- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 105
I realize MD/PhD's are the most competitive programs offered but I was wondering how big of a criteria GPA plays into this. I looked around and some schools show MD/PhD avg acceptances are around the same as their MD acceptances however the consensus here is 3.8+ minimum.
I spoke with my advisors and was told that my background suggests I love research much more than the physician/patient part (which I'm confused as to how that can even be assumed..)
I understand that is a reasonable assumption to make but how do I show schools that I appreciate the research part of science but MD much more?
I feel that I am stuck where I like research and have invested my time heavily into it, but doesn't mean anything because I'm not competitive (not near the 3.8+ GPA range) for MD/PhDs. Advisor told me considering where my GPA is and what schools I am moderately competitive for... I should have chosen traditional MD extracurricular over research.
I have a 3.5 GPA, no MCAT yet, 2years of summer research, 1-semester undergrad credit research, and recently accepted an NIH-IRTA position. Leader of two social advocate groups at school, working ~30hours/week, club sports for one year, ~50 hour shadowing MD, ~100 hospital volunteer.
I realize I could have done more to show I wanted the MD but research opportunities required full commitment and offered $tipends which made someone from my background easily choose that than shadowing. Should I even bring up why I chose research initially?
How do I address this disparency or should I even apply for MD/PhD's anyway and just go from there?
Any success/advice for ~3.5GPA applicants considering MD/PhD?
Current plan is part-time scribe while NIH-IRTA and shoot for near perfect MCAT score.
I spoke with my advisors and was told that my background suggests I love research much more than the physician/patient part (which I'm confused as to how that can even be assumed..)
I understand that is a reasonable assumption to make but how do I show schools that I appreciate the research part of science but MD much more?
I feel that I am stuck where I like research and have invested my time heavily into it, but doesn't mean anything because I'm not competitive (not near the 3.8+ GPA range) for MD/PhDs. Advisor told me considering where my GPA is and what schools I am moderately competitive for... I should have chosen traditional MD extracurricular over research.
I have a 3.5 GPA, no MCAT yet, 2years of summer research, 1-semester undergrad credit research, and recently accepted an NIH-IRTA position. Leader of two social advocate groups at school, working ~30hours/week, club sports for one year, ~50 hour shadowing MD, ~100 hospital volunteer.
I realize I could have done more to show I wanted the MD but research opportunities required full commitment and offered $tipends which made someone from my background easily choose that than shadowing. Should I even bring up why I chose research initially?
How do I address this disparency or should I even apply for MD/PhD's anyway and just go from there?
Any success/advice for ~3.5GPA applicants considering MD/PhD?
Current plan is part-time scribe while NIH-IRTA and shoot for near perfect MCAT score.