Possibly a miracle: 19 MCAT and accepted

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
medic170 said:
Studies show that people who take prep courses do no better on average on the MCAT than people who study on their own, so I must still disagree. I worked 40 hours a week, and I still was able to push myself to study with very few prep materials (a couple of books and audio osmosis), and I achieved a score high enough to get in. If I can do this (I am no genius), than I have to assume that "most" other people can do it regardless of financial status. Sure I had a lot less free time than a traditional student with Mom and Dad paying the bills, but that cannot be used as an excuse for scoring very poorly on the test.
I am not saying that when a person has to for during school that it is an excuse for doing poorly in school or on the MCAT. We both agree that the more time and effort you put into the mcat the better you will do. If you had 40 more hours a week to study would you have done better on the mcat? thoses students who have more financial reasources will have more time to prepare for the MCAT. again if it is not a factor then why does AMcas and AAcom ask able being finanical disadvatage?
 
drtongue_danger said:
The validity coefficients for the MCAT are not “a good indicator” the highest I have ever seen is .60 (over 40% are not known) the MCAT is not used to see how you do on the boards it is used to see how you do in the 1st and 2nd years of med school.

What's your source? Here's some credible sources that disagree with your assessment:

AAMC research

Koenig, J.A.; Wiley, A. The Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for Predicting Performance in the First Two Years of Medical School. Academic Medicine, 71;S83-S85, 1996

Tons of other research links
 
drtongue_danger said:
again if it is not a factor then why does AMcas and AAcom ask able being finanical disadvatage?


Because some people can have their application/secondary fees waived. It has nothing to do with how you did on the MCAT and Im not sure how you would even draw that conclusion.



Its AACOMAS and AMCAS.
 
Thank you LadyDoc and Buckeye
 
Saved Satan said:
Med school courses are not so much comprehension or creative reasoning but rote memorization....And memorization is an elementary mental activity. Remember memorizing the multiplication table?

Have you ever taken a medical school course? Although much of medical school is about memorizing things "intelligently," I can assure you that a class such as physiology or endocrinology would give you a real challenge if you merely try to "memorize" everything.

Saved Satan said:
So, what's my point? In patients' perspective, we want physicians who can think and reason on his/her own as we entrust our lives in his/her hands...Having said all this, I must conclude with the obvious fact that not much intellect is required to be a physician, just hard work. True intellectual challenge is in physics and math.

You seem to contradict yourself a bit, but I think I still get what you are trying to say. Some of the 'harder' sciences and studies in upper-level math require an incredible level of intellectual aptitude. But you can't compare Good Will Hunting to Patch Adams, because they both were exceptionally brilliant at what they loved. True intellectual aptitude lies not only in cognitive ability, but passion. Would you call Yo Yo Ma (one of the most gifted musicians of modern day) a genius? I sure as hell would. But it's because he is so driven by music. Becoming a physician is about drive, passion, hard work, and intellectual ability. That is why med schools consider all aspects of an applicant's qualifications and the most well-rounded generally fare better. GPA, MCAT, exposure to medicine, volunteering, possible research experience - all of these demonstrate an applicant's motivations for entering the profession of medicine. If one is a bit deficient, the others can usually compensate for it. With that said, however, I agree with some of the posters who think that an overall MCAT score in the teens should not be overlooked, as it indicates a lack of preparation and/or motivation to study for the MCAT. Any student (with rare exception) who makes it through the premed core with decent grades and who also truly desires to become a physician should also be able to earn a score better than a 19. The MCAT is about more than scientific aptitude and reasoning ability. It's about a person's willingness to work hard and discipline themselves for months at a time, as well as a willingness to study for something that is not entirely related to their future career aspirations (but are willing to do it just because they know it's damned important). But above all, the MCAT is a golden OPPORTUNITY to show how much you want to get into medical school and become a physician, regardless of your other qualifications. Despite the GPA that someone may have worked for along with all the time they spent volunteering and doing research, the MCAT is just one more chance (and an important one at that) to show how much you want to get in. Doing well on this test is not about how much money you paid for a prep course or about not having time to study because you have other obligations. Simply put, it's about busting your ass for one of the most important tests you will ever take in your life and finding a way to succeed.
 
