Personal Statment-to do or not to do?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

CaliRx

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
235
Reaction score
0
Is it wrong/bad to mention in my personal statement that I want to eventually be a clinical pharmacist or be more research oriented? Especially, when applying to retail based institutions because wouldn't they feel like I am not a correct match for that school? 😕 Any feedback appreciated!
 
Is it wrong/bad to mention in my personal statement that I want to eventually be a clinical pharmacist or be more research oriented? Especially, when applying to retail based institutions because wouldn't they feel like I am not a correct match for that school? 😕 Any feedback appreciated!

Not at all. Just be honest with what you really want to do. I don't think there are many schools that like to identify themselves as a retail based institution.
 
Is it wrong/bad to mention in my personal statement that I want to eventually be a clinical pharmacist or be more research oriented? Especially, when applying to retail based institutions because wouldn't they feel like I am not a correct match for that school? 😕 Any feedback appreciated!

i agree with KARM12. plus, it shows you have direction and have made plans about how you will utilize your pharmD.
 
I agree with the above postings...

Also - make sure you have an excellent Proofreader... a second opinion can make all the difference...

~above~
 
well, quite honestly... i would include it with hesitation. i know in my interview i mentioned wanting to specialize in a certain field of pharmacy knowing they had a program in it...there's no point in mentionting it to the institution if they dont offer it. if it seems like you are set on that route, and they dont offer specialization in it, they may consider that you may be accepted into an institution that can better serve you for that purpose...but it does show direction...it's really up to you. id have to think about that one myself for a day or two, write the statement with and without it mentioned, and ask myself what sounded best.
 
well, quite honestly... i would include it with hesitation. i know in my interview i mentioned wanting to specialize in a certain field of pharmacy knowing they had a program in it...there's no point in mentionting it to the institution if they dont offer it. if it seems like you are set on that route, and they dont offer specialization in it, they may consider that you may be accepted into an institution that can better serve you for that purpose...but it does show direction...it's really up to you. id have to think about that one myself for a day or two, write the statement with and without it mentioned, and ask myself what sounded best.

I don't agree with the above post at all.

Clincal pharmacy and research aren't really specializations. All pharmacy schools produce many students that go into these fields. The way pharmacy is changing is to include clinical pharmacy services in all types of settings, including retail. Schools now focus on the clinical side of pharmacy practice as opposed to the pure dispensing role. Specialization in an area of pharamcy practice is what residency programs are for.

Schools also do not expect you to know what exactly you are going to do when you graduate. It is good to have some ideases, but your interests will shape as you go through classes and rotations and get an actual feel for practice. Mentioning your goals to work as a clincal pharmacist and do research does show that you have put thought into a career as a pharmacist.

Be honest about what you want and what your goals are. You will be able to write a far better personal statement that way then just writing to tell someone what you think they want to hear. This will carry over into interviews when you get asked that question.
 
I think that you should include it in your statement. In mine, I put that my long-term career goal was to return to the biotech industry (I currently work in a research lab) and work on clinical trials or as a consultant. It came up in my interviews and I was able to expand on it. The one school I was rejected from focuses on educating community pharmacists (at least in my opinion), but I think I was rejected due to lack of pharmacy experience and not neccessarily what was in my essay.

Bottom line: include what is true to YOU, and not just what you think adcoms want to hear.
 
CaliRx....you live in my area & I'm going to assume you're going to apply to CA schools primarily....with perhaps some out of state. If I'm wrong, then please disregard all my opinions.

For CA schools - I'd really not mention the phrase "clinical pharmacist" because in the current political pharmacy within this state, all the schools are graduating pharmacists with competent to excellent clinical skills.

The phrase "clinical pharmacist" has become trite, overused & frankly sets up & acknowledges a divide which the pharmacists within CA have seen is nonproductive. The trend is to have pharmacists in all practice settings facilitate safe, effective & appropriate drug use - not just within the framework of disease, but also acknowledging cost & expense realities. This involves not just use within inpt acute medicine, but also ambulatory care & smooth transitions between the two areas.

But - how should you phrase your interest (I'm not even sure what you mean by "clinical pharmacist" frankly....)?

You could indicate your interest in learning how to facilitate the most appropriate and effective use of drugs in a variety of practice settings. If acute inpt medicine is your interest...you might mention your interest in monitoring drug therapy to optimize outcomes and minimize adverse reactions or unnecessary expense (which requires learning about budgets, cost analysis in addition to physiology, pharmaceutical chemistry & pharmacology).

All practice settings involve a great degree of education from pharmacists. Acute inpt medicine requires us to develop monitoring protocols & educate a variety of professionals when new drugs are introduced or when older ones have been identified as being a source of drug errors.

Likewise, ambulatory pharmacy (which is your reference to "retail") requires pt or family education & now is being strongly pushed toward medication therapy management - which is reimbursement for the pharmacist to monitor a pts therapy for appropriateness, effectiveness & development of side effects. This is a new trend toward using pharmacists in the ambulatory setting in a more "clinical" role and is a first step toward reimbursing for service rather than for product, however, this has been done for years & years without reimbursement.

So......yes - indicate your interest - but use better wording. As for research....yes - if research is an interest of yours then by all means, include that. Be prepared to be able to discuss in an interview what area of research you're interested in & why.

Good luck!
 
Thank you everyone for your great and honest advice. It is quiet helpful.

sdn1977, yes I do live in CA and I am aiming for schools around my area. I agree that clinical pharm is such a broad phrase and that I should work on giving a better explanation.
 
Top