• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!


PBL? what?


MS4 -> R1
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jan 27, 2004
  1. Resident [Any Field]
Problem Based Learning

My understanding is that students meet in small groups and are presented with case studies. Collectively, they solve them and recommend a course of action with an advisor who chimes in with advice to keep them on track...

Here is a good post that mentions it...

Looking Back as a 4th Year


Fallen from Grace
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Aug 6, 2003
so for PBL based schools, it really depends on whether you learn best in a lecture-based setting, or a small group setting. Lecture based schools are exemplified by schools like P&S and UCSD, whereas, Cornell and Northwestern are known for their more progressive curricula.

Characteristics of PBL...done well
They'll give you specific case studies. For example, they'll say that a patient comes in with chest pains, high bp, etc. Then you work together to try to find out what the problem is, order tests, etc...through it all, a lot of time is used to research the physiology, biochemistry, genetics, etc. of the disease...this is all guided and facilitated by the instructor and the handouts...

Strengths of PBL:
Small group learning, led by 1/2 instructors - get to know students/faculty in a small group setting
Active learning
Incorporates group learning because each member is responsible for a discreet body of knowledge
Clinically relevant

Shortfalls of PBL:
A lot of people don't like PBL because they think it's a waste of their time. Whereas you're responsible for a clearly defined set of information in lectures, PBL can often lead to tangents and cause you to research information that you feel is irrelevant, i.e. lack of direction arguement. If you are a gunner/loner, you probably won't like PBL.


Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 14, 2003
Nor Cal
I don't think I would like too much of PBL because I really enjoy learning new material in lectures from people who know a lot more about the topic than I would if I researched it on my own for a couple of hours. When I do read about the information, than it can help to solidify what I learned in lecture; reading is a lot more helpful for me when I already have some familiarity with the subject. I do aknowledge that there is sooooo much information to be learned in the pre-clinical years that the lectures will not cover a lot of it and they may not be that helpful, but I remember being quite surprised in undergrad a couple of times when I hadn't studied on my own at all but I did have a pretty solid grasp of the material just based on lecture. I think small group PBL sessions would be helpful as a supplement to my education, helping to solidify what I have already learned, but not as the core of my education.

Cornell, NW, and the UCSF-UCB program wouldn't be good places for me. I'm just glad I was too lazy to fill out those secondaries. I'm learning so much more as I go through this process than I did when I started it. That's why I think it's a good idea to apply to quite a few schools (esp for Cali residents) because, as with other things in life, you learn so much more when you go through the process than when you read about it.
About the Ads
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.