1. Dismiss Notice
  2. This forum is for support and discussion only. Please promote test prep materials/services (including AMAs) in the Special Offers subforum only. Thanks!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Guest, be sure to check out How To Get Into Dental School, our free downloadable PDF with step-by-step details for dental school applicants!
    Dismiss Notice

please please please help me? KAPLAN book..

Discussion in 'DAT Discussions' started by dentalmagnet, Dec 4, 2008.

  1. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have the 2007-2008 edition of the Kaplan DAT book. On page, 680 #92. Does anyone else think this question is wrong? The answer they give is E which has carbon with 5 bonds! outrageous right? lol...please if you are good at organic and you have this book sitting in your room, open it and let me know what you think. Thank you so much!!
     
  2. joedat41

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    Carbon can't have 5 bonds. I have the Kaplan book but not with me right now. I will check later for you
     
  3. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    oh yeah..the explanation does not even make sense. They say C is wrong because the carbonyl only has 3 bonds...but in the picture, the carbonyl has four bonds! I just want to see if anyone can show me something I'm not seeing. Thanks Joedat41!
     
  4. zuma35

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Dental Student
    You're right. Both C-O bonds should really be single bonds.
     
  5. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did you look in the kaplan book? Did you notice that too? I'm taking it into my organic professor on Monday because it's bothering me. Such a simple question, such a very wrong answer. Carbon never has 5 bonds!!
     
  6. zuma35

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Dental Student
    One of many mistakes in Kaplan. Don't let it trouble you too much.
     
  7. Zubnaya Feya

    Zubnaya Feya Combinator
    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    2
    Status:
    Dental Student
    DAT Kaplan blows... I have the book and I think it is a typo of some kind, you are right.
     
  8. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thanks for the response. Yeah Kaplan is really easy. I am going to stick to Destroyer from now on. It's like 300x harder..
     
  9. Sublimation

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    That is not a typo. that is correct. Have you ever seen a resonance structure with a combined representation? all they are showing you as that the electrons get delocalized along those bonds. That answer seems perfectly correct to me. Look at it again and draw the lone pairs on the N and draw out the triple bonds in the aromtic ring agian, and you will see that the representation fits perfectly. Chemists usually denote a resonance stabalized bond as such
    (check attachment)
     

    Attached Files:

    • EG.doc
      File size:
      17 KB
      Views:
      44
  10. Sublimation

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    I would agree that the way they chose to represent the "correct" answer was incorrect in itself. there should be only one negative charge on one o fhthe two oxygen atoms. The one with the double bond should be neutral, and if you are using the parameters they are using for representing a delocalized bond, then you will need to draw "six"bonds on the carbon you are referring to. That is one of MANY poorly represented answer choices, i hope the real DAT is not like that. Gluck I will draw out the Correct representation of this molecule for you. I will post it by tomorrow.
     
  11. Sublimation

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    Here it is.
     

    Attached Files:

    • EG.doc
      File size:
      22 KB
      Views:
      43
  12. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you for your detailed response. I see what you are saying..but I'm not sure that this particular answer means that. I mean, wouldn't they use a dashed line along with the bold line? I see that one bond may be considered shorter than the other..but they drew that for the C-N bond as well. I don't know.
     
  13. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0

    haha thanks! Your drawings are correct by my standards..theirs aren't There is an extra bond to only one of the carbonyls. Me thinks they are dumbies..smarter than me..but still dumbies!
     
  14. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    ;;
     
    #14 dentalmagnet, Dec 4, 2008
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2008
  15. Sublimation

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Dental
    Im taking it next semester with Dr. BAKER!!!! lol that guy is such a douch. He isnt hard by any means, just very rude, and condescending
     
  16. zuma35

    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Dental Student
    You guys are reading way too much into this. They did not intend any combined representation or anything. It's a simple typo. There should only be a single bond between the C-O.
     
  17. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    ;
     
    #17 dentalmagnet, Dec 4, 2008
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2008
  18. dentalmagnet

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. It's whack lol.
     

Share This Page