PCP and PA

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

titanz7

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
So currently I am planning to pursue Masters in Physician Assistant degree over MD due to many reasons, but I have some questions regarding a specific scenario between PA and PCP MD.
So IF I were to become a physician, I would definitely choose pediatrics. The thing that I've been wondering is that if pediatricians are primary care providers, who work in a private practice or at the hospital like the PAs do, what are the differences in practice between PA and a pediatric MD? (besides the obvious depth of knowledge and time of training)
for example, what can MD pediatrician can do that PAs cant?
 
Depends on what the PA feels comfortable seeing and what the supervising doc feels comfortable letting the PA see. A PA that has been working in peds for many years is going to see more complicated cases than a PA that just graduated. Prescription rights are pretty much the same as most states allow PAs to prescribe things like ADHD meds now. Some parents are going to only feel comfortable with a doctor seeing their kid, even if it's something easy like a well-child visit or even a very common ear infection.
 
Yeah ive heard about this stigma regarding PA's. Most patients will not know what a PA is so you will have to explain it to them. Some patients feel that their money is spent so they can be seen by a physician and not a PA, so some will refuse your care. Nurses and the nursing profession does not face this problem since their are pediatric nurse practitioners, NP's that specialize in peds and patients trust their care. Nursing is regarded as the most trusted profession in medicine. This is just one of the reasons I chose to pursue NP over PA.

There is no "stigma" regarding PAs. Yes, I occasionally hear the "so are you going to be a Doctor soon?" question, but just as often I've heard NP's have to explain that they are a Nurse that practices advanced nursing, but that when they prescribe medicine it's not medicine it's nursing, but when a doctor/PA prescribes a medicine it is medicine...and the patients roll their eyes into the back of their head in utter confusion.

I've never had a patient "refuse my care" as a PA. Of course, I work in a single coverage ER, so they would have limited options if they did want to, but never had anyone try.

Dude - you have drunk some major kool-aid. There are plusses and minuses to each profession. NP education is very weak in comparison to the standardized PA educational route, however the NPs (due to their powerful nursing unions/mafia) have a greater legal scope of practice in many states. But, since most true learning doesn't come until you're on the job anyway, NPs can quickly make up for their educational deficiencies, and the greater legal scope of practice rarely endangers patients because the vast majority of NP's work directly for physicians anyway.

You will, hopefully, take off your rose-colored glasses when you get out of school.
 
There is no "stigma" regarding PAs. Yes, I occasionally hear the "so are you going to be a Doctor soon?" question, but just as often I've heard NP's have to explain that they are a Nurse that practices advanced nursing, but that when they prescribe medicine it's not medicine it's nursing, but when a doctor/PA prescribes a medicine it is medicine...and the patients roll their eyes into the back of their head in utter confusion.

I've never had a patient "refuse my care" as a PA. Of course, I work in a single coverage ER, so they would have limited options if they did want to, but never had anyone try.

Dude - you have drunk some major kool-aid. There are plusses and minuses to each profession. NP education is very weak in comparison to the standardized PA educational route, however the NPs (due to their powerful nursing unions/mafia) have a greater legal scope of practice in many states. But, since most true learning doesn't come until you're on the job anyway, NPs can quickly make up for their educational deficiencies, and the greater legal scope of practice rarely endangers patients because the vast majority of NP's work directly for physicians anyway.

You will, hopefully, take off your rose-colored glasses when you get out of school.

Absolutely. Look, OP and others, if you put a white coat and a stethoscope on anyone you could walk into you nearest hospital and start seeing patients. And they would take you at face value as their doctor. A very, very small percentage of people are familiar with the different professions and might prefer one or the other.

Anyone who spends more time with the patient will garner the most trust and will garner the best relationship. Since I have the lowest patient load on my medical team, I have the most time to spend with individual patients and we end up bonding. The difference between me and somebody actively engaged in counterintelligence and misinformation is that I account for it by realizing I just flat have more time on my hands.
 
Yeah we srsly need to stop debating/arguing, w/e happens with the healthcare laws is not my business, I'll just go with the flow. I'll earn respect from my patients by how good I am, not by my title. Who knows, maybe i'll even impress the physicians with my medical knowledge in the future. i think that's a good way of gaining respect.

Unlikely. At this point, you don't even know what you don't know. And many newly graduated PAs (or pediatric NPs) don't even know what they don't know.

