- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 109
I am a terribaddie at this, but 1 question I have about the proper format concerns two things:
1. What does "transfer status" mean? It is listed as one of the things under "HPI" on this document:
https://catalyst.uw.edu/workspace/medsp/30311/202905
2. Review of Systems
Some guidelines say to present the pertinent/relevant ROS in the HPI part of the oral presentation, and then do not present a complete ROS later on. I.e. with acute stroke, don't tell the attending stuff like "patient denies flank pain, dysuria, hematura," etc. etc. (like you would go through each system).
Is this your experience? Or are attendings/residents making you go through every segment of the ROS?
1. What does "transfer status" mean? It is listed as one of the things under "HPI" on this document:
https://catalyst.uw.edu/workspace/medsp/30311/202905
2. Review of Systems
Some guidelines say to present the pertinent/relevant ROS in the HPI part of the oral presentation, and then do not present a complete ROS later on. I.e. with acute stroke, don't tell the attending stuff like "patient denies flank pain, dysuria, hematura," etc. etc. (like you would go through each system).
Is this your experience? Or are attendings/residents making you go through every segment of the ROS?