing, my impression was that the C/L experience was particularly taxing, e.g., covering multiple sites (in addition to the call). Not sure if the absolute number of call days is greater than at other comparable programs, though. What you wrote sounds like about as much PGY3 call as Cambridge, UW, and UCSF, although perhaps less than Penn.
-AT.
Just to clarify, unless things have significantly changed since my time there - while there are two separate rotation sites for CL at Longwood (Beth Israel and Brigham) a resident in only on service at one place at one time, i.e., you're covering CL for either BI or BWH that month, but not both at the same time.
Scott & White in Temple, TX
Food/Accommodations Dinner the night before at a residents house. No hotel provided, but there are cheap hotels near campus. Starbucks for breakfast is provided the day of the interview. Lunch is at a really nice steak/seafood joint.
they didn't tell you you could just give them the reciept and they would reimburse you a certain amount?(up to 90 dollars or so iirc).....
that's what I did and they sent a check within 10 days.....
Hi everyone,
first thanks so much to everyone who's been posting!
I just wanted to ask about your thoughts on Baylor Houston if you interviewed there or are in the program. I got the impression that you are a workhorse without too many perks (no on call food, lots of parking fees, lots of commuting)
Any advice/thoughts would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance!
Posted for an anonymous applicant by the primate professional.
UT-Houston
Food/Accommodations – Box lunches with two 3rd years and a total of 5 applicants.
Interview Day – One on one interviews with four faculty. No interviews with students. The day started with lunch. Most of the information about the program was gained through questions. There isn't really any dedicated time for a formal informative session about the program. The day was 11:30-4pm. There is a new program director, and he was not present for the interview day. A second year also told us that intern year is very busy and that is why no interns were available to answer questions. Interns are also scattered around multiple hospitals. No dinner the night before.
Program overview – You rotate through LBJ, MD Anderson, HCPC, and a brand-new outpatient center (probably a couple more places that I forgot). The new PD is apparently very big on picking up more research at UT-H. They supposedly have multiple fMRI machines. Child faculty are very likeable, and a majority of residents go into child fellowships. Some are able to grandfather into their program to do both in 5 years, but there are too many residents to accommodate all. Approximately 7 residents/class but it seemed to vary. I didn't understand that well.
Faculty – They are very nice people, but I found them to be uninformed about the program in general. Prepare lots of questions because you get a lot of "I don't knows".
Call – New call system was just put in place. On inpatient psychiatry (1.5 years), there is a night float (approximately 1 month/year split up 1 week at a time). There is also short call from 3pm-11pm I believe q10. Also there is weekend call split up among 1st and 2nd years q5 weekends. Otherwise you don't round on weekends on psych. 3rd and 4th years take some sort of beeper call that I didn't understand. This is how it was presented to me by a 2nd year, but the new system has only been in place about 2 weeks. The 2nd year mentioned that they admit 8-10 patients on average every 12 hour float shift. Her record was 18, so it appears like volume won't be lacking.
Location – Houston medical center. Some residents buy houses, but a majority live in apartments for proximity reasons. Overall Houston has a good cost of living though. If you like humidity, it is a great city. Lots to do.
Benefits – Salary looked a little low compared to some programs I've seen. 2nd year residents get free lunch by way of the inpatient center giving away free vouchers continuously. Otherwise, a 3rd year mentioned that most other residents bring lunch.
Program strengths – Child department was presented as being very strong. Houston is a great city. More research funds becoming available. Night float. Who wouldn't want to rotate through MD Anderson? Kind faculty. Plenty of patients. Outside moonlighting allowed beginning 3rd year.
Program weaknesses – "Psychiatry and pediatrics departments don't get along well" – 3rd year resident. New PD. Tough intern year. Didn't get to speak to interns.
University of South Alabama
Food/Accomodations- Hotel not provided, but there are a number of decent hotels in the area that are inexpensive. No dinner the night before. Lunch was in one of the physician lounges at one of the hospitals.
