PK Anesthesia

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
So is he going to still be board certified? I just checked on the aba.org website. 1980 boarded.

So who invented the ketadural?
 
Friedberg posted on here for a couple of months under the name "aghast1" He was one of the most arrogant persons I have ever encountered on the internet. That is a pretty elite crowd considering how many tools are out there.
Copro, from years ago, actually called him on it early on and received a reprimand from a moderator. Over the next few days it turned out that copro was dead on correct about the guy. He is a media ***** who exploits tragedy to promote himself and his non-original thoughts. His so called textbook on cosmetic surgery is a joke. He has a chapter on brain monitoring that is authored by the medical director for Aspect, the makers of the BIS monitor.
The text overall is a complete joke that he pushes as innovative.
I am, however, sorry that he had a patient that had a bad outcome. I would never wish that on any physician or patient. No matter how good or careful anyone is, we will all face a bad outcome or a situation we could get a "do-over" for in our career. Sounds like a very unfortunate situation.
 
A while back a Barry Friedberg, MD was espousing his views on how great his propofol/ketamine IV sedation "protocol" was. Dude went so far as to say that he invented it.

Turns out it isn't as safe as he thought:

http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/smile-implant-center-negligence-c611681.html

He spent eight months in federal prison for committing the felony of mail fraud, according to a stipulation agreement.

(about the dentist.... seriously where do they get these guys?!)
 
Friedberg posted on here for a couple of months under the name "aghast1" He was one of the most arrogant persons I have ever encountered on the internet. That is a pretty elite crowd considering how many tools are out there.
Copro, from years ago, actually called him on it early on and received a reprimand from a moderator. Over the next few days it turned out that copro was dead on correct about the guy. He is a media ***** who exploits tragedy to promote himself and his non-original thoughts. His so called textbook on cosmetic surgery is a joke. He has a chapter on brain monitoring that is authored by the medical director for Aspect, the makers of the BIS monitor.
The text overall is a complete joke that he pushes as innovative.
I am, however, sorry that he had a patient that had a bad outcome. I would never wish that on any physician or patient. No matter how good or careful anyone is, we will all face a bad outcome or a situation we could get a "do-over" for in our career. Sounds like a very unfortunate situation.

What is the name of the cosmetic textbook. Just looking for a good laugh. To be honest, I've never saved anyone's life with a BIS monitor. The only reason I use it is because we are required to whenever we paralyze a patient at my place. I try to practice cost effective medicine.

How was this guy exploiting tragedy and how was he a media *****? Is he going to lose his ABA crtification?

You are right about bad outcomes. Unfortunately, it seems to happen when we least expect it.
 
What is the name of the cosmetic textbook. Just looking for a good laugh. To be honest, I've never saved anyone's life with a BIS monitor. The only reason I use it is because we are required to whenever we paralyze a patient at my place. I try to practice cost effective medicine.

How was this guy exploiting tragedy and how was he a media *****? Is he going to lose his ABA crtification?

You are right about bad outcomes. Unfortunately, it seems to happen when we least expect it.

It's this one

http://www.amazon.com/Anesthesia-in-Cosmetic-Surgery-ebook/dp/B001QFYZ04


Gern is 100% on target.
 
What is the name of the cosmetic textbook. Just looking for a good laugh. To be honest, I've never saved anyone's life with a BIS monitor. The only reason I use it is because we are required to whenever we paralyze a patient at my place. I try to practice cost effective medicine.

How was this guy exploiting tragedy and how was he a media *****? Is he going to lose his ABA crtification?

You are right about bad outcomes. Unfortunately, it seems to happen when we least expect it.

He sat outside the Conrad Murray trial in scrubs with a copy of his text in his hand doing interviews with anyone who would listen. He had a brief moment of fame with CNN.
He had a printable document on his web site where patients were encouraged to print off his recipe for how to perform "safe" or "goldilocks anesthesia" for their anesthesia so that the patient could hand it to their provider so that they could survive the surgery. The obvious implication was that his way was the only way. His method involves Propofol and ketamine and a BIS monitor.
He adamantly denied any involvement with Aspect Medical, but something was very fishy about the relationship. At every turn, he was talking up the BIS monitor as the next best thing since sliced bread. Then he has the medical director write a chapter in his "text." It seemed a bit coincidental. I never fully followed the money trail, but it sure seemed logical that some money changed hands. He was like a glorified equipment rep that showed up to SDN passing out kolaches.
 
