Generalizations are generally true. What's the big deal? The exceptions prove the rule and you should know that.
I think what we find to be an interesting or fascinating person can vary from one to the other. I had a friend tell me about her boyfriend who, according to her, was the most interesting person in the world. Turned out he bored the hell out of me. I've even met people who say sport freaks and video game freaks are dull...even to the point that tailgating at college football games is boring.
So from my perspective, most of the Rho Chi super high GPA students are boring as hell. I had two close friends make it to Rho Chi and they are far from boring but the others were as dull as rocks. Never had interesting contributions to make during class or outside class and seemed to isolate themselves from others.
edit: One thing I remembered about my class's Rho Chi bunch is that there were only 2 people who ever served as President or Vice President of an organization. For a lot of them, Rho Chi was the only group to which they belong. Kinda odd if you ask me. Personal experience can shape the way you view things so can you really fault me for yawning when I see Rho Chi listed on a student's CV or job app?
I know this is an older post (and this isn't specifically directed at whoever I quoted) but this really bothers me because I've seen it come up a couple times now.
Is this really the outlook most pharmacy people right now have about Rho Chi and/or students that excel academically? :/ I mean yeah, some kids these days are like that and just focus on grades, barely doing anything else but I feel like those are the minority, at least from people I know.
All of the my med student friends had high grades in college (obviously), and this is just a small sample: my old roommate was a great basketball player but was in AOA and geeked out with me over medical/therapeutics stuff a lot, one guy has like 800 hobbies (violinist, pottery, art, amazing researcher...), another guy was a ranked gamer who played at tournaments (had like a 3.9 as an engineering major and played a LOT of video games). My sister has a 4.0 in high school but she plays piano, violin and is a ranked tennis player. I know a ton more that are just good at art, build computers, play tons of instruments, do chalk art, and just are really fun people to be around.
Just is weird to me because I've heard this generalization from other people too ("oh med students made this funny parody video? i didn't know they had other talents") as if they don't realize you have to be well rounded and have great grades to even get into med school in the first place.
Or are people only interesting if they party a lot, are social butterflies, or are presidents of organizations and sell t shirts or something.
Personally, I think it's pretty amazing to see high schoolers winning science competitions and what not. I guess I just don't understand where this dismissing attitude towards academic excellence and scholarly activities comes from and I don't know how I'm supposed to make myself "interesting" towards my future residency directors or hiring managers.
And what would it take for people to take Rho Chi more seriously (for my own benefit since I'm an officer of that org and I want to make some changes there)?