- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 12,750
- Reaction score
- 6,952
Drama. Drama. Drama. I really don't feel comfortable throwing out a vote.
Drama. Drama. Drama. I really don't feel comfortable throwing out a vote.
Alright. Unlynch SnS Maybe SOV was just trying to vote to lynch someone since he can't talk in anything other than dog pictures. My original post did say I have no reason. Going to read through this all again and then vote.
Drama. Drama. Drama. I really don't feel comfortable throwing out a vote.
Seeing as I am about to die, I will say screw it. Dear husband, I know English and i'm not afraid to use it. Please villagers, do not kill me, I am good!
Alright. Unlynch SnS .
elect krist
We're just in a new block of school so lots of free time and I'll be at my grandma's all weekend with not much else to do so pick me!
Small caveat, I know nothing about Lost (tried to watch the pilot once 😕) but I do know lots about catching wolves.![]()
Lynch krist. Just picking from the people that disappeared after the mayor vote.
Do we know anything more on why there were three deaths on N1? Only one was a shooting, same as last night.
This early, I don't think anyone does. But we do have to vote - don't want the mod island angry with us.
I just really don't think I can do it. Don't want to get anyone upset with me. What if I lynched the wrong person?
Not sure what to think of you being Naomi, or even what that should mean for the villagers or what you can do... But I guess Naomi should be a villager role from what I've read on the wiki...unlynch jojo, lynch krist I don't know where the tally is at, but think I might getting up there in votes and you don't want to lynch me. I am Naomi, sure hope the wolves are feeling generous tonight.
I'm not ok with it, but at least for the immediate future I'm willing to let it slide because he makes it seem like his role is important. I'm curious enough to let it play out for another few rounds.
Then we have LIS admitting to killing a player and saying that it is very possible that he will do this again in the game. But everyone seems to be ok with this? Am I missing something crucial here?
1. My vote yesterday for you was not based on absolute crap. You have many times singled out a group of people as a wolf in order to draw attention away from other groups and yourself.
2. What argument about you is weak? You admitted to killing WS, then admitted that there is a good chance you will kill again in the game.
You're not reading closely enough. I very carefully chose my words: that if I am *unable to* (or choose not to) perform my role things will happen. Those are the words I used. So think it through and realize that if I'm dead I'm unable to perform my role. So by your own logic, if you're NOT ok with that crap happening (which seems to be what you're saying above), then you want me alive so I can prevent it.
Bull****. I've done it MORE often as a villager. It's just the way I play - if I get a suspicion I go after it. If my suspicion suggests someone in a particular group, I go after the group. Trying to claim I do that "as a wolf" is utter crap. I know it, you know it, and it makes it pretty obvious that you're trying too hard.
You're twisting things, which also is suspicious. First, I didn't say there is a "good chance I will kill again". Show me precisely where I said that. Second, you clearly didn't bother to read what I actually said (per my last post regarding what will happen if I'm unable to perform my role, which includes being dead).
You're being irrational in more ways than one. So either it's just you being normally irrational, or it's you trying hard to steer suspicion onto certain people. I don't have a clue which. But I *do* know that you're full of crap.
Bull****. I've done it MORE often as a villager. It's just the way I play - if I get a suspicion I go after it. If my suspicion suggests someone in a particular group, I go after the group. Trying to claim I do that "as a wolf" is utter crap. I know it, you know it, and it makes it pretty obvious that you're trying too hard.
You're twisting things, which also is suspicious. First, I didn't say there is a "good chance I will kill again". Show me precisely where I said that. Second, you clearly didn't bother to read what I actually said (per my last post regarding what will happen if I'm unable to perform my role, which includes being dead).
You're being irrational in more ways than one. So either it's just you being normally irrational, or it's you trying hard to steer suspicion onto certain people. I don't have a clue which. But I *do* know that you're full of crap.
The bolded part is what concerns me. I read what you posted just fine, but it appears as if you "chose" not to perform your role last night as you aren't making any mention that you were unable to.
I also think that the mod probably has some mechanism in play for if you should die what will happen, I highly doubt that she will have one player die every night simply because you aren't alive, as that would severely unbalance any ww game. What mechanism this might be, I don't know.
Yes, I am always "twisting" things, I have no reading comprehension abilities at all and I obviously didn't read what you said because I didn't mention that you can either be "unable" to or "choose not" to perform your role, clearly I am making some huge obvious mistake. Clearly I am putting words in your mouth and clearly I am just dumb and irrational.
First, you still haven't answered me. I asked you where, specifically, I said that I am likely to kill again. You distorted my words, and now you don't want to admit it, and you know you can't actually find a quote in this thread from me that supports what you said.
Second, why would it concern you? I'm being very specific in explaining my role: if I'm unable to fulfill it, or choose not to, bad things happen. That's not a threat, it's just an explanation of how my role works; I have to intentionally act to prevent the badness.
I tend to agree. But first, that's really speculative. And since I'm a villager, why bother finding out if the mod has some mechanism in place? And second, just because the mod might (probably? may? likely?) have a mechanism in place doesn't mean there won't be repercussions. If it were me modding I'd have someone replace my role ... but it'd take a day or so of nastiness to happen. I wouldn't just immediately pop a new player in place.
