- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 32
Marijuana.
Anyone here smokes or know any healthcare practitioners that smokes weed?
Anyone here smokes or know any healthcare practitioners that smokes weed?
They exist, I know a couple of RPhs in the great state of Colorado who do/did, although one was fired due to somehow not knowing how to pass a drug test. Thankfully he kept his license.
Drug testing is illegal in some states, so there have got to be people smoking there.
Personally I feel that marijuana illegality and it's associated drug testing is a major affront to privacy rights, but, wouldn't pick up smoking again until it became legal nationally. Once it does, off-duty-behavior statutes should prevail and provide legal protection.
There are plenty of "professionals" who use illegal substances out there , for better or worse. The smart ones either only indulge occasionally, or know how to keep secrets wisely. One way or another, if you're stupid, you'll get caught and likely lose everything. Don't go into healthcare if you are already planning to use drugs, or if it is a real part of your lifestyle.. plenty of people will be ready and waiting to fire you, put you in jail, or take your license.
But there are dumber situations to be in, such as going into pharmacy with a pre existing dependence or addiction to narcotics, which believe it or not, they exist out there, but as you will learn in your drug abuse for healthcare providers seminar, these people are basically on a one way train to having no livelihood, jail, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt.
Wait, I thought pharmacists in Washington and Colorado would be in the clear since recreational is legal there.
No, they are not in the clear. It is a C-1 drug, and thus you cannot keep a DEA license if you are found to have it. The state laws do not protect you from being fired or suffering consequences on the federal law.
I always thought it was ironic that you can pass a pee test for heavy stuff like opiates and meth after a relatively short washout yet weed will get you weeks/months afterafter
Hmm, pretty weird. What if you have a medical marijuana card?
New York State recently legalized medical marijuana but they did it all wrong. Only non-smokeable forms are being legalized and there are only a few conditions that it can be prescribed for.
I was hoping it would be like California.
The fed needs to wake the **** up and just legalize it and allow it to be sold without restrictions or regulations.
It's about as useful as a Buzz Lightyear Space Ranger ID card would be if you were trying to get into secure NASA facilities.Hmm, pretty weird. What if you have a medical marijuana card?
...
It's constitutionally and legally completely bogus to fire someone for what they do legally during their private (time off).
It's that lipophillic property.
I always thought it was ironic that you can pass a pee test for heavy stuff like opiates and meth after a relatively short washout yet weed will get you weeks/months afterafter
I always thought it was ironic that you can pass a pee test for heavy stuff like opiates and meth after a relatively short washout yet weed will get you weeks/months afterafter
Lexi says up to 30 days, last I checkedWhat? I don't believe it lasts that long.
are you an idiot? It may be legal by state law, but still federally illegal, feds win out EVERY time. It is a C1 (although I disagree with this, I still have to follow the law). And it is not bogus to fire someone for what they do legally during their time off. There is a fortune 500 company - I cannot remember which one, that will not employ tobacco smokers, which is perfectly legal.It's constitutionally and legally completely bogus to fire someone for what they do legally during their private (time off).. This has already been brought to court in Colorado, but the appeals court basically said (paraphrase) 'we're not going to issue such a big ruling while it is still federally illegal' which sucks but is a wise move considering the DEA and DOJ are watching pretty closely at this point.
Also most medical states have specific provisions in statute protecting employers rights with regard to marijuana use by employees. Constitutionally, complete crap, but would likely change when it becomes legal nationally. There is the whole issue of measuring impairment level, which still needs to be established.
Actually it isn't. The constitution does not address the "Right to Work." Most likely, the writers of the constitution and Bill of Rights would have seen Employment law outside the purview of the federal government (a state issue). Your state constitution might address it, but that is also unlikely. I am unaware of any state that protects you for being fired for action outside work. The only exception might be states where it is medically (but not recreationally) legal. There you might be protected because of a medical condition. However, if said condition (or treatment) interferred with work, was not protected under ADA laws, or could not be "reasonably" accommodated then you might be fired anyway.It's constitutionally and legally completely bogus to fire someone for what they do legally during their private (time off)..
If your state is a right to work state, you can be fired at any time for any reason, provided it is not a "protected" reason (age, sex, religion, etc)
There you might be protected because of a medical condition. However, if said condition (or treatment) interferred with work, was not protected under ADA laws, or could not be "reasonably" accommodated then you might be fired anyway. For example, in all states - if the employee handbook states that you can be terminated for positive drug tests, then you would be pretty much SOL unless you had a prescription treating an ADA protected condition.
thanks for the clarification - I understand the differences, but often they go hand in hand here - but yes, you are correctActually it isn't. The constitution does not address the "Right to Work." Most likely, the writers of the constitution and Bill of Rights would have seen Employment law outside the purview of the federal government (a state issue). Your state constitution might address it, but that is also unlikely. I am unaware of any state that protects you for being fired for action outside work. The only exception might be states where it is medically (but not recreationally) legal. There you might be protected because of a medical condition. However, if said condition (or treatment) interferred with work, was not protected under ADA laws, or could not be "reasonably" accommodated then you might be fired anyway.
Just a side comment (as this is a small pet peeve with me), I think the phrase you are looking for is "At will" not "right to work." Right to work states prevent Unions from requiring membership, the opposite being a "Union Shop" state. Most states are "At-will" in some regard. "Implied-in-law" states are the most opposite from pure "at-will" states, and even those allow company policies to dictate firing practices for this kind of thing. For example, in all states - if the employee handbook states that you can be terminated for positive drug tests, then you would be pretty much SOL unless you had a prescription treating an ADA protected condition.
Lexi says 4 days for minimal use & 30 days for frequent use. Those might be point estimates, but I wouldn't expect "months" to be realistic. Maybe 6 weeks?If you're a chronic (luls) smoker it can be + for months. If it's a once in a while thing its generally out of you in a week.
Lexi says 4 days for minimal use & 30 days for frequent use. Those might be point estimates, but I wouldn't expect "months" to be realistic. Maybe 6 weeks?
Do you have a source for this?Months is for the people who smoke pretty much all day every day.
Anecdotal. I have a friend that smoked daily and passed a urine test for an IPPE site within 2 weeks of stopping.Do you have a source for this?
Lexi says 4 days for minimal use & 30 days for frequent use. Those might be point estimates, but I wouldn't expect "months" to be realistic. Maybe 6 weeks?
Do you have a source for this?
I talk about it all the time, I am an huge advocate of the legalization. Although I never smoke simply because I am afraid of getting caught. WHen I tell people I never have, most don't believe me, but I enjoy messing with the conservative southerners who think it is a product of the devilIt's pretty much common sense though. Don't smoke if you're going to be at work within the next 8 hours. Don't let people at work know that you smoke, don't even get into conversations about weed. As long as you don't give them a reason to think you're working while high, you won't get drug tested.
I talk about it all the time, I am an huge advocate of the legalization. Although I never smoke simply because I am afraid of getting caught. WHen I tell people I never have, most don't believe me, but I enjoy messing with the conservative southerners who think it is a product of the devil
like I said, I don't smoke so I have no concerns about peeing in a cup, and I know many managers/directors in a company I used to work for who smoked, hell our former executive president of the board of pharmacy was a strong advocate for the legalizationYou gotta be careful who you talk about it to. I'd never ever talk about it to the director or anyone in management. Only if they bring it up first. Let's say you talk about it, and then one day you call in sick. If the director is a sadistic bastard he might say, "oh are you calling in because you're sick or because you're high", next thing you know you're peeing in a cup and getting fired.