Ozone Lewis Structure

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DrHJ

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
315
Reaction score
71
I am wondering why one of the ozone;s lewis structure is not like having two double bonds around the central Oxygen.

Members don't see this ad.
 
So O3 has 18 valence electrons, if you put two double bonds, the outside two Os will have 6 valence e (with the lone pairs) but the central O would have 4 (which is 2 less than it should) and would give it a 2+ charge....and the overall charge should equal 0. I think my explanation is right but i'm not 100% sure.
 
I am wondering why one of the ozone;s lewis structure is not like having two double bonds around the central Oxygen.
Putting a pair of double bonds on the central O would be incorrect for a few reasons. 1. Ozone needs 18 valence electrons, the double bonded structure you suggest has 16 2. An O such as the one you suggest would cause that central atom to have a +2 charge, and that is wrong because ozone is neutral, written as O3. The final reason is #3. This is based on theory. Ozone has a SINGLE bond distance. This is only explained by valence bond theory if a resonance structure is drawn. If we did attempt to draw the structure that you suggest, only a single bond length would be present, and clearly that is wrong. I hope this helps.

Dr. Romano
 
Putting a pair of double bonds on the central O would be incorrect for a few reasons. 1. Ozone needs 18 valence electrons, the double bonded structure you suggest has 16 2. An O such as the one you suggest would cause that central atom to have a +2 charge, and that is wrong because ozone is neutral, written as O3. The final reason is #3. This is based on theory. Ozone has a SINGLE bond distance. This is only explained by valence bond theory if a resonance structure is drawn. If we did attempt to draw the structure that you suggest, only a single bond length would be present, and clearly that is wrong. I hope this helps.

Dr. Romano
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.
 
Top