Originally Posted by Gern Blansten
Copro, from years ago, actually called him on it early on and received a reprimand from a moderator. Over the next few days it turned out that copro was dead on correct about the guy.

Yeah, classic coprolalia ... http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=5872383

🙂


How time flies.
🙂 Good times. Now if you call someone out as a douchebag, f'ing prick, etc. you probably get some points.😉

I can't help but wonder aloud if his reliance on his trademarked technique and lack of intubation skills after 15 years of not intubating anyone (or nearly nobody) contributed to the death. The judgment was quite low. We really need tort reform, perhaps with a multiplier for gross malpractice? Like calling your technique superior and safer and not being able to escalate care as needed. Perhaps it was a PE, but I would think that would have probably not lead to a malpractice judgment.
I also wondered about the fact that it was noted that he was not an approved by the dental board to practice anesthesia. Perhaps there's more to that, like he wasn't practicing according to accepted ASA standards, but some lesser dental anesthesia standards. They certainly could be more liberal. I suppose we will never know.
Cheers!
 
Last edited:
AND....................
Once again, why ALL anesthesiologists should be subject to MOCA and simulation recertifications.... Yes, I know, I know, not a panacea of preventing harm/death but at least these old timers/cronies/dudes who screwed us young guys by f****** health care in the 80's raking in tons of cash and now crying poverty would at least be monitored a little closer. I wouldn't let some of these old timers put my dog to sleep. Cockiness always catches up with you....
 
🙂 Good times. Now if you call someone out as a douchebag, f'ing prick, etc. you probably get some points.😉

I can't help but wonder aloud if his reliance on his trademarked technique and lack of intubation skills after 15 years of not intubating anyone (or nearly nobody) contributed to the death. The judgment was quite low. We really need tort reform, perhaps with a multiplier for gross malpractice? Like calling your technique superior and safer and not being able to escalate care as needed. Perhaps it was a PE, but I would think that would have probably not lead to a malpractice judgment.
I also wondered about the fact that it was noted that he was not an approved by the dental board to practice anesthesia. Perhaps there's more to that, like he wasn't practicing according to accepted ASA standards, but some lesser dental anesthesia standards. They certainly could be more liberal. I suppose we will never know.
Cheers!

After reading that earlier thread (particularly with regards to the definition of MAC vs GA), it wouldn't surprise me if he had his own version of "standards."

I think he actually had a few valid arguments in that thread, but on the whole, he came across as someone who found an anesthetic plan that worked and convinced himself that it was the best plan, in that it was easy, patients liked it, and it appeared safe, so why mess with it?

On the contrary, in my limited experience anesthesia seems like a field where you need a Plan A, B, C, and D to practice safely. I will be the first to admit that I don't know that he didn't have plans B-D, I'm just extrapolating from that earlier thread.
 
Dr Barry Friedberg Sets the Record Straight.

Fact #1 - I never knew anything about Dr. Teich's legal problems but naively assumed if he was licensed that he had met certain legal requirements; i.e. not being a convicted felon. So it never occurred to me to ask him if he was one.

Fact #2 - I did not administer Paula Kane's oral medication, as you reported.

Around 1:30 pm, I was asked to provide IV sedation after Ms. Kane demanded to be put to sleep.

Fact #3 - Ms. Kane did not suffer a respiratory arrest, as plaintiff's attorney asserted at trial.

It was undisputed that Ms. Kane suffered a primary cardiac arrest with a nearly uniformly fatal condition called PEA or pulseless electrical activity.

While the commonest cause of PEA is lack of oxygen typically recognized by a decrease on pulse oximeter tone. There was no such decrease in Ms. Kane.

Low oxygen events have been prevented by the use of the pulse oximeter, a device I insisted Michael Stephens, Hoag Hospital administrator, acquire in 1983, 7 years before it was deemed a ‘standard of care’ by the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

It is virtually impossible for a primary respiratory arrest to occur with a functioning pulse oximeter, as was the case until Kane's last heart beat.