Interview Day- The chief resident interacts with the candidates throughout the day, drives them around to the sites. Only three interviews- one with the cochair, one with the pd, and one with another faculty member. Everyone was really nice and laid back. The interview lasts until abou 3 oclock.
Program overview- This is more of a community program in the sense that Altapointe(which alabama contracts out for mental health services) is behind it. If you're looking to do a lot of research or eventually move up in academia, this is not the proram for you. No fellowships are available. The setup of the rotations was pretty typical. Right now none of the off service months have to be inpatient, but the new PD is planning on making at least one of the off service months inpatient for the future.
Call- 5-6 calls a month first year, 3-4 second year, and 3 third year. At first this seems heavy, but it's home call. The residents I spoke to said the average number of patients they had to actually drive to the hospital and go see any given call period was between 1 and 2. So they actually do stay home a good part of their call. It seems like in terms of total hours worked, this program would be less than most I've been at. Whether this is a good or bad thing depends on ones perspective I suppose.
Location- I really like the mobile area.
Benefits- salary is pretty typical, but in mobile it goes farther than atlanta or somewhere else. Moonlighting opportunities are available and some would do that, but there are no in house opportunities.
Strengths- Faculty are very down to earth. Seems the opposite of a malignant program. This is definately an attending driven program in the sense that the attendings do not depend on the residents to "get stuff done". I sense this is because not too long ago altapointe was functioning independently without residents, so the attendings at this program in many cases were used to not having residents around. If you want to work in community mental health one day this would be a great program because you already would be more familiar with community mental health than residents at larger programs with a more typical academic structure.
Weaknesses- As mentioned before, this is not a program that does a lot of research. No fellowships are available.
Overall I really liked the program and will rank it very high
Has anyone been to Albert Einstein at Montefiore? I'm nearing the end the interview trail and have been thinking of canceling, but I'm undecided.
Just adding some further impressions and corrections to the review above:
Interview Day We were told to arrive early and then were given some materials to read and but the day did not start until the originally scheduled time. There was a PowerPoint overview presented by the PD at the HSC. One interview (a faculty) was conducted at HSC and then we had boxed lunches with two residents (PGY-II and PGY-III). We were then taken to HCPC. The group of applicants was split in two with one group going on a tour of HCPC and one group being interviewed. The groups then switched off. The tour was conducted by a PGY-I and a PGY-II. The interviews at HCPC were with the Chair, PD, and two faculty. Some of the interviewers were late to the interviews and the schedule seemed fairly disorganized.
Program Overview Along with the new PD the Chair is also new. Also, there are 10 residents per class.
There is a separate research track and as noted above the program seems to be pushing for more research. There is lots of opportunity for imaging. The program has a 89.7% board pass rate vs. the national average of 88%; which would seem to be within the margin of error but they seemed very proud of it.
Faculty The new chair has a vision of more specialty clinics, more research, and independent faculty time. Another faculty was especially interested in cross cultural psych. Research interests I noted were bipolar, fMRI, substance abuse, autism spectrum disorder. The faculty were said to be good teachers. The PD has an open door policy. I was told the didactics were good.
Call Agree with most of what was written above. Except, short call is actually from 3PM to 8PM, though if it's busy there is flexibility to stay until 10PM to finish notes without going over the 80 hour week (you also get to pick your short call day). The average workweek was said to be around 55 hours. The beeper call in 3rd year is back-up call. There is also a big buddy system in place to help the interns during their first few month of call.
Location Don't have much to add here.
Benefits Agree on the salary being a little low. There is an extra week of vacation during either Christmas or New Year that is not counted in the normal vacation time. Sick days roll over. $100 for books in PGY-III and PGY-IV. Parking is expensive at HCPC ($80/month) and no professional association dues are paid by the program.
