So, just at a glance, it may seem like a lot...
but, breaking it down...most med schools require at least 3:
-2 Science faculty (that taught you in an academic setting)
-1 Non-Science faculty (that taught you in an academic setting)
if you add:
-clinical/shadowing rec
-research PI rec
that's already five!
So, what if you've done research w/ more than one professor?
Is the general rule, pick and choose who's gonna write best?
I heard more than 5 can be kind of obnoxious...is there any truth to that?
Then, if you think your two research letters might be stronger (they know you better than the shadowing director), would it ever be recommended to have both write, INSTEAD of the clinical letter?
just wondering what you guys think...thanks!
but, breaking it down...most med schools require at least 3:
-2 Science faculty (that taught you in an academic setting)
-1 Non-Science faculty (that taught you in an academic setting)
if you add:
-clinical/shadowing rec
-research PI rec
that's already five!
So, what if you've done research w/ more than one professor?
Is the general rule, pick and choose who's gonna write best?
I heard more than 5 can be kind of obnoxious...is there any truth to that?
Then, if you think your two research letters might be stronger (they know you better than the shadowing director), would it ever be recommended to have both write, INSTEAD of the clinical letter?
just wondering what you guys think...thanks!