Buckeye(OH) said:
Because some people can have their application/secondary fees waived. It has nothing to do with how you did on the MCAT and Im not sure how you would even draw that conclusion.



Its AACOMAS and AMCAS.

with all due respect . Rubbish

AACOMAS and AMCAS (sorry my mistake) have you write a 300-500 word essay on your primary application as to why a person is Economically disadvantage, they take it into consideration, ask your admissions committe.
 
drtongue_danger said:
with all due respect . Rubbish

AACOMAS and AMCAS (sorry my mistake) have you write a 300-500 word essay on your primary application as to why a person is Economically disadvantage, they take it into consideration, ask your admissions committe.


Actually, AACOMAS has no such essay at all.
 
LadyDoc said:

First of all AAMC are the ones who make the MCAT, like any researcher I like to see an independent research report. Need to ask your self, was the journal peer reviewed? Just like any issue you can all sorts of research reports saying different things. For example Green Peace can produce reports about environmentally issue and so an Exon but a wise person would look for independent research so there is no conflict of interst.

However I will use you AAMC report to prove a point.
The report a was only of 14 medical schools (allo or D.O?) with under 100 of students for each school. Not the greatest sample size. The R values according to the paper are .69( USMLE 1) .59 (USMLE 2) .63 (USMLE 3) for a data set close to 1500 people. Are you are satisfied with a 69% 59% or 63% in your class’s? I am not. The paper says “ one of the profound results of this study was the predictive value of all preadmission data varies greatly among medical schools.” It goes on to say that the range of values was R=.81 and R=.28, that is one big range!! At the school with .28 R value that mean that 72% of the data was unexplained by the MCAT! does not look alike it was the best test for that school!
 
drtongue_danger said:
First of all AAMC are the ones who make the MCAT, like any researcher I like to see an independent research report. Need to ask your self, was the journal peer reviewed? Just like any issue you can all sorts of research reports saying different things. For example Green Peace can produce reports about environmentally issue and so an Exon but a wise person would look for independent research so there is no conflict of interst.

However I will use you AAMC report to prove a point.
The report a was only of 14 medical schools (allo or D.O?) with under 100 of students for each school. Not the greatest sample size. The R values according to the paper are .69( USMLE 1) .59 (USMLE 2) .63 (USMLE 3) for a data set close to 1500 people. Are you are satisfied with a 69% 59% or 63% in your class’s? I am not. The paper says “ one of the profound results of this study was the predictive value of all preadmission data varies greatly among medical schools.” It goes on to say that the range of values was R=.81 and R=.28, that is one big range!! At the school with .28 R value that mean that 72% of the data was unexplained by the MCAT! does not look alike it was the best test for that school!

But he simply asked for your source, which you did not provide. This person, at least, provided several valid research sources to back his claim.

Also, N=1500 is a pretty good sample size for this type of research. the standard is usually N=1000. And .69 for step 1 seems ok, I agree the others are a bit low though.
 
drtongue_danger said:
with all due respect . Rubbish

AACOMAS and AMCAS (sorry my mistake) have you write a 300-500 word essay on your primary application as to why a person is Economically disadvantage, they take it into consideration, ask your admissions committe.

I had no opportunity to write such an essay on either application.
 
Buckeye(OH) said:
I had no opportunity to write such an essay on either application.

AMCAS has a section for it now, but like you said, it does not guarantee you any special consideration. It is more like just some extra space on top of your essays that you can explain unusual hardships if your family was below the poverty line.
 
gujuDoc said:
My two cents:

I would retake the MCAT if I were you. Although, I personally know of people whom have gotten a 14 and 17 respectively on the MCAT, and into LECOM Bradenton, and then others with about an 18, I don't think that a person with that kind of score should accept that and try to take an easy way out.

I think you should do all you can in your power to prove yourself and to admissions committees that you can do well on these kind of exams. All it takes is practice. Look at what you did wrong last time. Take diagnostics to see what your strength and weaknesses are and review intensely. There is still time. If not in April, take it in August. Study the whole summer. If verbal was your weakness, read a lot and do several Verabl practice tests. If it were the sciences, review what you didn't understand and take diags in real testing conditions.


