- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 10,255
- Reaction score
- 13,584
Oh, yes you absolutely can. It goes like this,You know you should never comment about a woman's weight.
"Have you lost weight? You look like you lost some weight lately."
Last edited:
Oh, yes you absolutely can. It goes like this,You know you should never comment about a woman's weight.
You know you should never comment about a woman's weight.
This is definitely my favorite SDN post of the month. Thank you for this. It should be required reading for all students. EBM has been trying to influence the "way we do it" for a generation now and is still just "another opinion" to most people
So are you saying that it's good that evidence based medicine cannot be implemented? Unclear.
On another note, respect is something that's earned. Just because you're older or have more seniority doesn't mean that much, even though this flies in the face of the hierarchical medical field. Those MD/PhDs probably do know much more than your average 28 year old resident. Some people might take an issue with age, but I think in most cases lack of respect isn't an age issue but rather something else, like disrespecting someone due to their lack of knowledge, intelligence, etc.
Meh. I'll grant that some nontrads have trouble adjusting, but I don't think that's the norm. By the time you're an intern, you've gone through two years of med student rotations where you've been well-acculturated to being at the bottom of the totem pole. I also would argue that there's some discomfort in the other direction, as many trad seniors feel uncomfortable giving orders to a student or intern who's older than them. And then those expectations become self-fulfilled prophecies in both directions, even if there's just a disagreement or a personality difference.I'm also a non-trad having started med school at age 25. But in residency there are 40+ year olds with PhD dual degrees resenting being an intern having to take orders from 28 year old seniors. They give such an attitude about it. After working with attendings as a PhD, it flips their whole world upside down to have to obey their younger R2's and R3's. So much drama comes out of it. Things would work out so much better if interns acted like interns and medical students acted like medical students. There's a certain submissive role that older people just can't take.
S/he (and I) are saying it *won't* be implemented. And for all the reasons I mentioned before, in practice, it isn't implemented.So are you saying that it's good that evidence based medicine cannot be implemented? Unclear.
On another note, respect is something that's earned. Just because you're older or have more seniority doesn't mean that much, even though this flies in the face of the hierarchical medical field. Those MD/PhDs probably do know much more than your average 28 year old resident. Some people might take an issue with age, but I think in most cases lack of respect isn't an age issue but rather something else, like disrespecting someone due to their lack of knowledge, intelligence, etc.
As for the respect bit, please, just stop now before your argument gets any more foolish than it already has. It is exceedingly rare for a senior resident to know less than an intern does about any aspect of clinical practice. Interns (and new interns in particular) are so ignorant regarding how medicine is practiced that they often can't even recognize how ignorant they really are. That goes just as much for those of us who are/were MD/PhD interns as it does for everyone else. Medicine is hierarchical for a reason: seniors are responsible for the work done by their interns, and it's their job to help interns get through the "boot camp" that early residency is, hopefully without killing anyone. This is the reason why an intern showing disrespect to a senior (ex. not carrying out their orders) is almost never acceptable behavior.
No arguments from me on anything you've said here. I did not in any way intend to suggest that interns should be automatons or should not raise concerns or ideas. Ditto for my nurses, techs, pharmacists, med students, etc. But in the end, as you said, the intern is still not the person making the final decision or taking ultimate responsibility. And there's a big difference between an intern raising a concern/making a suggestion, versus disrespecting their seniors because they think they're smarter than their seniors are. Having a PhD doesn't make you smarter than your seniors.To be fair, I wouldn't say that interns never know more about any aspect of clinical practice than seniors. I can think of plenty of cases the interns knew more than the seniors and their input is more than welcome. For example, someone who had recently done a subspecialty clerkship that the senior hasn't done in the past could easily know more about aspects of that practice than their supervisor. If my intern tells me "well, I was on rheumatology last week and when we had a similar patient we did BLAH, or dr. soandso wanted these labs done before treatment, or whatever", of COURSE I'm going to listen to them. I know ****-all about rheumatology. Or perhaps the intern recently graduated from the same institution they are now doing their residency in and thus might know a few more of the more interesting system issues (i.e. "for a blah consult, the system is actually screwy, we should actually just call number XYZ to get around the 2 hour wait time to hear back" .
I want to know when I'm wrong or when there's a better way of doing things, and if the intern, medical student, or fracking janitor has input, I'm more than happy to hear about it. That said, it's input. Same as a consultants input. No obligation to follow it, and the attending has no obligation to follow my decisions either. If the decision is made to do things a certain way by someone higher up on the totem pole, that's the way things will be done. I've put in orders before I disagreed with because my senior or attending told me to, but after I brought up my concerns and the reasoning was explained again, I did it. Even if my concerns were still real. That's what's expected in the end, because it's someone elses name on the bottom line. No one wants a group of robots, because in a year the intern will be a senior. They want people who can reason their way through it, provide input to the team, but when push comes to shove gets stuff done.