All of the above, as far as I can tell, is accurate. I agree with you.
All of the above, as far as I can tell, is accurate. I agree with you.
And once again - I asked you to point out where I said what you claimed I said ... and for two posts in a row now you've ducked answering that. Instead, you've favored vague attacks on me.
It's very clear that you're stretching. My vote stands.
Whatever. I revealed my role. If you wiki it you would realize that lynching me is a stupid move and you are just retaliating against me, for what, I am not sure. My guess is because I questioned the reasoning as to why we are keeping someone in the game who can "inadvertently" kill people. But then rojo's post about the button thing made sense so I dropped it, never even lynched you. But not that it matters because lynch is closed today.
I don't see where you revealed your role. I see that you dropped hints. I don't know if those hints are enough to clearly identify a single character.
I don't see where you revealed your role. I see that you dropped hints. I don't know if those hints are enough to clearly identify a single character.
If you're not sure why my vote to lynch you is out there, then it goes back to your reading comprehension. I was very clear about it: you're trumping up nonsense against me, all the way back to trying to claim that I "go after groups" when I'm a wolf. And then you went after Jojo for a pretty weak reason. From where I'm sitting, it looks like you're trying to spread unwarranted suspicion all over the place, which is wolfy.
But, I said all that already. So I'm not sure why you're unclear where my vote is coming from.
Whatever. I revealed my role. If you wiki it you would realize that lynching me is a stupid move and you are just retaliating against me, for what, I am not sure. My guess is because I questioned the reasoning as to why we are keeping someone in the game who can "inadvertently" kill people. But then rojo's post about the button thing made sense so I dropped it, never even lynched you. But not that it matters because lynch is closed today.
right, and it wasn't even close, so I'm not sure your desire to role reveal particularly if it is really detrimental to the villagers for the wolves to know (still not sure why you have such a vital role as Naomi from my reading on the wiki, someone with more Lost knowledge may better fill in why Naomi would be a huge deal since she was alive a whole 7 days on the island, didn't save the villagers, and the ship she came on exploded... in fact, I would think that Lis's character (again, assuming that he is the original pusher of the button, Desmond) might have reasons to distrust DVMD's character... and I can't find Naomi's true purpose on the island except to protect the scientist team, and the scientists team were suppose to capture Ben and kill everyone else is I am reading correctly... 😕
All this is really befuddling me and I dunno what to think...
Hmm...guessing not a wolf. Villager or neutral, if neutral/chaos exists.
right, and it wasn't even close, so I'm not sure your desire to role reveal particularly if it is really detrimental to the villagers for the wolves to know (still not sure why you have such a vital role as Naomi from my reading on the wiki, someone with more Lost knowledge may better fill in why Naomi would be a huge deal since she was alive a whole 7 days on the island, didn't save the villagers, and the ship she came on exploded... in fact, I would think that Lis's character (again, assuming that he is the original pusher of the button, Desmond) might have reasons to distrust DVMD's character... and I can't find Naomi's true purpose on the island except to protect the scientist team, and the scientists team were suppose to capture Ben and kill everyone else is I am reading correctly... 😕
All this is really befuddling me and I dunno what to think...
Post #262, I revealed my role. Look who fails at reading now, should we lynch you for missing something? People miss things, get over it. Move on.
I would say neutral. She was a total loner IIRC.
Honestly, I know nothing about Lost. I don't watch the show. I have never seen a single episode. But your answer to what my character can do is there in the wiki; it really isn't that hard to figure out and the role is quite beneficial to the villagers. So please, use some common sense and don't make me tell you what it actually is tomorrow should I still be alive.
right, and it wasn't even close, so I'm not sure your desire to role reveal particularly if it is really detrimental to the villagers for the wolves to know (still not sure why you have such a vital role as Naomi from my reading on the wiki, someone with more Lost knowledge may better fill in why Naomi would be a huge deal since she was alive a whole 7 days on the island, didn't save the villagers, and the ship she came on exploded... in fact, I would think that Lis's character (again, assuming that he is the original pusher of the button, Desmond) might have reasons to distrust DVMD's character... and I can't find Naomi's true purpose on the island except to protect the scientist team, and the scientists team were suppose to capture Ben and kill everyone else is I am reading correctly... 😕
All this is really befuddling me and I dunno what to think...
Yup. The difference between us is I can say "I may have missed it. Sorry." Whereas you just get snarky, insulting, and refuse to acknowledge a mistake.
right, and it wasn't even close, so I'm not sure your desire to role reveal particularly if it is really detrimental to the villagers for the wolves to know
Yes, and you were a complete angel and didn't insult me at all. 🙄
Yes, and you were a complete angel and didn't insult me at all. 🙄
And reading back, you put words in my mouth as well. There were things you claimed I said that I did not say in the way you are claiming them. But I am willing to drop it and move on, because it doesn't matter any more. Because I have already stated multiple times that I think you are most likely a villager due to rojo's post.
Whatever. I'm done with you. You're an irrational beeyatch who can't admit when she makes a mistake.
I think that DVMD, if she is a villager, was in a position where she had to role reveal. The issue wasn't going away.
Ok children, let's play nice.
Ok children, let's play nice.
👍
Before the island swallows you whole.
Woof woof woof!
growwllll.
WOOF!