- Joined
- Jan 4, 2005
- Messages
- 779
- Reaction score
- 3
Peer VI Q70:
"A 23 y/o female 7 wks pregnant c/o pelvic pain and vag bleeding without tissue passage. Exam is remarkable for minimal blood in vault, minimal uterine tenderness, and no adnexal tenderness or masses. Quant beta is 8, 230. Transvag u/s shows no adnexal mass, no free fluid, and a normal-sized, empty uterus. What is the most likely diagnosis?
Answer is: Ectopic.
The answer makes sense, but I have a question about the broader learning point. What would you do at this point?
Does one call OB and restate that I have a woman with the above symptoms, a beta above threshold, and a non-diagnositc u/s (seemingly ok if I'm in a big academic center and not so concerned with getting the definitive diagnosis myself);
Is there a better test I can order? ie. if the presumed ectopic is not in the adnexa based on u/s, is CT of any value?
Is the u/s so "operator dependent" than a repeat is warranted?
"A 23 y/o female 7 wks pregnant c/o pelvic pain and vag bleeding without tissue passage. Exam is remarkable for minimal blood in vault, minimal uterine tenderness, and no adnexal tenderness or masses. Quant beta is 8, 230. Transvag u/s shows no adnexal mass, no free fluid, and a normal-sized, empty uterus. What is the most likely diagnosis?
Answer is: Ectopic.
The answer makes sense, but I have a question about the broader learning point. What would you do at this point?
Does one call OB and restate that I have a woman with the above symptoms, a beta above threshold, and a non-diagnositc u/s (seemingly ok if I'm in a big academic center and not so concerned with getting the definitive diagnosis myself);
Is there a better test I can order? ie. if the presumed ectopic is not in the adnexa based on u/s, is CT of any value?
Is the u/s so "operator dependent" than a repeat is warranted?