- Joined
- Dec 27, 2004
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0


Docta "O" said:At this point I have to make a choice between working towards becoming either a Pharmacy Technician or an Emergency Medical Technician. I really am stuck between the two. I need advice, pros and cons, anything to help me make a decision.
OSUdoc08 said:EMT = patient contact, medical procedures, autonomy of medical decision/diagnosis/treatment, interaction with physicians and other medical personnel, potential for volunteer or paid medical hours, participate in the saving of lives and life threatening injuries/illness
Pharm Tech = put pills into bottles and ring it up to a customer
Docta "O" said:At this point I have to make a choice between working towards becoming either a Pharmacy Technician or an Emergency Medical Technician. I really am stuck between the two. I need advice, pros and cons, anything to help me make a decision.
neoncandle said:At most pharmacies around here, they will pay you while you train to be a pharm tech which really only requires passing a test which doesn't take too long to study for. Beconing an EMT takes a lot more time and money. If you have that, I would be an EMT. When you deliver patients to the ER and tell the doctors that you are pre-med, I think you'll get a major bonus of getting to see and (maybe do) really cool stuff.
Shredder said:Pharm Tech. You might learn a thing or two about drugs, which is most of what you do as a doctor anyway--prescribe them, and have the companies take you out to free, lavish dinners for doing so. There's a lot of money and potential to make a large-scale impact on medicine in pharmaceutics, even for doctors. EMT is on a person to person basis. More personal yeah, but not as much influence overall.
Doctors make decisions on which drugs and treatments to give, not administer IVs or set up splints or such and such. That's for nurses. Why is the whole patient interaction deal touted so much--I've seen plenty of doctors in action, and they tend to be quite impersonal. Again, the nurses do much of the comforting and whatnot. I just think pharm would be more fascinating, and since you've listed it as an option I assume you have some interest in the field. EMT always seemed like a blue collar job to me. Just opinions, all.
Docta "O" said:At this point I have to make a choice between working towards becoming either a Pharmacy Technician or an Emergency Medical Technician. I really am stuck between the two. I need advice, pros and cons, anything to help me make a decision.
texas1emt said:I'd recommend EMT for the hands-on experience. I've been an EMT since 2000 and it's very rewarding. My only gripes are:
1) Long hours
2) Low pay
3) 500lb people
As long as you stay away from private carriers, and no I wouldn't want to name names here (American Medical Response), you will be paid more and your experience will be better. I found that interviewers were very interested in my previous EMT experience and asked me a lot about where I worked, what type of patients I saw, and what types of skills I'd already used.
The one reason I wanted to be in medical school was what happens after a call. After the EMS call, we would always leave the hospital and wonder what happened to the patient afterwards. But, thanks to HIPAA, there's no way to find out even the most basic information about your patient's later status, even something as vague as whether they lived or not. This might not bother some people, but I want to know if my actions helped at all after the call.
Pharm Tech can't hurt though either, you might learn a bit of pharmacology, but not too much.
OSUdoc08 said:I'd be careful who you talk about. AMR is the most successful of all private ambulance companies in the U.S., and provides 911 and medical transport services to many areas in Texas, and other areas of the country (especially the southwest.)
Preet said:Now listen up. Both can be helpful to an extent. What you should do is go backwards. There is not point in getting training in either one if later you are sitting idle without a job. So check the job listings, web etc in your area and see what types of jobs are plentiful. Then embark on a training program.
EMT is only going to be helpful if you get an ER tech position at a local hospital. On the ambulance, EMTs are not doing much but transporting patients from convalescent homes to the hospital. Paramedics do much more. ER Tech positions will give you more exposure to patient issues.
Pharmacy tech is not bad either. When you get to med school, pharmacology would be very easy to grasp for you while your fellow students are soiling their pants.
OSUdoc08 said:EMT's assist patient care on the scene, and with a volunteer service, they can be in the back with the medic. To say that EMT's only drive would be erroneous.
texas1emt said:I agree. I'm an EMT and I've done plenty of advanced care. It depends a lot on how much your paramedic trusts you and what your SOP's or SOC's allow. Yes there are many paramedics who consider EMT's as "Equipment Management Technicians" (GRRRR 😡 ) but the vast majority give EMT's a chance to do a lot.
Plus, chicks dig the uniform. 🙂 They didn't dig me, but they liked other guys in the uniform, ha ha ha. 😎
OSUdoc08 said:Nah,
ECA's are Equiment Carrying A-holes
EMT's are the Extra Man on the Truck
OSUdoc08 said:EMT's assist patient care on the scene, and with a volunteer service, they can be in the back with the medic. To say that EMT's only drive would be erroneous.
tic112 said:What EMT's can and cannot do really depends on where you work and what sort of regulations the EMS in your particular county/state has. In certain states, EMT's respond to 911 emergency/trauma calls. In other states, the fire department takes the 911 calls and EMT's are simply taxi drivers (take patients from hospital to nursing home). So the quality of your EMT experience will really vary depending on where you live.