Thanks for your comments. As stated previously, I plan on retaking the MCAT in August. I must say that for the MCAT which I got a 19 on, I didn't not prepare. Although I prepared on my own, I worked hard and took many practice tests. It was these tests that I was scoring in the mid twenties (I know, still not a good score), which is why I think I can say I had a bad test day, decreasing my practice scores by 5+ points. For this reason I will retake the test. I just think people are a bit wrong in saying those who score drastically low are lazy. I'm sure its possible that many people scoring low prepared well. It could have just been a bad day with many unforseen circumstances.

It seems I've started quite the debate here. I didn't realize this post would generate so many responses....but I'm glad it did. I think many people have written some good ideas and strong points. Let the debate continue! 👍
 
medic170 said:
But he simply asked for your source, which you did not provide. This person, at least, provided several valid research sources to back his claim.

Also, N=1500 is a pretty good sample size for this type of research. the standard is usually N=1000. And .69 for step 1 seems ok, I agree the others are a bit low though.


My orginal post was concerning where the MCAT was a “good inducator” I was simply pointing out that the vailidy coefficents that I have seen are close to .60, the paper that LadyDoc posted showed a little higher coefficents (.69) which is by no means is a “good inducator” I worked in a research lab for a few years now and deal a great deal with data sets and R values. Any assay or data we use or collect needs to have a predictive vaildiy coefficent of .88 or higher. My point being that the MCAT is not the End all or be all that many people think that it is. It is still tool for admissions, not the only one. Some schools use it more than others. Like the research paper said “one of the profound results of this study was the predictive value of all preadmission data varies greatly among medical schools.” For one school the R value was .28. Taking that into consideration I can see why a medical school would admit someone with a 19 Mcat.

My $.02
 
drtongue_danger said:
My orginal post was concerning where the MCAT was a “good inducator” I was simply pointing out that the vailidy coefficents that I have seen are close to .60, the paper that LadyDoc posted showed a little higher coefficents (.69) which is by no means is a “good inducator” I worked in a research lab for a few years now and deal a great deal with data sets and R values. Any assay or data we use or collect needs to have a predictive vaildiy coefficent of .88 or higher. My point being that the MCAT for admissions, not the only one. Some schools use it more than others. Like the research paper said “one of the profound results of this study was the is not the End all or be all that many people think that it is. It is still tool predictive value of all preadmission data varies greatly among medical schools.” For one school the R value was .28. Taking that into consideration I can see why a medical school would admit someone with a 19 Mcat.

My $.02

Actually, as you can see below, you said that you had never seen one above .60, not that the ones you have seen were close to .60. You were embellishing a bit to get your point across and you got called on it, that's all I am saying.

drtongue_danger said:
The validity coefficients for the MCAT are not “a good indicator” the highest I have ever seen is .60 (over 40% are not known) the MCAT is not used to see how you do on the boards it is used to see how you do in the 1st and 2nd years of med school. Just like the SAT/ACT is used to predict GPA in the freshmen year of college. LVDOC had it right, people train for this test, much of your success is dependant on how much money you can spend on this test to “train” for it.
 
Teach Learn Med. 2002 Winter;14(1):34-42. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: the contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions.
Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Norman GR.



Here are a few paper for MCAT validity.



Acad Med. 1998 Oct;73(10):1095-106.
Evaluating the predictive validity of MCAT scores across diverse applicant groups.
Koenig JA, Sireci SG, Wiley A. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20037-1127, USA.


Traditional predictors of performance in medical school. Mitchell KJ. MCAT Program, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C 20036.


J Med Educ. 1984 Jun;59(6):455-64. Links Validity of the MCAT in predicting performance in the first two years of medical school.
Jones RF, Thomae-Forgues M.


Medic170
I have made my point, I am sorry you are to blind/hard headed to acknowledge it.
 
Your stats are almost exactly like mine were a couple years ago...I'm sitting for the boards (Step 1) this summer! Keep the faith and hang in there!

