Is that a typical day? I just would be afraid I would go through all of that and end up doing 3rds all day long.
I think you may be under the misconception that a large of number of OMFSers are in private practice mainly doing Dentoalveolar (whizzies & implants) because there aren't opportunities to do the other stuff. Quite the contrary! That is where the competition is bc it's where the big bucks are. Even so, most seem to be doing extremely well...
I don't think anyone would argue that the big hospital cases are alot more fun and bad @$$, but the negative is that you aren't compensated as well and you have to deal with all the bureaucratic BS of a hospital and medicine in general. You will also have to be on call some, which some people enjoy and some do not.
So to simplify it for you, YOUR options are:
-100% hospital based OMFS: (+) Bad @$$ procedures, more fun, etc. (-) Not as much $$$, on-call some, etc.
***My Dad's good friend is chief of the Maxillofacial department at an HMO and absolutely loves it. Works 4 days/week and claims to pull in mid 300k a year...
-Part-time Hospital/Part-time in Private practice or moonlighting: (+) Best of both worlds, fun stuff + the cash-money, (-) difficult to balance
***Know another guy who works 2.5 days private practice (group practice), 1 day in the OR at the Hospital (orthognathic, cancer, etc.), and twice a month doing clefts at the childrens hospital.
Also heard of Surgeons working 3-4 days in a hospital and 1 or 2 days at dentist office pulling whizzies for them...
-100% private practice: (+) Lots of ca$h-money, (-) not as fun, running your own business is a biotch
***Heard of guys making anywhere from $250,000-over a million...
(do the math...$2,500 a case for whizzies, appointments scheduled every 30-90 min with 35-55% overhead, 3-10 cases a day, 1-6 days a week [lots of variability I know])
Any option, you'll end up pulling in more, FOR THE MOST PART, than you will as a GP...
What I was trying to state in my previous post (which I did unsuccessfully
😉) was that your logic was contradicting in that you said Option #1 or 2 above isn't worth it for the pay cut (more variety, less pay), and option #3 isn't worth the money (less variety, more money), and state that general dentistry may be a better option.
In short you say:
More variety, less pay - NOT WORTH IT
Less variety, more pay - NOT WORTH IT
The only other logical options are:
More variety, more pay
Less variety, less pay
This 1st option in reality isn't an option, so I guess you'll just have to stick to the SECOND: LESS VARIETY, LESS PAY...Good luck!!!
hahaha
P.S. I'm totally messing with you, and probably still totally butchering my interpretation of what you were trying to communicate...Hopefully anothers perspective helps!