genung said:I have a PhD in Psych and an NP and at age 48 am considering MD.
Have heard Canadian NP to MD program.
Any info or leads much appreciated!!!
sasevan said:Hi genung, 🙂
I say go for it. It seems to me that you have slowly been moving in that direction for years. So what if you finish residency when you're 56 or 60; you may well still have 20 years of practice left. And even if you don't, so what, you'll be doing what you're really interested in doing during the next 8 years.
And yes, school/residency will be hard but what else is new: you've already made it through PhD psych school/residency and NP program. I also believe that you being a psychologist and a nurse practitioner will make you VERY competitive to MD programs (btw, don't forget about DO programs!).
The only caution I would have is if you just want full scope of practice and believe that you can't have that as a PhD/NP but only as an MD. Things are changing and in many states nurse practitioners have full independent/full formulary scope and of course, psychologists are also moving in that direction. So, if all you want is full scope and are ok with moving then I would suggest consideration of an alternative to the MD/DO route.
BUT, if your self-concept has evolved to seeing yourself most professionally fulfilled as a psychiatrist physician, then again I suggest that you don't let anyone dissuade you from that MD/DO path. 👍
biers6 said:I'm not sure if this is a serious question, but if it is, I strongly discourage you. You're a PhD -- you know your psych. You're an NP -- you can prescribe meds. Why exactly would you pay money instead of earn money to study a body of knowledge only peripherally (in med school) related to what you want to do? What are you looking for?
genung said:Yes, this is a serious question...
In California, hospital regulatory restrictions limit prescribing on acute psych units to MDs. On M/S, critical and ED units I consult and prescribe with no limitations. My pvt. practice is limited to psych assessments and psych Rxs. My passion and strengths are psych emergency and acutely psychotic pts. The only way to work inpt. psych in CA seems to be as an MD. Additionally, I just want to know more....
PsychMD said:Why don't you just try to work for the Dept. of Corrections? Lots of jobs available in CA. I'm sure that your qualifications would be more than acceptable, since your background is both psych and NP. You'd see lots of patients who are similar to the patients from inpatient units, lots of co-morbid medical problems, and you'd be able to hone your skills pretty well, learn new things, interact with and learn from more senior boarded psychiatrists, the environment and learning experience wouldn't theoretically be that different from a post medical school psych. residency experience in an acute inpt. psych. on a county hospital unit, plus you get the additional bonus re. forensic psych. exposure, etc...
Of course, if your goal was really to get the MD and subsequent private practice combining inpt. and outpt....this wouldn't be the road. But since you mentioned you want to learn more about psychosis and experience acute inpatient work...I really think Corrections would be a pretty comparable "shortcut" for you...The money wouldn't be bad either, from what I hear, although it goes by scales, so you might have a different scale on the PhD track vs. the NP vs. the MD tracks... Benefits are good...you could learn (fulfill your knowledge thirst, get additional interesting experiences, AND have a good retirement package too.)