The ASA represents the employers of anesthesiologists; it has long since given up representing individual anesthesiologists. Thus this complaint to about the company model while a step in the right direction seems to complain about a small minor issue yet overlook the much larger far more
obvious real problem. This is far too little to late as always.
from
http://www.asahq.org/Washington/ASAL...OIG3-19-09.pdf
"After the anesthesia providers salaries, billing expenses and other costs are extracted, the anesthesia companys profits are distributed back to the owners of the facility. Some estimate these distributed profits as 40% or higher of the anesthesia fees. In most cases, the fees paid to the anesthesia providers are less than they could earn if they billed independently."
What about tens of thousands of anesthesiologists who work for an AMC, are associates on the partnership track or are employed by a hospital? All these groups of anesthesiologists are earning fees far less that if they were able to bill independently. Why doesnt the ASA bother to say something or to fight to end these unfair employment situations? If you are earning 40% less than you should be making it makes little difference if the money is going to the surgery center owner, a non anesthesiologist or if it is going to an anesthesiologist, owner of an AMC, or the anesthesiologist partners of an anesthesia group, or a non anesthesiologist, MBA hospital administrator.