After getting baseline vital signs and BIS readings, I administered the late Paula Kane’s propofol sedation monitored by both pulse oximetry & brain activity monitors.

She did not die from propofol overmedication as you reported.

Her sentinel event was an abrupt loss of pulse oximeter signal, the vast majority of times is caused by the sensor falling off the fingertip.

Her probable cause of death was the extremely rare cause of air embolism that, after 3 days, would have been undetectable by the coroner’s autopsy.

Air embolism is not predictable in dental implant surgery but has been reported.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/x6602350v24vp388/

Air embolism in dental surgery is not preventable or treatable.

Fact #4 I have been a board certified anesthesiologist since 1980, licensed by the California Medical Board since 1976 & recognized as an expert reviewer for the Board since 2005.

Unlike my Dental License for general anesthesia, my medical license has both the original date of issue & the expiration date.

The Dental Board never provided any notification of the expiration of my permit for GA.

Fact #5 - I have not been sued for malpractice since 1991, settled for $5,000 to cover a Hoag OB patient's medical expenses. She had nothing bad to say about my care.

I have spent my entire career in anesthesia as a patient safety advocate, starting with my introduction of the non-invasive blood pressure monitor to Hoag Hospital in 1979.

In March 1992, I developed propofol ketamine IV sedation in response to the challenge of caring for patients involved in the office death in Newport Beach in 1990.

http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/edward-j-domanskis

I was his expert witness in both his malpractice trial & with the CA Medical Board.

In 1997, I was the first Orange County anesthesiologist to routinely monitor propofol anesthesia depth with a BIS brain monitor.

Following the 2004 death of Olivia Goldsmith, author of ‘The First Wives’ Club,’ Cambridge University Press chose me first, among 40,000 US anesthesiologists, to write the first ever anesthesia textbook, ‘Anesthesia in Cosmetic Surgery.’

This book is the first anesthesia text with a brain monitor on the cover & first to define levels of sedation/anesthesia with numbers instead of words.

Also, in 2004, local US Congressman John Campbell presented Dr. Friedberg with a Congressional Recognition award for improving safety of wounded combat troops.

I thank you for taking time to read the facts.

Dr Barry Friedberg

:eyebrow:

The response from Ronald O. Davies, DDS is interesting as well.

- pod
 
A solid helping of BS right there, some hand waving, some of the old Barry patting himself on the back. No mention of using standard ASA monitors and guidelines, no mention of resuscitation, appropriate equipment, etc, etc. The judgment speaks for itself, and the experts disagreed with his version of the facts and/or how the case was handled. No acceptance of any responsibility, just failed deflection and excuses.
By the way chief, if you're reading, IF she did have an air embolism, it's not universally fatal as you suggest. Anyone, myself included, who does significant neuroanesthesia will have probably seen several significant ones, and, my God, they lived! Even with PEA, vtach, etc. Maybe I should trademark my recussitation technique, I'll call it "Il Destriero'$ maximally invasive ACLS®". I'll start writing letters to the editor tomorrow. I'll also let it slip that I developed the technique for the military while I was deployed during Gulf War II. Maybe I'll get the Medal of Honor.
Once I even had a massive amnionic fluid embolism, now that was bad, and that's usually fatal, but not always. My "maximally invasive ACLS" proved it's worth that day, that and 100 units of blood products.
Another thing, You'd think an EXPERT in office based anesthesia would know he needs some special license to practice in a dentists office, THAT HE ALREADY POSESSED AT ONE TIME.
I see much arrogance, and it's inevitable repercussions in the above statement.
Sad.
Cheers!
 
