D
deleted875186
Perhaps transverse process fracture, hard to tell without scanning through images. The conus looks normal to me ….
Perhaps transverse process fracture, hard to tell without scanning through images. The conus looks normal to me ….
@lobelsteve saysIt might not be normal but is anything there “fixable”?
SPR multifidi is stupid. It is uncomfortable, skin hates it, MoA makes no sense. I'll never do another. This pt still has wire left inside her bc the 300 micron lead fractured.Then he'll milk the site of service to do some erector spinae plane blocks for the transverse process fracture (Erector spinae plane block for bilateral lumbar transverse process fracture in emergency department: A new indication - PubMed), maybe dropping an SPR lead to treat the acute multifidus strain.
SPR multifidi is stupid. It is uncomfortable, skin hates it, MoA makes no sense. I'll never do another. This pt still has wire left inside her bc the 300 micron lead fractured.
View attachment 351675
Pain with sitting. Delightful. So how’s that work? MOA?Minuteman for adjacent segment disease. 3 months now - very happy, can walk with less pain, sit with less pain. Extremely surprised it helped him as much as it did.
Discogenic pain along with LSS w/ neurogenic claudication. This is taking pressure off the disc and tilting the vertebral body forward in a vertiflex type fashion for indirect decompression of the neural structures. But of course you knew that right - such a hater lolPain with sitting. Delightful. So how’s that work? MOA?
dafuq?Discogenic pain along with LSS w/ neurogenic claudication. This is taking pressure off the disc and tilting the vertebral body forward in a vertiflex type fashion for indirect decompression of the neural structures. But of course you knew that right - such a hater lol
Tilting forward and taking pressure of the disc. Time to go back to middle school physics for you.Discogenic pain along with LSS w/ neurogenic claudication. This is taking pressure off the disc and tilting the vertebral body forward in a vertiflex type fashion for indirect decompression of the neural structures. But of course you knew that right - such a hater lol
The opposite right?Discogenic pain along with LSS w/ neurogenic claudication. This is taking pressure off the disc and tilting the vertebral body forward in a vertiflex type fashion for indirect decompression of the neural structures. But of course you knew that right - such a hater lol
Tilting forward and taking pressure of the disc. Time to go back to middle school physics for you.
One more and it is Dx for DISH. Xray would show it better. In Georgia we call that age 65+To change subjects - how do you suppose this happened?
One more and it is Dx for DISH. Xray would show it better. In Georgia we call that age 65+
Show me the xray. Those spurs in that parasagital cut appear to curve up. Sure, some fibrous tissue and/or disc is there and we all see this routinely.However those are HNP not bridging ostephytes
You can say that confidently without CT or X-ray? Not that it matters for this patients care, just an academic pointHowever those are HNP not bridging ostephytes
Look like not uncommon degenerative disc-osteophyte complexes to me.However those are HNP not bridging ostephytes
I don’t think I have X-rays but here is an axial cutShow me the xray. Those spurs in that parasagital cut appear to curve up. Sure, some fibrous tissue and/or disc is there and we all see this routinely.
yeah, this is DISH. if there id a focal anterior single disc herniation, then MAYBE it would cause some trouble. but i doubt it.
this isnt unusual.
you sure you should be throwing in those inter-spinous spacers?
Maybe post some axials. Looks at least moderate stenosis. PT vs HEP, ESI at L3 TFESI vs ILESI at L3-4.39M, back pain for 9months, no inciting injury, although he notes that 20 years ago he was thrown into a pool and caught his back on the edge of the pool, right around that level. Back pain, radiating right groin and inner thigh pain and tingling. No weakness. Trying an ESI. Could be a candidate for Intracept if radic resolves and axial back pain persists.
Axials, flex/ex or at least standing xrays?39M, back pain for 9months, no inciting injury, although he notes that 20 years ago he was thrown into a pool and caught his back on the edge of the pool, right around that level. Back pain, radiating right groin and inner thigh pain and tingling. No weakness. Trying an ESI. Could be a candidate for Intracept if radic resolves and axial back pain persists.
