One-on-one vs multiple interviewers at the same time?

[ProteinChemist]

When people say they have two interviewers, does that mean they have two at the same time or that they had two one-on-one interviews? What is more standard?

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[RoadRunner17]

It sounds like they are referring to having 2 at the same time. I had this at one of my interviews, and it wasn't as bad as it sounds.

However, I would say that having two one-on-one interviews is more common.

 

[ProteinChemist]

Ohhhh awesome. That is good to hear. I do way better at one-on-one so I'm glad to hear that is the norm.

Thanks!

 

[olemissbabydoc]

I had 2 one-on-one at one school, 3 one-on-one at another, and ONE one-on-one at a third.

 

[Premed Worrier]

i have had a couple two on one interviews. the first was kind of intimidating, because it was back and forth between the two, as soon as i would answer one the other would ask something, i never knew how long to look at the one who asked the question, if i should even look at the other one, etc. but they weren't too bad in hindsight though.

 

[adizz mfresh]

Northwestern has a one-on-one interview and a three-on-three interview.

 

[RySerr21]

When people say they have two interviewers, does that mean they have two at the same time or that they had two one-on-one interviews? What is more standard?

Ive had both.........one interview with multiple interviewers......and mutliple interviews with ONE interviewer each time. I dont think one is more common than the other.

 

[bluesmd]

all of my interviews have been one on one but it might just be me