Pictures of Ancient Faith-based non-evidence-based books that control the US

[mTOR]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Discuss.

 

[MediCynical]

 

[Rollo]

Oh look, it's another liberal anti-religious evolutionist bigot trying to troll and start needless, unwarranted arguments.

I would participate but I've found that when throwing mud at others, I tend to get hands dirty too.

 

[adaptation1]

really? you really think this is prelude to this discussion? a picture of the bible, in a country almost predominantly christian? okay that's just 100% trolling at its worst, no matter how you look at it.

 

[cetac]

Oh look, it's another liberal anti-religious evolutionist bigot trying to troll and start needless, unwarranted arguments.

I would participate but I've found that when throwing mud at others, I tend to get hands dirty too.

1. Label OP liberal, anti-religious, evolutionist and bigot
2. Ensure little evidence exists for labels conjured up in Step 1
3. Announce non-participation
4. ...
5. Click "Submit Reply" (Participate?)

 

[jdh71]

This is why we can't have nice things

 

[tiedyeddog]

This is why we can't have nice things

 

[Morsetlis]

This is why we can't have nice things

Are we meant to have nice things?

Are nice things objectively proven to be desirable?

Who made these nice things?!

 

[HumbleMD]

Oh look, it's another liberal anti-religious evolutionist bigot trying to troll and start needless, unwarranted arguments.

I would participate but I've found that when throwing mud at others, I tend to get hands dirty too.

This clearly a trolling thread. But I'd eliminate the word "evolutionist" from your vocabulary if you want to be taken seriously in medicine. By "evolutionist" I assume you mean "science-based," as in the paradigm within which medicine operates. Would you like me to start calling you an "evolution-denier?" I'd love to start.

 

[Neuronix]

If you want to seriously discuss religion in healthcare, please post in topics in healthcare.

Closed thread.