pathology without Robbins

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
yes me too. pathoma + FA + Zanki is all i have
 
I don't understand the hype about Robbins I made the mistake of buying it thinking it would cover clinical stuff as well but it doesn't go into nearly as much clinical depth as a medical student needs to know. I understand knowing the pathology is important but I can get both in a good pathophysiology book
 
I am all about robbins for understanding. Pathoma and stuff is just review. While you are having your primary learning I believe it is more effective to use a primary source, rather than review resources. The review stuff is good to supp the primary resources.
 
Robbins is great for practice questions.
 
6 more weeks of preclinical lectures and I've never used Robbins. Maintained above average in courses so who knows - YMMV.

Seriously only use Pathoma to review.
 
does Robbins have practice questions?

I have the Robbins and Cotran review of Pathology book alongside the regular Robbins book. I love the Robbins review practice questions, great practice if you have NBME exams.
 
does Robbins have practice questions?



You only use Pathoma?

I used lecture material and the random google/youtube search to learn most things. I've just recently started using pathoma to review stuff that I've already learned. It's useful as soon as you start organ systems.
 
.
 
Last edited:
Robbins is great if you actually want to understand the pathophysiology of what is going on. If you just want to pass a test and hear a guy say, 'and THAT is very high yield' 500 times then Pathoma is the best. You do you.
 
Robbins is great for some but I am near comatose after about 10 pages no matter how hard I try to care what it says.

I gave up using it after about a month and just watch Boards and Beyond/Wikipedia everything. I get along just fine.
 
Robbins is great if you actually want to understand the pathophysiology of what is going on. If you just want to pass a test and hear a guy say, 'and THAT is very high yield' 500 times then Pathoma is the best. You do you.

*scribbles word on screen* --> *underline* *underline* *underline* *circle*
 
This thread is an excellent example of how entitled this new generation of “millennials” has become. You know how I became a doctor? By studying medicine. Not by “twittering the pathomas” and “uworlding first aid.” We did a thing called “reading books.” You should try it sometime. When I did MY intern year, my attending would tell me “Intern 7A, tell me Robbins page 351 paragraph 2!” And I had 20 seconds to recite it verbatim from memory, and end it with the phrase “if it please m’lord.” A stumble would earn me 15 push-ups and 5 call hours. Believe me, we didn’t make mistakes back then. We can’t do this nowadays, the ACGME coddles you too much and liberals would probably call this “sexual harassment.”
 
Everyone I have every talked to has said Pathoma alone is not enough to actually learn pathology well enough for boards and I agree. You don't necessarily need to use Robbins (though I really liked it), but you should be using something beyond pathoma to actually teach you pathology instead of just memorizing a bunch of random facts about the diseases and looking at a table here and there.
 
Robbins is great for some but I am near comatose after about 10 pages no matter how hard I try to care what it says.

I gave up using it after about a month and just watch Boards and Beyond/Wikipedia everything. I get along just fine.
the great thing about robbins is that you really don't need to read more than 10-15 pages a day
 
Why are people dogging on pathoma so much? I use it for most of my course lectures since it is better organized and mostly covers about the same stuff. I would just supplement pathoma with the Robbins review book and make sure you do all the questions before each exam pertaining to that system.
 
Top Bottom