Atlas

P.S. MCAT don't mean jack, in my opinion. From my practice tests, COMLEX Step 1 is NOTHING like the MCAT.
 
drtongue_danger said:
Teach Learn Med. 2002 Winter;14(1):34-42. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: the contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions.
Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Norman GR.



Here are a few paper for MCAT validity.



Acad Med. 1998 Oct;73(10):1095-106.
Evaluating the predictive validity of MCAT scores across diverse applicant groups.
Koenig JA, Sireci SG, Wiley A. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC 20037-1127, USA.


Traditional predictors of performance in medical school. Mitchell KJ. MCAT Program, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C 20036.


J Med Educ. 1984 Jun;59(6):455-64. Links Validity of the MCAT in predicting performance in the first two years of medical school.
Jones RF, Thomae-Forgues M.


Medic170
I have made my point, I am sorry you are to blind/hard headed to acknowledge it.

Your point is acknowledged and I stand slightly humbled 🙄
 
drtongue_danger said:
I have made my point, I am sorry you are to blind/hard headed to acknowledge it.


your initial "point" was:

the highest I have ever seen is .60 (over 40% are not known) the MCAT is not used to see how you do on the boards

I asked you for your source, and then you use MY source that I used to show your figure wasn't right to show your figure WAS right? The sources you quote all agree that there is a correlation between MCAT scores and USMLE performance. If your point was that MCAT isn’t a perfect indication, I don’t think anybody will disagree with that. The only things about your post I questioned were:

the highest I have ever seen is .60
and
the MCAT is not used to see how you do on the boards

I think Medic170’s point was that you threw out some data off the top of your head to make your point, but you weren’t too concerned if your figures were right or not. It is a common error to confuse correlation and causation. All that correlation shows is that the two variables are associated. There may be a third variable, a confounding variable that is related to both of them. For example, monthly deaths by drowning and monthly sales of ice-cream are positively correlated, but no-one would say the relationship was causal!

Anyway, every study I’ve read has agreed that MCAT score is a good indicator of medical school success, USMLE performance, and medical school grades. Here is a site with a synopsis of each of quite a few different studies that show this. If there are credible studies that show there ISN'T a connection, then I have an open mind would be intrested to read them:

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Union/5092/valid.html
 
LadyDoc said:
your initial "point" was:



I asked you for your source, and then you use MY source that I used to show your figure wasn't right to show your figure WAS right? The sources you quote all agree that there is a correlation between MCAT scores and USMLE performance. If your point was that MCAT isn’t a perfect indication, I don’t think anybody will disagree with that. The only things about your post I questioned were:


and


I think Medic170’s point was that you threw out some data off the top of your head to make your point, but you weren’t too concerned if your figures were right or not. It is a common error to confuse correlation and causation. All that correlation shows is that the two variables are associated. There may be a third variable, a confounding variable that is related to both of them. For example, monthly deaths by drowning and monthly sales of ice-cream are positively correlated, but no-one would say the relationship was causal!

Anyway, every study I’ve read has agreed that MCAT score is a good indicator of medical school success, USMLE performance, and medical school grades. Here is a site with a synopsis of each of quite a few different studies that show this. If there are credible studies that show there ISN'T a connection, then I have an open mind would be intrested to read them:

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Union/5092/valid.html

Um, exactly. Thank you for making it clear as day LadyDoc 👍
In order to make a pursuasive argument, one must supply evidence supporting their claim, especially when citing statistics.
 
Atlas said:
MCAT don't mean jack, in my opinion. From my practice tests, COMLEX Step 1 is NOTHING like the MCAT.

I'm sure they are nothing alike, but all the study shows is that those who do well on the boards tended to also have done well on the MCAT. This really doesn't surprise me though since it seems to make sense. One who is either really smart or studied a lot for the MCAT and scored extremely high would seen to be the type of person who would do the same for the boards.

That's really all the studies are saying -- that those who scored the highest on the boards also tended to be the ones with the highest MCAT scores.
 
Atlas said:
Your stats are almost exactly like mine were a couple years ago...I'm sitting for the boards (Step 1) this summer! Keep the faith and hang in there!