Program strengths The residents seemed like a diverse bunch. The faculty are said to be good teachers. Research opportunities with the program's new focus. HCPC looks to be pretty much a one stop shop for psychiatric needs. There are new specialty clinics planned. The program seems resident friendly. The PD has an open door policy. There is early exposure to therapy. There is a new outpatient facility. There is an autism clinic if that is a point of interest for you. Houston is a diverse city and there shouldn't be an issue working with any patient population that interests you. The didactics are said to be good.
Program weaknesses HCPC, with it being a one stop shop the residents spend a lot of their training there and I got the sense that maybe they felt they spent too much time there. The future specialty clinics sound great but it didn't look like many (if any) of them had been started to this point. Houston traffic is generally pretty horrible. Minimal exposure to ECT (none at HCPC).
Overall Seemed like a pretty good program and the residents seemed pretty happy. The call schedule seems very manageable and there looks to be good therapy exposure. I don't know that it has many of my areas of interest up and running at this point.
As you can see we've been holding out on a few reviews (my wife has been extremely busy and hasn't had a chance to review these before I post) please forgive us! At any rate, I don't think she got a sense that the program was IMG centric and I don't think that would bother her anyway so I don't know that she would notice normally. There were funding issues at Harris for a few years if I remember correctly and interns had to spend almost a year doing primary care so I wouldn't be surprised is this turned off AMG's during that period and caused an increase in IMG's. We've heard the funding issues had been cleared up but we didn't get the sense that there was absolutely no way it could happen again... so caveat emptor and all that. We will be ranking this program so we're not too concerned about it.
Just adding some further impressions and corrections to the review above:
Interview Day We were told to arrive early and then were given some materials to read and but the day did not start until the originally scheduled time. There was a PowerPoint overview presented by the PD at the HSC. One interview (a faculty) was conducted at HSC and then we had boxed lunches with two residents (PGY-II and PGY-III). We were then taken to HCPC. The group of applicants was split in two with one group going on a tour of HCPC and one group being interviewed. The groups then switched off. The tour was conducted by a PGY-I and a PGY-II. The interviews at HCPC were with the Chair, PD, and two faculty. Some of the interviewers were late to the interviews and the schedule seemed fairly disorganized.
Program Overview Along with the new PD the Chair is also new. Also, there are 10 residents per class.
There is a separate research track and as noted above the program seems to be pushing for more research. There is lots of opportunity for imaging. The program has a 89.7% board pass rate vs. the national average of 88%; which would seem to be within the margin of error but they seemed very proud of it.
Faculty The new chair has a vision of more specialty clinics, more research, and independent faculty time. Another faculty was especially interested in cross cultural psych. Research interests I noted were bipolar, fMRI, substance abuse, autism spectrum disorder. The faculty were said to be good teachers. The PD has an open door policy. I was told the didactics were good.
Call Agree with most of what was written above. Except, short call is actually from 3PM to 8PM, though if its busy there is flexibility to stay until 10PM to finish notes without going over the 80 hour week (you also get to pick your short call day). The average workweek was said to be around 55 hours. The beeper call in 3rd year is back-up call. There is also a big buddy system in place to help the interns during their first few month of call.
Location Dont have much to add here.
Benefits Agree on the salary being a little low. There is an extra week of vacation during either Christmas or New Year that is not counted in the normal vacation time. Sick days roll over. $100 for books in PGY-III and PGY-IV. Parking is expensive at HCPC ($80/month) and no professional association dues are paid by the program.
Program strengths The residents seemed like a diverse bunch. The faculty are said to be good teachers. Research opportunities with the programs new focus. HCPC looks to be pretty much a one stop shop for psychiatric needs. There are new specialty clinics planned. The program seems resident friendly. The PD has an open door policy. There is early exposure to therapy. There is a new outpatient facility. There is an autism clinic if that is a point of interest for you. Houston is a diverse city and there shouldnt be an issue working with any patient population that interests you. The didactics are said to be good.
