This is somewhat tangential to the original post (where I generally agree, the school is probably trying to have their cake and eat it by recruiting URMs while not needing to worry about where they stack up academically). But I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding about diversity recruitment as it pertains to medical school admissions. The point is not to "level the playing field" and reward URMs with admission to medical schools through affirmative action, which more or less is kind of how it works for undergrad admissions. Basically, the end goal is not to just recruit each individual future physician in a vacuum. Rather, the NIH has decided that there is intrinsic value in training a diverse
workforce of physicians that: 1) more actively recapitulates the American population at large; and 2) benefits from diversity of backgrounds and ideas.
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Notice of NIH's Interest in Diversity NOT-OD-20-031. NIH
grants.nih.gov
NIH Diversity in Extramural Programs, Find Opportunities to Participate in Diversity Programs, Information about NIH initiatives that promote scientific workforce diversity, Increasing scientific breakthroughs through diversity for NIH Funded Researchers, Extramural Diversity that supports NIH...
extramural-diversity.nih.gov
You can choose to disagree that having a diverse workforce has intrinsic value, but as @Goro highlighted, the MCAT is only one aspect to consider when assessing applicants. And if a school is trying to build the best class of 200 students with diversity of backgrounds and ideas rather than selecting individual applicants in a vacuum, then whether someone got a 517 or a 514 may not be the most important consideration.