Atlas

P.S. MCAT don't mean jack, in my opinion. From my practice tests, COMLEX Step 1 is NOTHING like the MCAT.

Good luck on the COMLEX 👍 Keep us posted! Thanks for the encouragement!
 
LadyDoc said:
your initial "point" was:

I asked you for your source, and then you use MY source that I used to show your figure wasn't right to show your figure WAS right? The sources you quote all agree that there is a correlation between MCAT scores and USMLE performance. If your point was that MCAT isn’t a perfect indication, I don’t think anybody will disagree with that. The only things about your post I questioned were:

Anyway, every study I’ve read has agreed that MCAT score is a good indicator of medical school success, USMLE performance, and medical school grades. Here is a site with a synopsis of each of quite a few different studies that show this. If there are credible studies that show there ISN'T a connection, then I have an open mind would be intrested to read them:

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Union/5092/valid.html

I am not trying to fight here. I do acknowledge that I was wrong when I said MCAT not being used for you board exams, I stand corrected. However I think that we may read the scientific literature differently. The papers I found had lower validity coefficients. As for the paper you posted I used it as an example to show that .69 R values is not a “good indicator” I really don’t understand how you can post a link to that paper and in the same sentence say the MCAT is a good indicator. The paper you posted had a range of .88-.28 R. Let me boldly say that .28 R is sucks!! Secleting eye and hair color for success in medical school would be close to that.

As for you point about correlation and causation I may not have understood you, but causation has nothing to do with a standardized test. The function of a standardized test is to correlate it with other variables. Take for example any lab test. If you take PSA (prostate specific antigen) levels using an immunoassay test then you can take that data and plot other variables with it to see if they correlate. You would not say that the immunoassay test caused the PSA levels in the blood to be high. I am involved in clinical diagnostic and any correlation of .69 R is nothing worth my time.
 
The beauty of the scientific process is in part the dependablity & repeatability of results. I often think the world may be going to hell in a hand basket but science still moves forward.
The problem with human behavior is that it is just so damn confounding. But to hold a predictor of human behavior to the same level of certainity as a scientific assay is not particularly helpful.
The race is not always to the swift, the fight not always to the strong. (But bet that way.)
 
LadyDoc said:
I'm sure they are nothing alike, but all the study shows is that those who do well on the boards tended to also have done well on the MCAT. This really doesn't surprise me though since it seems to make sense. One who is either really smart or studied a lot for the MCAT and scored extremely high would seen to be the type of person who would do the same for the boards.

That's really all the studies are saying -- that those who scored the highest on the boards also tended to be the ones with the highest MCAT scores.

Well...I can say that even though my MCATs were on the low side, I'm hanging right in there with the rest of my classmates in terms of exams and practice board exams. I think you have to look at the "other factors" that go into a person's score. I worked and took care of a sick parent through college and I didn't study for the MCAT like I should have. Med school is a whole 'nother beast because THIS IS ALL YOU DO - STUDY. It's really hard to fail out. And of the people that failed the boards at my school, all of them were "slackers". They didn't go to the KAPLAN lectures. They never took their work seriously and they failed. But, you know what??? They all ended up passing on the second time!! So, I don't believe that MCAT/USMLE hype like I used to. You'll see how little it REALLY means when you get there. Good luck.

Atlas
MSII
 
Just for clarity:

1) I never claimed that those who didn’t do well on the MCAT won’t or can’t do well in med school or on the boards. What the studies seem to indicate is that those who did WELL on the MCAT also tended to do well on the boards. There are people in my class who have a higher GPA than I do and I significantly outscored them on the MCAT. 🙂

2)
As for the paper you posted I used it as an example to show that .69 R values is not a “good indicator” I really don’t understand how you can post a link to that paper and in the same sentence say the MCAT is a good indicator.

I was only quoting what those particular studies said. I didn’t find a single study where the researchers claimed that the MCAT was NOT a good indicator, as you claim. Maybe there is a difference in what is a “good correlation” for your PSA example (and similar scientific experiments) as opposed to standardized test correlations. Just guessing though. Here is what I was quoting from my first set of links (the underlining is mine):

“The results confirm previous findings that increased risk of academic difficulty is associated with low MCAT scores, low science GPA…” (Huff KL; Fang D Section for the Medical College Admission Test, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C., USA.)