Program weaknesses HCPC, with it being a one stop shop the residents spend a lot of their training there and I got the sense that maybe they felt they spent too much time there. The future specialty clinics sound great but it didnt look like many (if any) of them had been started to this point. Houston traffic is generally pretty horrible. Minimal exposure to ECT (none at HCPC).
Overall Seemed like a pretty good program and the residents seemed pretty happy. The call schedule seems very manageable and there looks to be good therapy exposure. I dont know that it has many of my areas of interest up and running at this point.
As you can see we've been holding out on a few reviews (my wife has been extremely busy and hasn't had a chance to review these before I post) please forgive us! At any rate, I don't think she got a sense that the program was IMG centric and I don't think that would bother her anyway so I don't know that she would notice normally. There were funding issues at Harris for a few years if I remember correctly and interns had to spend almost a year doing primary care so I wouldn't be surprised is this turned off AMG's during that period and caused an increase in IMG's. We've heard the funding issues had been cleared up but we didn't get the sense that there was absolutely no way it could happen again... so caveat emptor and all that. We will be ranking this program so we're not too concerned about it.
Sorry for another, but I wanted to add that I spoke with a 4th yr from UTH on the interview trail and she said that the residents there were all really genuinly happy, the call is as good as it seems, its not all just an interview day ruse!
Good review. Got a little confused about your call notes though. You mention that short call is only until 8pm as to stay under work hour rules, but you also mention that the average week is only 55 hours. Did you get those numbers right?
The biggest negative I had with the program was the benefits. For one of the most expensive cities in TX (if not the most expensive), I don't understand why they are compensating residents so poorly.
Yeah, the numbers don't quite work out but it's pretty much a direct quote from them (the residents). So it seems like there could be weeks where you could hit the 80 hours but the overall average is 55 hours. At least that's how we interpreted it.
Actually, after thinking about it they must have been describing a week when you would have a couple of late calls and a 24 hour weekend call which would put you near 80 hours.
I'm sorry for not seeing this earlier, I've been out of town interviewing. But if you're still trying to decide, I'll throw in my two cents.
I interviewed at Monte and loved it. Some of the nicest, down to earth and friendly people I've met. Great atmosphere in terms of people. Big program with lots of great residents.
The Bronx, like most other big city areas, is ugly. Not that much uglier than any other part of New York but without all the cute little shops and stuff that more popular (and expensive) areas in NY would have. But all the residents assured me that the areas was very safe.
Amazing benefits. I have the feeling you work very hard when you're at work, and the patient population is, well, the Bronx. Which could be a plus or a minus depending on your preferences.
Great didactic schedule - in fact you don't go to work on Thursdays, you just go to classes.
Overall I liked the program very much and the residents seemed really happy, which is important to me. But it might now be where you want to live, etc. etc.
Everywhere there is water, as the city is bounded on both sides by large bodies of water (Puget Sound and Lake Washington). The city is hilly, giving it a striking sense of dimension similar to SF, and allowing you great views as you drive downhill.
However, even she admits that UWs curriculumn probably puts more emphasis on the more evidence-based and practical psychotherapy modalities such as supportive and CBT, rather than old-school psychoanalysis. She also admits that, despite having 4 psychoanalytic institutes in the city, there are no analysts on the entire faculty. This is in stark contrast to OHSU where the PD himself is an analyst with couch. The resident I talked to felt she got plenty of psychotherapy training, including lots of psychodynamic theory. In fact she felt maybe she is getting a bit too much for her taste, since she has little interest in practising psychotherapy in her career, and doesnt really believe in psychodynamics anyway. My feeling is that the truth probably is there is some slant, but there is probably plenty of opportunity to shore up any shortcomings in the first 2 years with 4th year electives if it is very important to you.
There may be a 'slant' there, but I think the important thing to realize is that you can do whatever you want if you take a little initiative. One of the current PGY4's got the American Psychoanalytic Association fellowship and will be entering analyst training after finishing.
-AT.