Last edited:
A solid helping of BS right there, some hand waving, some of the old Barry patting himself on the back. No mention of using standard ASA monitors and guidelines, no mention of resuscitation, appropriate equipment, etc, etc. The judgment speaks for itself, and the experts disagreed with his version of the facts and/or how the case was handled. No acceptance of any responsibility, just failed deflection and excuses.
By the way chief, if you're reading, IF she did have an air embolism, it's not universally fatal as you suggest. Anyone, myself included, who does significant neuroanesthesia will have probably seen several significant ones, and, my God, they lived! Even with PEA, vtach, etc. Maybe I should trademark my recussitation technique, I'll call it "Il Destriero'$ maximally invasive ACLS®". I'll start writing letters to the editor tomorrow. I'll also let it slip that I developed the technique for the military while I was deployed during Gulf War II. Maybe I'll get the Medal of Honor.
Once I even had a massive amnionic fluid embolism, now that was bad, and that's usually fatal, but not always. My "maximally invasive ACLS" proved it's worth that day, that and 100 units of blood products.
Another thing, You'd think an EXPERT in office based anesthesia would know he needs some special license to practice in a dentists office, THAT HE ALREADY POSESSED AT ONE TIME.
I see much arrogance, and it's inevitable repercussions in the above statement.
Sad.
Cheers!

Were you able to oxygenate the patient after 100 units of blood? I had a liver transplant where I gave so much blood the patient developed TRALI. Not a good outcome.
 
Were you able to oxygenate the patient after 100 units of blood? I had a liver transplant where I gave so much blood the patient developed TRALI. Not a good outcome.

Agreed. Not to hijack the thread, but because AFE is such a rare and God awful cluster, wondered if Dest would mind starring a new thread for a case discussion. I know we'd all get some useful discourse going. Thanks in advance.
 
I wonder if he saw a petechial rash on the patient's torso from this supposed fatal air embolism situation. Deep sea divers with air embolism syndrome are known to also get a petechial rash from the systemic air.
 
He sat outside the Conrad Murray trial in scrubs with a copy of his text in his hand doing interviews with anyone who would listen. He had a brief moment of fame with CNN


Amazing that he had the gall to do this knowing that he is under ongoing legal scrutiny for losing a patient while utilizing a very similar anesthetic approach.


Expert on Michael Jackson?s Death Predicts Dr. Murray will be Ordered Tuesday to Stand Trial

An anesthesiologist with more than 30 years’ experience, Dr. Friedberg has developed a new standard of care for the administration of anesthesia that virtually eliminates any damage to the brain during surgery and prevents nausea and vomiting after the patient wakes up. By adding the use of a brain monitor, the Friedberg Method of Goldilocks anesthesia eliminates the danger of over-medication and almost all risk of the patient waking up during surgery.


That guy is a douchebag of the highest order.

- pod
 
Some of my favorites:

Anesthesia over medication is especially perilous for people older than 50, says Dr. Friedberg, who notes that nearly 40 per cent of people leave the hospital in delirium, commonly known as "brain fog," or clinically called Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD).

The movie "Awake" terrorized Americans about being awake during surgery. However, waking up in the middle of surgery is a very slight risk that's 82 per cent reduced when a brain monitor is used. The most serious risk faced from routine anesthesia over-medication is waking up with dementia and never again being the same person who went under anesthesia for surgery.

"Going under anesthesia without a brain monitor is like playing Russian roulette with your brain," says Dr. Friedberg. "You have to live with the long-term effects of your short term care."

To avoid the risks of over- and under-medication, Dr. Friedberg has developed Goldilocks anesthesia which is not too much or too little but always just the right amount. Over- and under- anesthesia is two sides of the same coin — failure to measure your brain! Download three free letters to help you get Goldilocks anesthesia when you visit http://www.drbarryfriedberg.com.

Visit this guys website and you will come away very pissed off. Just wander through his statements, his "press releases," his instructional sheets to give to your anesthesiologists so that they can be as safe as he is...I had forgotten how much I disliked him. He is so incredibly arrogant.

to schedule an interview with Dr. Barry Friedberg, please contact Scott Lorenz, President of Westwind Communications Book Marketing, 734-667-2090
 
It seems like this statement:
"It is virtually impossible for a primary respiratory arrest to occur with a functioning pulse oximeter, as was the case until Kane's last heart beat."
contradicts this statement:
"Her sentinel event was an abrupt loss of pulse oximeter signal, the vast majority of times is caused by the sensor falling off the fingertip."
 
It looks like a lot of you are happy he had a bad outcome. I hope you don't encounter yourselves in the same situation in the near future.
 
