- Joined
- Mar 18, 2002
- Messages
- 1,929
- Reaction score
- 3
What do guys think about this?
Originally posted by Random Access
It's in good interest for med schools to give secondaries to everyone: They get more money!
But that's not the only purpose. Secondaries do serve to differentiate people in some way, shape, or form. You never know who's going to come up with something good, so it could be a good policy to give them to everyone. Hell, a good secondary could help you if you have a not as strong MCAT/GPA.
Originally posted by medicine2006
What you are saying is true. But let me add this element to the discussion. The ADCOM is busy enough reading through letter of rec, transcripts, personal statements, meetings. If they now had to read more secondaries that is less time they spend evaluating each candidate. Clearly someone with GPA and MCATs more than a standard deviation below their average is not competitive so why waste the time of the ADCOM?
Originally posted by Random Access
Aren't these adcoms pretty big? They can get less experienced adcom members to read through lesser applications, and the big wigs can flip through the ones more in their range. I'd imagine not too many of the lesser applications get bumped up, but some of them would. There's lots of skimming involved, but if they can find a good applicant, they're not wasting their time.
Originally posted by Street Philosopher
personally i want schools to screen as much as possible and save everyone a lot of time and money. same goes for interviews. if i'm going to fly across the country, i want a decent shot at getting in.
Originally posted by the boy wonder
hmm, interesting RA - I would have done it the other way round if I were running the show - got the less experienced to review the ones that were likely "yes" unless some really obvious red flag came up, and have the more experienced adcoms who knew what the school was looking for review the more borderline ones as these ones need better consideration....
Thankfully, thats not my job!
Originally posted by uclachris
Ok this might be a bit self-motivated but here goes. I think that they all should offer secondaries for the following reasons
1) Asume that as an undergrad you didnt have your prioritries straight (i.e. research before courses (though you learned the material well enough to do B+ ish work and understood it at a level superior to most of those in the class, graduating early to minimize financial burden, etc.)
2) Now, since school screen ONLY on undergrad GPA, any work done in addition to your undergrad portofolio is lost UNTIL a secondary is submitted (i.e. grad GPA of near 4.0, many publications, an MS or PhD from a top program, additional ECs)
Anyhow, I know I'll catch flak... but I think that you have to be egalitarian in the admissions process because a 4.0/45 does not make a good doctor-- neither does going to a top, top, program guarantee that honor as well. It comes completely from within, the spirt, the soul, the humanistic nature that drives the compassionate giving of care under adverse situations. Of course the mental facilities MUST be present to absorb, comprehend, and synthesize the vast amounts of information needed to become a physician-- and to this GPA and MCAT does bare a strong correlation-- but it cannot be used in absentcia of mitigating factors that either add or detract from these facilities.
The goal is to educate and mould the best doctors possible-- not the smartest-- not the best test-takers-- not the grade grubbers-- not the cheaters (of which I have caught several as a TA)-- the best possible doctors who will give completely of themselves to make it possible for people to go on through their most dire and desperate moments.
Anyhow. I shall go now...
C
Originally posted by STi555
I agree 100%. I don't want to spend $60 and spend a lot of time carefully answering the secondary questions if I don't have a chance anyway.