Friend murum, you have a lot of surprises in store for you, and you may not like them much.
I'm a PhD-to-MD. Have both an MS and a PhD in chemistry, a "hard science." Started med school at age 31. Got through the first two years of basic sciences, took the first step of the boards, and went on to clinical rotations. Was just floored by how utterly unscientific most of what we do in medicine is. Continued to be equally floored by this as a resident, and now as an attending as well--if anything, even more so because I'm now that much more aware of the economic basis of many of our practices.
Let me tell you something I wish I had known at your stage: medicine ain't science. It's loosely based on science, but all those people insisting on calling it an "art" is not an accident. If you want to do science, then keep on doing science. Because if you become a clinician, you won't be doing science. We make so many, maybe even most, treatment decisions based at least in part upon anecdotal experience, personal preference, financial considerations, and expert opinion. If you can't accept that, then this isn't the right career for you.
I don't think anyone who comes to medicine from a science background could possibly fail to notice the disconnect between the two, at even the most fundamental level. For example, in spite of a couple *centuries* worth of evidence regarding the mode of transmission of infections, even now, physicians have the lowest rates of handwashing among caregivers in the hospital. Does anyone really believe that nurses, techs, and therapists have a better scientific understanding of the germ theory than physicians do??? (FWIW, this study was replicated at the hospital where I did residency, and they had the same findings, namely that senior physicians had the lowest rates of handwashing.)I already figured this is how most docs operate but Im very happy to see one admit it. Makes me like medicine even more actually.
N=1 but when I rotated through surgery there was a 38 year old from the states and the attendings made comments that translate to:
I don't get why he's here at this age, he probably failed at something else (wtf?!?)
He doesn't have many "good years" left in him
Very stupid and trivial comments, they were in Spanish and the guy didn't hear these (to their credit they didn't say it to his face). I enjoyed rotating with him and he will be a great physician, but unfortunately the stigma of being "old" is usually seen negatively.
I agree with almost all MurumUmUm is saying; however, you too may be missing a couple of points:I read through this thread and the arguments got rather ludicrous on both sides. If I may be so bold as to interject here another point of view: I myself will start medical school later in life and in no way do I dream that age is not going to be a factor. In fact, I cannot even say that age must never be a factor - for some persons, even 30 might be too old. I am not the judge of that and nor is it particularly important. However, what I wanted to say is this - as a non-traditional future doctor, I have dedicated years of my life to bench research that has enabled me to understand my field of interest down to the molecular level (yes, without PhD). For years I have delayed my medical school application because I was too busy learning, discovering, and publishing. So now, now that I feel satisfied with my knowledge, now that I have dedicating years and countless hours of my life to science and am ready to move on to the world of medicine where my goal was always to finally be able to translate all of my knowledge and experience into important discoveries, do you believe that someone like me has the smallest care about what a 28 year old surgical resident might think of my age? Or do you think that if anyone dared to question my age in a disrespectful manner that I would not easily quash any such motions with an unambiguous, if not seemingly condescending answer?
You know, in all the responses to this thread I was hard pressed to find any substantive discussion about the most important aspect of a physician: quality. Most are quick to state that age discrimination is real, but what an obvious statement that is and at the same time, what a misguided statement when quality is left out of the discussion. I believe that what I described above about myself is not very unique. Many non-traditional students do have very important, non-quantifiable qualities that they would bring to the world of medicine and it is a tragic misjudgment by attendings and others who quantify an applicant rather than qualify him or her. I am not saying disregard age, but if you are judging someone based on “number of years left to practice,” you are missing the forest for the trees. We are talking about human lives here, and even more importantly, we’re talking about science. Isn’t it obvious that an experienced physician who can make a significant advancement in the field which could affect numerous patients is a more “worthy” professional even if he or she practices only 5 years compared to someone you can practice 50? Of course, not every non-traditional student is going to bring something major to the field, but the point made here is that you look at the person first and not the age. Ask what qualities and experiences the person has, before asking for the age. The logic here is incomprehensible, especially for intelligent professionals.