It looks like a lot of you are happy he had a bad outcome. I hope you don't encounter yourselves in the same situation in the near future.

I was very careful to separate the two issues:

I am, however, sorry that he had a patient that had a bad outcome. I would never wish that on any physician or patient. No matter how good or careful anyone is, we will all face a bad outcome or a situation we could get a "do-over" for in our career. Sounds like a very unfortunate situation.

It is completely possible to be sorry that he had a bad outcome, but to also detest the way he throws the entirety of the rest of his field under the bus as incompetent. I was very careful to specify that. His website and his quotes, however, offer no such remorse for when others have bad outcomes. So,at least in my case, I think you are incorrect in your assessment. I suspect the others who have expressed a distaste for his actions feel the same way. Though, I must note, his points of defense for his case that are listed above are mostly silly.
 
It looks like a lot of you are happy he had a bad outcome.

I don't get that impression at all. Gern even explicitly commented
Gern Blansten said:
I am, however, sorry that he had a patient that had a bad outcome. I would never wish that on any physician or patient. No matter how good or careful anyone is, we will all face a bad outcome or a situation we could get a "do-over" for in our career. Sounds like a very unfortunate situation.


What you're seeing here is disgust for an attention whorish individual who came in here preaching at us a few years ago, making absurd declarations about the inherent safety of a propofol/ketamine technique he claimed to have invented 🙄 and the inferiority of other methods.

He's a bad guy who exploits tragedy and sows fear in the public to further his profits. He has made himself a public figure and has sought to represent all anesthesiologists as some kind of media expert, and is a black mark on our specialty. He deserves every ounce of the criticism he's getting here, and more, for his past behavior.

That he had a bad outcome is only relevant here because of his incredibly smug and arrogant declarations about his patented 🙄 and inherently safe "Goldilocks" 🙄 anesthesia technique.


I don't think anyone here is happy he had a bad outcome, any more than anyone is happy when anyone dies in a dental clinic (such tragic events inspire threads here every year or two).


I hope you don't encounter yourselves in the same situation in the near future.

I'd certainly hope the same - but maybe there's a secondary lesson to be learned here about arrogance and humility, and the near-inescapable fact that at some point ALL of us have had or will have complications or bad outcomes. I hope that the day my number comes up, I'll handle it with a shred of grace and genuine remorse; I know I won't treat it as an opportunity to be seized and exploited.
 
I don't get that impression at all. Gern even explicitly commented


What you're seeing here is disgust for an attention whorish individual who came in here preaching at us a few years ago, making absurd declarations about the inherent safety of a propofol/ketamine technique he claimed to have invented 🙄 and the inferiority of other methods.

He's a bad guy who exploits tragedy and sows fear in the public to further his profits. He has made himself a public figure and has sought to represent all anesthesiologists as some kind of media expert, and is a black mark on our specialty. He deserves every ounce of the criticism he's getting here, and more, for his past behavior.

That he had a bad outcome is only relevant here because of his incredibly smug and arrogant declarations about his patented 🙄 and inherently safe "Goldilocks" 🙄 anesthesia technique.


I don't think anyone here is happy he had a bad outcome, any more than anyone is happy when anyone dies in a dental clinic (such tragic events inspire threads here every year or two).




I'd certainly hope the same - but maybe there's a secondary lesson to be learned here about arrogance and humility, and the near-inescapable fact that at some point ALL of us have had or will have complications or bad outcomes. I hope that the day my number comes up, I'll handle it with a shred of grace and genuine remorse; I know I won't treat it as an opportunity to be seized and exploited.


Well said. Ketafol is powerful drug in many aspects including the effects on cardiac function and coronary perfusion. Respiratory depression is just one possible side-effect.

Would this patient's outcome have been any different with PeriopDoc doing the anesthetic?
Hard to say for sure but the airway and cardiac system wouldn't have been ignored on the assumption that ketafol provides goldilocks anesthesia. There is no free lunch and no perfect anesthetic or anesthetic agent (even one administered by Friedberg).

Will the lawsuit and civil judgment for $250K change Friedberg's practice? No. Friedberg won't change a thing.
 
Top