“RESULTS: The MCAT score was a strong predictor of medical school performances” (Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. Acad Med 1997 Sep;72(9):781-6)

And the absolute most important of them all:

“Although undergraduate GPAs and MCAT scores are good indicators of NBME I performance, they are not useful in predicting clinical performance”. (Silver B; Hodgson CS University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90095-1722, USA. Acad Med 1997 May;72(5):394-6)

I think we should all focus on that one 😀

As for the correlation and causation, you are right; that was a bad example and really didn’t apply here. What I was trying to say was that, for example, I could show a correlation between those who eat meat and lung cancer, but that wouldn’t necessarily mean that eating meat causes lung cancer.

I too wasn’t trying to start an argument. It's hard to communicate with text sometimes because you don't get the facial expressions and voice inflections you would face to face so it's easy to read something in a way that wasn't intended. I just get tired of putting these little smiley faces all the time to show that I'm not mad 😉

I think it’s pretty safe to say that getting into medical school was the hardest thing about medical school. The schools will try very, very hard to make sure you don’t flunk out. I don’t think osteopathic schools look as closely at the MCAT as the allopathic schools anyway, which is really the whole point of this thread. I agree that as long as a person shows reasonable intelligence so they can pass the classes, the single most important trait for prospective doctors is compassion and personality. I don’t know how else a school admissions board would gage “reasonable intelligence” other than the standardized test though.
 
LadyDoc said:
Just for clarity:

1) I never claimed that those who didn’t do well on the MCAT won’t or can’t do well in med school or on the boards. What the studies seem to indicate is that those who did WELL on the MCAT also tended to do well on the boards. There are people in my class who have a higher GPA than I do and I significantly outscored them on the MCAT. 🙂

2)

I was only quoting what those particular studies said. I didn’t find a single study where the researchers claimed that the MCAT was NOT a good indicator, as you claim. Maybe there is a difference in what is a “good correlation” for your PSA example (and similar scientific experiments) as opposed to standardized test correlations. Just guessing though. Here is what I was quoting from my first set of links (the underlining is mine):

“The results confirm previous findings that increased risk of academic difficulty is associated with low MCAT scores, low science GPA…” (Huff KL; Fang D Section for the Medical College Admission Test, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C., USA.)

“RESULTS: The MCAT score was a strong predictor of medical school performances” (Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. Acad Med 1997 Sep;72(9):781-6)

And the absolute most important of them all:

“Although undergraduate GPAs and MCAT scores are good indicators of NBME I performance, they are not useful in predicting clinical performance”. (Silver B; Hodgson CS University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90095-1722, USA. Acad Med 1997 May;72(5):394-6)

I think we should all focus on that one 😀

As for the correlation and causation, you are right; that was a bad example and really didn’t apply here. What I was trying to say was that, for example, I could show a correlation between those who eat meat and lung cancer, but that wouldn’t necessarily mean that eating meat causes lung cancer.

I too wasn’t trying to start an argument. It's hard to communicate with text sometimes because you don't get the facial expressions and voice inflections you would face to face so it's easy to read something in a way that wasn't intended. I just get tired of putting these little smiley faces all the time to show that I'm not mad 😉

I think it’s pretty safe to say that getting into medical school was the hardest thing about medical school. The schools will try very, very hard to make sure you don’t flunk out. I don’t think osteopathic schools look as closely at the MCAT as the allopathic schools anyway, which is really the whole point of this thread. I agree that as long as a person shows reasonable intelligence so they can pass the classes, the single most important trait for prospective doctors is compassion and personality. I don’t know how else a school admissions board would gage “reasonable intelligence” other than the standardized test though.