You will be amazed at the knowledge that a board-certified pediatrician has. Residency makes all the difference in the world - and no amount of on-the-job learning will account for that. Residency is more than just on-the-job training. In addition to rotations through various services (where you are the primary person taking care of the patient), there are dedicated didactics meant to educate and expand knowledge (and treatment). Then there's the pediatric boards (not talking about usmle - that's just minimal competence to practice medicine) but the American Board of Pediatrics certification exam.

You can spend 20 years in a pediatric clinic - and while you can become very knowledgeable on outpatient general pediatrics, you still won't know a thing about peds critical care, NICU, or the subspecialities (peds ortho, peds ID, peds heme/onc, peds cards, etc). And believe it or not, it helps to know these things - your patients may need their services or have received services (and if you don't know what they have or what treatment they are going through, how do you expect to co-manage your patient, or be their PRIMARY care doctor). Patients won't come in with a sign saying "I'm a complex medical patient" .. they will come in with vague symptoms and complaints. Common things being common, most are benign or your typical run-of-the-mill stuff that everyone sees. But if you don't have the knowledge base to pick up on subtle hint that this may not be your run-of-the-mill stuff, how will you know that it's time to consult your supervising (or collaborating) physician, or refer?


There is a reason why a brand new board-certified pediatrician, straight out of residency training, will know more about taking care of kids than an NP working in a practice for 20+ years. Sure, the NP will know more logistics on how things work in the community (and practices) and the typical types of families and patients that come through the practice - but in terms of medical knowledge, there is still a wide gap.

To be honest, the training of NPs is a joke when it comes to actual medical practice and knowledge. The clinical rotations (they rotate through my hospital) is more akin to shadowing than actual rotations that medical students and PA students do (although some have taken the initiative and started to follow 1-2 patients as their own students, although they are not required too). Where in the process, will you actually learn about diseases and management? And if you talk to any board-certified physicians, if you go through residency with just on-the-job training (and ignore the lectures and conferences), and don't do any outside reading and studying, even with 80+ hrs/week for 48-52 weeks/year for a minimum of 3 years, there is still a good possibility of not passing the boards. So with that said, how will NPs and PAs surpass the knowledge of physicians?
 
Unlikely. At this point, you don't even know what you don't know. And many newly graduated PAs (or pediatric NPs) don't even know what they don't know.

Easy there.....I know what I don't know...the answer is (seemingly) every-darn thing. I am constantly reminded of that every shift in the ER. I had two EARACHES last night that turned out to be complicated and sent me running to look stuff up, with one requiring a phone call to my supervising physician. (CLL with neutropenic fever)

You will be amazed at the knowledge that a board-certified pediatrician has. Residency makes all the difference in the world.

Exactly....and not the 6-24 week "Residencies" that are coming out among some NP/DNP programs. REAL residencies.

To be honest, the training of NPs is a joke when it comes to actual medical practice and knowledge. The clinical rotations (they rotate through my hospital) is more akin to shadowing than actual rotations that medical students and PA students do (although some have taken the initiative and started to follow 1-2 patients as their own students, although they are not required too). Where in the process, will you actually learn about diseases and management? And if you talk to any board-certified physicians, if you go through residency with just on-the-job training (and ignore the lectures and conferences), and don't do any outside reading and studying, even with 80+ hrs/week for 48-52 weeks/year for a minimum of 3 years, there is still a good possibility of not passing the boards. So with that said, how will NPs and PAs surpass the knowledge of physicians?

Why you throwing PA's in there with the NP's?
 
Easy there.....I know what I don't know...the answer is (seemingly) every-darn thing. I am constantly reminded of that every shift in the ER. I had two EARACHES last night that turned out to be complicated and sent me running to look stuff up, with one requiring a phone call to my supervising physician. (CLL with neutropenic fever)

The rant above (you don't know what you don't know) wasn't aimed at you. Knowing what you don't know is actually the next step (meaning you have learn enough to realize there is a ton of stuff out there that you don't know - you just didn't realize it before). To be honest, I don't think there will ever be a point where you will know all that you need to know.

And nice pickup on the earaches last night ... always feels good when you catch something that may potentially save a life (or prevent a debilitating complication), especially when you know that it could have easily been miss - 👍


Why you throwing PA's in there with the NP's?

Sorry - a little blue on blue friendly fire while ranting about the rigors of medical education
 
Top