Percent Ionization problem

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ezsanche

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
594
Reaction score
0
bsproblem.jpg

Members don't see this ad.
 
This problem seems weird to me. I dont think there is enough info to solve it. Here is my thought process

HCN --> H+ + -CN

if were to take the Ka expression of this we should get

Ka=[H+][-CN]/[HCN]

solving for

Ka/[H+] x 100% =[-CN]/[HCN] x 100%

dont we need a Ka value to solve for the percent ionization?
 
is the answer B?

what I did is:

.339 M HCN means in solution you SHOULD have .339 M [H+]

but you have pH 4.89, which working backwards is like a little more than 1e-5 M [H+]

then i just divided 1e-5/.339 which is ~ 3.3e-5

but then it is % so you multiply by 100 and get ~ 3.3e-3 which is close to B
 
is the answer B?

what I did is:

.339 M HCN means in solution you SHOULD have .339 M [H+]

but you have pH 4.89, which working backwards is like a little more than 1e-5 M [H+]

then i just divided 1e-5/.339 which is ~ 3.3e-5

but then it is % so you multiply by 100 and get ~ 3.3e-3 which is close to B
yeah the answer is B but I just dont get why we are using the 1e-5 for the numerator.
I mean what if the pH was 11

then that would mean

10^-11/.331 x 100 = a really small number.

BUT!!!!! if the pH is 11 then the solution is really basic and you would expect the concentration of the -CN to be great. and the percent ionization to be near 100 percent not a small number.

does anyone see something wrong with my logic?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
yeah the answer is B but I just dont get why we are using the 1e-5 for the numerator.
I mean what if the pH was 11

then that would mean

10^-11/.331 x 100 = a really small number.

BUT!!!!! if the pH is 11 then the solution is really basic and you would expect the concentration of the -CN to be great. and the percent ionization to be near 100 percent not a small number.

does anyone see something wrong with my logic?
if pH is 11 and the only thin in solution is HCN, this means precisely that there is a tiny amount of HCN dissolved.. it's an acid. the only way you can have a pH greater than its pKa would be to add its conjugate base.
 
if pH is 11 and the only thin in solution is HCN, this means precisely that there is a tiny amount of HCN dissolved.. it's an acid. the only way you can have a pH greater than its pKa would be to add its conjugate base.

okay so you agreeing with me that the percent of ionization will be greater.
 
BUT!!!!! if the pH is 11 then the solution is really basic and you would expect the concentration of the -CN to be great. and the percent ionization to be near 100 percent not a small number.

does anyone see something wrong with my logic?

What's screwing you up is that it's impossible to ask this question with a pH < 7. Pure water already has 1e-7M [H+]. HCN can only ADD to the number of [H+]. Therefore the question only makes sense if the pH is < 7. (At pH=7, there would be 0% ionization since pH=7 implies that no additional hydrogen ions have dissociated other than those from water alone.)


Solving for % ionization at pH = 11 will require a Ka for HCN, as well as a description of the base as either a strong base or provide a Kb. As you can already guess, you cannot solve this problem in the same manner as the original.
 
BUT!!!!! if the pH is 11 then the solution is really basic and you would expect the concentration of the -CN to be great. and the percent ionization to be near 100 percent not a small number.

does anyone see something wrong with my logic?

What's screwing you up is that it's impossible to ask this question with a pH > 7. Pure water already has 1e-7M [H+]. HCN can only ADD to the number of [H+]. Therefore the question only makes sense if the pH is < 7. (At pH=7, there would be 0% ionization since pH=7 implies that no additional hydrogen ions have dissociated other than those from water alone.)


Solving for % ionization at pH = 11 will require a Ka for HCN, as well as a description of the base as either a strong base or provide a Kb. As you can already guess, you cannot solve this problem in the same manner as the original.
 
Last edited:
What's screwing you up is that it's impossible to ask this question with a pH < 7. Pure water already has 1e-7M [H+]. HCN can only ADD to the number of [H+]. Therefore the question only makes sense if the pH is < 7. (At pH=7, there would be 0% ionization since pH=7 implies that no additional hydrogen ions have dissociated other than those from water alone.)


Solving for % ionization at pH = 11 will require a Ka for HCN, as well as a description of the base as either a strong base or provide a Kb. As you can already guess, you cannot solve this problem in the same manner as the original.

Thanks Zmatrix!
 
Top