Opinions on Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology?

[pejrolrad]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Hello folks.

I've been reading through Core Radiology for my first year, but I've found that it doesn't go in-depth enough for my liking.
I've been told to stay away from Brant & Helms, but I've been wondering if any of you have experience with the Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology book? Is it a good enough foundation to build on in later years?

 

[radsresident-US]

Never heard of it. CORE is meant to be more of a board review with the key AuntMinnies, for my detail I would go with requisites series. There are also individual subject favorites, like the fundamentals Msk by helms (different from b and h, which is awful), CT body and thoracic by Webb, mettlers nuc Med, and some others I can’t remember

 

[IRattending2021]

If you want more details read Brant And Helms. Core radiology is sufficient. Never heard of the other book.

 

[SirGecko]

Requisites is great, read the requisites series.

 

[pejrolrad]

Requisites is great, read the requisites series.

Thanks for the recommendation. I checked it out and it seems to be something right up my alley.
The books aren't even that expensive to get as a pdf, so that's a plus.