As an addendum, I am in a position at my institution (a medical school) where I have come in contact with many medical students, residents, and doctors over the years, some of whom have worked under my supervision. I will not go into a protracted discussion here, but my experience has taught me that the majority of doctors and future doctors must have never been accepted and should not be doctors. I, and some of my colleagues, are honestly abhorred that those individuals will one day be treating human beings or are treating them already. Medicine is a science and a doctor must be a scientist first. If you don’t understand statistics, if you don’t regularly read or can’t understand scientific publications, you should not be a doctor. So for ****’s sake, please leave all this irrelevant discussion about age and address the real issue if you’re really concerned about the so called “returns” in medicine. And please understand that the fact that you were able to finish medical school at 24 says nothing about your qualities as a doctor or your scientific mind. In fact, statistically speaking, a certain, not so small percentage of future/current doctors contributing to this very thread are likely in a camp where they should have never been accepted into this field, despite their starry eyed ambitions at the age of 23.57.
P.S.: I didn’t even mention the possibility of real adversity some people face that delays their applications. There are those who frown upon this too. But here too, it is completely ok. I believe that any non-trad who has a one track mind and knows what he or she wants to do in life, will not spend too much of his or her precious time reading opinions from unknown users and certainly not make a decision based on that. If you are possessed by a goal, then go and do it. If you will not, based on a thread, then it was good that you read it. Like it or not, the people who posted here are/will be our colleagues and therefore age discrimination is real for certain people. Ok, and?
I agree with almost all MurumUmUm is saying; however, you too may be missing a couple of points:
1) There is a [good] reason that our society has long decided/concluded/legislated that age discrimination in the work place (including med school/training) is ILLEGAL. So anyone trying to interpret/justify/tolerate/sympathize with the actions of anyone that violates this law is simply wrong and misguided; unless, the goal of this discussion is to change the said law. In any event, NO admission committee/residency program director should chose to disregard/violate the [current] law and act selectively based on his/her bias/opinion/etc.
2) We should not underestimate/forget the huge positive/bonus effect the non-traditional/older students have on the younger generations: inspiration, encouragement, motivation, etc. ... acting as role models, mentors, and so on - a multiplier effect.
So I vote to uphold the current law... while continuing the pursuit of medicine undeterred!
older students/residents are the worst.
No one cares about your "life experiences". I am trying to learn medicine.
Don't hang out with the class, too busy taking care of their family.
always trying to leave early, inevitably resulting in more work for others.
Oh my kid got sick again and I cannot come in. Once again more work for everyone else.
These older individuals are always the most selfish as well. Don't care about connecting or hanging out with their classmates or co-residents. Just have to go home to the wife and kids as soon as humanly possible!
Plz just go. Tax payer money is NOT being put to good use on older applicants. They are less productive in the long run. This is just how life works.
Hmm, so you’ll tell your geriatrics/hospice patients “Plz just go.” since “taxpayer money is NOT being put to good use...”?!older students/residents are the worst.
No one cares about your "life experiences". I am trying to learn medicine.
Don't hang out with the class, too busy taking care of their family.
always trying to leave early, inevitably resulting in more work for others.
Oh my kid got sick again and I cannot come in. Once again more work for everyone else.
These older individuals are always the most selfish as well. Don't care about connecting or hanging out with their classmates or co-residents. Just have to go home to the wife and kids as soon as humanly possible!
Plz just go. Tax payer money is NOT being put to good use on older applicants. They are less productive in the long run. This is just how life works.
Obviously from someone who has no life and somehow thinks that residency is going to be the way he makes friends...tax payer money isn't there for you to "hang out" and make friends
This is not college or even med school, its the real world and you have a job now...get used to the idea that people have lives that don't revolve around you...
Hmm, so you’ll tell your geriatrics/hospice patients “Plz just go.” since “taxpayer money is NOT being put to good use...”?!
I can go on for ever on what ‘I’, as an older student/resident have to offer to more than make-up for any likely shortcomings thereoff; take ‘my’ attribute of systems-thinking for example - which, from your post, seems absent: it could be that that ‘older resident’ of yours may be getting home early in order to [better] raise/educate future ‘taxpayers’ ... whom will fund your future pension; don’t you agree?
Besides, not all “older students/residents” are created equal.
This is not college or even med school, its the real world and you have a job now...get used to the idea that people have lives that don't revolve around you...
Edit: I had a long explanation initially - deleted it.... ‘cause I had too many “/“/“/“...@non-trad++ Why do most/all of your posts/arguments involve so many /‘s?
How did you do it? can you discuss? I am in same situation. what state? what hospital? how to get residency?Hello, I started Med school age 42, residency age 46 and I am 2 months shy of finishing
I am a carib grad , and did very well on the steps, applyed only to Family since my plan was to work in urgent care since I believe can have better lifestyle just working 3 days a week. Had many job offer and got a really good one. Age was never an issue, since keep myself in good shape training for triathlons .
I have no doubt you can do the same.