I sure hope you aren't getting worked up over my post. That was not my intention. My intention was to show people out there that it can be done despite what studies show. I'm sure there is a minor (or maybe even a major) correlation between MCAT scores and board scores. Heck, like someone said earlier, they may just be good test-takers. My fiance is also in med school with me. She is a GREAT test-taker. She scored like two points higher than me on my MCAT (She studied a week before and worked through college ya-d-yada). She scored two points higher than me on our first Kaplan Diagnostic Exam. No big deal. However, I felt validated because I know I did just as well as the rest of my closest friends who scored in the upper 20's on their MCATs. It was very refreshing to see how far I've come. And I don't mean to brag, but I'm improved alot since my senior year of college. I've matured a bit, settled down alot, and have really made getting through medical school a priority of mine. I think once you're here, you become determined to stay here. It's funny because my confidence coming into med school, knowing I had a lower MCAT than just about everyone else (or so I thought) really phased me alot during the first quarter of my first year. But I ended the quarter with an 89% overall and that gave me more confidence and then I kept rolling from there. I have confidence that I'll pass boards and move on to my third year. I think that MCAT scores are a necessary evil. They help weed people out. They don't show how good you'll do in med school - I'm proof of that. And they definately don't show how good you'll be as a doctor (duh!). They are a hurdle. Just like boards are a hurdle. I have a goal in mind of what I want my board scores to be. However, I'm also cool with passing. Osteopathic schools definately look past lower MCAT scores (which is great!) but their board exam isn't any easier. My point there is...any body who passes a two-day long, 16-hour exam should be proud of themselves. And, fortunately, most DO...on the first time too!! I know I'm not the first student they've let in with a low MCAT score. In fact, now that I think about it, one of my classmates had a 19!! He's doing alright too I guess. He's getting ready to sit for the boards with me! Obviously students with low scores still pass or they'd stop letting us in!! lol Anyways, I appreciate all of the feedback and encouragement regarding my success thus far in my medical school career. It is very encouraging. Thank you.

God bless
Atlas
 
Atlas said:
My intention was to show people out there that it can be done despite what studies show.Atlas


Atlas, you need to read more carefully. Nobody ever said that the studies show a bad MCAT score is correlated with bad performance, only that a good MCAT score is correlated with good performance in med school and on the boards. Don't infer the wrong conclusion, the study was not intended for, nor did it, measure a correlation of low MCAT scores with poor performance, but it only measured a correlation with high MCAT scores and good performance. The only inference the correlation suggests is that people who score high on the MCAT are likely to be successful in med school and on Step 1. It does NOT necessarily imply that people who score low on the MCAT are likely to perform badly in med school and on step 1.
 
medic170 said:
Atlas, you need to read more carefully. Nobody ever said that the studies show a bad MCAT score is correlated with bad performance, only that a good MCAT score is correlated with good performance in med school and on the boards. Don't infer the wrong conclusion, the study was not intended for, nor did it, measure a correlation of low MCAT scores with poor performance, but it only measured a correlation with high MCAT scores and good performance. The only inference the correlation suggests is that people who score high on the MCAT are likely to be successful in med school and on Step 1. It does NOT necessarily imply that people who score low on the MCAT are likely to perform badly in med school and on step 1.

I apologize. Sorry, it's finals week here at OU and my mind isn't into reading these posts that carefully.
 
Atlas said:
I apologize. Sorry, it's finals week here at OU and my mind isn't into reading these posts that carefully.


Good luck on your finals!!!👍
 
I can't believe this thread is still around after a friggen month......and that I can't help wasting my time following it........but even moreso that I put this shameless cry for a free Ipod referral in my signature....
 
Which is more shameless? The link in your signature or the fact that you just plugged it WHILE complaining?
 
Buckeye(OH) said:
Which is more shameless? The link in your signature or the fact that you just plugged it WHILE complaining?

ha...im well aware of that.....but I'm only one single referral away from getting my free 300$ Ipod.....i always laugh when i see these things in peoples signatures.....but i figured what the hell...especially when i can get a sweet new ipod to download lectures in mp3 format on next year....
 
How amusing is this? Call me crazy, but I can only imagine you are not accepted yet right? wonder why?