🙄OSUdoc08 said:I doubt anyone wants to hear about me selling a bottle of prozac to someone. We all know what it does anyway.
meister said:🙄
Do we? I'm sure adcoms want to sit through another person talk about "saving someone's life" as they drove around at 3 AM in search of something to do.
Put pills into a bottle and ring up a customer? Hardly.
Have you guys ever heard of insurance companies? Yeah, I think you have. And I think we all know how much doctors have to deal with them nowadays. You think EMT's learn anything about the bureaucratic aspects of being a physician? Formularies, prior authorizations, etc. etc.
Not to mention that you get first hand contact with hundreds of medications and their uses.
Now, obviously EMT has procedures and excitement(sometimes), but being an rx tech is a little bit more involved than counting pills and ringing up the patient. Especially when their drug isn't covered and they're going on vacation and it's Saturday morning and blah blah blah.
I think that my experience as a tech has helped me develop excellent skills in learning how to deal with patients who don't really have a clue as to how the healthcare system works.
Sorry to sound defensive, but having a bunch of people dismiss it with such carelessnes touched a nerve. To be perfectly honest, I think either choice would be good, just for different reasons. EMT is the much more common and probably more "fun" way though.
😀 meister said:🙄
Do we? I'm sure adcoms want to sit through another person talk about "saving someone's life" as they drove around at 3 AM in search of something to do.
Put pills into a bottle and ring up a customer? Hardly.
Have you guys ever heard of insurance companies? Yeah, I think you have. And I think we all know how much doctors have to deal with them nowadays. You think EMT's learn anything about the bureaucratic aspects of being a physician? Formularies, prior authorizations, etc. etc.
Not to mention that you get first hand contact with hundreds of medications and their uses.
Now, obviously EMT has procedures and excitement(sometimes), but being an rx tech is a little bit more involved than counting pills and ringing up the patient. Especially when their drug isn't covered and they're going on vacation and it's Saturday morning and blah blah blah.
I think that my experience as a tech has helped me develop excellent skills in learning how to deal with patients who don't really have a clue as to how the healthcare system works.
Sorry to sound defensive, but having a bunch of people dismiss it with such carelessnes touched a nerve. To be perfectly honest, I think either choice would be good, just for different reasons. EMT is the much more common and probably more "fun" way though.
So you get zero benefit from working as a tech? Please, who are you kidding? Don't be so narrow minded.OSUdoc08 said:Actually, all 5 of my interviews requested to hear those things. They loved my EMS stories, and we spent half of the interview time discussing them.
Pharmacy tech is good for if you want to be a pharmacist, not a physician.
By the way, as a paramedic, I was required to take pharmacology, so no "extra benefit" would have come from being a pharmacy tech.
Bingo.texas1emt said:I think the basic idea is - do what you want, and do what you enjoy. ANYTHING and ANY experience will look good to an interviewer, just back it up and talk about it. If you cut lawns during college, tell them why you did it, and what you learned from it. That's the big picture.
meister said:So you get zero benefit from working as a tech? Please, who are you kidding? Don't be so narrow minded.
And by the way, this guy isn't going to be a paramedic. He's going to be an EMT. Plus, just taking a class on something isn't nearly as informative as actually working and having direct contact with drugs. Obviously anyone in the healthcare industry is going to have access to drugs, but trying to pretend that working in a pharmacy doesn't give you good exposure to drugs is insane.
texas1emt said:Forget all you guys, I'm going to be the next American Idol. Yeah, you're jealous. 😛
And it will look sweet on my app for next year. 😎
I dunno, man, it was kinda fun parking on the middle of the interstate this morning while everyone else was 😴. Unfortunately, our MVA wasn't too exciting. There was a much more exciting one just a ways down the freeway. Got to see them BVMing him on their way into the trauma room.NEATOMD said:I (ok, so it isn't always fun at 3AM)
That's not really the point though, IMO. It's for the exposure, not the fine-tuning of your skills.sknott said:I'm not knocking being an EMT, but all I have to say is that the things you learn as an EMT are many basic procedures that any medical student will master and soon never perform again because that is what nurses are for.
Don't work full-time all the time. I'm taking 16 credits at school, volunteer occasionally, work in a student organization extensively, work in a research lab, and I work as an EMT. This semester, I've been doing one 24-hour shift a week, but I did two last week and I have two this week, but that's because I'm saving up for something.RJSpaulding said:I have a question for those who are EMTs and prospective medical students....How well have you been able to balance such a stressful occupation and going to school taking those lovely med school pre reqs? I know that it will be intense, but I have also heard that the hours are long.
