pathology without Robbins

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I don't understand the hype about Robbins I made the mistake of buying it thinking it would cover clinical stuff as well but it doesn't go into nearly as much clinical depth as a medical student needs to know. I understand knowing the pathology is important but I can get both in a good pathophysiology book
 
I am all about robbins for understanding. Pathoma and stuff is just review. While you are having your primary learning I believe it is more effective to use a primary source, rather than review resources. The review stuff is good to supp the primary resources.
 
6 more weeks of preclinical lectures and I've never used Robbins. Maintained above average in courses so who knows - YMMV.

Seriously only use Pathoma to review.
 
does Robbins have practice questions?



You only use Pathoma?

I used lecture material and the random google/youtube search to learn most things. I've just recently started using pathoma to review stuff that I've already learned. It's useful as soon as you start organ systems.
 
Robbins is great if you actually want to understand the pathophysiology of what is going on. If you just want to pass a test and hear a guy say, 'and THAT is very high yield' 500 times then Pathoma is the best. You do you.
 
Robbins is great for some but I am near comatose after about 10 pages no matter how hard I try to care what it says.

I gave up using it after about a month and just watch Boards and Beyond/Wikipedia everything. I get along just fine.
 
Robbins is great if you actually want to understand the pathophysiology of what is going on. If you just want to pass a test and hear a guy say, 'and THAT is very high yield' 500 times then Pathoma is the best. You do you.

*scribbles word on screen* --> *underline* *underline* *underline* *circle*
 
This thread is an excellent example of how entitled this new generation of “millennials” has become. You know how I became a doctor? By studying medicine. Not by “twittering the pathomas” and “uworlding first aid.” We did a thing called “reading books.” You should try it sometime. When I did MY intern year, my attending would tell me “Intern 7A, tell me Robbins page 351 paragraph 2!” And I had 20 seconds to recite it verbatim from memory, and end it with the phrase “if it please m’lord.” A stumble would earn me 15 push-ups and 5 call hours. Believe me, we didn’t make mistakes back then. We can’t do this nowadays, the ACGME coddles you too much and liberals would probably call this “sexual harassment.”
 
Everyone I have every talked to has said Pathoma alone is not enough to actually learn pathology well enough for boards and I agree. You don't necessarily need to use Robbins (though I really liked it), but you should be using something beyond pathoma to actually teach you pathology instead of just memorizing a bunch of random facts about the diseases and looking at a table here and there.
 
Robbins is great for some but I am near comatose after about 10 pages no matter how hard I try to care what it says.

I gave up using it after about a month and just watch Boards and Beyond/Wikipedia everything. I get along just fine.
the great thing about robbins is that you really don't need to read more than 10-15 pages a day
 
Why are people dogging on pathoma so much? I use it for most of my course lectures since it is better organized and mostly covers about the same stuff. I would just supplement pathoma with the Robbins review book and make sure you do all the questions before each exam pertaining to that system.
 
Top