It is worth noting that DO schools seem to be much more welcoming and into the "entire" person than MD schools in my experience. Yes, a 19 is low but it is your score, you should stand up for yourself and for your hard work and apply. If it works out, great! if not, you know what you need to do next. Remember, MCAT is not all. I was recently informed from a DO school's director of admissions that they have not yet found a statistical correlation between MCAT scores and medical school academic performance. If this is truly your passion and you have worked hard for it, go for it. If that is the case then you probably worked hard in all areas that will help you shine in other areas. Believe me, if this is your passion they WILL know and a good personality that is kind and genuine is worth more than a score any day.

Then again this is just coming from a recently accepted medical student with a 3.2 and 19 score.

Above all, have respect for your fellow peers. We all work hard!!

Best of Luck


Buckeye(OH) said:
Yeah see, reading comprehension is key.

I don't recall saying a gpa at a podunk school was worth nothing. But just so you can re-read/carefully analyze what I did say, please refer to the attached:

"A 2.7 from Johns Hopkins is different from a 2.7 from Podunk Community. You can't put gpas on a level playing field....hence, a standardized test."


So, how'd you do in verbal?
 
What would say to a couple of accepted students that got low GPAs (think 2.5) and 30-35 MCATs scores and are the top students in the class?
 
cornellmedic said:
What would say to a couple of accepted students that got low GPAs (think 2.5) and 30-35 MCATs scores and are the top students in the class?


Huh?? I don't understand what you are asking 😕
 
Brown eyed DO said:
I was recently informed from a DO school's director of admissions that they have not yet found a statistical correlation between MCAT scores and medical school academic performance. ...

Actually there are publications reporting a close corelation between MCAT scores and success on USMLE and in Classes. Do a search on google or pubmed and you should be able to find something.

However, I agree that MCAT is not the answer to all questions!!!

I got 23 on my first attempt and repeated it with Kaplan course to score much higher. I did not even study that hard. I think DO school should increase the requirement for MCAT to at least 24 (average of 8 on each section) and going up to a 26 in a couple of years. There is no reason for regular students, who plan to do well on the USMLE/COMLEX, to get 24+ on MCAT. Of course there will always be exceptions (THat will not change).

Another options is to creat a scoring system with GPA and MCAT, say 65/35 or vise versa whatever benefits the student. 2/3 credit towards your better performance would be fair.

Brown eyed DO said:
Then again this is just coming from a recently accepted medical student with a 3.2 and 19 score.

Congrats for your acceptance. I am happy that you can follow you dreams. I don't know the reasons for lower than average stats. But I am guessing you have a lot of qualities/experience to make up for the difference.

Most people with these stats and a good reason for it (worked full time, illness, family com. had difficulty etc...) work really hard and do really well to make up for their past. Its that drive to succeed that makes the difference.
 
NUKid said:
Basically what you're saying is that I should retake it. I know I can do better than a 19...it was just a terrible test day. But I also think that some of these 2.7 or so GPAs shouldn't be acceptable either. Also, why do you think those caribean schools exist: for people who don't do well on the MCAT but can do well in medical school and on the USMLE


I've heard some people call the MCAT "The Great Equalizer". Some undergraduate schools are harder than others. I was struggling in biochemistry at my school so I had to drop it. I then took it at a different senior college during the summer (This school was known for being easier than mine). I got an "A" there. I would had made a "D" or "F" at the school I regularly attend. If you have a low 3.0 GPA and an 30 MCAT I think that says a lot more than a 4.0 and 19 MCAT. Schools vary in difficulty, It's best to do your best in both areas (GPA/MCAT). However, I strongly believe that if you half ass prepare for the MCAT and take the bare minimum requirements for med school, you should make higher than a 19. All I can say to you is God-speed and study like crazy for the next 2 weeks.
"Good Luck"

To answer your other question: The Caribbean med schools do exist but they are frowned upon by many doctors (both MD/DO) and only 25% of the students that apply to these schools end up obtaining a U.S. residency. I guess it's because these students obviously did not take their grades serious while obtaining their undergraduate education. So why would they take med school serious? I'm sure there are some success stories but there are even more students that feel like these schools just took their money.

Check out this link:
http://www.network54.com/Forum/61578

Yours,
Caraway
 
Top