fIF you look at the ADA Survey of Dental Income Practice here:
http://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Science and Research/HPI/Files/10_sdpi.ashx
On page 132, it lists net income by specialty. Specifically for mean salary, it says:
OMFS -----$437,800
Endo----$288,130
Ortho----$281,650
Pedo ----$312,660
Perio - --$255,240
Prost ----$212,200
And the average net income for private practice general dentists is reported as less than $200k.
But, my question is, all the specialties seem to make similar amounts, except for OMFS which appears to be a little skewed. Is this average skewed?
I have heard that on a per-hour basis, OMFS make about twice as much as a GP. However, most of them also tend to work fewer hours per week than a GP. All of this seems to indicate that the number reported here is highly skewed. Please explain, if anybody know.
http://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Science and Research/HPI/Files/10_sdpi.ashx
On page 132, it lists net income by specialty. Specifically for mean salary, it says:
OMFS -----$437,800
Endo----$288,130
Ortho----$281,650
Pedo ----$312,660
Perio - --$255,240
Prost ----$212,200
And the average net income for private practice general dentists is reported as less than $200k.
But, my question is, all the specialties seem to make similar amounts, except for OMFS which appears to be a little skewed. Is this average skewed?
I have heard that on a per-hour basis, OMFS make about twice as much as a GP. However, most of them also tend to work fewer hours per week than a GP. All of this seems to indicate that the number reported here is highly skewed. Please explain, if anybody know.