Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
We want to make knowledge literally diffuse into your brain.
Hey SDN! We're happy to answer any questions you have and field your feedback. Please feel free to message us via http://facebook.com/OsmoseIt, or our website, www.osmosis.org.
In terms of the Android app, we're hoping to get that out within the next few weeks, but will first release our review feature via a web platform this month.
Like other programs we use spaced repetition, but we have a lot of other features and cognitive principles in store that aim to change the paradigm of medical education! For example, check out this article: http://www.fastcolabs.com/3014088/o...-me-through-med-school-and-inspired-a-startup.
Looking forward to speaking with you all!
Best,
The Osmosis Team
@FirefighterDoc, the app is only on iOS right now so if you have an iPhone, iPad, or iPod you'll be good to use it. No trial period, we just haven't released the second larger set of preclinical questions yet.Not sure if this is an advertising thread or not (i.e. did someone from this company start this thread?).
I downloaded this app when it was released. I was pretty unimpressed with it. The concept could be good, but the content isn't.
I'm not sure if it's been updated/expanded, but when I opened it...it only had maybe 200 questions. It had answer explanations but they were generally short and not too detailed (i.e. this is no UWorld where you end up learning 10 additional facts and concepts just by taking the time to read the explanations thoroughly). They have teamed up with the ACP to offer internal medicine questions, so there's probably hope that they'll have better questions/explanations in the future.
Overall, I got the sense that the questions were designed to learn small facts and retain them. This approach is fine, but you need more than 200 questions to justify being relevant. Other question banks (i.e. UWorld) train you to memorize both facts and concepts so you retain them with a broader understanding. The explanations are richer, and they tell you not only why one answer is right, but why the others are wrong. I could see this being mildly helpful during 1st and 2nd year while you're trying to cram info, but you can't expect this is going to be very helpful with only a few hundred questions covering the entirety of the pre-clinical curriculum.
@FirefighterDoc, the app is only on iOS right now so if you have an iPhone, iPad, or iPod you'll be good to use it. No trial period, we just haven't released the second larger set of preclinical questions yet.Not sure if this is an advertising thread or not (i.e. did someone from this company start this thread?).
I downloaded this app when it was released. I was pretty unimpressed with it. The concept could be good, but the content isn't.
I'm not sure if it's been updated/expanded, but when I opened it...it only had maybe 200 questions. It had answer explanations but they were generally short and not too detailed (i.e. this is no UWorld where you end up learning 10 additional facts and concepts just by taking the time to read the explanations thoroughly). They have teamed up with the ACP to offer internal medicine questions, so there's probably hope that they'll have better questions/explanations in the future.
Overall, I got the sense that the questions were designed to learn small facts and retain them. This approach is fine, but you need more than 200 questions to justify being relevant. Other question banks (i.e. UWorld) train you to memorize both facts and concepts so you retain them with a broader understanding. The explanations are richer, and they tell you not only why one answer is right, but why the others are wrong. I could see this being mildly helpful during 1st and 2nd year while you're trying to cram info, but you can't expect this is going to be very helpful with only a few hundred questions covering the entirety of the pre-clinical curriculum.
We're trying to build a movement in medical education, not just sell a product, and it's our job to convince you of that.
haha blatant advertisement of new company..in before the lock
+1
The future of medical education is learner-oriented, technologically-aided, and grounded in proven cognitive science principles like retrieval practice (spaced repetition) and elaborative encoding (mnemonics).
All kidding aside, yeah it would be nice if all major texts had a FA version.
@dismorfik, We don't view ourselves as mutually exclusive. Some differences: Osmosis doesn't have monthly subscriptions, and we also are aiming to change the way students engage with both official curricular material and unofficial supplemental material (web platform announcements to come!) We aren't interested in only test prep, but more broadly in how we learn and retain information. This article will give you a taste of what we're working on: http://www.fastcolabs.com/3014088/o...-me-through-med-school-and-inspired-a-startup.Can anyone comment on differences/similarities between Osmosis and Firecracker? I'm looking to invest in one or the other. Thx
that too has already been done..
there are "review book" versions of some of the major texts for Pharm and Micro
Pathoma = sometimes word-for-word copy of Robbin's Pathological Basis of Disease (nearly identical chapter organization as well)
entire first aid series (not just Step 1) in of itself a copy and paste of factoids from major resources from Pharm, Robbin's, Goljan, etc
Can anyone comment on differences/similarities between Osmosis and Firecracker? I'm looking to invest in one or the other. Thx