- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 32
I've debated posting my predicament here for several months, but I find myself in need of guidance and perspective.
I previously posted about a side-gig I have with an RTC. I described the details in a separate thread some months ago, quoted below. My current predicament is that I want to increase my rate, but also that the way I bill, which is essentially fee for service (FFS), doesn't feel right to me.
I see three options.
1) continue FFS model but increase my prices
2) switch to a flat management fee with no FFS
3) devise some sort of hybrid, to allow for flexibility
With that said, what makes the most sense? If it were entirely up to me, I think I would increase my total compensation by charging something like a $300 management fee for each kid, then on top of that, each follow-up visit I would charge $150. This would allow more flexibility in visit frequency as I could be compensated for seeing kids as often (or inoften) as they need, rather than seeing each kid once a month by default, which is how it currently is set up. I could then charge $750 for the intake, which could include management for that first month or have a pro-rated management fee added into it.
My questions: What's typical for the industry as far as models for paying for psychiatric coverage? Does the above seem appropriate as far as my rate, or does it seem high/low? What else should I be considering? In the other thread where I mentioned this, I was surprised at some of the reactions as far as my compensation; particularly the sentiment that I should be charging more. My hope is to remedy that with a new proposal.
Thank you sincerely,
I previously posted about a side-gig I have with an RTC. I described the details in a separate thread some months ago, quoted below. My current predicament is that I want to increase my rate, but also that the way I bill, which is essentially fee for service (FFS), doesn't feel right to me.
Part of what's motivating me here is a handful of clients they've accepted recently, with the understanding that they'd only be in the program for a few months until they turn 18; this puts me in the position of having put a ton of work into completing my evaluation, but then being unable to profit off the ongoing management, which I feel is much more generously compensated.For some background, I'm a fellowship trained C&A psychiatrist and have a side-gig with a residential treatment center managing their 40 residents. I charge $300 per month for each patient I manage (which is all of them) which includes a monthly follow-up visit, and $600 for intakes. I am debating asking for $750 for intakes. The intakes I do are likely more involved than what you do; I spend an average of 30 minutes reviewing testing beforehand, 30-40 minutes interviewing the patient and their therapist, and 15-45 minutes on the phone with their parents. The intakes are the most challenging and lowest paying part of my job, and I wouldn't do them for $600 if I wasn't able to rake in the bucks through providing ongoing management afterward.
I see three options.
1) continue FFS model but increase my prices
2) switch to a flat management fee with no FFS
3) devise some sort of hybrid, to allow for flexibility
With that said, what makes the most sense? If it were entirely up to me, I think I would increase my total compensation by charging something like a $300 management fee for each kid, then on top of that, each follow-up visit I would charge $150. This would allow more flexibility in visit frequency as I could be compensated for seeing kids as often (or inoften) as they need, rather than seeing each kid once a month by default, which is how it currently is set up. I could then charge $750 for the intake, which could include management for that first month or have a pro-rated management fee added into it.
My questions: What's typical for the industry as far as models for paying for psychiatric coverage? Does the above seem appropriate as far as my rate, or does it seem high/low? What else should I be considering? In the other thread where I mentioned this, I was surprised at some of the reactions as far as my compensation; particularly the sentiment that I should be charging more. My hope is to remedy that with a new proposal.
Thank you sincerely,