That’s a really crappy disc for a 39 yo. Basovertebral ablation would be worth a try if all axial, certainly better than fused.
39M, back pain for 9months, no inciting injury, although he notes that 20 years ago he was thrown into a pool and caught his back on the edge of the pool, right around that level. Back pain, radiating right groin and inner thigh pain and tingling. No weakness. Trying an ESI. Could be a candidate for Intracept if radic resolves and axial back pain persists.
But will correcting the slip correct the pain?Burning it won't correct the slip.
Stabilizing that offers the best chance of long term success. All these treatments being mentioned will help for some length of time and should be pursued, but the biggest problem is segmental instability.But will correcting the slip correct the pain?
So when surgeons do a fusion in a case like this we, as pain docs, question and condemn it?But will correcting the slip correct the pain?
Correct, IF you're a Rolex, Patek or Audemars guy.So when surgeons do a fusion in a case like this we, as pain docs, question and condemn it?
But when pain docs do a “fusion” it’s totally indicated, a good thing and deserves a group high-five on linked in?
I’m so confused…..
Im not condemning, just saying we know the long term consequence of a fusion.So when surgeons do a fusion in a case like this we, as pain docs, question and condemn it?
But when pain docs do a “fusion” it’s totally indicated, a good thing and deserves a group high-five on linked in?
I’m so confused…..
Sorry- I wasn’t specifically directing my reply at you, just a general theme on this thread and pain docs doing fusions in generalIm not condemning, just saying we know the long term consequence of a fusion.
I meant more along the lines of, does correcting the slip actually correct pain, or is it just removing the diseased disc that does it. If removing the diseased disc is the main thing, theoretically the intercept should also have just as goid an outcome.
Sure if there is movement on flex extension and symptoms with flex ion in everyday life, then he needs a fusion. If not and it’s stable, no way to tell if it’s from the disc or from the lithesis, why not try intracept.We need flex/ex plain films of course, but common things are common and this pt needs to be stabilized at some point.
ESI should go first, and I'd exhaust that avenue before moving on...
Unstable translation, not just a dead disk...Meaning, the pt is actively slipping during flex/ex movements and the pain comes from that instability, and that's the reason so many pts do well after fusing these.
We're not talking spondylosis with 3 level spinal and foraminal stenosis with lateral recess obliteration and 3 level fixed degenerative listhesis. That's a different fusion pt.
No one wants to do surgery on a 39 yo, but I'm not going to stand in the way of that pt receiving what we all know to be a much more definitive solution.
Maybe some of you who do Modic burns have great results but this isn't just a dead disk with endplate edema - The disk collapse lead to the instability and the instability is most likely your culprit.
Sure. Try it. At best you're buying time on the order of months. From a 30k foot view I can't see the utility of it long term.Sure if there is movement on flex extension and symptoms with flex ion in everyday life, then he needs a fusion. If not and it’s stable, no way to tell if it’s from the disc or from the lithesis, why not try intracept.
1. because it will put a hole in their vertebraSure if there is movement on flex extension and symptoms with flex ion in everyday life, then he needs a fusion. If not and it’s stable, no way to tell if it’s from the disc or from the lithesis, why not try intracept
It doesn't really put a hole in there. The trocar/stylet tract heals up quick, like kypho tract.1. because it will put a hole in their vertebra
2. because it costs a ton of money that the patient MAY need to pay out of pocket
3. because it will get the patient's hopes up
4. because it will delay treatment
5. --and most importantly -- because it won't work
I would try intracept before getting a fusion. All the above arguments are unfounded, except for it may potentially cost something out of pocket. Delay treatment? What is the risk of delaying a fusion for chronic axial back pain.1. because it will put a hole in their vertebra
2. because it costs a ton of money that the patient MAY need to pay out of pocket
3. because it will get the patient's hopes up
4. because it will delay treatment
5. --and most importantly -- because it won't work