Shredder said:Pharm Tech. You might learn a thing or two about drugs, which is most of what you do as a doctor anyway--prescribe them, and have the companies take you out to free, lavish dinners for doing so. There's a lot of money and potential to make a large-scale impact on medicine in pharmaceutics, even for doctors. EMT is on a person to person basis. More personal yeah, but not as much influence overall.
Doctors make decisions on which drugs and treatments to give, not administer IVs or set up splints or such and such. That's for nurses. Why is the whole patient interaction deal touted so much--I've seen plenty of doctors in action, and they tend to be quite impersonal. Again, the nurses do much of the comforting and whatnot. I just think pharm would be more fascinating, and since you've listed it as an option I assume you have some interest in the field. EMT always seemed like a blue collar job to me. Just opinions, all.
carn311 said:I disagree. I'm volunteering as an EMT now at a rescue squad where they only run to EMT-Basic (the lowest EMT certification) and these people know much more about medicine than you give them credit for. And they also can teach you more about patient contact then being behind a pharmacy counter every could. These people will be in the most dire circumstances of life and you will have the opportunity as a PREMED to console them. This is a skill that cannot be taught in the classroom and will prove an invaluble asset in both your career in medicine and your medical school application.
RJSpaulding said:I have a question for those who are EMTs and prospective medical students....How well have you been able to balance such a stressful occupation and going to school taking those lovely med school pre reqs? I know that it will be intense, but I have also heard that the hours are long.
voulpaix said:Hey, I am having the greatest time as an EMT in the ER at my local hospital. I do EKGs, help nurses with everything from IVS, CPR, monitoring, vitaling, getting blood, testing blood glucose, bandaging, splinting, transport, etc. You get the point. I feel like a mini-doc because I get to talk, fill out papers, and wear scrubs. The doctors are the best and it's just great to get experience medically and on an interpersonal level with staff and patients. I just graduated UCLA and this is what I'm doing on my year off before school next year. If you go the EMT route try your best to put in an application with a local ER. My pay is 14.35/hr with overtime that takes me to about 22/hr. This is grave yard shift of course (7p to 7a). Anyways, I played around with the ambulance thing, and after doing my ride alongs I realized that there is so much down time and the pay is so low (around 8.5/hr in CA), so I went for the hospital experience. I have a lot of respect for PharmTechs but I don't think that it will be as fulfilling for a student bound for medical school. There is definitely the patient factor missing in that one. So try to get through a one month EMT program, put in an ER application, and you are on your way. Good luck!
voulpaix said:Hey, I am having the greatest time as an EMT in the ER at my local hospital. I do EKGs, help nurses with everything from IVS, CPR, monitoring, vitaling, getting blood, testing blood glucose, bandaging, splinting, transport, etc. You get the point. I feel like a mini-doc because I get to talk, fill out papers, and wear scrubs. The doctors are the best and it's just great to get experience medically and on an interpersonal level with staff and patients. I just graduated UCLA and this is what I'm doing on my year off before school next year. If you go the EMT route try your best to put in an application with a local ER. My pay is 14.35/hr with overtime that takes me to about 22/hr. This is grave yard shift of course (7p to 7a). Anyways, I played around with the ambulance thing, and after doing my ride alongs I realized that there is so much down time and the pay is so low (around 8.5/hr in CA), so I went for the hospital experience. I have a lot of respect for PharmTechs but I don't think that it will be as fulfilling for a student bound for medical school. There is definitely the patient factor missing in that one. So try to get through a one month EMT program, put in an ER application, and you are on your way. Good luck!
blessed1 said:Voulpaix,
Where/how did you find a one-month training program for EMT-B? I live in the state of Maryland and have not been able to find one shorter than a regular college semester. Any help is greatly appreciated. 🙂
Thank you!
Blessed1
Shredder said:Pharm Tech. You might learn a thing or two about drugs, which is most of what you do as a doctor anyway--prescribe them, and have the companies take you out to free, lavish dinners for doing so. There's a lot of money and potential to make a large-scale impact on medicine in pharmaceutics, even for doctors. EMT is on a person to person basis. More personal yeah, but not as much influence overall.
Doctors make decisions on which drugs and treatments to give, not administer IVs or set up splints or such and such. That's for nurses. Why is the whole patient interaction deal touted so much--I've seen plenty of doctors in action, and they tend to be quite impersonal. Again, the nurses do much of the comforting and whatnot. I just think pharm would be more fascinating, and since you've listed it as an option I assume you have some interest in the field. EMT always seemed like a blue collar job to me. Just opinions, all.
OSUdoc08 said:Actually, all 5 of my interviews requested to hear those things. They loved my EMS stories, and we spent half of the interview time discussing them.
Pharmacy tech is good for if you want to be a pharmacist, not a physician.
By the way, as a paramedic, I was required to take pharmacology, so no "extra benefit" would have come from being a pharmacy tech.